Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "Supreme Court strikes down Alabama congressional map in voting rights case" video.

  1. It does not mean any such thing and you are a liar.
    3
  2. When you claim that you can read DeSantis' mind and know what he was thinking and why . . . you are lying.
    2
  3.  @jameschan9634  Do you need a dictionary? This is someone TRUTHFULLY giving their opinion: "This vote could indicate that there may be 4 racists on the Supreme Court and based upon this one vote alone, I tend to believe that it does. But one vote would not give us enough information to know for sure. So we would need to know more about each justice's position." This is someone lying: "This one vote alone proves that there are 4 racists on the Supreme Court." One vote does not carry enough information to tell us anything about someone's personality and you already know that, but you chose to make up your lie anyway. You ignored obvious facts and made it true solely because you wanted it to be true. You are a liar as a said.
    1
  4.  @jameschan9634  Your position is fundamentally flawed because . . . When you say that they will "say anything," you are intimating that they will all just make up any lie that will support their position. Which is not always true and the facts do not support your assertion: Racists tell the truth about the world around them -- that the world is divided into different races and that different races have different talents and abilities. That fact is FUNDAMENTALLY TRUE. On the other hand, anti-racists will say anything to uphold their denial that the world is made up of different races. They claim that everyone in the world is identical (which is very obviously not true). They are living in a bubble-world of denial of reality. Their whole FUNDAMENTAL BELIEF SYSTEM is founded upon a LIE. So you have the racists whose position is fundamentally true versus the anti-racists whose position is fundamentally based upon a lie. So on which side are the most liars likely to be found?
    1
  5.  @jannichi6431  How can the comment be "truthful" if she claims to be able to read minds? Can you read minds?
    1