Comments by "Orwellian Horseman of the Apocalypse" (@DennisMoore664) on "The Hill"
channel.
-
222
-
58
-
19
-
16
-
15
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@in_wino_veritas First, thanks for not calling me Tulsibot or something like that. But I'm curious why you think she's not a true progressive or at least a Left leaning centrist? What do you classify her as? She wants us out of foreign wars, she's for a single-payer Healthcare system, she supports the Green New Deal's zero-emissions goals, but not 'leaving the door open' to nuclear power unless and until there is a permanent solution to the problem of nuclear waste.", she's come out for full legalization and regulation of currently illegal drugs, she stands up against the establishment politics of both sides and bucked Hillary and the DNC in 2016 to support Bernie, when she went to Syria she went with Dennis Kucinich and met with lots of other religious and political leaders bedsides Assad. Sounds pretty Left of Center or Progressive to me. Mike Gravel, who is pretty hard to the Left, pointed to both Bernie and Tulsi as his choices months ago. And now Kyle Kulinski, another hard Left figure, has made the same endorsement. What else does she need to do to make you think of her as a Progressive?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1