Comments by "Vaska Tumir" (@vaska1999) on "Russia Prepares for Kherson Battle, Shoigu Calls West Defence Ministers, Discuss Alleged Dirty Bomb" video.

  1. Alexander's spun a plausible narrative about the dirty nuke claims, but he missed at least two very pertinent moments in the series of events that have brought us to this. First, Liz Truss's public statement some 6 weeks ago that the UK would nuke Russia if it used nuclear arms in Ukraine. The second was Macron's apparently unprovoked announcement that France would NOT use nuclear weapons against Russia in the event Russia used them in Ukraine. I maintain, as I did then, that the real reason Macron came out with such a startling statement -- and remember how viciously he was attacked for it by London, Washington, and Berlin -- is that the French intelligence services have information that a nuclear false flag is being planned in Ukraine as a pretext for nuking Russia. This also fits the rumours that some people in the US establishment are now discussing the feasibility of a limited nuclear war with Russia. I also believe that Ben Wallace flew out to Washington precisely as he himself said, i.e. to alert the Americans that their communications with the Brits had been breached and that Russia knows about their joint plans with Ukraine to stage a dirty nuke false flag in one of the 4 regions which have chosen to secede from Ukraine and rejoin Russia. Unlike Alexander, whose narrative has Shoigu and RF's military intelligence community falling for some idle chatter they overheard but which should not be taken seriously, I believe that the Russians have solid intelligence on this, bits and pieces of which Shoigu shared with the defence ministers of Turkey, France, and the UK. In other words, I have absolutely NO doubt that the Ukrainians are fully capable (and not just in the technical sense) of a false flag using dirty nukes and that the US and UK are on board with this. Last but not least, I don't believe that it's a coincidence that just as this was unfolding 1. the Western media intensified their absurd claims about Ukraine winning and Russia losing, a narrative necessary to make the public believe that Russia is desperate and might therefore resort to nuclear weapons (the false flag has to be made plausible before it happens) 2. Joseph Borrell and others came out to tell us that should Russia win in Ukraine, this would amount to a catastrophic defeat for NATO as a whole. It's this last that must be prevented at all cost, and those with a track record of nuking civilian cities cannot be expected to have serious qualms about nuking some more civilians as well as soldiers to preserve their hegemony. I think the Russians understand this and that Shoigu's phone calls, as well as the fact that they've now made their concerns about a planned dirty nuke false flag public, were moves made to pre-empt such a false flag by alerting the global public to its strong possibility. I hope these moves have achieved their goal and that the parties involved have dropped their plan. But that's only a hope: we all know that in Syria they went ahead with at least one false flag using chemical weapons even though many people had raised the alarm about it in advance. Unlike Syria, Russia is a nuclear superpower, something that just may deter the Anglo-Saxons and their friends in Ukraine.
    8