Comments by "Republitarian" (@republitarian484) on "CHRONOS-MEDIA History" channel.

@haroldgodwinson832 . . . I've been reading your little discussion with this Commie and one thing I will have to disagree with you is that I do believe that Fascism, in the context that you're discussing, is not that similar to Communism. Communism is more of a global system of state control and redistribution of wealth and the eradication of classes whereas "Fascism" or National Socialism is more of tribalism and not necessarily about eliminating classes or eliminating Free Markets or introducing an complete Centralized Command and Control economy like Communism. I'm a Libertarian for the most part, but I also am a tribalist from the standpoint that I believe the different races are different and that each race/ethnicity will structure their societies based on their natural inclinations, behaviors, characteristics, qualities, capabilities, etc. I believe a multiracial/multicultural society will be detrimental to our Western way of life because I don't think "people of color" will structure their societies like white westerners do. Hitler despised Communism and his rise to power was in great part due to the rise of Communism in Germany/Europe. I also heard that Hitler was distrustful of International Capitalism and Multi-national Corporations as they could undermine the host nation. Sort of like "colonialism" where the host nation/people are used and discarded after. Many in Europe viewed Communism and Judaism as being one and the same. . . Jew!$h B0I$hev$m. And many others also viewed International "Capitalism" and "Bolshevism" as different sides of the same coin and both have been used to obtain wealth and power. Anyway. . . gotta go.
2
@haroldgodwinson832 . . . Hmmm. . . .I think I agree with you somewhat. But I think National Socialism in Germany was much less Centrally Planned than Communist countries. In fact, Hitler privatized some industries that were previously ran by the state. Some of Germany's largest and most successful companies existed before, during, and after WWII. I can't think of any private companies from Communist countries. He did not trust International corporations as we already have an idea as to why. Also, are you saying that Hitler admired Marx & Lenin? I wouldn't think he did. Actually, I think he hated them. Could it be that Hitler saw National Socialism as the only way to defend Germany from becoming Communist? I see similar parallels currently with the West. That's why I'm not a pure Libertarian as I think there are some inherent flaws with Libertarian ideology such as discounting Culture and Tribalism. Also, the 2nd Amendment sort of contradicts Libertarian philosophy in that at what point do you infringe on other people's rights by utilizing the 2nd Amendment. And lastly. . . was he right?
2
@haroldgodwinson832 . . . so you don't think he was right about anything? So what about Imperialist Great Britain and all their colonies around the globe? How many perished? Same with France. And it's not like ordinary German citizens were immune from the indiscriminate killing by the Allies such as the bombing of Dresden. But I guess those poor Vietnamese Villagers that died at the hands of American soldiers deserve our sympathy right? What about China? Look at who our allies were during WWII. . . not so innocent if you look at it from the Losers perspective. I guess what I'm getting at is that it always seems that the Left and Communism are never mentioned, vilified, demonized, etc. like the right is. And yes I do consider some aspects of the National Socialists of Germany Right Wing and also Left Wing. And what if a Libertarian Conservative Constitutional Republic type form of government is a characteristic of Western Whites? It derived from the way white people think and all the other natural characteristics that define them. Does the land or people make the country? Maybe our Constitution would never work in Africa (Liberia) because that's not who they are. I'm a Libertarian but also a tribalist. I also believe that race does matter. No matter how "Libertarian" I try to be if I'm being honest I prefer my own kind. I think that is human nature. I don't believe a multicultural/multiracial society can exist because it goes against human nature. And I'm not advocating for a pure one race society, but you need a dominate/supermajority of the same race for a country to succeed. From what I've read it sounds like Hitler despised Marx and Lenin. But I guess I'll have to research more. So Hitler wanted Lebensraum? That didn't mean he wanted to take over the world and that didn't mean he wanted to exterminate all the other races. I understand that he came to hate the Jews. . . but from some of the things I read is that he wasn't alone on the "J" question. What to do with them? The Transfer Agreement and all. Anyway, I agree that he was a murderous dictator and that he went too far. But it seems like there never is an honest and complete discussion on what led up to these events taking place. It seems we only get a one-sided view and that tends to push some people away from the narrative given. I also think people discount what Germany was going thru after WWI and the Treaty of Versailles and all the problems they were dealing with during the 1920s. I think you can make the argument that they had a right to be angry. I'm sure the Commie in this section has nothing but utter disdain for Hitler and yet they're both "Socialists". Anyway, I jumped around a bit more than usual. Have a good day.
2
@haroldgodwinson832 . . . wasn't Hitler/Germany also concerned about the Franco-Russian Pact/Treaty, or whatever it was, that France and Russia signed therefore basically surrounding Germany? Was it so terribly wrong for Hitler to want Lebensraum? From what I understand Lebensraum was really just uniting the Germanic people of Europe. It wasn't like they wanted to colonize the world like Britain and France. So a German dominated Western Europe was a threat to Britain so is Britain really responsible for WWII? And what about Soviet Unions interests in spreading Communism? Now you see the predicament Germany was faced with. . .especially after WWI and the Treaty of Versailles. Which brings me to my next point. A big reason for WWII was the Treaty of Versailles. So was a "Hitler" inevitable? Are the countries and people responsible for drafting and approving the Treaty of Versailles responsible for WWII? Are there names well known? When do they get their chance to be demonized? Do you deny the nature of Tribalism? How much should a people suppress their tribalism? Which is one of the reasons I pointed out as to why I'm not a pure Libertarian. Does an acceptance and embracing of a people's tribalism automatically lead to Totalitarianism? I do believe that Nationalism tends to be more of a right wing characteristic. Just look at the United States. . . Conservatives tend to be more Nationalistic than Liberals. Most elite Left wing Communists only use nationalism as a tool to keep the masses appeased. They truly don't care about anyone. Leftists look down on Nationalism as though it's beneath them. I would argue that Hitler loved Germany more than Lenin or Stalin loved Russia which is one of the reasons why Communists tend to kill their own. And if Left Wingers/Communists are just as Nationalistic as Right Wingers, then maybe it's an us against them world that we need to accept. If the Left wants to change this nation to their world view and they are in almost complete power how do you stop it? What's the point of the 2nd Amendment then? The 2nd Amendment runs contrary to all the other amendments as utilizing the 2nd Amendment infringes upon all others. Anyway, I just think one side gets pointed out. The National Socialists of Germany are considered evil, but the Communists just didn't have the right people in place or "that wasn't real Communism" is an excuse as to why Communism is still accepted as a viable political/economic system.
2
And how has the West done sine WWII?
1