Comments by "dave h" (@daveh322) on "Fox commentators go off on Biden's vow to nominate Black woman for court" video.

  1. It's funny reading these comments. "Should be a black" "No Native American" "Should be Asian" racist racist racism race race race Cnn got you all hating each other. Way to go!🙄
    11
  2. He's not just going to pick a woman. She has to be black as well. Basically he is is saying NO Asians! NO Hispanics! NO men! NOTHING but black women. You think this is fair?
    4
  3. Because they're racists. Always have been.
    4
  4. He's too busy running ruining the country.
    3
  5.  @lekudos  98% of the NBA is black. How did we let so much racism happen? The answer is...WHO F$%KING cares theres so many blacks in the NBA? WHO F%^KING CARES theres more white Justices? Racists care. Ya know....like you.
    3
  6.  @jkarma3356  So,I guess we can just throw 'em out eh?
    3
  7. As long as he doesnt pick an Asian! Or a Native American! Right?
    3
  8. Biden..."I get to sniff her first!!!"
    3
  9. Well he just EXCLUDED any Asians or Native Americans from his Supreme Court nomination.
    2
  10.  @Profoundimpact2  By saying that ONLY a black woman can be picked, you are making the case that whites are superior and the black woman could not compete otherwise. Those that disagree with you are the ones saying she COULD compete Democrats are so f%^kin' dumb.
    2
  11. More like Faux garage door puller😆
    2
  12. Politician...outsider GOOD Court of Law...QUALIFIED GOOD If you can't understand this simple concept that explains why you voted for a corrupt 40 year politician and are paying 4 dollars a gallon for gas. Knucklehead
    2
  13. NO! Lets keep this going! I'm opening a bar this spring and I'm only going to hire large breasted white women!🤪
    2
  14. @The Real American Patriot! Notice the Democrats had a diverse field of candidates only to nominate the oldest richest white guy? Notice the Democrats invented the kkk Notice that Democrats believe that black women cant compete for the supreme court on their own merit?
    2
  15.  The Observer  A lefty judge is retiring. Biden will replace with another lefty. You gain nothing. The only ones concerned about the skin color of the new lefty is cnn and Joe Biden.
    2
  16. Absolutely 1. Womens rights!! Men can be women to and kick their ass out of scholarships!! 2. Trump is a dictator!! And we should give him all the guns!! And on and on and on.🙃
    2
  17.  @bruceperkins2921  Isn't it amazing thinking you're not the racist picking someone for a job because of their race.🙄
    2
  18. You need more bots Evelynn. Four aint gonna cut it.
    1
  19. Who cares? He's gonna pick a lefty. A lefty is retiring, replaced by another lefty. You gain nothing.
    1
  20. Because they know something that you do not.
    1
  21. 🙄
    1
  22. Who cares. Biden will appoint a lefty to replace a lefty. You gain NOTHING. The only ones concerned with skin color are racist Democrats.
    1
  23. How so?
    1
  24.  @ryanmalone2681  Yes, English is my first language. 🙄 Strategic relating to the identification of long-term or overall aims and interests and the means of achieving them. Tactic which means a carefully planned strategy. Tactical is more about a strategic problem solving process than anything else. Is English your first language?🙄
    1
  25. terrible idea.
    1
  26. Says the guy who wants a Supreme Court Justice to be nominated based on the color of their skin.🙄
    1
  27. You're falling into a trap. Thinking that a white can't represent a black or a Asian can't represent a white etc etc etc. It's all baloney and you all argue over it while they sit back and laugh at you.
    1
  28.  Ann Montgomery  I was addressing the OP which is why your name appears nowhere in my post.🙄
    1
  29.  Ann Montgomery  😄No you didn't.
    1
  30.  Ann Montgomery  Back at ya toots.😎
    1
  31.  Ann Montgomery  Never heard of it, but...i like you. I'll check it out.👍
    1
  32.  Ann Montgomery  Thanks for the recommendation. Here is one for you JCS - Criminal Psychology Doesn't post very often but good stuff.
    1
  33.  Ann Montgomery  You too. Glad to meet ya.✌
    1
  34.  @marcilk7534  You are describing revenge, not diversity. You know that...right?
    1
  35.  @marcilk7534  Not when you base it on past wrongs, which is exactly what you said. That is revenge. If you really want to acknowledge people for their intelligence, hard work and accomplishments then you would not consider anything else. But you dont. You want to get even for past discrimination. Thats what you said. I'll even quote you. "It’s because historically people of color and women who were more than qualified were too often overlooked, so now it’s time to select from these qualified candidates."
    1
  36.  @marcilk7534  I quoted you, thats not twisting what you said. We do not nominate Supreme Court Justices based on "turns". We nominate Judges based on qualifications. Not skin color, not gender, not because "it's their turn". Not because someone in the past was overlooked. Your analogy is interesting. A childhood analogy from childish logic.
    1
  37.  @marcilk7534  You're quote describes revenge. Revenge...."To avenge (oneself or another) usually by retaliating in kind or degree." I believe thats not what you WANT it to mean, but it does. Maybe you just dont realize it? I dont know, but it is EXACTLY what you are doing. What makes you think I dont? I agree with your last sentence.
    1
  38.  @marcilk7534  Well neither do you. I quoted you. I gave you the definition of the term. Read them both. You're quote is the EXACT definition of the word revenge. I even gave you the benefit of the doubt that you may not even realize thats what you are doing. You can not argue it. All you can say is "OMG!😲
    1
  39.  @marcilk7534  You are just in denial now. Read what you said. Read the definition and THINK. It's not hard to see. I'll say nothing further on the matter as it's getting old. You're becoming unglued. I think nothing of the sort and haven't said anything remotely like it. As a matter of fact, I agreed with your sentence about this very same thing. I'm the one making the case that skin color has nothing to do with nominating a Justice. You in fact are arguing that it does. Forced "diversity" is not "fair" it is racism. Denying someone the right to be considered based on ANY skin color is racism to the Nth degree. This is another trap you have fallen into. That someone HAS to be the same color as you before they can represent you. Thats simply not true and it's racist to think as such. I'm white and can think of many people of different skin tones that I would be completely happy with representing me. If you have 100 candidates, hell ! MILLION candidates, you CAN NOT pick ONE of them based on skin color NOT ONE. If they all end up being black, or white, or asian, or some mix in between it should not matter if you base SOLELY on qualifications. Fine. We are done then. I dont like to call names either but...you are a racist.
    1
  40.  @marcilk7534  Absolutely agree. I thought you were done?
    1
  41. You do realize if he does that the Republicans will do the same when in power. Right?
    1
  42. Absolutely
    1
  43. Good Lord, is that what they call it? Positive discrimination? Seriously?🙄
    1
  44. A lefty judge is retiring. Biden will replace with another lefty. You gain nothing.
    1