Comments by "Republitarian" (@republitarian484) on "CNBC Television" channel.

My Body My Choice. . . same goes for the Vaccine.
5
Same Sh!t. . .different bag!
4
That America is over as we know it. And now that white people have become submissive appeasers and are being replaced with "people of color" from all around the world you will start to see the United States more as a 3rd world country than what it was pre-1950. General Patton came to believe "we defeated the wrong enemy". Maybe WWII wasn't the great victory we've been led to believe. Watch a short cartoon video called "The Fable of the Ducks and Hens". It was written in the 1950s and is quite informative.
4
Anti-vaxxers: "My body, my choice" Pregnant Texans:: What about abortion? Anti-vaxxers: "Baby's body, not your choice" Although I'm probably like most Americans in that I believe in abortion up to a certain point. . .such as 3 months, LIFE of the mother, etc. etc. But I can also see the pro-life / anti-abortion side of the argument also.
4
It's not ignorance. . .it's tribalism. Tribalism is natural in many instances. A multiracial/multicultural society is doomed to fail. The different races are just that. . . different. And larger groups of different races that try to live peacefully together in the same land/country will eventually find themselves at odds culturally with one another which brings division and conflict. That doesn't mean you have to strive to have a pure one race society, but you need a majority/dominate culture of the same race where any minority freely and willingly living in that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the norms, customs, language, traditions, culture, history, laws, etc. of the majority. Call me a racist but that's the truth.
3
I'm pro-abortion, but I think Roe vs. Wade should be overturned.
3
@StillLivinginthewoods . . .actually, Communists began subverting this nation in the 1930's. Why do you think we went to war on behalf of the Communists. But it was ramped up after WWII. Communist "Bolsheviks" were elated with the beginning of WWI as they believed it would unleash a world wide Communist revolution where the working class would rise up and overthrow their Imperialist Bourgeoise leaders. But instead the working class proletariat happily went to war to be slaughtered for their imperialist country. Disillusioned Marxists then came to the realization that nationalism was too ingrained in the populace. So they created the Frankfurt School and Critical Theory to teach that in order to bring about the Global Communist Revolution you needed to tear down the institutions of the Western White Christian Patriarchy and teach (indoctrinate) people to hate themselves and their culture. This subversive ideology bore the insidious rotten fruit of Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness, Identity Politics, Intersectionality, etc etc etc. More people need to red pill themselves and learn the other perspective of WWI and WWII.
2
@mikestefano3986 . . .agreed. But please research how Capitalism and Communism are different sides of the same coin and is being used to oppress people. I agree that Free Market Capitalism under a Constitutional Republic is the best form of government/economy, but it's being used as a tool. . . I'll leave it at that. My comment might get deleted if I go into it too much.
2
And the comments.
2
The Great Replacement. Cloward and Piven. Many of those "Conspiracy" theories are not really too Conspiratorial.
2
Totally agree.
2
I say you can have your check and LAND so you can create your own nation. I don't believe a multiracial society is possible. Reparations with Land for Separation.
2
@papasmurf555 . . .not a bigot at all. Just came to the conclusion that a multiracial/multicultural society is doomed to fail. Actually, I sort of think it was done on purpose with the radical 1960's and the 1965 Immigration Act, but that a much longer conversation that stems from earlier politics. I also don't believe in the pursuit of a pure one race society. But you need to have a dominate/majority of one race/culture where any minority living within that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the customs, norms, traditions, language, culture, history, laws, etc. of the majority. And that minority must stay a minority. Larger groups of different races trying to live peacefully in the same area, land, country, etc. will eventually be at odds with one another and only will result in division and conflict. China has almost 1.5 Billion people. If 300,000 million Chinese were to emigrate to Nigeria, would Nigeria be Nigerian? NO. Of course not. And Nigeria would not let that happen. Now it's up to you to figure out why mostly/only white countries have been duped into this mass immigration into their countries.
2
@farewelliquit4575 . . . all hierarchies have a top, middle, and bottom. So far Free Market Capitalism within our Constitutional Republic has been the most efficient system in creating hierarchies that are the most fair. The reason Communism fails miserably so much is that it tears down these hierarchies partially due to the fact that many Communists feel they are social constructs of power structures of oppressor vs. oppressed. But hierarchies are natural and seem to work well in Free Market Capitalist societies that are built on competence. When these natural hierarchies are eliminated, many times by force, it will usually be filled by a person that is looking to insert their will on the people in order to restore a hierarchy. Sort of like the saying "out of chaos comes order". Jordan Peterson speaks a lot about this and it really gives you good insight into the psychology of political movements.
2
No reparations received unless they separate. Those that received reparations need to repatriate back to Africa or maybe we section out some land in North America where black people can create their own nation.
2
@phill7507 . . . so why do college lunch rooms to this day still self-segregate by race? Because it's human nature. A multiracial/multicultural society is doomed to fail. The quicker we realize this the better we'll be able to figure a way out of this mess because the future looks pretty messy.
1
@phill7507 . . . maybe your situation is a little unique in that you were in the military. I'm just wondering though, even if you keep in touch with your friends from the military, did you and those friends find yourselves as you got older associating more and more with members of your own race? That seems to be common as people age. Also, there is a certain % of people that can bridge the racial divide, but most can't. And differences in individual traits can be overlooked by common courtesy, manners, more in common than less, same interests, upbringing, etc. But that changes when larger groups come into play. We've all seen it. A "friend of color" that seems to change ever so slightly when they are around larger groups of people from their "tribe". Some do it out of courtesy to their own tribe, and others do it because that is who they are and they truly feel more comfortable around others of their own race. The Group Identity eventually trumps the traits of the individual. I consider Candace Owens a person that has no problem being around white people as her own qualities and characteristics seem to be aligned more with white people. If you listen to what many black people tell you, you'll hear them admit they are different. "Capitalism is a white persons system" , and many other examples. Did you ever think that maybe they're right or telling the truth? Hence the reason why black Conservatives can more easily associate with white people. The don't seem to have a chip on their shoulder. I have a Mexican friend (I guess we call them Hispanics now) from high school. He almost exclusively hung out with white friends. And we had a decent % of Mexicans in our school. We all got along, but most of the Mexicans tended to be more social and friends with other Mexicans. Except our one Mexican friend. He almost strictly hung out with his white friends. He was in the military also for 20+ years. Just moved into my neighborhood about 5 years ago after retiring from the military. Saw him last night actually. Trying to plan a golf/fishing getaway weekend with our friends. First you need to figure out who "the media" is and all the problems some of them seem to cause. Plus, if there were no inherent differences and race was truly just a color, the media wouldn't try to divide us by race. But they know race is a big factor in a persons identity so they can divide us. But beyond that, the world has always tended to self-segregate by race and ethnicity. Our cities self-segregate, neighborhoods, churches, etc. Even in many large European cities they have distinct racial neighborhoods. Please name a multiracial society that has successfully integrated for any extended period of time? Some say the Roman Empire was a good example, but in reality the Roman Empire was an Empire of many distinct nations. You can read up on that if you want. Also, if a multiracial society can work and is so great, why is it that no "countries of color" seem to partake in this experiment? If you look at the citizenship and immigration laws of other countries of color, you'll find that many of their laws directly and indirectly are structured to keep their racial majority the same. Such as, "you can become a citizen of X country if your grandparents are from X country and that they have lived there for 10 or more years". If diversity and multiculturalism is so great why aren't so many other countries of color participating. Think about this. If diversity is a strength, why hasn't it just happened naturally. Why are we still arguing about race? It seems that if we value diversity, we wouldn't be pushing to have all these different races live/mix together as it will lead to less diversity. Gotta go.
1
@sparkymcplug3765 . . . there's was a person from the 1920s and 1930s that came to despise a group of people that he claimed used both Communism and Capitalism for their own gain. You really need to look into what really happened and it can explain what is currently happening.
1
@remyn.9198 . . . Agree. . . Social Security and Medicare are not entitlement programs. Social Security is not Constitutional. It is theft. In order for it to have been ruled Constitutional it was ruled as an excise tax. Go look into the history of Social Security. Anyway, technically you have no right to that money. If the Government really wanted to it could tell every Social Security beneficiary and payor to pound sand. Why would the US have paid family leave? Save your own money to pay for your own family leave. Just think, if the Federal/State government didn't tax everyone so much you could actually save $. Prior to 1917 (check my year) there was no Federal Income tax. Universal Healthcare? Really. Buy your own health insurance/care. We should never went down the road of "employer provided" insurance. (See paid family leave) Education is funded to the max. We actually should reduce educational funding, reduce/eliminate many certifications and license requirement, etc. College has become a joke. Most careers don't need a useless college education. Most people learn by doing things and those that can learn well from sitting in a classroom aren't usually good at doing anything. Maybe if we create more laws and regulations on "corporations" and raise their taxes things will get better. Can you hear my sarcasm? Did you ever just think that those corporations like more laws and regulations as it creates less competition? Why do you think Facebook is petitioning the Federal Government to regulate them? Because it will limit the upcoming competition they might get down the road. Wake up and get a clue.
1
@mikestefano3986 . . . I agree with everything you state. But if a certain group of elites that have become billionaires/millionaires from a Capitalist system and are now working to transfer over that system into a Global Communist system within the framework of our underlying Democracy in our Constitutional Republic and they don't really care about either system and only their elite tribe then what do you do? Those same people will still be in power and will still be very wealthy. Again, I agree with everything you said. I'm a Conservative/Libertarian (leaning more towards a Libertarian Tribalist. . .long conversation) but at what point do we realize the system is broken? What is the point of a 2nd Amendment when in utilizing that Amendment you must infringe on other Amendments and rights?
1
@sparkymcplug3765 . . . you're a brainless twit. Our founders utilized what would eventually become the 2nd Amendment. And the Red States welfare argument is propaganda. Look at "real welfare" and not farm subsidies, military spending, Interstate Highway, Infrastructure, etc. Just look at what every real American considers real welfare and by far you will find Blue States lead in that category. How about you do a welfare spending study on Blue County vs. Red Country? Red States would do quite well without you Blue States. You inner City Blue States/Counties would have to drive individually to each Red State/Country Farm on those Federally Subsidized highways in those Federally Subsidized EV's to buy our Federally Subsidized Groceries.
1
@sparkymcplug3765 . . . McCarthy was right. General Patton came to believe "we defeated the wrong enemy".
1
@mikestefano3986 . . . and when has the State ever given up it's "responsibilities" willingly (few exceptions)? 10th Amendment. . . one of my favorite Amendments.
1
Why doesn't systemic racism seem to be prevalent when it comes to the NBA/NFL?
1
Did you really think you were going to be wrong?
1
@Ur2ez4me81 . . . I don't think it's a question of oppressed as much as it's a subconscious feeling that the United States and it's history is really more of a White Europeans history. And since his ancestors were brought here as slaves that he had no choice but to try to identify with our history in which his ancestors were slaves.
1
Reparations with Land for Separation. Part of the 14 Trillion must also include land (not $14 trillion and land). Just like many black people believe they still are affected by the aftermath of slavery and are somewhat resentful of that fact, many white people who never owned slaves and who's ancestors never owned slaves (Polish, Hungarian, Swedish, Irish, etc.) will be resentful also.
1
@dandobrowolski5818 . . . exactly. And that's the way it should be.
1
It is still not enough. . . it never will be.
1
@Armed-Forever . . . and what if that private entity is coerced by government subsidies, laws, fines, grants, etc.? And what about contract law?
1
Would Reparations with Land for Separation make him satisfied?
1
@Saltinator . . .and actually the first group of people killed were I think 10 white people. Correct me if I'm wrong anybody.
1
Pam Bondi gave a speech over 8 months ago about this story. It's on the PBS News Hour. Unfortunately, most of the media is just as corrupt as Joe Biden.
1
@papasmurf555 . . . what about Hispanics with Spanish Ancestry? Will they ever be held accountable for their ancestors sins in Colonialism and Slavery? Should we blame Chinese Americans for the bombing of Pearl Harbor? Why not. . .aren't they also Asian? So why do we blame all white people for the sins of the English, Spanish, and French? What did a white Polish American ever do to be labeled a racist with inherent bias? What about a white German American, or Hungarian, or Swedish, Irish, etc. Why aren't those white people considered an immigrant just like an Indian, Arab, Asian, etc. that emigrated to the United States during the late 1800's/early 1900s? Actually, many white immigrants that came here in the early 1900's were shipped off to war to fight against their own relatives in WWI and WWII. And what's even more ironic is that you had Polish, German, Austrian, Irish, etc. immigrants going to war against their own family members many times. And our allies were the English & French. . . 2 global imperialist original colonizers of North America and other parts of the world. How f(&^(*^d up is that? And you want to cast blame on all white people and pull this systemic racism, inherent bias, white guilt, etc. crap?
1
@farewelliquit4575 . . .as Jesus said. . .the poor will always be with us.
1
@ldiggs9072 . . . are you sure it oozes ignorance? So what about Hungarian, Irish, German, Polish, etc. Americans who's ancestors never owned slaves, never displaced Native Indigenous tribes of the Americas, and even after they emigrated here in the late 1800's/early 1900's went to war in WWI and WWII against their own relatives? You do realize it was the English, French, and Spanish that colonized the Americas right? I also mention that "if" they decide to take reparations that they have a "choice" of either repatriation to Africa OR land can be sectioned off here in the United States. See. . .it's a choice. And what about Chinese Americans? Do Americans deserve an apology from them for the bombing Pearl Harbor? After all. . .they're Asians too. And what about the 11,000 Germans that were put into concentration camps during WWII? Do they deserve reparations like the Japanese received? And what about Hispanics that have Spanish ancestry? AOC has stated her ancestors are from Spain. Is she and many other countries with Spanish heritage going to "chip in" for reparations for their colonizing/slavery history? And if people with European ancestry are to repatriate to Europe can we force those "Europeans" that have mixed ancestry from "countries of color" to go back to their countries of origin? Actually, I think I might be willing to go back to Europe. But any of those "Europeans" that have blood from other "people of color" need to leave immediately. And when did the United States become systemically racist? Was it during the Civil War? Was it during WWII (fighting a war against the "supposed" biggest "racist" of them all), Was it during the Civil Rights Act? Is systemic racism prevalent in the NBA/NFL? Why not? Does evolution only work from the Neck down? I have plenty more of example of how you see everything from an anti-white perspective.
1
@ldiggs9072 . . . great rebuttal beta. Maybe you should think about why your perspective always seems to be anti-white. Black people tend to be loud. . .that's racist. White people tend to be uptight. . . sure do!
1