Comments by "dave h" (@daveh322) on "Bill Clinton: 'Superficially hypocritical' for Republicans to fill Supreme Court vacancy" video.

  1. Speaking of Hypocrisy.... She lamented the Republican-majority Senate’s continued blocking of Garland from consideration, and its insistence that the next President, to be elected in November, should be the one to appoint a new Supreme Court Justice. “That’s their job,” Ginsburg said, when asked whether the Senate should give the 63-year-old judge a fair hearing. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the President stops being President in his last year.”
    8
  2. Hypocritical Ginsburg!!! From Time magazine.... She lamented the Republican-majority Senate’s continued blocking of Garland from consideration, and its insistence that the next President, to be elected in November, should be the one to appoint a new Supreme Court Justice. “That’s their job,” Ginsburg said, when asked whether the Senate should give the 63-year-old judge a fair hearing. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the President stops being President in his last year.”
    3
  3. Where is her Martin? Where are they going to meet, do you think?
    3
  4. Ginsburg..... She lamented the Republican-majority Senate’s continued blocking of Garland from consideration, and its insistence that the next President, to be elected in November, should be the one to appoint a new Supreme Court Justice. “That’s their job,” Ginsburg said, when asked whether the Senate should give the 63-year-old judge a fair hearing. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the President stops being President in his last year.”
    2
  5. Nah. Get it done now.
    1
  6. Yes! Because we ALL know the most important qualification for a SCOTUS appointment is gender and skin color!! YAY RACISM YAY!!!
    1
  7. There is no reason it can not wait. There is also no reason why it can not be filled immediately. We do not conduct governmental business based on the dying wishes of officials, nor should we start.
    1
  8.  @SMS9155  Every politician that was there when this exact same scenario happened are exactly arguing 180 degrees from their positions then. Every one of them, on both sides. You expect better from them? There is a problem with your argument here. You say that Obama was denied his RIGHT to fill the vacancy, yet here you are trying to deny Trumps RIGHT to do the same thing. How do you rectify this conflict?
    1
  9.  @SMS9155  Thats not an intelligent response. I DID expect better from you. Not from politicians but yeah, from you I did.
    1
  10.  @SMS9155  Hey here's something interesting Ruth Bader Ginsburg..... She lamented the Republican-majority Senate’s continued blocking of Garland from consideration, and its insistence that the next President, to be elected in November, should be the one to appoint a new Supreme Court Justice. “That’s their job,” Ginsburg said, when asked whether the Senate should give the 63-year-old judge a fair hearing. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the President stops being President in his last year.”
    1
  11.  @SMS9155  Ok, well, we are really discussing the nomination of a Supreme Court Justice. Whether Trump calls people names and it makes you feel bad is something that I dont really care about. No one died when we waited, and no one will die if we nominate a Justice now. Why do you keep saying "no one died"? I never even said anyone did. I dont understand what it is you mean by that?
    1
  12. The American people do not decide SCOTUS appointments.
    1
  13.  @cybrfriends5089  Yeah, thats nice. You still have no say who is nominated for SCOTUS. No matter how many platitudes you can think up. Sorry.
    1
  14.  @cybrfriends5089  Ok. I dont know what anything means. You still have no say in who is nominated for SCOTUS. Sorry :(
    1
  15.  @cybrfriends5089  Soundbites? You do not know what a soundbite is. You have no say...zero...zip...nada for SCOTUS appointments.
    1
  16. I got my $1200 stimulous check. 2 days later I got my property tax bill.....$1500. :(
    1
  17. He's got a cigar waiting just for you. wink wink
    1
  18. We do not and SHOULD NOT conduct governmental business based on dying wishes. Seriously, grow up.
    1
  19. On both sides. Go back and listen to what Democrats said. If you dare.
    1
  20. Every politician that was there the last time this happened is now exactly arguing 180 degrees from what they did then. It aint just Mitch.
    1
  21. It's funny how Democrats call rape a "moral shortcoming" when another Democrat does it. lol You so fake!
    1
  22. You got a link to that quote? Thats gold!
    1
  23.  @drewdurbin4968  I got the link thanks.
    1
  24. Yeah, to heck with all that sexual abuse. They wanted it.
    1
  25.  @hnys7976  Like I said. They wanted it. Trailer trash floozies. They deserved it.
    1