Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "CNN" channel.

  1. If you are dumb enough to believe that is why they are there, you might as well go back to sleep.
    10
  2. Float like butterfly 🦋 -- sting like a bee. 🐝
    9
  3. They can't. They have to bury President Trump and discredit the republicans for their own protection. They are afraid President Trump is a vampire and will get up out of his grave and bite them. They will never let this go until President Trump is buried 6 feet under with a silver stake in his heart.
    9
  4. Sometimes when someone steals an election, you will see some of the citizens rise up and fight to take their country back. It is sad, but unavoidable. 😎 🇺🇸
    4
  5. The president is NOT having a meltdown. He is putting on his battle armour and getting ready to do battle with Goliath. Watch this giant fall. . .
    2
  6. There were some issues with the request having to go up the chain of command for approval.
    2
  7. Speaking as a homeless person, I support President Trump and he and his family are welcome to join me on the streets anytime. They are mighty welcome.
    2
  8. In future elections dead Republicans will be allowed to vote. That will even the odds.
    2
  9. Supporting your party's political policies and agendas is "tribalism." ????? This chick is one slick communist propagandist.
    2
  10. It is not because of freedom of speech. It is because she does not represent our viewpoint. Politicians must represent the viewpoint of their constituents. 😎 🇺🇸
    2
  11.  @bradhuskers  ha ha. I usually just keep proving them wrong until they finally just give up and block me. God Bless the USA! 😎 🇺🇸
    2
  12.  @towbar8655  After President Trump's upcoming 4 years, you will be surprised about what the history books say about him. And you do understand that President Trump had nothing at all to do with the Capitol breach, right? Currently the lying liberal media is still pouring gasoline on that fire. But historians are calmer folk. They will sort out the truth and President Trump will go down for standing up to China, recognizing Israel, and brokering the greatest peace deal of the Middle East. What history will report about the Capitol breach is that the democratic leadership concocted a "big lie" blaming President Trump for something that he had nothing to do with. (And they will only get one paragraph in the book.) President Trump will be regaled as the only president who was falsely impeached twice and came out the winner twice. History will know him as a winner.
    2
  13.  @towbar8655  He won twice is referring to his beating the impeachment twice. But now that you mention it . . . He did not lose the election -- he won the election. And he will win the next election. So that makes him a 3-time winner, right? That WILL be something for the history books.
    2
  14. The president is NOT missing in action. He knows what to do. He is in his prayer closet praying for America.
    2
  15. Drain the swamp. 🐉
    1
  16. We are putting on a show for the world -- get some. 🍿 and keep watching. 😎👍 🇺🇸
    1
  17. So that would be the Stairway to Heaven? I heard some woman is buying it. . .
    1
  18. We are asking that and we have seen the proof (although CNN has blocked you from seeing it). Why do you think we are about to audit, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire? It is to get the proof past CNN's blockade.
    1
  19. I can tell you what we are planning . . . Very soon the military will remove the fake president from the Whitehouse and install the president elected by the people. A number of people who rigged the election will be tried by the military for treason and then everything will be back to normal. Life goes on. 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  20. Uumm . . . The Arizona State Senate are the authorities in Arizona.
    1
  21. Actually he didn't have information that preceded the current Dominion flap. Dominion and some other voter security questions have been in the mainstream news for several years.
    1
  22. No.
    1
  23. The "mob" does not carry Confederate flags. They are true Patriots defending America and the constitutuon. Go look at the pictures of the crowd outside -- you will see nothing but American flags for miles.
    1
  24.  @Kstang09  It may surprise you to learn that a lot of people in the North vote Republican.
    1
  25. The "red meat lie" is not a lie. Bill Gates said two weeks ago that we have to all stop eating red meat to save the planet. The idea may not currently be in the administration agenda -- but it likely will be added to their Green New Deal program soon. Bye bye burgers . . 🍔
    1
  26.  @MFPhoto1  I am not going to prove it, so just keep waiting. My "proof" is that you can just keep waiting until it happens and CNN reports it. You will believe anything you hear on CNN . . Right? And while you are waiting, stop going around on the internet saying stupid things to people. You saw that I said it would LIKELY be added . . Right?
    1
  27. Republicans will win the next 4 elections -- grab a soybean burger and keep watching. 🍔
    1
  28. Very tricky how you changed the word "undisciplined" to "unruly." You are one of the slippery serpents. 🐍
    1
  29. You will understand more if you stop believing "they said."
    1
  30. You are wrong about that. Everyone is free to either lie or tell the truth as they see fit. How would you like it if you got 6 months in jail for one of your lies?
    1
  31. So CNN is now telling us not to believe what we see on TV? 📺 Uumm . . . I think we already knew that.
    1
  32. If he did that, he would be lying. Are you suggesting that the President of the United States should lie to its citizens?
    1
  33. Good for Idaho! 😎👍 🇺🇸
    1
  34.  @scottrobinson529  Yes. I do and none of the things you people claim suppresses the vote actually does so. The law blocks out cheaters -- so that is a good thing for Idaho.
    1
  35.  @scottrobinson529  Blocking cheaters from voting makes the Constitution stronger. It prevents the dilution of the votes of LEGITIMATE AMERICAN VOTERS -- which preserves democracy. It is the same thing as installing security cameras to prevent shoplifting. Shoplifting dilutes your money's buying power because the store has to increase everyone's prices to pay for the stolen goods. But when the store blocks shoplifting by hiring security people and installing security cameras, your money goes further because you do not have to pay for the stolen items -- you are only paying for your own. That move STRENGTHENS the law because the store has implemented policies that MAKES THE LAW WORK BETTER. 😎👍 🇺🇸
    1
  36.  @scottrobinson529  This it? Idaho Gov. Brad Little on Saturday signed legislation making it more difficult to get initiatives or referendums on ballots in what is widely seen as an attempt to stop a medical marijuana initiative and other left-leaning causes in the conservative state. Those previous rules required signatures from 6% of registered voters in each of 18 legislative districts in 18 months. The new law requires 6% of registered voters in all 35 Idaho districts in 18 months. The OVERALL NUMBER OF SIGNATURES NEEDED to get an initiative on the ballot REMAINS THE SAME, but they will need to be collected from a much wider area without as much focus on urban centers."
    1
  37.  @scottrobinson529  House Bill 344? 34-1113. IDENTIFICATION AT THE POLLS: All voters shall be required to provide personal identification before voting at the polls or at absent electors polling places. The personal identification that may be presented shall be one of the following: An Idaho driver's license or identification card issued by the Idaho transportation department; A passport or an identification card, including a photograph, issued by an agency of the United States government; A tribal identification card, including a photograph; A current student identification card, including a photograph, issued by a high school or an accredited institution of higher education, including a university, college or technical school, located within the state of Idaho; or A license to carry concealed weapons. If a voter is not able to present personal identification as required, the voter may complete an affidavit in lieu of the personal identification if he assents to having his photograph taken at the polls by an election judge or clerk. The affidavit shall be on a form prescribed by the secretary of state and shall require the voter to provide the voter's name and address. The voter shall sign the affidavit, and the election judge or clerk shall affix the photograph to the signed affidavit. ********************* House Bill 88? A person may not knowingly collect or convey a voter's voted or unvoted ballot. This section does not apply to: An election official in the performance of his official duties; A United States postal service worker or other individual specifically authorized by law to transmit United States mail in the performance of his official duties; An employee or contractor of a parcel delivery business that receives and delivers parcels in all states within the United States in the performance of his official duties; or a family member authorized by the voter.
    1
  38. God creates them . . Republicans elect them.
    1
  39. 🙋‍♂️
    1
  40. If you believe that 60+ court cases have been thrown out due to lack of evidence, my advice is . . . Do not believe everything you see on TV.
    1
  41. That is correct. -- The election was stolen. 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  42. No. 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  43.  Kitana Brewer  This is nothing personal or feeling about it. These are just facts. She just said that 25,000 troops are in Washington D.C. to protect the country from 1 person who has never encouraged a violent solution. That comment is beyond anything that any person could think of as dumb and that is just a fact. (And so far that idiotic comment has 35 upvotes from people just as dumb as she is.)
    1
  44.  Kitana Brewer  The only thing going on in front of your eyes is democratic lies and propaganda telling you that Trump incited the violence.
    1
  45.  Kitana Brewer  I find that people who are backed into a corner and know they are wrong but cannot deal with it will tend to resort to calling the other person hypocrite. It is a difficult charge to defend against and it gives them a way out when reason is not on their side. I can tell you who the REAL hypocrites are. The REAL hypocrites are the democrats who encouraged violence when black people were burning down major American cities, but condemn violence when the president tells his supporters to "stand strong." Those lying snakes are the REAL hypocrites. 🐉
    1
  46.  @wethepeople1021  You seem kind of loud and boisterous for someone who does not know what they are talking about. You might want to read this: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-approves-district-columbia-emergency-declaration/
    1
  47.  @wethepeople1021  Stop shouting.
    1
  48. It is. People should earn what they get -- no loafers. 😎
    1
  49. Because in their subconscious, they know he won the election and is the real president elected by the people. 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  50. No one in their right mind would believe that a feeble old man who did not even campaign got 81 million votes.
    1
  51. He is. 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  52.  @ericgayton6607  Where is it and how much do you want for it?
    1
  53.  @ericgayton6607  Okay. Well I do not need a bridge on the moon. You might want to contact Elon Musk. He may be interested in buying it. Here . . . have some Koolaid: 🥤
    1
  54.  @ericgayton6607  You are a cult member and the lying liberal media is your leader. You believe anything they say. Enjoy your beer and your delusions.
    1
  55. Unarmed citizens? Kent State?
    1
  56. ??????? He is not in any trouble at all. In fact, he will be back in office soon. 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  57.  @Profoundaj  He who laughs last, laughs best. 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  58. So this commie wants to take away our guns? 🔫
    1
  59. No. What she was referring to is the video clip showing the crooks pulling the suitcases out from under a table in the middle of the room. Millions of people have seen that clip. She just failed to express what she was trying to say.
    1
  60. Nope. 🍊
    1
  61. Not really. When you hear somebody take something that you know is true and say that it is false, it is perfectly normal to have a reaction to the that fact that the person is misrepresenting reality. There is nothing bizarre about it -- it is normal. What would be abnormal is if someone heard a lie and had no reaction to it . . . They would be desensitized to the truth.
    1
  62.  @henryhudson1297  I know exactly what you are talking about idiot and my comment is 100% accurate. When someone lies and misrepresents reality it is perfectly normal for a truth-bearer to get triggered. I get triggered every single time hear a lie. So I know exactly what you are talking about (and it is a normal reaction). It is exactly the same thing as when Jesus got triggered and threw the money-changers out of the temple -- it is a normal response.
    1
  63. Psaki said that week that the administration is not going to do anything about the border because it is not a popular subject with enough people.
    1
  64. FDR was absolutely right. But when he said that, he had no idea about communists taking over our educational system.
    1
  65. Vice president Pence sent the lynch mob bright eyes.
    1
  66. Its Pence.
    1
  67. Adam and Eve lost their mental stability when they sinned in the Garden of Eden and none of their pro-genitors have ever been mentally stable. So we do the best we can.
    1
  68. It worked in the Derek Chauvin case.
    1
  69.  @MrAhuapai  I watched the whole trial. I think he was rail-roaded.
    1
  70.  @MrAhuapai  President Trump?? I think that is a very uninformed and stupid thing for you to say. 75 million people voted for him and you think all 75 million think like flat-earthers?? You are the one not being rational.
    1
  71.  @MrAhuapai  I was talking about President Trump because YOU were not clear about who YOU were talking about. I submitted that comment as a question. Did you NOT SEE the 2 question marks? Man. You are stupid. Now then, about Derek Chauvin your comment is just as uninformed and stupid when it is about Derek Chauvin. It does not matter how many "supporters" he had. It is NOT a popularity contest. The people who believe he is innocent believe that because the evidence supports that. It has nothing to do with flat-earthers.
    1
  72.  @MrAhuapai  It is not anger -- it is impatience. There are so many stupid people like you on the internet, that I just get impatient with all of your stupidity and all of the stupid things you people are constantly saying. AND you people just won't stop. I say something reasonable and you come back with something stupid. I say something else reasonable and you come back with something stupid. I say something else reasonable and you come back with something else stupid . . . Finally, I figure if I call you out for being stupid, maybe you will go away and stop harassing me with your damned stupidity. (And almost invariably the idiot will come back with the same idiotic comment you made that I "clearly" am angry. What makes you think you can know when someone is angry on the internet? You can't. You are just stupid and think you can.)
    1
  73. These 4 talking heads are just blowing into their own sails trying to move their own ship along. 🛥
    1
  74. For the first time in our miserable existence do the right thing? Uummm . . . We outlawed slavery, broke the Soviet Union, United Germany, and annihilated Al Queda. Hello???
    1
  75.  @intercat4907  I did not use it as an excuse for what I am today -- I am SUBSTANTIALLY PROUD of what I am today. I do not need any excuses. Give the money back. You did not win it legitimately (just like Traitor Joe, huh?)
    1
  76.  @kenzielarsen1771  Were you alive then? -- I was. Let me tell you why I said that. There was a cold war going on between the U.S. and the USSR. There was also a military buildup going on from both sides and a nuclear weapons buildup. An agreement was signed that neither side would build a defense from ICBMs. That was called Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). People lived with the real fear that those ICBMs would somehow get launched. The movie Star Wars came out. Ronald Reagan (a Republican) got elected mostly by calling the USSR "the Evil Empire" from the movie Star wars. After Ronald Reagan got into office, he ditched MAD and announced the development of weapons that would defend against ICBMs. It was called the Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars Defense for short). The Russian economy was not as robust as our economy and Ronald Reagan realized the weakness. He started a massive U.S. military buildup because he knew the Russians would try to match our military buildup. He also put them into a position of having to develop some type of defensive shield to protect from ICBMs (which he knew that they absolutely could not afford to do). They tried to match our buildup, but ended up spending themselves into oblivion. Their overspending on military trying to match our military spending bankrupted their economy and that was the first crack in the wall that broke up the Soviet Union and ended up uniting Germany. The plan was GENIUS. At the same time, Christian churches all across America started getting prophetic messages from God to pray for Russia and that Jesus Christ would answer the prayers and would handle the rest. I was present in church and heard the prophecies and together Christians all across America prayed and prayed for Russia and the whole thing came crumbling down. That is what broke up the Soviet Union and brought down the Wall of Berlin. You will not hear it in any school and, yes I really believe it -- I am a witness. We are currently praying for President Trump to be reinstalled in the Whitehouse. To be continued . . .
    1
  77.  @qwadratix  Patriots do what is best for their country -- not themselves.....and we are sticking with Trump.
    1
  78.  @Pete-1261  Well you are right that the brainwashing is strong -- but you have it on the wrong side. It is the cabal and the liberal media who is doing the brainwashing. You even give a couple of examples of how they have brainwashed you: 1. You question Joe being a traitor. Did the media tell you that articles of impeachment were filed against Biden yesterday for crimes involving his dealings with the Ukraine? Not reporting that is one of the ways the liberal media brainwashes people. 2. You say president Trump sent a mob to the Capitol to try and hang the vice-president. Who told you that? The lying liberal media did. What is the truth of the matter? President did NOT send those people that said they wanted to hang Pence. This is where being honest with your own thoughts goes a long way. You know very well that Trump did not encourage anyone to hang Pence -- yet you are stating that as if it were true? Why? You are brain-washed. 3. Then you say 5 people died because of Trump. Somehow you are twisting reality to get the idea that President Trump is somehow responsible for what happened at the Capitol and blaming him. Those people acted on their own. President Trump was not present -- he was a 45-minute walk away. He had nothing whatsoever to do with it -- yet you say 5 people died because of him. That is a part of your brainwashing -- misrepresenting the true facts to get them to be the way you want them to be instead of how they really are. The lying liberal media does that all of the time. Now they have you following along like a little puppy. You literally sound like a Liberal Media Cult Member. Use your head to think for yourself. 4. You say that Trump needs to be taken off the stage for causing a riot that he did not cause. The Media Cult has you EXACTLY where they are trying to get you: Condemning a man who is not guilty of the crimes he is being charged with. THAT is brainwashing. 5. Now as far as him claiming he won the election . .  . The lying liberal media has been saying for months that "there is no substantial evidence of widespread voter fraud." Why are they saying that? Part of the brainwashing process. THEY DO NOT WANT PEOPLE LOOKING FOR THE EVIDENCE. 6. That facts are:  The election was stolen and WE HAVE THE PROOF. There was a computer programmer arrested in Italy on Jan 6 for manipulating the U.S. election. Did the liberal lying media tell you about that?  NO! They buried the story and it did not get reported at all in U.S. media. THAT is how they brain-wash people. 7. You say President Trump is a traitor without having even one shred of evidence that he has ever done anything to compromise this nation to a foreign entity. This is just misinformation, disinformation, and false accusation. And where are getting all of your false notions and ideas? FAKE NEWS. You are being brain-washed.
    1
  79.  @Pete-1261  You are doing the brainwashing thing again. Trump did not tell anybody to attack the Capitol and in your heart you know that, but your mouth is falsely accusing him. You know very well that cheerleaders tell crowds to "fight" all of the time and the crowds do not burn down the gymnasium. Your failure to put this forward and deal with this issue forthrightly is due to your brainwashing. You also know all about our imperfect court systems where some people have been in prison for years who did not commit the crime and many criminals get off scott free either because there is not enough evidence to find them at all or not enough evidence to convict them or because of biased jurors or corrupt judges. You know all about this stuff in your heart, but your mouth cannot say it because of your brain-washing. Now I will agree that we have to go by our laws and judicial system and we have to put innocent people in jail when police tamper with the evidence. We have no choice. But that does not make it right. And I am waiting to hear you say that. Under our laws Joe Biden is the president and I agree that we go by our laws. But he is not the person whom the people actually elected -- Trump is. I do not get my news specifically from one type of source. I do not own a TV. I use my smartphone to research matters in depth from all sources. I try to look at what is called "primary sources" because second-hand information from anybody is going to be filtered somewhat. After looking at all of the different information available, my conclusion is that in 5 or more states, trucks full of fake ballots drove up to polling centers in middle of the night and evil people entered those fake ballots into the count. That is ballot-stuffing and over the years is the most common way to steal an election. The election was stolen from the true victor. We all know that, but only half of the population is willing to say it (because their guy won). But, just the same way that an innocent person can get out of jail and have his record expunged when the true evidence comes to light, Mr. Biden's presidency will be annulled and Mr. Trump will be restored to office and vindicated . . . . when the fraud evidence is FINALLY proven. That is how it should be. Truth and justice will prevail.
    1
  80.  @Pete-1261  No. YOU are the brainwashed one. Even your saying my conclusion does not count is a part of your brainwashing. This is not a game where some things count and other things do not count -- it is a search for truth and ANYTHING that sheds the light on truth counts. Your saying that is a tricky way of removing my information from the discussion even if my conclusion is right. That forces the discussion to say that only the courts can be right (which is a lie). Your manipulating the discussion that way is a part of your brainwashing. ************ "Where is the proof of all this?" ?????? It has been right out in the light of day the whole time, but your brainwashing kept you from looking for it. Remember the brainwashing I told you about? "There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud." "There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud." "There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud." "There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud." The purpose of that, as I said before is to KEEP PEOPLE FROM LOOKING FOR IT. The lying liberal media did not want people looking for the proof because their man (supposedly) won and they do not want people turning over rocks. They buried the proof and did not report on any of the Senate hearings (that is brainwashing). Here is (half of) the evidence: Pennsylvania State Policy Committee hearings: https://youtu.be/ZYtwfyi78Bs Wisconsin State Election Hearings: https://youtu.be/pkqFTUEvMoU Michigan Senate Committee hearing: https://youtu.be/eZXkAv7yKgw Arizona State Election Committee hearing: https://youtu.be/QfC2T7UpxkI Georgia Senate Committee hearing: https://youtu.be/Ur4vl5UTN8g Wisconsin Court Hearing: https://youtu.be/Ka0CvXQetVY Wisconsin Supreme Court Oral Argument: https://youtu.be/ajoztGav1q0 Nevada Court Hearings: https://youtu.be/YdPT2saxs18 Trump Victory Rally -- fraud evidence explanation: https://youtu.be/xzc-B_L8gG8 The Fake Ballots Printed in China: https://youtu.be/vthDm3cJ4m4 Semi Load of Ballots Stolen: https://youtu.be/M8Sv1rWyNho Founder of Overstock dot com Wades into the Foray with Crack Cyber-security Team: https://youtu.be/24OjIzpKfSs Former Senator Testifying on Election Fraud: https://youtu.be/06CKIz1dkBw ***************** This is police tampering: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampering_with_evidence#:~:text=By%20law%20enforcement,-When%20police%20confiscate&text=Police's%20loss%20of%20evidence%20such,evidence%20and%20tampering%20with%20evidence.
    1
  81. Not necessary -- he believes it. And anybody who saw the vote count switched on live television believes it.
    1
  82. I can answer that. First, your phrase "self-serving agendas" is a complete mischaracterization of the reality. When you get your question wrong, you will always get the wrong answer back. These politicians are serving their constituents -- not themselves (otherwise, they would have been out long ago). But trying to work around that short-coming with my answer: We elect political leaders to implement policies and laws that we favor. As long as a majority of people agree that they are doing a good job with their policies and laws . . . . They stay.
    1
  83.  @donnajohnson3792  If you do not figure out that you are asking the wrong question, you are going to die with the question still unanswered. Now in your response to me you ask: "How can these politicians be serving their constituents if there are lies, propaganda, and conspiracy theories being told to people?" That is a valid question. But it must be taken in within the context of what is really happening. Not everything that CNN reported in this video as being a lie or conspiracy theory really is one. For example: What CNN keeps calling the "big lie" is not even real. There is no "big lie". That itself is a conspiracy theory that the house democratic leadership just made up specifically for the impeachment trial. But the facts are, there is no "big lie." The "big lie" conspiracy theory states that the election was legitimate and that President Trump somehow "convinced" his followers that the election was stolen. But what are the facts? The facts are that the whole world watched tens of thousands of votes get switched from President Trump to citizen Biden on world-wide television. So almost everyone in the world believes the election was stolen. In fact, the only people in the world who do not believe the election was stolen is the democrats living in the United States. So . . . You have a situation where 75 million Republicans believe the election was stolen. It has nothing at all to do with President Trump telling them the election was stolen. They saw the votes change on world-wide television on election night. So there is no "big lie" coming from President Trump. The "big lie" is a conspiracy theory made up by the democrats. It is all smoke and mirrors. In fact, it is propaganda coming from the CNN mouthpiece (and propaganda is something you were complaining about right?) Now this is how President Trump can be serving his constituency: MOST Republicans believe that the election was stolen . . . President Trump believes the election was stolen. So everybody is on the same page, right? So he is serving his constituency. You want me to do another one? ********************** After that you ask: "How is it constitutional to limit the votes of a demographic?" The facts are: No one has been working to limit the votes of a demographic -- CNN has been lying to you again. Let us talk about mail-in voting: The postal carrier delivers mail to everyone's house . . right? So if you want to mail in your ballot, you can send in a request for an absentee ballot . . Right? Then the government will mail you an absentee ballot . . Right? You can fill in your absentee ballot sitting at your dining room table . . Right? The next day you can hand your ballot to the mail person and it will get to the polls . . Right? So you were actually able to vote without even leaving your house. Could it get any easier? When a constituent can literally vote without leaving their own home, how could a specific demographic be limited from voting? Wake up . . Because people are lying to you. ********************** You are not living in the real world -- you are living in an alternate reality that someone has very cleverly constructed for you. That is why there is no answer for your question. You are asking an alternate reality question and trying to get a real world answer. That is not going to work.
    1
  84. When President Trump gets back, we are going to reverse everything that China Joe has done -- everything. 😎👍🇺🇸
    1
  85. I have always been willing to admit that we have lots and lots of idiots. 😳🤪😵
    1
  86.  @MilanaElearning  My opinion is that the Trump family has ultimate class and have spent the last 4 years defending America from all enemies foreign and domestic (especially communist China) and I respect them immensely. And I also respect your opinion on the matter.
    1
  87.  @MilanaElearning  What actions? The president did not take any actions on the 6th -- he gave a speech. Have you listened to it? The idiots running your government impeached the president today for something that he had nothing to do with. This is your president on violence: https://youtu.be/J2Kd_aGRipU
    1
  88. No. We want to break China's aggression and overturn Roe vs. Wade.
    1
  89. Rep. Jeffries is lying about who is blocking the stimulus package. The house democrats have it blocked. They put things in the bill that they know republicans will NEVER vote for. They have a provision for stimulus money to go to illegal aliens. They have a provision blocking the deportation of illegal aliens. And other ignorant provisions that they know full well that republicans will not vote for. The democrats need to stop blocking the stimulus and take that stuff out of their bill so it can get passed. Stop blaming the republicans. Stop blaming the president. The DEMOCRATS have the stimulus bill blocked.
    1
  90. Now we see what the crooked communist/socialist/democrats have brought this country to. All of this was easily predictable in the 1960's when the democrats started embracing their socialist agendas.
    1
  91. Sorry. I have to disagree with your statement. I have been a TRUE AMERICAN for every second of my life. 😎 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
    1
  92. They are trying to bury him because they are afraid he will come back.
    1
  93. So you are calling me a liar?
    1
  94. Maybe she is from Florida. 👠
    1
  95. Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. Psalm 23:4
    1
  96. Are you people joking? No you are not joking -- you are lying. CNN is lying when they say there is no evidence of fraud in the elections. The Trump team has collected enough evidence to overturn the election and CNN is hiding that fact from the American public. CNN has joined the serpent trying to cover our eyes from seeing the truth. It is the great end-time deception. Sheesh! What a pack of snakes and liars!
    1
  97. That is why we call it "The American Dream." 😎👍🇺🇸
    1
  98. Thanks. I got tried of listening to the communist broad and cut it off -- now I know how it ended. 👍
    1
  99. The coup attempt? You mean when the democrats rigged the election and took over our government?
    1
  100. a. If there is not enough fraud found to change Arizona's electoral vote, everyone will go home and that will be the end of it. b. If there IS enough fraud found to change Arizona's electoral vote, other swing states will audit their election results to make sure they do not have fraud in their votes.
    1
  101. Seeing as you are in Norway and only know the limited information that reaches you . . . How would you know whether President Trump is lying or not? 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  102.  @chaserofthelight1737  So you are lying when your lips are moving?
    1
  103.  @geirsivertsen4225  Media sources in the United State are allowed to lie if they choose to do that. It is protected speech and they can say whatever they choose to say. So you have to verify through more than one source to make sure they are not putting "spin" on the story and fooling you. When you hear the same story from a conservative news source and a liberal news source it will tell a completely different story depending on what facts they include and what facts they leave out. A liberal news writer will tell you that something the president said is a lie. But then when you read a conservative writer, he will say the president was telling the truth. The main way the media fools people is not by lying outright. But by only quoting a part of a statement or only telling a part of the story. They will tell us something, but not give the background or context. That changes the whole meaning of the story. Also, they will "editorialize" within the story. For example, they may quote something the president said accurately, but then say the president is lying. A lot of gullible people will believe that he is lying just because the writer said it when maybe it is the writer who is actually lying and the president telling the truth. Living in the United States is fantastic. But politically, it is like living in a courtroom. You have the prosecution telling you one story and then you have the defense telling you a whole different story. The general public is the jury caught in the middle. It is their job to listen to both sides of the story and then figure out what really happened. You have to watch out for editorializing in a story. The writer could be the one lying. If you want to know what the real facts are, you have to cover all of the bases. You cannot just assume that the media is telling the WHOLE truth. We call that "fake news." The most important thing is to ask yourself, "What are they NOT telling me?" Then go find out. ******************** You have 10 people in a room. Your media source reports that the president just made a public statement. 5 people say he is lying. 5 people say he is telling the truth. How do you know whether the president is lying or telling the truth?
    1
  104.  @growyouronlinebusiness2036  Auditing an election count does not destroy democracy -- it safeguards democracy. Auditing an election count restores the public's faith in the electoral process because citizens can have confidence that there was no cheating and their vote counts. Auditing an election actually makes an election more safe and secure. It moves the overall security of the election up about 10 notches and you can trust the results of an audited election. Auditing an election is the best thing for democracy and our nation. We should already be auditing EVERY election to guard against fraud and cheating. So if someone is oppossed to a fair and open election audit . . . What are they trying to hide? (We are going to find out.) 😎👍 🇺🇸
    1
  105.  @krisenger4410  Somebody has been lying to you my friend. The Arizona election has NEVER been audited. Maybe you are the gullible fool?? 🙆‍♂️
    1
  106.  @krisenger4410  Okay. So you say there are "numerous sources" saying that there have been "multiple audits." And you are right. There are numerous sources saying there have been multiple audits. Guess what ? They are all lying to you (as I said in my previous comment). Well to be specific, they are not all lying. Most of them are quoting from one of the others and the original lie is getting spread around by dupes. So I do not say those people are deliberately lying. But they are unknowingly passing on a lie. You see, there is no such thing as "numerous sources." The person who originally told the lie is the "primary source." And the reporters who were present at the press conference are "secondary sources." But behind that, there are no other sources. All of the media who copy from those sources are not sources. They are just copying the information from the original reporters. That is easy to do with modern technology. But the ones who copy and recast the story are not sources -- because they were not present to hear the original statement. Now the facts are: There has NEVER been an audit of the Arizona election. So let us do a little fact-checking. So this is what you do: Give me the dates of each supposed audit and the results of each supposed audit. When you try to find this information, you will discover that there have not been any previous audits and you will know that you have been duped. This exercise will help you guard yourself from being duped in the future. This is what we call "critical thinking." Let me know when you find those "audits." 😎👍 🇺🇸
    1
  107.  @krisenger4410  You want a valid reason to trust an audit coming from a an auditor who is obviously biased? It is very simple -- we don't. When they have completed the audit, they will have to make a report and present evidence that supports their findings. There is no way for them to fake that evidence. For example: If they say they found 15,000 ballots that were not filled in by hand . . But those ballots were printed on a printing press, they will have to hand us those ballots so we can check their work. So it is not really a matter of us trusting them. At the end of the audit, we either have a stack of fake ballots or we don't. It is as simple as that. We do not just blindly trust anyone -- we double-check those guys. Their job is to find the fake ballots (if there are any). And our job is to review the fake ballots that they find to see if they are really fake ballots or not. We do NOT trust them. That would be the case with any auditors, whether we know they are biased or not. We do not trust any of them. We check their work. ****************** In addition to that, there are checks and balances: 1. If they pull any shenanigans, they could go to jail and they know that. 2. If they get caught cheating in any way, no one will ever hire them again and it will destroy their company. 3. There are 9 security cameras in that room watching everything from every angle 24 hours a day. 4. There are both democrats and republicans working for that company and working in that room. Also, you have to remember that EVERYBODY is biased in some way. That is just a fact of life. So we have checks and balances.
    1
  108.  @krisenger4410  I do not owe you an explanation for anything and it is not my job to convince you of anything. So do not give me a smart-ass answer like try again. So what if you do not think my answer is convincing?? Who cares? Did you think I would change my answer? My answer is right and I am not changing it because you do not think it is convincing. Who are you? Some kind of an answer judge? If you do not think my answer is convincing, that is YOUR problem. How do you know checks and balances is not working in Arizona when you have not given it time to work yet? Your comment is just plain stupid. Give it some time to see how it all works out first -- then decide whether it worked or not. Arizona is doing an audit whether you like it or not or think it is equitable. And they could really care less what you think about it. If you do not like it . . . Tough cookies. When the people vote you to be in charge of Arizona, you can do it your way.
    1
  109.  @krisenger4410  I am okay with them checking for anything. That is what the audit is for. If they find bamboo fibers fine -- if they do not find bamboo fibers fine. Either way they have done their job. The reason they are checking for bamboo fibers is there is a printing house in China that claims they were paid to print a bunch of fake ballots. So that lead has to be checked out. If you have a credible lead on something under-handed from Italy, submit your evidence and they will check it out.
    1
  110.  @krisenger4410  I learned about the printing house in China in a uTube video several months ago and I watch something like 20 videos a day. So I am not going try to find it out of my hundreds of thousands of previously watched videos. It does not matter to you who it was anyway -- you are not the one doing the audit.
    1
  111.  @krisenger4410  Sure. The State of Arizona is paying the first $150,000 and if it runs over that, the rest is being covered by donations.
    1
  112.  @krisenger4410  Well let us look at this logically . . . Democrats (supposedly) won the election, right? So they would not want to pay for an audit for 2 reasons: 1. If they believe they legitimately won and the audit will not change the results, then they would think that paying for an audit would just be a waste of money . . . Right? 2. There is a chance that the vote tally really is wrong . . . Right? Which presents a problem for democrats. If there is an audit and it (for some reason) actually flips the election over to President Trump, democrats would not want that to happen . . . Right? So there is absolutely no way any democrat anywhere is going to support an audit in any way shape or form. And there is absolutely no way any democrat would donate even a penney . . . Right? They cannot take that chance . . . They have too much to lose to risk it. They are (supposedly) the winners and they are not going to take a chance on messing that up. Democrats are NOT the donors. So that leaves . . .
    1
  113. You do realize that you just said "women hate women?"
    1
  114. No one would come. 😎 🇺🇸
    1
  115. It will end. God is watching and He has a plan.
    1
  116. So you are one of the commies who wants to put people into reeducation camps . . .
    1
  117. Appreciate your concern, but the GOP did not cause this.
    1
  118. First amendment.
    1
  119.  @lantrick  You should read the original comment again. It says, "Why isn't misinformation regulated?" It does not say, "Why doesn't uTube delete this stuff?" The GOVERNMENT regulates things. So that would be a First Amendment question. (By the way, telling somebody, "You should read the First Amendment" is just being the smart-ass that you are.)
    1
  120.  @lantrick  Actually, utube cannot do whatever they want. None of us can do whatever we want because we are all subject to laws. In the case of uTube, they operate under a federal law known as section 230. Section 230 was written for broadcasters -- it was not written for platform companies. Under section 230, utube cannot do certain things. One thing they cannot do is take sides in a political debate. The law requires them to give everyone a fair voice. If the platform companies continue to take sides and abuse their power by deleting videos and users they disagree with, Congress has the option of removing them from section 230 and writing a law that specifically controls what platform companies can do. They are not free to do whatever they want.
    1
  121. Sledgehammers and ropes are not weapons -- they are tools.
    1
  122. Sorry . . Can't answer. Ask again.
    1
  123. Not exactly. If you will remember, there was a last minute change to move that polling center and most people were not aware of the security cameras in the lobby.
    1
  124. I think it will be forgotten. 30 years from now will anybody really care that the Capitol police escorted a tour of 400 people through the Capitol Building?
    1
  125.  @towbar8655  You are the one with water in your ears. Let us think about this logically (if you can keep up). A. The democrats stole the election. B. President Trump said the democrats stole the election. Therefore . . . C. President Trump is telling the truth. Simple logic . . . .see? And no I cannot name any other president who claimed the democrats stole the election because this is the FIRST TIME THEY DID IT. Simple logic . . . See? (If you can keep up.) Now after it gets PROVED that the democrats stole the election, President Trump's statements will be vindicated and he will go down favorably in history.
    1
  126.  @towbar8655  President Trump was not in charge of the election activities. They do not allow the candidates to be in charge of the election activities. That would be a conflict of interest and it would be too easy to cheat. Now Biden had nothing to do with the election fraud. He is the stooge and they are "using" him. It was the one-percenters who want to establish a one-world-government who stole the election. They wanted President Trump out because the trade tariffs with China are soaking them for millions and millions of dollars. They are hoping to get citizen Joe Biden to lower the trade tariffs so they can get some relief. So they used their vast resources to get him elected. *************** I am not a duntz. I am very, very sharp and well-versed on world affairs. (Try to keep up.) ******************** Now you do some thinking: Do really believe that a quiet senile elderly gentleman who did not even do any campaigning could really get 81 MILLION votes??? THINK!
    1
  127.  @towbar8655  Rockefeller, Rothschild, Morgan. Soros.
    1
  128. He is a Phillydelphia lawyer.
    1
  129. If I told you . You would not like the answer.
    1
  130. CNN and Anderson Cooper: Because of the deceptive and hateful way that Anderson has presented this clip, I am 100% certain that I will NEVER watch CNN in the future for any reason. We do not need this kind of hate and vitriol in American society. The president says that he wants us all to stop with all of this divisiveness and start cooperating with one another and working together. But you are only adding fuel to the fire. 🔥 We do not need your agitating.
    1
  131. If you think the "broader electorate despises Trump," you do not have your finger on the pulse of the conservatives in this nation.
    1