Comments by "Republitarian" (@republitarian484) on "Monsieur Z" channel.

@lucasoneill9662 . . ..LOL. . .the whole "party switched" lie. So the Democrats were really Republicans during slavery. . .and then they switched to vote in FDR. . .but then switched back after FDR. . . only to switch back for the Civil Rights movement. . . only then to switch back again. You're delusional. The truth is, is that back in the 1800's neither Republicans nor Democrats wanted to live among freed slaves as they both felt that white people and black people were naturally too different to live harmoniously in the same country. The difference is, is that Republicans didn't feel that any person should be a slave. Whereas, Democrats had no problem with black people being slaves as well as they don't have an issue with anyone being a slave to the elite. And to this day it seems like the Republicans were right. Most white people, even Democrats, choose to live among their own kind and that increases the older they get. Integration seems to have been a failure and diversity seems to be a weakness. If diversity was a strength why are will still and always arguing over it. Race has nothing to do with better or worse. . . it has more to do with different.
3
What's wrong with that? We did the same thing during WWII. Maybe people should rethink our "victory" during WWII. Maybe it wasn't the great "victory" we've all been taught.
2
@takinoborudesu . . . I guess you missed the point of my comment. My comment was in regards to WWII not being the great victory many people seem to think. During WWII we fought on the side of Russia and China, both Communists and both probably our biggest adversary. And yet people have been duped into thinking that was a good war and a great victory. Nobody wants a Civil War, but that doesn't prevent them from happening. Sometimes the other option would be unbearable. Who wants to live under a Socialist/Communist dictatorship. Because that's what you get with the Left.
2
@lucasoneill9662 . . . many Conservative/Republicans are against Civil Rights laws as they intrude upon individual rights of freedom of association on free private individuals. Now you can be sued for refusing to bake a cake. What business is it of the Federal Government's on who you choose to discriminate against. All Civil Rights Laws have done is increase the power of the Federal Government.
2
@takinoborudesu . . . Republitarian 9 minutes ago What's wrong with that? We did the same thing during WWII. Maybe people should rethink our "victory" during WWII. Maybe it wasn't the great "victory" we've all been taught.
1
Add France and the Soviet Union to that. And maybe even the United States that we just a few decades from slavery.
1
I lean Libertarian but have a few big issues. First, Libertarians rarely get anything accomplished. Second, Libertarians can only succeed in a culture that is naturally inclined to accept most of their ideology. Races and cultures are naturally different and therefore many of those races/cultures will never accept a Libertarian ideology (unless Libertarians don't believe in evolution anymore). 3rd, how does the 2nd Amendment fit into the practical world of a Libertarian? They'd be arguing their limited government philosophy while the enemy is at the gates. I'm sure there are plenty of other issues I have with Libertarians, but those a just a few.
1