Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "Trump clarifies changes to Department of Education" video.

@Antwonn83 What country are you from? Here in America, the job of government is to build roads and maintain a police department. There is no government responsibility to correct social problems. "What is the point of government" ??? Are you joking?
5
Wow. I graduated from high school 3 years before the Department of Education. No wonder education started going down hill. 🤷‍♀️
2
@KimmieSue. "Helping people" is not a government responsibility. Besides that, if you take tax money from one person and give it to someone else, that is stealing.
2
@gunkulator1 You do not need to come on here lying.
2
@margaretsenglishcamp-esl6884 It will also stop you people from indoctrinating our children with your false theory of evolution and your fake, sinful social theories.
1
You are completely fake and uninformed. Of course children eat at home.
1
 @leaharchambault5796 Morality is done by the church. The federal government does not do morality.
1
 @MajinMist603 People can see right through your fake pro-life argument.
1
@user-oh9yr9ti6r You are going to Hell 🌅 for laughing with filthy language, and you are permanently blocked for the same reason.
1
@dentedcan77 Jesus never said to use Ceasar to fix problems. Your argument is fake.
1
@Paperfriend12 Maintaining social order is a government responsibility.
1
@ptcglass Your argument is fake. If you saw other countries jump off of a cliff, would America jump? That would just prove that we are as stupid as they are. Other countries have sold their citizens to be slaves to their governments. Americans are smart enough not to go there. I do not want to hear anymore about billionaires not paying taxes. The average tax bill of the top 1% is $562,000. They pay their share of taxes.
1
@dozzer009 Take off the dark glasses because in your sad state, you cannot the truth from a lie.
1
@ptcglass Your argument is fake. The government provides FOOD STAMPS for qualified children to eat at home. NO ONE is going hungry.
1
@KimmieSue. The argument that the government should do things because it is not being done by the correct people is a trap. If you get started down that road, you will have this: The government takes over this responsibility. The government takes over this responsibility. The government takes over this responsibility. The government takes over this responsibility. It never ends. Soon your government will insert itself into every area of your life. And that means CONTROL. Do you really want the federal government telling you that you cannot spank your children when they are bad? Because that has been done in places already, and people have had their children removed from the home. Do you want the government having that much control to be saying what is right and what is wrong? And if you do not comply, they will just cut off your school lunch until you do comply.
1
@dozzer009 I know it because I know the people who are being accused personally. I know what they care about and what they don't. I eat meals with them. We discuss things.
1
@dozzer009 Trying to claim that someone cares about you until you are 23 years old, and then suddenly at age 23 stops caring, is so obviously ridiculous that a blind man could spot that as a lie.
1
@dozzer009 It is not the government's job to help the less fortunate. Suppose you are a member of a hunting club. You pay your monthly dues. What do you expect that money to be spent on? Guns. Vests. Blinds. Duck calls. The club leaders are not authorized to give your hunting club dues to a soup kitchen. That is not what you gave it for.
1
@Paperfriend12 Actually, you oversimplified the issue. Farm subsidies in red states lower the price of food and that low-priced food gets moved to blue states where blue people get cheap food prices. I am against it, regardless of who it helps. Under the free-market theory, inefficient farms must be allowed to fail. Also, subsidizing housing and food has the net effect of creating low work wages. It is all completely fundamentally wrong, and fundamentally wrong stuff has bad side-effects.
1
@dozzer009 Honestly, guy. Do you really know what tax breaks billionaires get?
1
@Paperfriend12 Under free-market theory only a handful of farms would go bankrupt. Those would be the ones that are inefficiently-managed and present higher food prices to the public. The facts are that large scientific farms are more efficient and can produce cheaper food. There cannot be a monopoly formed because there are 2 million farms in the United States alone, and they all have to compete against each other. They also have to compete against overseas farms.
1
@Paperfriend12 I am not going to argue math that is obvious. If you want to make up unrealistic fake math, I am out. One company cannot monopolize 2 million farms because of management inefficiencies of scale. For example the break up of the Soviet Union or the Roman empire.
1