Comments by "Travis Jazzbo" (@travisjazzbo3490) on "Candace Owens"
channel.
-
234
-
96
-
40
-
40
-
27
-
24
-
24
-
22
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@throwaway2478 I am a fan of their messaging for today's world for men. For men to stand up for themselves. To work hard and have pride. To strive for masculinity, not be ashamed of it. To work out, be healthy, be strong, stand tall, take care of your responsibilities, and be what real women traditionally actually want, and stand on your values and raise kids with a sense of hard work and responsibility and to think for themselves and be independent and seek truth and not fall for propaganda.
BTW, there is ZERO evidence of them ever trafficking anyone or ever breaking the law in any way, shape, or form. You can be jealous or hate that women throw themselves at them, that's fine. Jealousy is a horrible human trait but it has always been there and man have always been chasing tail. I have never heard a single report where they took advantage of a woman, but yes, from 15+ years ago, they definitely were proud to take advantage of weak simp men. That was then, and this is now. I don't know of a single person in their young 20s who isn't dramatically different by their 30s, especially if they have opened up avenues in their lives where they aren't scraping to get by.
In all their years, zero complaints of any legitimacy from any women... that is absolutely amazing when you think about it.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
First, consider the numbers involved. Depending on which source you believe Project Apollo employed 35 to 40,000 people directly and involved around 180,000 subcontractors and suppliers, all of whom did nothing but eat, sleep and work on the project to put a human being on the moon for the best part of twenty years. Consider the time, effort and money that is going to be involved in keeping all of those people quiet for the rest of their lives! The organisational and financial infrastructure required to manage a conspiracy of that gargantuan size would be visible from, ironically, the Moon.
Two little concepts for you to think about while contemplating a conspiracy of that mammoth size. Watergate and Monica Lewinsky. The United States government could not cover up a shabby little burglary in a hotel somewhere, and it cannot even keep a secret about what the President is doing with his love spuds, but you expect anyone to believe that it can actively keep tens of thousands of people quiet about the biggest secret in history? Establishing and maintaining such an blatantly obvious conspiracy would be technically more complex and far, far more expensive than putting a man on the Moon. In other words, doing it would have been easier and cheaper than lying about doing it.
Second, an even simpler concept, Comrade. Russia. Throughout the Sixties and Seventies the Russians were the implacable enemies of the United States.
Documents released after the fall of communism and the collapse of the Soviet Union reveal that their spies carefully and meticulously monitored the design, development and testing of the Apollo vehicles (and the shuttle, incidentally) and when the project reached the launch pad they tracked the flight path of every single vehicle and gleefully reported their position in Pravda and Tass. They did this by triangulating the radio signals from the Apollo craft. This is all now a matter of public record.
If the Russians thought for one millisecond that the Apollo missions were faked the news would have made headlines in every paper on earth, because the Russians would have had proof. The reason this didn’t happen is simple. The Russians did not have proof that the Apollo missions were faked because the Apollo missions weren’t faked.
Third, the films. At the end of the Apollo 15 mission Commander David Scott dropped a hammer and a feather which fell to the lunar surface at the same speed, impacting at exactly the same instant. Films of the Lunar Roving Vehicle (the moon buggy) used on Apollo 15, 16 and 17 show that the dust kicked up by the wheels rises and falls in a perfectly parabolic trajectory instead of billowing out at random as it does on earth when the dust motes strike and are scattered by air molecules. Those films were shot in a vacuum. There was no vacuum chamber on Earth (and there still isn’t) large enough to accommodate a film studio large enough to shoot the films we see. End of argument.
The most significant demonstration of filming under lunar conditions was unintended. During the Apollo 14 mission Ed Mitchell uses a cable and pulley system to unload some equipment from the SEQ bay of the lunar lander. One cable breaks free and acts as a perfect pendulum, observable on film for 86 seconds. The mathematics are incredibly complex but are also precise and irrefutable – we are watching a pendulum operating under 1/6 normal Earth gravity. It was filmed on the Moon. (The film is on YouTube - I can't access it from work.)
Fourth. The Van Allen belt boondoggle. The Apollo capsule was shielded against radiation though in fact it hardly needed to be. The speed and trajectory of the vehicle meant that the astronauts were exposed to about as much radiation as you would expect to get from a chest x-ray. The Van Allen belts are not a huge, concentrated sphere of deadly radiation surrounding the whole planet, they form a figure of eight shape and have weaker and stronger areas as well as convergence points where the radiation levels are minimal. Traversing them is not a problem as long as you don’t hang around, and the Apollo vehicles didn’t. As for the risk of the crew being wiped out by an unpredictable solar flare, well, tough cookies if they were. These men were ex-test pilots. They were used to taking risks.
Finally, we do have proof that we landed on the Moon because we have been back. We just haven’t landed. The hyper-spectral camera fitted as a part of the Indian Chandrayaan-1 lunar orbital satellite took clear photographs of the Apollo 15 landing site, and NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter captured the sharpest images ever taken from space of those of Apollo 12, 14 and 17. Google them to your heart's content.
I will leave it to others to comment on the breathless accusation that the studio artists forgot to put stars in the background of the set (hilarious) or that the shadows don’t follow perfectly straight lines (shadows don’t) or the fact that all of the photos are perfectly exposed and framed (we didn’t see the many thousands of duds – would you release them?) and so on and so on.
Twelve human being walked on the surface of the Moon. They got there on the back of a huge amount of work by hundreds of thousands of dedicated and intelligent people and the crackpots who seek to deny such a simple and straightforward fact do so because they like to believe that they are smarter than the people who did that.
They aren’t.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2