Youtube comments of Republitarian (@republitarian484).
-
345
-
301
-
300
-
242
-
201
-
176
-
167
-
167
-
153
-
128
-
119
-
111
-
98
-
97
-
95
-
93
-
91
-
86
-
83
-
81
-
77
-
74
-
69
-
68
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
60
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
47
-
46
-
45
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
@decartes_3168 . . .Actually, I can answer both because the 1965 immigration act is one of the reasons why the US will be over with.
Because a large multi-racial society will fail. Even Barrack Obama has made comments on if a large multiracial society will be successful.
A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing, but too much diversity brings division and conflict. Hence the reason we're so divided right now.
Many black people think they are getting even with the white man. But in the end they may end up replacing themselves with Asians, Arabs, Indians (India), Hispanics, etc. And those groups have no guilt from slavery or colonialism. They're a minority just like black people. Which is not right. At least the white man tried to atone for the sins of slavery and colonialism (even white people that have no ancestral ties to slavery or colonialism like Polish, Irish, Hungarian, Swedish, etc.). Black and native Indians were the only groups that deserved any type of special treatment for what happened to them. They were Americas minorities. Not an Arab Muslim from Pakistan.
Anyway, that's all gone now. Now it's replace whitey and see what we get. You're not going to get Utopia once the white man is gone from North America. Hopefully Europe can manage to stay majority white.
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@HeatGeek1 . . . but they are. Race, culture, behavior, IQ, temperament, risk aversion, gratification delay, organization, planning, etc. are very closely linked with race. Even the Smithsonian published that article on "white characteristics". If you want to get angry, get angry and disgusted with all these POCs living in "countries of color" that are much more xenophobic and racist than me. I'm just honest about it. I'm not arguing any race is better or worse than the other. I'm just arguing that "in general" the different races are different. I even argue that a little diversity is a good thing. You can't possibly look around and tell me that "diversity is our strength" can you? I don't think the vast majority of people believe that anymore.
The Declaration of Independence and Constitution are probably the greatest documents ever written by white English men. But we don't practice them anymore. We live in a post Constitutional era. We have the right to absolute freedom of association (freedom to discriminate), 10th Amendment, separation of powers, federalism, etc. etc. etc. But there are laws on the books now forbidding us to exercise our Constitutional rights. I'm quite certain that without the 1930's and then the 1960s legislation nightmare this country would have remained solidly huwhyte. Take a look at the 1st immigration act. The Naturalization Act of 1791 (double check my name and year). . . "only free white persons of good moral character. . . could become US Citizens".
A multiracial society will fail. A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. Too much diversity brings division and conflict.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@sabin97 . . . what's odd is that you've never had an event like this. To be a majority where they basically hate themselves. What other country, race, ethnicity, nationality, etc. has bent over backwards to demonize itself but then also welcome its replacement? Name one other "country of color" that openly welcomes people of all stripes, colors, ethnicities, races, etc. Do you think Nigeria would welcome 300 million Chinese? What about Pakistan, Somalia, Israel, Mexico, India, etc.
Also, it seems that white people are already becoming a hated majority. I'd hate to think how much more we'd be hated once we're just another minority? Or maybe it might end up being a good thing?
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
A large multiracial society will fail. The United States will eventually balkanize. The different races are just that. . .different. And they will structure their societies differently from one another.
A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. Too much diversity brings division and conflict. A small minority living in a country with another racial majority can work because the majority will not see them as a threat. If anything the majority will look at the minority with admiration and flattery as they see a different group willingly adopting the majorities country, customs, language, history, etc. But once that minority, and other "minorities", start to increase the feeling goes from flattery to displacement and distrust. It's human nature. A country needs a supermajority of one race where their customs and culture are dominant and any minority living in that country adopts, adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc the majorities culture, history, norms, customs, language, laws, etc. Would Japan remain Japanese if you had tens of millions of Arab Muslims emigrating to Japan. NO. And Japan will not let that happen. Would Nigeria remain Nigerian if you have hundreds of millions of Chinese emigrating to Nigeria? NO. And Nigeria will not let that happen.
People confuse themselves by thinking their friendships with a few others outside their race can be extended to group relationships. Usually friendships are between individuals that have enough in common and for what they don't have in common is easily overlooked by manners. But they don't realize those small differences between the races become exacerbated and amplified when larger groups are involved. The larger group dynamic trumps the individuals' traits.
We see it all the time when large groups of different races self-segregate. Most large urban areas have neighborhoods that are comprised of different ethnic/racial groups living among each other. That's the norm. Even today the most "open-minded" people, college students, self-segregate in the college lunch rooms.
Don't take my word for it. Barrack Obama has made similar comments eluding to the fact that it still remains to be seen if a large multiracial society can be successful.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@warzone2761 . . . and many Mexicans have Spanish Ancestry. It's estimated that up to 50% of Mexico's population is comprised of Spanish heritage. Spain is in Europe. The Spanish Conquistadors were some of the most vile colonizers to walk the earth. When are those descendants of the Spanish Conquistadors going to be held accountable for their ancestors colonizing ways?
And yet many white Americans, such as Polish, Irish, Hungarian, Swedes, etc. never owned slaves nor practiced in the Atlantic Slave Trade, and never displaced the native tribes of the Americas. Most came here legally in the late 1800s to early 1900s to become Americans to build their own future without government welfare programs or stealing Social Security #'s, or working under the table for cash. Many also went off to fight wars against their own family members in WWI and WWII. And yet those white Americans get blamed for slavery and colonialism, systemic racism, white privilege, etc. That's like blaming all Asians for the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Rational thinking is to realize that the reason the world has always been separated and self-segregated by race is due to the fact that the races are inherently and naturally different. And those differences become amplified when larger groups of different races try to occupy that same land/country peacefully.
That doesn't mean you need a country that has only one pure race, but you need a country to have a overwhelmingly dominate majority of the same race to sustain and prosper. And any minority living within that country needs to adhere, accept, admire, appreciate, etc. the language, customs, norms, culture, history, etc. of the majority.
Multiculturalism/multiracialism leads to division and conflict and will eventually fail.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@antifactoid . . . the Indigenous people of North America were replaced by white immigrants and settlers from Europe, so what?
The races are just naturally different, and those differences become amplified when larger groups of different races try to occupy the same land peacefully. It doesn't mean that one race is better than the other and it doesn't mean you have to strive to have a pure one race society, but any society that has to sustain and prosper needs a dominate/majority of one race where any minority living within that society adheres, admires, accepts, appreciates, etc. the majority's customs, language, history, norms, culture, etc. And that minority must stay a minority.
The world has always self-segregated for a reason. Even today our cities, neighborhoods, churches, organizations, etc. self-segregate. Even college lunch rooms to this day self-segregate by race. Race and culture are inseparable and multiculturalism/multiracialism brings division and conflict.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@sevenmoore9208 . . . thank you.
I've never seen a group of people whine and complain so much as black people. What do you want from white people? Can we just separate already? I actually support reparations as long as it comes with separation. I see little benefit of white people living with black people. The races are just too different. This small "incident" proves that. We see this "incident" differently just like we see the world differently. Our behaviors are different. Our intelligence is different. We differ in impulse control, planning, organization, athleticism, aggression, sexuality, etc. Good and bad with all races but different between all races in general. White people tend to have very nice societies but also wage pointless wars and kill each other on mass scales where as black people tend to be more violent on smaller scales but less in larger conflicts. White people tend to be a little too uptight, but the benefit of that is we have very organized societies (that we'll eventually blow up LOL). Black people tend to be more down to earth.
Keep this in mind also. Most white people did not own slaves and did not participate in colonialism (Polish, German, Hungarian, Irish, etc.) that was the English, French, Spanish, Portugese, etc.). And many "Hispanics" have Spanish ancestry but for some reason they get a pass on their ancestral ties to slavery and colonialism. I just thought I'd throw that in there.
Also, take a look at FBI statistics to see who the violent people are. If there is any group that should be upset it should be Asians as they are the victims much more than the perpetrators. Black people commit a much higher % of violence than any other race.
Even Barrack Obama has been quoted/paraphrasing that it still remains to be seen if a large multiracial society will be successful.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@derricklanders1921 . . .shut up do nothing know it all. Even engineers are clueless nerds. I worked with them in Auto Mfg. and most of them were idiots that wanted to spend $10,000 for a $10 fix. Engineers are also very narrow minded and suffer from tunnel vision. I "earned" my degree almost 3 decades ago (2 majors and a minor) and realized back then much of what we were learning was watered down and useless. I can't imagine how bad it is now along with all the Left wing indoctrination that is taking place.
Most careers, even white collar, can be learned on the job. Most of what students think they might have learned in college is forgotten by the time next semester rolls around. Most students just study in order to get a good grade on the upcoming exam and retain a fraction of the subject matter. And usually what they retain is now common knowledge that could be learned in a few classes while working in that field. College has no way to determine supply and demand within the market for any particular job/field. Hence the reason why 70%, or whatever % it is, find employment outside their major. Most professors have no clue on the real world in regards to employment and career because they're insulated in a bubble of tenure, unions, seniority, etc. Most don't work in the real world at real jobs. I can go on and on about how terrible of a deal college is for most kids. . . I've been talking about it for over 15 years.
Also, many skilled trades make much more than white collar employees. Heck, I have friends that work plumbing, HVAC, electricians, lineman, etc. that make more than my boss. I know plenty that make well into the 6 figures. You really need to get a clue and be a little less narrow minded.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Find a job. Quit or get fired. Find another job. Quit or get fired. Eventually you learn why you either quit or got fired and find your niche of what you enjoy or are good at or both. Then you take the base knowledge that you learned up until about age 15 (sophomore year in high school as the last 2 years are basically worthless pre college prep) and expand upon your knowledge in that field from there on.
Most careers, even white collar careers, can be learned on the job. Most people learn by doing things. Also, most things people learn from a book or lecture will not be retained unless they are physically doing that job/activity. And those that can learn from a book/lecture many times are not good at doing things. Those are the ones that should strive to further their education and push the boundaries and theories in that field. Why does every student need to learn the history and why and how of when X was theorized, created, invented, etc. when they will learn that within 30 minutes of working in that field. If a knew innovative technique in dentistry, farming, medical, etc. was created/inventive why does the student need to learn when, how, why, etc it happened when it will eventually be communicated to them as common knowledge in that field.
College is doing a lot of damage to most students right now.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@thedude5740 . . . agreed. But genetics plays more of a role than environment. I'm not arguing that environment has no effect on people. It can have a drastic effect. But it still doesn't change in any significant way the characteristics that evolved as a whole within the group. Again, bell curves explain this and so many other aspects of life. You can also just look around and see the real life results of these differences. I do compare black culture with certain sports just as I compare white culture with certain sports. It's foolish to think our physical attributes don't play a role in our culture. If a particular group is better at performing a particular sport, activity, etc. then a culture develops around it. And I know you will take this the wrong way, but white people are probably the most well rounded of all races. . .good and bad characteristics. They have athletes in almost every sport. Even those stupid X Game sports. I think the well roundedness of white people leads to that argument from "people of color" saying that white people tend to appropriate things that other cultures/races developed. There are many very passive white people and then there are a lot of white people that do crazy white people sheit.
What about swimming? Black people have higher muscle/bone mass and density than other races. Making them good at sports that have sprinting, jumping, etc. Not swimming. And not hockey either. Hockey is for skinny/fat lanky white kids. They might look like they're good athletes, but they're not. Hockey/skating makes a non athlete to average athlete look good. The motion of skating where you chop and push from the inside out and back while leaning over creates a very tight core and hips. If you are a real athlete with muscular legs, hips, buttocks, etc. hockey will tighten them up too much and that athlete will become more muscle bound and lose flexibility. That's why hockey players waddle when they run. Go to any hockey rink and watch a few games and if you can see some of those good players come off the ice without their equipment. . . many of them are dweeby skinny/fat kids. I hate hockey and dislike hockey people. Anyway, you're probably like. . "that came out of nowhere".
I agree with your last few comments. And actually, I think we agree on a lot of things. I'm just arguing that evolution happened more than skin deep. And I'm arguing that a large multiracial society will fail.
A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. Too much diversity brings division and conflict.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@JeffMcDuffie72MeridianGate . . . culture and race are inseparable. Culture is downstream from race and politics is downstream from culture.
The different races are just that. . . different. As the OP said up above is that wealth can sometimes mute those differences. The more wealthy people become the less they notice race within the group they associate with. And the lower you get on the socioeconomic ladder the more "racism" you'll encounter. I rarely look at it as racism and more of tribalism in varying degrees between individuals within that race. Some white people are more tribal than others while some black people are more tribal than others. Men tend to be more tribal than women. But those small differences become amplified when larger groups are involved. Go to any College lunch room even today and the students tend to self-segregate by race.
People fool themselves into thinking just because they have a few friends of different races that it can then be applied to larger groups. Usually individual friends of different races have enough in common where any differences are overlooked by manners or just an individual having different tastes. But those little differences become exacerbated when larger groups of different races interact. The group dynamic will trump the individual trait. There are also some individuals that can bridge the natural racial divide. C. 0wen$ and La-ry EIder come to mind. There's a few derogatory names that their own tribe call them. That alone tells you something.
This isn't a statement or question on one race being better than another. It's just an honest acknowledgement of the races being different.
A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. Too much diversity leads to division and conflict.
In order for a nation to prosper you need a dominate super-majority of one ethnicity/race where any minority living within that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the customs, norms, traditions, language, culture, laws, history, etc. of the majority. But that minority must stay a minority. And the majority welcomes that minority as they feel proud and flattered that a different ethnic/racial group would adopt their culture and country as their own. But as the minorities population #'s increase to a certain point (I have no idea at what % that would be but I'm assuming 10% to 20% minority) that feeling of welcoming and flattery turns to concern, displacement, and resentment. I'm sure the Native Indigenous Tribes of the Americas were curious and flattered at first when the white man set foot on North America. But at some point as the white man's #'s increased they became concerned.
If multiracialism within countries were the norm then why do so many "countries of color" have strict immigration and citizenship laws designed to keep their ethnic/racial majorities the same. Such as "your grandparents had to be a citizen within such and such country for 10 years".
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
@Alt Voices Portal . . .more and more people understand this. The movement is gaining momentum. But the opposite should not be a goal of "we can all get along" as a multiracial society.
The races are just naturally different and those differences become amplified when you have larger groups of different races trying to live peacefully in the same country. And that also doesn't mean we need to strive for a pure one race society. But in order for a society to sustain and prosper, you need a dominate/majority race where any minority living in that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the customs, norms, language, history, culture, religion, etc of that majority. And that minority must stay a minority.
Almost every non-white country already has immigration/citizenship laws are directly and indirectly structured to keep the majority ethnicity/race the same.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
DIVERSITY IS NOT A STRENGTH.
A successful and prosperous nation needs a dominate supermajority of one race with any minority living in that country to adhere, accept, appreciate, admire, etc. the customs, norms, traditions, culture, language, history, laws, etc. of the majority. And that minority must stay a minority. All other non-white countries instinctively know this. Which is why they structure their immigration/citizenship laws designed to keep their ethnic/racial majorities the same. A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. Too much diversity brings division and conflit.
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's not ignorance. . .it's tribalism. Tribalism is natural in many instances.
A multiracial/multicultural society is doomed to fail. The different races are just that. . . different. And larger groups of different races that try to live peacefully together in the same land/country will eventually find themselves at odds culturally with one another which brings division and conflict. That doesn't mean you have to strive to have a pure one race society, but you need a majority/dominate culture of the same race where any minority freely and willingly living in that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the norms, customs, language, traditions, culture, history, laws, etc. of the majority.
Call me a racist but that's the truth.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ICXCNIKA.777 . . .you're pretty ignorant. There's a ton of difference between a Bolshevik Communist and a National Socialist. I used to think the same thing. But as I researched the Russian Revolution, WWI, Treaty of Versailles thru to WWII it became clear to me that the Bolshevik Communists were globalists that wanted a world wide Communist Revolution. Whereas the National Socialists and Hitler were partially a reaction to fend of their dilution of their ethnic identity and national heritage.
And many National Socialists of those times considered Communism a Jewish system of government; Jewish Bolshevism. And if you look up the history of Jews and Communism many Jews are quite proud of their Jewish involvement in Communist Revolutions/Movements.
Germany did not start WWI and basically lost a stalemate war on paper only (stabbed in the back theory); Balfour Declaration. Germany had to pay war reparations, lost lands, and had many other sanctions imposed upon it. Then shortly after WWI, there was a communist coup attempt by the Spartacists to overthrow the German government. It's estimated that a few thousand people lost their lives. Then Germany went thru Hyper-inflation due to the sanctions, war reparations, and monetary policy/banking, etc. Their currency became worthless and their economy was in shambles. All the while they had to fend off Communist agitators causing problems in Germany/Europe.
General Patton came to believe that we defeated the wrong enemy and knew the press in the United States (New York Times) was disingenuous.
McCarthy tried to warn us that Soviet Spies and Communists had infiltrated our Government, Media, Universities, Hollywood, Legal, etc. in order to subvert our nation.
Shortly after WWII the United Nations help create Israel; a religious ethnic nation; see Balfour Declaration.
Watch a short fable called "The Fable of the Ducks and the Hens".
That's enough for now. Time for you to educate yourself.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@bakhembrutalknowledge . . . to be honest, I want to see black people succeed. I want to see all people succeed. I just don't think it can happen in a large multiracial society with everyone claiming things are fair and just. Tribalism will set in and any perception of being slighted will diminish the faith in that system. Different races will structure their systems differently from one another and the system will be set-up to reflect more of the majorities innate characteristics. I think you need a supermajority of one race for a country to succeed and prosper; 80% +. And any minority willingly living in that country must adhere, accept, adopt, appreciate, admire, etc. the customs, norms, culture, traditions, language, laws, etc. of the majority. I think when people look at it that way they can understand the "chip" on black Americans shoulder due to their ancestors not willingly coming to the United States but being brought her in chains on slave ships.
Does that make sense?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@swaythegod5812 . . .agreed. Race realism is the acceptance that different races are just that. . .different. And those differences become exacerbated when larger groups of different races try to occupy the same land peacefully. Funny thing is, is that a white nationalist has more in common with a black nationalist as they both understand tribalism is what keeps large racial groups divided.
Also, it doesn't mean that one group is better than another, it just means they are different and that most people from a particular group prefer to associate with others from the same group. And it doesn't mean you have to strive to have a pure one race society. But in order for that society to sustain and flourish you need a dominate/majority of the same race where any minority living in that country needs to accept, adhere, appreciate, admire the culture, history, customs, norms, language, etc. of the majority.
Once people accept and realize this fact each group will better identify issues and problems within their own culture and relations with other cultures will improve because now they respect each other in knowing that they realize they are different.
And it's "you're" (you are) not your. Don't want to be the grammar police but wanted to help in your future posts.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@fablewalls . . . that study/paper can be found in the "blame whitey" section of any University these days. Funny how there's no genome to be found until it's time to blame the white man.
When is China going to ever apologize for the bombing of Pearl Harbor? After all. . . they're Asians too.
So why does an Irish, Polish, German, Hungarian, Swedish, etc. American feel any guilt or obligation over slavery or displacement of the indigenous tribes of the Americas? You do realize that the English, French, and Spanish are the people that colonized the America's right? Most white Europeans were immigrants that came to the United States after it was a nation founded and the indigenous tribes of the America's were already displaced. Most white European immigrants came to this land after slavery. And in fact, many of those immigrants and their direct descendants took up arms against their own family members in Europe during WWI & WWII. But I guess that was just another example of our imperialism and systemic racism right?
And why are current Indian, Asian, Arab, African, etc. immigrants treated differently than those white immigrants that did not partake in slavery or the displacement of North America's indigenous populations? Why do those immigrants get the benefit of "minority" status when in actuality they come from a larger global population than white people?
And when is AOC and other Hispanics with Spanish ancestry going to be held accountable for their ancestors colonizing/slavery ways?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@teresacastro1263 . . . . and here we are discussing Genocide while the Olympics are taking place in China in which they are currently committing genocidal acts against the Uyghurs and the Left has absolutely no problem with it. Or wait. . .are you talking about white people and how they are being systematically demonized in a country where they are the majority. White privilege, white characteristics, "Everything's going to be All White" show, white guilt, references to the white devil, diversity initiatives that openly and legally discriminate against white people, etc. etc. etc. even though many white people's ancestors never colonized any other lands or participated in the Atlantic Slave Trade such as white Polish, Hungarian, Swedish, Irish, etc.
Have you heard of the Holodomor? If you have, why isn't it just as well known as the Holocaust? When are Communists going to be held accountable for their crimes against humanity? Tell me when? When is Communism and those supporting Communism going to be shunned by society?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@bevitossf2434 . . .so when are Hispanics going to be called out on their ties to slavery, colonialism, etc.? Where are demands for reparations from Hispanics? Where are the demands for ACO and other Spanish "Hispanics" to go back to Spain?
And why don't we blame the Chinese for bombing Pearl Harbor? They're also Asian too? And yet White Americans that are Polish, Hungarian, Swedish, Irish, etc are being asked to pay reparations, white privilege, systemic racism, colonialism, etc. when they came here after Slavery and after North America was already colonized. And in fact, many of those white immigrants from Poland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Sweden, etc. came to the USA legally, worked their aXXXXes off, went to war against their own family members during WWI & WWII, passed Civil Rights Laws, etc etc etc. to only be demonized not only by black people but by other "people of color" that never suffered the same tragedy that Black Slaves suffered nor the Indigenous tribes of the Americas. I'm quite surprised there are not more white people extremely angry at what has been done to them in regards to making them hate themselves.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
@AntiTMG . . . agreed. The different races tend to self-segregate with a few % of that group that can bridge the racial divide. The problem is, is when those that think just because they have a small % of friends from another race that it can apply to the larger group. It can't. The larger groups dynamic trumps the individual trait.
Plus you need a supermajority of one race that is the main population of a country with any minority willingly living in that country to adhere, accept, appreciate, admire, etc. that country's norms, traditions, culture, mores, language, history, laws, etc.
Now that the US is a large multiracial nation it will collapse. You see it happening right before our eyes.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Exactly. That's what I've been saying for years. You need a dominate/majority race in a country where any minority living in that country adheres, accepts, adopts, appreciates, admires, etc. the norms, customs, language, history, traditions, culture, laws, etc of that majority. And that minority must stay a minority.
The different races are just that. . .different. It doesn't mean that one is better than the other. They're just different. And larger groups of different races living in the same country will eventually lead to division and conflict.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MrMusashiMusashi . . . and I pointed out that the United States is over 250 years old. So is the amount of years a Capitalist society will turn into 9 guys owning everything 450 years? So actually, it wasn't a good start nor rebuttal by you.
Wealth is shifting towards fewer and fewer people, but the overall pie is getting bigger and many peoples standard of living is increasing. The problem with this wealth shift that is happening now is that much of it is by Leftists and their influence on our government and policies. They are already bringing in Socialism. It's going to be here within a generation. And it will fail again just like all other attempts because Socialism is for losers.
In a Capitalist society, most poor people are poor by their own bad decisions. I've seen it my entire life. I've grown up in a middle class blue collar neighborhood. And those people are partially why I'm a right wing Conservative today. . .among other things.
Just because kids born into wealth does not mean they are happy. It depends on how the parents raised them and how the kid is personally. Sure they get doors opened for them. But that's not necessarily a good thing. Actually, it many times can be a bad thing because it diminishes the qualities that create good character. Eventually that bloodline will be filled with incompetent losers that end up pissing away all the money their ancestors created. Just take a look at the Stroh's family for a good example.
Why do you blame all those issues on Capitalism? I blame them more on cultural issues which is why I'm not a pure Libertarian. I'm actually more like a libertarian tribalist which is more in line with human nature. But I guess Socialism will solve all those problems like they did in USSR, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela, etc.
So Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffet, George Soros, etc etc etc. The good millionaires and billionaires are usually Right Wing Conservatives.
OK. . here we go. . . your excuses as to how Socialism failed "again" and how the United States is good due to "Socialist" policies. Any Socialist aspects of the United States are actually a bad thing in the long run and are making things worse. Why not just let people voluntarily choose if they want to contribute to Social Security? Because if they were to let that happen everyone would opt out. If you want to own Amazon go buy some Amazon stock moron. And if you don't like working for Amazon go find another job or get a skilled trade and start your own business. Or you could go to college and become an indoctrinated Leftist lemming.
Socialism hasn't just tried. . . it's destroyed countries fool. And useful idiots still find some type of value in a system that has been shown to be seriously flawed. But I guess that's what you get from people that fall lower on the natural hierarchy. Just a bunch of jealous beta males still angry that people can't see how intelligent they are and how ignorant that successful jock is.
Don't fret it bud. . .your guys have control now. Within a decade or so we're gonna try this Socialism thingy all over and when it fails again fools like you will still claim that "it wasn't real Communism" or you just "had the wrong people running things".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@JerehmiaBoaz . . .I don't see Japanese wringing their hands over racism. I don't see the Chinese worrying about racial quotas. I don't think Nigeria cares too much about whether or not their society is diverse enough. I don't think Pakistan is promoting more Chinese Pakistanis. The only group of people I see worrying about "diversity" is white people who are pretty close to being a minority when you look at it globally.
Nobody is forcing preferences. Those social norms, customs, traditions, etc. are the natural results of the majorities characteristics. Who am I to say Nigeria should conform to what I think is proper and just as a white male. Should white people then go about around the world to also request universal standards of human behavior, norms, hiring, etc be administered and adhered to? Or is that only what white societies should do?
What is wrong with voluntary segregation, absolute freedom of association, and discrimination? I think more "ethnic" minorities have a better life and standard of living in the United States than their country of origin. But still they seem to cry racism and want to change our system that was much better than what they left into a system that was similar to the one they left. The people make a country not the land. The different races are just that. . .different. And those different races will structure their societies differently. A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. Too much diversity brings division and conflict.
If the United States is systemically racist, then why are so many NBA, NFL, 100 Meter athletes black? Does evolution only work from the neck down?
White people build nice societies because we are more well rounded "in general" than most other races. . .good and bad characteristics. We've waged extremely violent and bloody wars and created beautiful peaceful neighborhoods. Anyway, gotta go.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@willmdmv8848 . . . that's awesome. One of the few black Libertarians. I'm actually a white German/Hungarian Conservative/Libertarian whose ancestors never owned slaves and never colonized any land in the America's. Those were the English, Spanish, and French. And yet somehow ALL white people are getting demonized even though most white Americans have no ancestry tied to slavery or colonialism. That's sort of like blaming a Chinese American for the bombing of Pearl Harbor just because they're also Asian. And on the other hand many "Hispanics" do have Spanish ancestry and yet they get a pass on their ancestral ties to colonialism and slavery. So why are white Americans that descended from Irish, German, Hungarian, Swedish, Polish, etc. saddled with white guilt and blamed for everything? Why aren't those Americans treated the same as an immigrant from India, Middle East, Asia, etc.? And many of those white immigrants, after soon arriving in the United States, went off to fight wars against their own family members. Heck, they went to fight the supposedly biggest racist of them all and now they find themselves being called racist themselves. Go figure. And then those racist whites opened up the door to "people of color" from all over the world. How dare they!
But what's the point of the 2nd Amendment and when should it be used? So you stand for someone's right to buy one? Really? That's pretty brave. What about when it comes time to use one? When do we know when that time is?
I also believe in reparations for descendants of slaves, but don't believe in a multiracial society. I also don't believe you can strive for a pure one race society either, but in order to have a society sustain and prosper, you need a dominate/majority one race where any "minority" living among the majority in that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the norms, traditions, customs, language, history, laws, etc. of that country. That opportunity was blown when we passed the 1965 Immigration Act along with article/section 2 & 7 of the '64 Civil Rights Act. Now everyone other than a white male is a minority with special rights. That distinction was originally meant for black people to atone for the injustices of slavery.
Anyway, these subjects are much longer than youtube comments section. Take care. Keep promoting Libertarian principles, but realize that it might be a fruitless cause.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@governmentsnizzinspector2305 . . . what's funny and/or ironic, is that as I've come to be more honest about race and how a multiracial society is doomed to fail I've also "think" I've obtained greater empathy as to why many black people have resentment towards the United States. They had no choice in coming here. And when you're a slave and then discriminated against you can't help but feel resentment. Add on top of that a dominate (not dominate as in better but majority) white culture where many black people naturally will never identify with one can't help but start to understand their deep resentment. I'm actually a supporter of reparations for descendants of slaves. But reparations needs to come with many conditions such as repealing many welfare laws, eliminating Article 2 & 7 of the '64 Civil Rights Act, absolute freedom of association, land sectioned out for separation if desired. I'm not 100% sure on all the details and outlines. I'm not one of those fake white people that claim they love diversity and yet all their friends are white and they live in an upper class white suburb.
Please also remember that many white peoples ancestors never owned slaves or colonized the Americas. White Polish, Irish, Hungarian, German, Italian, etc. did not participate in those things. It was the English, Spanish, and French mostly. And when are "Hispanics" with Spanish Ancestry going to be held accountable for Colonization and Slavery?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
White people build nice societies because we are the most well rounded of all the races. We have all the pieces of the puzzle. We have lawyers, doctors, electricians, contractors, plumbers, janitors, accountants, athletes in all sports, entertainers, visionaries, etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@papasmurf555 . . .not a bigot at all. Just came to the conclusion that a multiracial/multicultural society is doomed to fail. Actually, I sort of think it was done on purpose with the radical 1960's and the 1965 Immigration Act, but that a much longer conversation that stems from earlier politics.
I also don't believe in the pursuit of a pure one race society. But you need to have a dominate/majority of one race/culture where any minority living within that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the customs, norms, traditions, language, culture, history, laws, etc. of the majority. And that minority must stay a minority. Larger groups of different races trying to live peacefully in the same area, land, country, etc. will eventually be at odds with one another and only will result in division and conflict.
China has almost 1.5 Billion people. If 300,000 million Chinese were to emigrate to Nigeria, would Nigeria be Nigerian? NO. Of course not. And Nigeria would not let that happen. Now it's up to you to figure out why mostly/only white countries have been duped into this mass immigration into their countries.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dee5298 . . . But people don't have the right to live the way they want. They don't have absolute freedom of associate or freedom to discriminate. That right then dictates the people that will come here and the culture that will take shape. This is partially why our country is changing dramatically right before our eyes. Most of these newer "immigrants of color" do not see the world the same way white people do. Most do not care about our history, culture, traditions, etc. Some do, but most don't. A white Polish, Hungarian, Italian, etc. American cherishes our history, good or bad, and all the customs, language, traditions, etc. even though many of those white immigrants came to this country during the 20th century. . .after slavery and colonialism. They don't go around spouting white privilege, systemic racism, inherent bias, etc. or referring to themselves as a minority or "person of color". Why is that? If culture and race are not linked then why did white immigrants from the late 1800s and early 1900s assimilate just fine?
I don't see where "people of color" in large enough numbers will accept our Constitution that was created and founded by white Westerners. I believe those that pushed for the 1965 Immigration Act and all the other "unconstitutional acts" of the 1960s knew different immigrants of color would change not only the demographics but also the politics.
Why wouldn't they owe you a voice when their people are coming to this country then? It should be a two way street. Open borders for everyone. If Somalia doesn't let in all immigrants than why should we let in Somalians? We have no obligation to the rest of the world. . .especially now that we're living in a Post Constitutional era.
What if immigration does not have pure intentions from the country of origin? Yeah. . . they're not stealing your money. . . no. . . many are just burdening our unconstitutional social services and voting in more Democrats that will eventually bring us full blown Socialism. This is the problem with pure Libertarians. You're so open minded your brains have fallen out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Is Bob Menendez a Hispanic? What is a Hispanic?
Does Bob Menendez have Spanish Ancestry? He sure looks like he has some Spanish ancestry.
People with Spanish Ancestry need to be held accountable for their ancestors colonial past. The Spanish Conquistadors were probably the worse colonizers to walk the earth, and yet they never get called out on it. And yet many white people, such as Polish, Irish, Hungarian, etc. never owned slaves, never participated in the Atlantic Slave Trade, never displaced the Native Tribes of the Americas, and came here legally in the late 1800s/early 1900s and went to war for this country, but they get blamed for systemic racism, white privilege, etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@DG-nk7jo . .you obviously only know the version of WWII from the victors perspective. What is a Nazi by the way? They never referred to themselves as that. Hitler wanted Lebensraum. . .more land for the Germanic people of Europe. England and France did not like that. They were the big boys that were colonizing the globe. They didn't want any competition from another European power. England especially liked to have the mainland European powers always divided. Germany also had to deal with the threat of France from the West and Russia from the East; Franco-Russian Pact. Hitler never wanted global domination. If you can cite the source of where he stated that please let me know.
But I guess taking sides with two very powerful Imperialist nations with colonies around the globe that subjugated the indigenous peoples of those areas was just fine and dandy. And also pairing up with a Communist dictatorship that had ambitions to spread Communism throughout Europe and the rest of the world was just fine and dandy too. And by the 1930's it was well know of all the murder, gulags, imprisonment, starvation, etc. that was happening in the Soviet Union. (Side note. . . the increasing influence of Communism was in part what gave rise to Hitler. Which is also why Germany became ultra nationalistic as Communism seems to be more anti-nationalism and more global).
And what part did the Treaty of Versailles play in the rise of Hitler? After all, Germany was punished for a war you could argue they did not start and severely punished for a war one could argue they only lost on paper. Germany was forced to cede lands to other nations, pay war reparations, and had many other sanctions imposed on them. On top of that, they had to fend off a Communist coup shortly after WWI by Spartacists. Their economy eventually collapsed and their currency suffered from hyper-inflation.
Also, many historians blame WWII on the Treaty of Versailles. So do the people/countries that drafted and signed the Treaty of Versailles also share some responsibilities for WWII?
Anyway, you really need to learn the other perspective of WWI and WWII.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dimitrikemitsky . . . wrong. This is just a snippet from a Left wing publication.
The storybook version is, from roughly late 1861 onward, Lincoln was involved in some very serious policy discussions about what the post-slavery United States would look like, and one of his solutions that he offered, drawing on something that had long been a part of his political advocacy, was to colonize the slaves abroad. Historically, the most famous example of this is Liberia, which was founded in 1816 and over the course of the next 50 or 60 years, several thousand former slaves migrated to Liberia and colonized it.
Lincoln liked this model, but wanted to expand upon it, and he was willing to look in Central and South America, and across the Caribbean. He pursued this policy for the better part of his presidency, secured funding from Congress in 1862, and carried it out in conjunction with the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elevenseven-yq4vu . . . true. But that doesn't refute the fact that hierarchies are natural and that certain behaviors, customs, cultural norms, etc. derive naturally. Most, if not all, cultures believe in God, have rituals for those that have died, do certain things to attract a mate, marriage, war, etc.
But let's say you're right and almost all of culture, customs, norms, etc. are just social constructs. Who then determines the appropriate and just social construct? I'm sure you arrogant snobby Lefties have all the answers. Too bad that's been tried before and 10 of millions of corpses lie at the feet of that ideology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bigcauc7530 . . . racism is a made up term to demonize white people. Almost all other non-white people have groups that advocate on their behalf. Almost all other non-white countries have immigration and citizenship policies to keep their ethnic/racial majority the same. It has been mostly only white countries that were duped into letting all these other non-white people come to their countries only to be accused of systemic racism, implicit bias, white privilege, DEI, affirmative action, white guilt, etc. Even white people that had nothing to do with Colonialism or Slavery such as White Polish Americans (hint. . . black Africans, Arabs, Spanish Hispanics, etc. were all involved in slavery/colonialism).
The exception is that descendants of black slaves did deserve special treatment as they did not come here willingly but as slaves. Same with American Indians. So why do Arabs, Somalians, Indians (India), Asians, etc. get any type of "minority status" or DEI benefit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bigcauc7530 . . .skating around? I literally just told you I'm a race reaIist if you know what that is. I'm a whi-te advocate just like any other non-white person has the benefit to advocate for their ethnicity/race (even though white people can't do that without being called racist as you have done). Funny thing is, is that I have more "friends of color" than most of my whyte Iiberal friends.
I misspell words so my comments don't get deleted and so people can read them. Here's the gist of what I believe. I believe the different races evolved very differently from one another and that they in general have very distinct differing characteristics (Bell Curve) such as temperament, athleticism, IQ, Aggression/Passivity, Risk Aversion/Taking, Planning and Organization, Gratification Delay, etc.
I don't believe a large multiracial society will work and that it will only create more division and conflict. Most other non-white countries instinctively know this which is why they structure their immigration/citizenship policies to keep their ethnic/racial majority the same.
I do think a little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. You need a supermajority of one race with any minority living in that country to adhere, accept, appreciate, admire, etc. the norms, customs, language, culture, history, traditions, laws, etc. of the majority. But people fool themselves into thinking that just because they have an individual relationship with a person from another race that that relationship can be ascribed to group relationships. But we all know when larger groups become involved that the group dynamic changes and those larger interactions trump the individual relationships. People fool themselves into thinking diversity can work because at first a few people of a different race/culture is flattering to the majority because a small group of different people willingly opened up to experience the dominate groups culture. But that feeling quickly disappears when you get too much diversity. That attitude happens at all levels of society; neighborhoods, sports teams, high schools, etc. But ethnicity/race is what binds entire countries together. So diversity in large scale will not work at that level in the long term.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@phill7507 . . . maybe your situation is a little unique in that you were in the military. I'm just wondering though, even if you keep in touch with your friends from the military, did you and those friends find yourselves as you got older associating more and more with members of your own race? That seems to be common as people age.
Also, there is a certain % of people that can bridge the racial divide, but most can't. And differences in individual traits can be overlooked by common courtesy, manners, more in common than less, same interests, upbringing, etc. But that changes when larger groups come into play. We've all seen it. A "friend of color" that seems to change ever so slightly when they are around larger groups of people from their "tribe". Some do it out of courtesy to their own tribe, and others do it because that is who they are and they truly feel more comfortable around others of their own race. The Group Identity eventually trumps the traits of the individual.
I consider Candace Owens a person that has no problem being around white people as her own qualities and characteristics seem to be aligned more with white people. If you listen to what many black people tell you, you'll hear them admit they are different. "Capitalism is a white persons system" , and many other examples. Did you ever think that maybe they're right or telling the truth? Hence the reason why black Conservatives can more easily associate with white people. The don't seem to have a chip on their shoulder. I have a Mexican friend (I guess we call them Hispanics now) from high school. He almost exclusively hung out with white friends. And we had a decent % of Mexicans in our school. We all got along, but most of the Mexicans tended to be more social and friends with other Mexicans. Except our one Mexican friend. He almost strictly hung out with his white friends. He was in the military also for 20+ years. Just moved into my neighborhood about 5 years ago after retiring from the military. Saw him last night actually. Trying to plan a golf/fishing getaway weekend with our friends.
First you need to figure out who "the media" is and all the problems some of them seem to cause. Plus, if there were no inherent differences and race was truly just a color, the media wouldn't try to divide us by race. But they know race is a big factor in a persons identity so they can divide us. But beyond that, the world has always tended to self-segregate by race and ethnicity. Our cities self-segregate, neighborhoods, churches, etc. Even in many large European cities they have distinct racial neighborhoods. Please name a multiracial society that has successfully integrated for any extended period of time? Some say the Roman Empire was a good example, but in reality the Roman Empire was an Empire of many distinct nations. You can read up on that if you want.
Also, if a multiracial society can work and is so great, why is it that no "countries of color" seem to partake in this experiment? If you look at the citizenship and immigration laws of other countries of color, you'll find that many of their laws directly and indirectly are structured to keep their racial majority the same. Such as, "you can become a citizen of X country if your grandparents are from X country and that they have lived there for 10 or more years". If diversity and multiculturalism is so great why aren't so many other countries of color participating.
Think about this. If diversity is a strength, why hasn't it just happened naturally. Why are we still arguing about race? It seems that if we value diversity, we wouldn't be pushing to have all these different races live/mix together as it will lead to less diversity.
Gotta go.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This started back in the 1920's/30's when disillusioned Marxists formed the Frankfurt School in Germany after Communism failed to sweep Europe during WWI. Traditional Marxists believed that WWI would bring about a global movement to Communism and that the working class would rise up against their imperialist/capitalist/bourgeoises. When that didn't happen they reasoned that it was due to the social construct of the West. . .such as being homogeneous - white, Christian, patriarchy, etc. So they set out to bring about Cultural Marxism to get people in the West to hate their own country and everything it stands for; Cultural Marxism. Demonize their history, mass immigration to create racial division, removal of religion, etc.
McCarthy tried to warn us. They attacked him but not what he was warning us about.
General Patton came to believe we defeated the wrong enemy.
Yuri Brezhnev - ideological subversion
WWII might not be the great victory we've been led t4o believe
Take the Red Pill and go down the rabbit hole. Much of this information can be found on youtube and the internet, but unfortunately they taken down many of these articles, videos, books, etc. discussing what has taken place.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joem8496 . . .not confusing anything. Race and culture are inseparable. Have you ever heard black people tell other black people to "stop acting white". That's because they themselves also see that they are different from white people "in general".
All the different races have different characteristics not only physically but also mentally, physiologically, psychologically, temperament, impulse control, risk aversion/taking, gratification delay, aggression, passivity, organizational/planning, etc. All you have to do is open your eyes and look around. Take a look and see how the world is structured and realize it's been tribal the entire time. Even Barrack Obama has made comments in regards to whether or not a large multiracial society will be successful.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrWolfheart111 . . . not everyone does want to move here. But you are right that it seems that more people want to move here than other countries. But then why doesn't everyone want to move to Nigeria, Pakistan, Mexico, Somalia, India, Brazil, etc. or most other non-white countries? Is it because many of those countries, and most countries, have immigration and citizenship laws that are structured to keep their ethnic/racial majority the same? Yes. . . which only adds to my argument that most people and countries self-segregate.
The United States, and many other white nations, are fairly wealthy and provide many social/welfare benefits which attracts people to move here. And maybe it's also because white people build nice societies because they tend to be more well rounded and have a larger spectrum of characteristics, good and bad, than most other races. But those broad range of characteristics is what helps build nice countries. Seems like a lot of doctors are Indian and yet their home country of India is relatively poor. Maybe they need more skilled trades and other professions that maybe they are not naturally suited for? Maybe free market capitalism is more of a system for white Westerners? Maybe West Africans evolved to be better sprinters and athletes? Does evolution only work from the neck down?
Anyway, the proof is all around you. They knew this over 100 years ago. It was basically common knowledge that different races of people are actually different. Heck, there are even differences between ethnicities. It doesn't mean you need to strive for a pure one race society. Actually, some diversity is probably good. But too much leads to division and conflict.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@esh9x153 . . . huh? or maybe it was the German's that were overrun by cultural Marxists during the 1920's and 1930's? And in response to the original wokeism was the rise of Hitler.
Germany did not start WWI. Germany only lost on paper (stabbed in the back theory) but was the only nation punished with war reparations, lost lands, and many other sanctions.
Shortly after WWI and attempted overthrow of the German Government was attempted by Spartacists (Communists). Communists were causing major problems within Germany throughout the 1920's and 1930's.
Communists thought WWI would spark a European/Global Communist revolution where the working class (proletariat) would overthrow their Imperialist Capitalist Rulers (bourgeoises). Instead the opposite happened. The working class happily went to war for their Imperialist rulers and were slaughtered by the millions. Disillusioned Marxists then went on to form the Frankfurt School where Critical Theory was taught. They basically believed that the reason the Western World did not accept Communism was due to homogeneous societies where they were white, Christian, patriarchal, capitalist, etc. They believed if they could tear down what they deemed as a "social construct" that they'd be able to replace it with a more just Marxist based system. Get the people to hate their own culture and country and you can destroy it from within. The Frankfurt School and Critical Theory spawned political correctness, intersectionality, identity politics, critical race theory, wokeism, etc. This started long before people realize. The long march thru the institutions. Hitler exiled these people from Germany. They were welcomed with open arms by the United States within our Universities, Government, Media/Hollywood, Legal, etc. And they repay us with ideological subversion. What you're seeing now are the rotten fruit of subversion from this insidious tree of Cultural Marxism.
Funny how we fought on behalf of two global imperialist nations (England and France) along with a Communist Dictatorship with ambitions for global communism (Soviet Union) along with another soon to be Global Communist power (China). England and France are no longer the global powers they used to be and Russia/China have been our biggest threats basically since WWII. And yet Germany and Japan are great allies and basically have been ever since WWII.
General Patton came to believe we defeated the wrong enemy. Maybe WWII isn't the great victory we've been led to believe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@theccpisaparasite8813 . . .I almost majored in Engineering. Mom got sick so I decided to major in Accounting because I believe at the time an Engineering degree would have taken another year in courses. I wish I would have majored in Teaching. Teachers in our state make almost 6 figures, great pension/benefits, retiree healthcare, summers off, same schedule as kids, etc. But I also think I would have done fairly well in skilled trades. Almost all my friends in skilled trades easily make 6 figures and that figure will increase the less and less skilled tradesman you have.
I worked in the Auto Mfg. sector for 17 years. Worked with a lot of engineers in regards to how their designs/processes affected productivity, efficiency, scrap, machine capabilities in processing the part, etc. Many engineers I came across were very narrow minded and many were just paper pushers. They also wanted to spend far too much money for simple fixes. An Engineer with good practical mechanical/technical/whatever insight are worth more than what they get paid. And again, I'm not saying you don't need a degree to become an Engineer. That is one of the degrees where you need some college education. But an Engineer, like almost all other professions, do not need about 1/3 of the classes they are forced to take such as women's studies, or many of the other humanities.
I don't think the Liberal Left came to the wrong conclusion. . .at least not the elites that really run things. I think they knew exactly what they were doing. It's about control and indoctrination. I believe much of this madness stems from the Frankfurt School and Critical Theory and all the insidious rotten fruit that it has created.
I think we would probably agree much more than disagree. I tend to come across a little bombastic as I think sometimes that gets a conversation going.
Have a good day.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sikkaMass . . .Good grief. The Blue State vs Red State argument. I've went down this road before. What about Blue Democrat South up until the 1990s? What about county by county? What about rural farm land and farm subsidies for low population areas that tend to be Conservative/Red? That makes "welfare" spending argument you guys use as though these people are getting food stamps. No they are getting subsidies that make food cheaper for inner cities. Same with Federal/Military spending in red states. Or how about those Conservatives that commute to bluer cities for work? How did the surrounding areas/counties of Washington DC become so rich? Maybe Federal Spending. Same with the areas of Ann Arbor with the Universities and Hospitals. It was only logical that as the Federal Government grew and spending increased that much of that funding would go to support the people/areas that support them. You must not be too smart to not have seen that coming decades ago. You need a license to do this or that etc. So go to government funded universities (after you've spend 12 - 13 years in public education) to get that license. This is partly why inflation and cost of living is skyrocketing. Most people don't need a 4 year degree to do most professions. And yes that includes most white collar professions. I "earned" my 4 year degree from a Prestigious College over 25 years ago and I knew back then the material, classes, subjects, etc. were watered down and 1/2 of the classes were a joke and unnecessary. Think about the inefficienties that brings to the economy from a macro economic standpoint. Anyway, that's a very long discussion and I'm flying thru typing this so excust any spelling/grammar errors.
Our country and founding was a Conservative/Libertarian founding. You guys on the Left can have the French Revolution or any other of the failed Left Wing Revolutions. Us Conservatives will take credit for the Right Wing American Revolution. Small limited government, balance of powers, federalism, 10th Amendment, enumerated powers, states rights, etc.
Classical Liberalism not modern day liberalism. Democrats didn't want to free the slaves as they have the mentality that everyone should be a slave to the state and them. Republicans did not believe any free individual should be a slave to anyone else. But Republicans, just like Democrats, did not believe freed slaves could live among white people for various reasons. Resentment, history, culture, completely different people mentally, physically, emotionally, all the innate characteristics, etc. Jefferson, and many of our founders, commented on this. President Lincoln had plans to repatriate them back to Africa or buy land in South America to send them to colonize down there. Yes, the different races are just that different. And they will structure their societies differently. I used to be a hard core Libertarian, but over the last 10 years I've come to realize pure Libertarianism leads to self-destruction such as believing in open borders. America's founding, the Constitution, and the ideals of it and Western Society are that of White Westerners. So a Libertarian invites their own demise by believing all the races are the same and can eventually come to the same conclusion on how to structure a society. It doesn't mean any race is superior than another. Actually, I could make the argument that Asians have many qualities that are superior to white people. But I'm not Asian and that's not my tribe. I wouldn't want to infringe on them too much. So to try to sum this up as I could type for hours. A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. Too much diversity brings division and conflict. Most "countries of color" instinctively know this which is why they structure their immigration and citizenship laws to keep their ethnic/racial majority the same. I'm fine with a little interracial mixing but not that much. And it's also being purposefully pushed by our culture. Look at any commercial these days and it's easy to see that it's on purpose. No other race would accept the propaganda that's being pushed on huwhyte people. Could you imagine the outcry if the majority of interracial commercials were a huwhyte man and woman of color. Screams from Liberals of "that's the oppressive white christian patricarchy". Interracial mixing will eventually lead to huwhyte genocide.
Anyway, sorry for the long rant and I might have jumped around but just trying to give you an idea of how I see things. Each one of these points I bring up could be expanded to a much longer conversation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ShubhamMishrabro . . . I'm still waiting for the endless movies and documentaries on the Holodomor. Jews are very influential in Hollyw00d, media, legal system, finance, etc. I just want to see more of them as plumbers and ditch diggers.
So Europe wasn't invaded by "people of color" long before the white man sailed the oceans looking to settle lands on other continents? Weren't they just innocent white immigrants looking for a better life too? Maybe it was those people of color in those lands that were the true Xenophobes.
How racist of you to assume most of the world is ran by white people. That's about as racist as me saying that most of our most influential and powerful institutions are ran by Jew$ right? And did I miss something in regards to all the negative things that have been said about white people for many years.. .such as we're a plague on this earth, or we are naturally racist and oppressive, etc etc etc. We are even demonized in our own countries.
Don't know of too many Polish or Hungarians that had colonies around the globe like England, France, and SPAIN. Those darn Spaniards. . . now they hide behind the term "Hispanic" to avoid the sins of their ancestors while a white Polish American has to listen to those old Polish Jokes while still being blamed for Slavery and Colonialism.
I don't condone killing anyone. But that doesn't mean I should refrain from making stereotypes that most likely are true. I'm rather ignorant in regards to Slavs, but I haven't heard too many redeeming qualities about Gypsies and it looks like the "I just want to be left alone and free to marry who I want" in regards to Homosexuality has now turned into Trans this, trans that, you must accept my lifestyle to you must practice my lifestyle etc. Makes me wonder as to why certain people were pushed in the cI0set to begin with.
Anyway, I'm sure youtube will delete this post or shadow ban it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What it Racism? Racism will never go away because it is natural. People are tribal by nature. The world has always self-segregated. The different races are just that. . .different. It's not just color. . . it's represents differences (IN GENERAL) from IQ, Height, Weight, Bone Structure, Temperament, Impulse Control, Risk Taking/Aversion, etc.
Larger groups of different races that live together in the same country, land, area, etc. tend to bring division and conflict. Individuals may be able to bridge cultural and racial differences, but the differences between larger groups of different races become amplified and that leads to division and conflict.
That doesn't mean you need to strive for a pure one race society. But in order to have a society that can sustain and prosper you need a dominate/majority of the same race/ethnicity where any minority living among that majority accept, adhere, appreciate, admire, etc. the language, customs, norms, culture, traditions, history, etc. of that country and the majority. And that minority must stay a minority. It's also not a question of superior vs. inferior, it's a question of just being different.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This may be long but people need to read this. This was what they planned for the West.
"Some decades before the first big feminist revolution, a German economist was sitting in a posh London library, furiously penning a book in which he swore up and down that one day, factory workers, abused and oppressed by their bosses for so long, would rise up, throw the bosses out, and take over the factories. He and his coworker died without ever getting to see their vision enacted. As World War I ignited and sent Europe up in flames, those who had read the pair’s work and become enchanted with its utopian vision watched with baited breath to see if the prophecy would be fulfilled. And fulfilled it was...in Russia. For the moment, it would go no further. Through the late teens and early 20s, Europe picked up the pieces, mopped up the blood, and with somewhat mixed results, tried to get on with their lives. There were no workers’ revolts. There were no poor people eating rich people. There was just plain work. To be sure, some of it was supervised by evil bosses, and some of it was done by children. But there were still factories, and those factories still had workers and bosses. What went wrong? Well, for one thing, the workers had just spent five years shooting and bombing each other. There were considerably fewer of them than there had been when Marx wrote Das Kapital. But there was a bigger problem. The few workers that were left just weren’t interested in socialism; especially those who didn’t work in factories. The jobs they had were not great, and frankly their bosses weren’t that great either—but they were surviving. In some cases they were even thriving. Many of them had grown up in poverty, and fought bitterly to escape it. Biting the hand the fed them did not seem like a great idea. Marx was quite nonchalantly disowned by the very demographic he had claimed to speak for. So a tiny cabal of German philosophers, certain of Marx’s veracity, decided on a different pathway to get his influence to the masses. Marx himself had waited for it to happen naturally. Lenin and Trotsky had brought it through a messy revolution. Neither would work with the peoples of the West. Capitalism was too deeply ingrained in the collective psyche. The group of philosophers, known as the “Frankfurt School”, blamed this condition, naturally, on those who had suborned it: Coca-Cola, Ford Motor Company, A&P, Radio City Music Hall...the list goes on. There was no way they would be able to release society from the addictions it had created for itself. The whole system would have to come down. Only then could something new be built in it’s place. The thinkers of the Frankfurt School were under no illusions that this would be an easy task. The destruction of five thousand years of tradition would not happen overnight, and it would not happen by itself. The first step was to get people to not like their society—to see it the way the Frankfurt school did. Having been rejected by their original audience, the Frankfurt School thinkers needed a new proletariat. That hadn’t worked in the microcosm in which Marx had tried it. But, why, the thought occurred to them, stop with just one group? What if they could create many proletariats? After all, history had given them plenty of other collective grievances and class struggles. The Civil War was only about six decades gone. The working poor in their arguments could be expanded to the poor in general, who could then be turned against the robber barons. And of course, the suffragettes were still embroiled in their struggle against the patriarchy. So Herbert Markuse and his Frankfurt School companions set out to make their case. They began by advocating for the end of everything that seemed too “normal” to them: marriage, jobs, music, philosophy, art...if socialism hadn’t produced it, then it was evil. The very world around you, they would say today, is an illusion; a gilded cage, if not created, then at least aided and exploited, by those in power to keep you blinded to the fact that you were a serf, enslaved by a powerful elite who would always enjoy power and privilege at your expense, that you will never have access to. And just who were these mysterious oppressors? That depended on who these new socialists were talking to. If you were poor, it was men like Carnegie, Rockefeller, and the bands of powerful corporate executives who followed them. If you were black, it was the whites who had enslaved your grandparents, and would have enslaved you if not for the brave progressives that had fought for the Thirteenth Amendment. (It was, in fact, Republicans who had fought for the Thirteenth Amendment—I’ll discuss the progressives’ chameleon-like ability to change political positions a bit later.) And if you were a woman, it was the men in your lives who had deceived you into marrying them, forced you into roles decided for you by society, against your will, and were routinely having their way with you at night. These progressive thinkers possessed a unique ability to figure out what made you as an individual angry—to find your mental weak point, and then tell you a story that you could relate to; that pressed the right buttons. Then they would offer you their antidote to this oppression, which was always revolution, followed by Marxism. Steinem and her misandrist followers were a product of this movement. The feminism of the 1960s, and the feminism of today, are not really feminist at all. They were just one of many disparate movements that had been co-opted by the progressives, and amalgamated into one big proletariat. No longer was socialism a workers’ movement that sought control of factories—it was now a struggle by anyone who had a grievance, against whoever had aggrieved them." From my upcoming book, "Silver Towers and Flying Cars: The Illusion of Progressivism, and the Reality"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@malcolmnicoll1165
If nothing more had ever been discovered, perhaps it would have been possible for some to assert that McCarthy was guilty of paranoia, and that he overreacted to the information he was given and blew things up out of all proportion. But four decades later, information emerged that proved conclusively McCarthy’s fear of a communist conspiracy was well placed. The full extent of Soviet espionage during the early years of the Cold War was finally revealed in 1995, when the U.S. government released classified documents related to a top-secret intelligence project that went by the code name VENONA.
This counterespionage initiative involved the interception and decryption of thousands of Soviet communications by the NSA and the FBI during the late 1940s and 1950s. In these cables, Soviet sources referenced 349 Americans in sensitive positions who were either spying for them or otherwise providing useful information about a variety of US government activities and defense programs, including research and development into nuclear weapons. Because these individuals were all given code names or numbers, it was not possible to identify every single one of them. However, many who were eventually identified as communist agents were in fact some of the very same people who had been named and listed on the government reports that had been used by Joseph McCarthy as his primary sources of information. Additionally, McCarthy was close to FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, and while it is not known exactly what Hoover may or may not have told him in their private conversations, some of the information that was being picked up on the VENONA intercepts certainly could have made its way back to McCarthy through this channel.
But regardless of any secret sources McCarthy may or may not have had, the release of the VENONA documents proved conclusively that his concerns about communist infiltration of the U.S. government were entirely justified, and, if anything, perhaps even a little too restrained.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@grimjoker5572 . . .10th Amendment makes much of what our Federal Government does that is not spelled out in the Constitution illegal. And the "general welfare" clause did not mean "welfare" as in freebies for votes. I believe Madison wrote about this in the Federalist Papers. What business is it of the Federal Governments what any private entity does in regards to hiring, firing, housing, service, association, etc. They have no jurisdiction to rule or make law in regards to who private individuals or entities associate with. There was a lot of unconstitutional legislation during FDR and Lincoln too. But the 1960's is when the most damaging legislation was passed. Civil Rights Act of 1964 is unconstitutional 2 & 7.
"The 1795 Act continued the 1790 Act limitation of naturalization being available only to "free white person[s]." And if you read further the 1795 Act made citizenship even harder. So nice try.
The 1965 Immigration Act is not illegal per se, but it was passed on the promise that it would not drastically change the demographics of this country. Which it obviously has. It was a betrayal of the American Public regardless of whether or not it was Constitutional. The 2nd Amendment is a utility to infringe on all other amendments and clauses of the Constitution. What sense does that make? You're smart enough to understand the point I'm making. . and no the point I'm making in this case isn't to overthrow a tyrannical government. All these laws, regulations, departments, etc. were passed and created in a fairly short amount of time to make it too difficult to repeal. And then once the Demographics changed enough, along with fear of being called a racist/bigot/etc., it would be too late with too few to change those unconstitutional laws back.
Our nation has been subverted by cultural Marxists. That's another long discussion.
I'm not sure all those white progressives that subverted this nation are really "white" LOL. Our Constitution is great. But we've been living in a post Constitutional America since the 1960s. I support our Constitution and form of government, but I already know we're too far gone to salvage it. We have too many people that will never accept a Libertarian/Conservative Right Wing Constitutional Republic because it's not who they are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@barongerhardt . . . race plays a large role in culture. Only an idiut would try to argue against it. But people like you have been so brainwashed that you only think skin color is skin deep. Even black people know that they are different than white people. Even the Smithsonian printed an article about "white" characteristics. And then the "math is racist". Different characteristics, behavioral patterns, wants, needs, desires, planning, organizing, temperament, risk aversion, introverted/extroverted, etc. are heavily influenced by race. Studies have been done for many decades on this. Bell curves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Max-ek3kf . . . I don't like almost ALL Leftists that I meet. And I've met quite a few and I also see the history that comes from the Left.
Systemic Racism exists in ALL countries. It is found least in white countries. Take a look at most countries immigration and citizenship laws. Almost all countries of color have immigration and citizenship laws directly/indirectly structured to keep the racial majority the same. Japan, China, Nigeria, Israel, Pakistan, Mexico, Somalia, etc. But, there is nothing wrong with a country and people to want to keep their countries white or the dominate/majority race that originated in that country. Is it wrong for Japan to want to stay Japanese? What about Nigerians? The races are inherently and naturally different and those differences are exacerbated when larger groups of different races come into contact. Hence the reason the world has always self-segregated. Much longer conversation and I'm quite versed at it.
Are you really this ignorant?
Let's go even further. Many Hispanics have Spanish Ancestry. Heck, it's estimated that 49% of Mexicans have Spanish ancestry. The Spanish Conquistadors were probably the most brutal colonizers that walked the earth and they raped, pillaged, and plundered many tribes of the Americas. Many Hispanics, such as AOC, have colonizer ancestry. And yet many White Americans have no ancestry tied to colonialism or displacement of the native tribes as they are European immigrants that came to North America in the late 1800s/early 1900s; such as Polish, German, Italian, Irish, etc.
The United States has unfortunately become more Socialistic over the decades with the Federal Government's programs of Social Security, Welfare, Unconstitutional Regulatory Departments, Taxation, etc. Just read the 10th Amendment and you'll see that the United States was never meant to be a Socialist country. The only Socialism they wanted was spelled out in the Constitution.
I guess it's not hard to improve when you're at rock bottom. If the United States keeps moving Left, we'll be at rock bottom also. Actually, we've set ourselves up for massive conflict with fooling ourselves into believing we can have a multiracial/multicultural society. It's doomed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jimmcloughlin . . . the foundation for America's greatness was laid when those English settlers created the colonies which led to the great experiment and a test run of a truly free nation being protected by England's Imperialism. That led to separating from England and the creation of the Constitution. It was further improved upon by white European immigrants that helped fill any voids in our diverse and expanding economy. Europeans as a whole are very well rounded so therefore all the roles needed for a successful society were filled. Ever since the 1960s (1965 immigration act in particular along with LBJs great society/welfare) we've slowly been going downhill. It doesn't mean that I think "Europeans" are superior, I just think we're different and that trying to force integration between all of the different races is going to lead to conflict. And that also doesn't mean that I'm arguing for a pure one race society. But in order for a nation/society to sustain and prosper, you need a dominate/majority race where the minority living in that country accepts, adheres, appreciates, admires, etc. the customs, norms, traditions, history, language, etc. of the majority.
And I also support Reparation for descendants of American slaves. But it has to be conditional. We can't give them reparations and then continue to be bombarded with grievances. I support Reparations with Land for Separation if that's what the want.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@raffaballzz . . . there have been many studies done over the last century that show the different races, "in general", have different characteristics from physical attributes, lQ, temperament, risk aversion/taking, gratification delay, planning & organization, introverted/extroverted, less inhibited vs. timid, etc.
It's not that hard to see especially when you just open your eyes and look around you and see the same behavior, patterns, etc. decade in and decade out.
A multiracial society is doomed and will eventually fail as we're seeing right now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@asobiseksu132 . . . white people's greatest strength is that we "evolved" to become very well rounded. We have all the pieces of the puzzle to create nice societies. We have doctors, lawyers, construction, plumbers, electricians, accountants, business owners, athletes, entrepreneurs, janitors, car mechanics, etc etc etc. We didn't need "diversity" to make us great. Actually, diversity has weakened us like a parasite weakens its host.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@swesleyc7 . . . multiracial is not irrelevant. The races, in general, are inherently and naturally different. Race and culture go hand in hand. That doesn't mean you need to strive to have a pure one race society. But in order to have a society that can sustain and prosper, you need a dominate/majority race with a distinct culture and any minority living within that country needs to adhere, accept, appreciate, admire, etc. the customs, norms, values, history, language, etc of the majority. There are individuals of different races that can bridge the racial divide, but as larger groups of different races come into contact is when those small differences become amplified into larger cultural differences. All one has to do is open their eyes to see this simple fact.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CoolPapaJMagik . . . one of white peoples greatest strengths is that we are he most well rounded of all races. Good characteristics and bad. We have janitors, lawyers, doctors, teachers, constructions, roofers, builders, manufacturing, scientists, environmentalists, hunters, farmers, etc. That gives us the ability to build nice societies because we have all the pieces of the puzzle. White people never needed immigrants of color because we already had all the positions filled. There's also another thing white people are good at.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jackriley5750 . . . but people's life span isn't billions of years. And they want to create a culture that they identify with and one in which they can pass down to their children and grandchildren. Also, tribalism is human nature. We can't change that.
Now, how about you go make your argument to China, Japan, Nigeria, Somalia, Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan, Mexico, etc. Maybe they can open up their borders to every color and creed from all around the world. And maybe they'll stop blaming whitey for colonization then right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nobumino . . .why is it a crime in some European countries to even question the H0I0caust? I believe different groups of people evolved differently and that each group, in general, have different characteristics. I've come to not trust this group. I've seen too many that are proud Communists, propagandists, positions of parastic middle men, rabble rousers, revolutionaries, etc. If you look up Gooi$h B0Ishevism you'll get a "conspiracy disclaimer" and yet if you look up Communist Revolutions and Jewish involvement you'll get article after article of Goos proudly talking about the leading roles Jews have played in those Communist revolutions.
Funny how you can cry out in pain for people saying anti-semitic things, but the mainstream media, politics, majority of people have no problem with people that say anti-white things. Heck, you're called a white supremacist for even complaining about anti-white rhetoric or mass immigration or bringing up crime statistics, etc. How many WHITE groups are there that are not labeled "hate" groups that advocate for White peoples interest?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stevenrempel . . . more and more people are taking the red pill and realizing what has happened. Just a quick history for those that care to learn a little history.
Cultural Marxism stems back from the Frankfurt School. The Frankfurt School was formed in Germany in the 1920's after WWI when the traditional Marxists became disillusioned that the working class (proletariat) did not rise up during WWI and overthrow their "imperialist/capitalist" leaders (bourgeoisie). They came to believe the homogenous society of Western Europe, United States, and even Australia had too strong of one culture, race, religion, history, etc. That culture was white, Christian, patriarchal, capitalist, etc. So in order to bring about their Communist/Marxist revolution they needed to tear down those social and cultural aspects of the West. This is where Critical Theory developed. Look up Antonio Gramsci, Michele Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and many others.
Mass immigration
Demonization of one's culture, history, institutions
McCarthy was right
General Patton came to believe we defeated the wrong enemy
Much much more.
Gotta Go!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And yet you have people saying this is what the Notsee's would do. They have no idea what Germany was going thru during the 1920's. Similar to today but much worse considering how many of their countrymen were killed in WWI, the TOV punishments, lost lands, economic sanctions, reparations, communist uprisings (Spartacists), Hyperinflation, degeneracy, discrimination against indigenous Germans, Soviet Union threat, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NoNo-ct9cl . . . What true Socialist countries are successful? The Nordic Countries are not Socialist but Capitalist with very generous welfare programs plus they are very homogeneous in their populations.
And yes there are differences between races and they will structure their societies differently. Why are there so many NBA/NFL/100 meter professional athletes that are black? Does evolution only work from the neck down? Race and culture are inseparable. What defines a country the people or the land?
Communists most certainly do divide people by race, gender, sex, etc. It's called Cultural Marxism and it was spawned from the Frankfurt School in Germany during the 1920's after the Communists were perplexed as to why the working class did not rise up against their imperialist rulers and happily went to war for their nation. So on top of the Bourgeoisie vs. the Proletariat it morphed into Cultural Marxism using Critical Theory to destroy Western Civilization by making its people hate their own culture and nation. And Mass immigration was one of those tools.
I'm fine with Socialist programs as long as they are Constitutional and more so on the state level. I'd rather have 50 democracies working for a solution than one large inefficient federal bureaucracy.
China stole almost everything they have from the United States. Patents, technology, reverse engineering, etc. I would hope someday that Japan becomes much more Nationalistic again and deals with China in their own terms.
Communism is failure. It always will be. Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. It's filled with jealous little vindictive beta males that don't like their social status in the hierarchy. You may be right that Communism will rear its ugly head unfortunately. But many times they end up eating their own. Weak men like you are not capable of being productive.
Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jaydee3965 . . . I'm the furthest thing from a Lefty. I used to be a Libertarian/Republican (hence my name), and still am to a certain point. But I've come to realize that a Constitutional Republic/Libertarian ideology will only work in a Homogeneous society due to the fact that the different races are just that. . . different. It doesn't mean I hate other races or that I think one race is superior to another. I just think we're naturally too different to coexist peacefully in the same country in large groups. Just take a look around you to see IT'S NOT WORKING OUT. And "immigrants of color" are purposefully being let in the country to dilute the white race. Kalergi Plan, Great Replacement, etc.
I'm also not arguing for a pure one race society. But I do think that in order to a society to sustain, prosper, and flourish that you need a dominate/majority of one race where any minority willingly living in that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the customs, norms, traditions, values, history, language, laws, etc. of the majority. And that minority must stay a minority.
I mean no disrespect, but all you really have to do is open your eyes to not only see that a multiracial country is not working, but to also see that it's quite apparent that the displacement of white people is being done on purpose.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@darth9302 . . . You can deny it all you want but it's true. If you don't like what I say then go preach to all these "countries of color" that are much more xenophobic, tribal, stricter immigration/citizenship laws, etc. Funny how just after WWII there was an ethno-religious nation created for that tribe where millions of people had to be displaced in order to make room for that new nation. Maybe lsraeI should have Open Borders and repeal the right of return? Read up on the Balfour Declaration. Or the "Stabbed in the Back Theory". I can't type everything in here on a youtube comments section. I already tend to be long-winded enough.
When was the last time you ever heard someone referred to as an Asian Supremacist for what the Japanese did during WWII? And what's worse is that Japan, and many other Asian countries, have much stricter immigration/citizenship policies than White Western Countries. Think about that next time a white Polish American gets called a White Supremacist because they want to limit immigration or whatever other policy goes against the Left. (And let's not even get into the pass "Hispanics" with Spanish Ancestry get.)
Your genes affect your culture and ideology and your IQ along with so many other characteristics. It's not hard to see or understand and it also explains many stereotypes. (Most stereotypes are true and are an effective way to assess a situation until more information is gained).
I think I've explained it quite well on how the different races are different. There have been many studies done over many decades (100 years ago), but have been demonized by the cultural Marxists because they want to up-end white western society and replace it with Communism.
So all humans evolved extremely different on the outside but somehow evolution never happened on the inside or in our brains? OK. . .sure. . . whatever. Am I a white supremacist if I state that on average Asians have higher IQ's than whites? Because it's true. But huwhyte people have a more broad bell curve where they have more people on the lower end of the IQ spectrum than Asians and more people on the higher end of the IQ spectrum than Asians. Bell curves do a good job at explaining the differences of many things. I feel that one of white peoples strengths as a whole is that we have a much broader range of capabilities and are more well rounded than other races. We have surgeons, physicists, idiots, criminals, serial killers, nuclear physicists, athletes represented in almost every sport, risk takers, risk averse, doctors, lawyers, plumbers, electricians, mechanics, etc. Do other races have that? Sure, but not as many and as broad. You can disagree with me all you want. That's my perspective. I feel white people have all the pieces of the puzzle to create nice societies.
The Left is the group that started identity politics in order to undermine our institutions and to foment the right conditions for a revolution. Now you're mad that some on the right have embraced their argument and have finally found truth in it. The Left wants it both ways. They want to demonize huwhyte people on their inherent bias and their white "characteristics" to the point that it's natural for white people to be racist. But then when white people agree and embrace what is natural the Left gets mad. You can't have it both ways. You can't tell white people they are inherently racist and then when other white people then agree and explain in a way to have a peaceful separation and to argue that maybe we should be living in a multiracial society you then say that's wrong. You do understand the path you're creating right? And then the Left will refer to the right as "reactionaries". . .well duh. . .why wouldn't they end up being reactionary.
I'm tapped out.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Laura-ux8vt . . . it's the truth. Many white people, such as Polish, Italian, Irish, German, Swedish, etc. never owned any slaves, did not live in this country during slavery, never had a part in displacing Native Americans, and came here as immigrants in the late 1800's / early 1900's to only then be sent off to war during WWI and WWII to fight against their white European brothers. And people have the audacity to refer to them as having white privilege and part of a systemically racist system. And yet you have many "Hispanics" that have Spanish ancestry tied to the Spanish Conquistadors, who were the worst colonizers to walk the earth. When are they going to be held accountable for their colonizing ancestry?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Working Prole inc. . . . Marxists are LOSERS! I did construction while in college. Loved it. Now I work in an office and I can't stand it. But have a family to support so really can't make a career change. Many skilled trades make more than degreed employees. Most of my friends that are in skilled trades make more than me. That's why I'm constantly fixing up my house, landscaping, working on our cars, fixing appliances, etc. You name it. Youtube is great for that. I actually think Youtube and similar platforms could do a lot of the teaching that these loser Marxist professors/teachers are doing. My original comment, which I copied from someone else, more accurately describes do nothing know it all Marxist professors that get paid 6 figures, great pension, lifetime health insurance, summers off, 20 hours per week of classes, etc etc etc.
I actually think college is doing more harm than good these days to most kids.
Sort of funny that a Marxist would be doing construction. Seems like most in Construction are more naturally inclined to be Conservative. Oh well, still doesn't change my mind that Marxists are losers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Part of Reparations was paid by the deaths of over 600,000 from the Civil War and Sherman's march. It was also paid with Welfare programs, diversity initiative, quotas, DEI, higher $ spent on crime, etc. Even so, it would probably have been better if it was paid right after the Civil War. It's been argued that the Civil War was so costly that the US couldn't afford it. I sort of still agree with payment of Reparations but it has to come with repeal of the many Federal Gov. programs that are unconstitutional such as Welfare, Social Security, DEI, etc. And maybe it comes with Land for Separation? But I think it's too late for that now. Too many other non-white Americans that also have "grievances" against America. Black people just aren't important to those Democrat politicians anymore. Heck, they have to look at all the "Hispanics", Muslims, Indians, Asians, etc. Good luck when whitey isn't the majority. Those other "people of color" could care less about Black Americans (descendants of slaves). Even Barack Obama didn't have any ancestors that were slaves in America. (I stand corrected. . . I just looked it up. Obama does have ties to American Slavery. On his white side one of his mother's ancestors was a white indentured servant).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@papasmurf555 . . . what about Hispanics with Spanish Ancestry? Will they ever be held accountable for their ancestors sins in Colonialism and Slavery?
Should we blame Chinese Americans for the bombing of Pearl Harbor? Why not. . .aren't they also Asian? So why do we blame all white people for the sins of the English, Spanish, and French?
What did a white Polish American ever do to be labeled a racist with inherent bias? What about a white German American, or Hungarian, or Swedish, Irish, etc. Why aren't those white people considered an immigrant just like an Indian, Arab, Asian, etc. that emigrated to the United States during the late 1800's/early 1900s?
Actually, many white immigrants that came here in the early 1900's were shipped off to war to fight against their own relatives in WWI and WWII. And what's even more ironic is that you had Polish, German, Austrian, Irish, etc. immigrants going to war against their own family members many times. And our allies were the English & French. . . 2 global imperialist original colonizers of North America and other parts of the world. How f(&^(*^d up is that? And you want to cast blame on all white people and pull this systemic racism, inherent bias, white guilt, etc. crap?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nimdaqa . . . when you talk of murdering over twenty million people are you talking about Great Britain, France, or the Soviet Union? It was war. Don't act like the bombing of innocent German civilians by the allies was justified and should be laid at the feet of HitIer. Or the rape and murder of retreating and surrendering soldiers should also be laid at his feet. Atrocities were committed on all sides. This is a very long conversation that has roots that go back to WWI and even before that. Didn't Poland and Czechoslovakia end up with German lands after WWI? So England can invade and colonize other countries but Germany couldn't? So 20 million killed in war can be blamed on HitIer but the 50 million killed (or whatever the real numbers are), murdered, starved in the Soviet Union was all in the name of Progress? So why is it that you really never hear Stalin or Communism being portrayed as evil? You have open Communists in our Universities, Government, Media, etc. You can't say the same about Notsee's.
The Soviet Union was much worse than the National Socialists of Germany. Many more were killed, murdered, starved, imprisoned, etc. and that was during both war and peace. Did the National Socialists take it too far? Of course. Did things seem pretty good in 1938? Sure. But many ethnic Germans were being persecuted and murdered in former German lands. I guess we could wish that the invasion of Poland never happened and what would have become. We'll never know.
Communists should be demonized just as much as the Austrian Painter. But they're not and that has my antenna's going up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@namenameson9065 . . . so as a nation state it was fine for the Germans to pursue Lebensraum? So nobody was living in the land prior to lsraeI? Is it OK for ethnic Europeans to keep their ethnic identity (Barbara Spectre). So the idea of lsraeI just happened to pop up after WWII? There were never any plans for Jews to create their own homeland prior to WWII? I'm very pro-ethnic/nation state. But currently it's huwhyte countries being "invaded" by all these people of color. And what do we get in return? Accusations of systemic racism, white privilege, inherent bias, diversity initiatives, quotas, etc etc etc etc etc. I support lsrael. . .as long as their people and Jews start to support right wing nationalistic capitalistic causes. But too many are far left radicals. Much more on the Left than the Right.
Why are Jews so successful? Oh boy. . . the road we can go down with this one. Jews are very intelligent and genetically have higher IQs. White Europeans are much more well rounded in all aspects than other races. We have all the pieces of the puzzle to create nice societies. We have lawyers, bankers, finance, plumbers, electricians, construction, ditch diggers, athletes in almost all sports, good and bad, etc. . . much more so than other races. I think we're tired of the parasitic nature of some groups that benefit from our societies and then call us racists when we point this out.
I agree with a lot of what you said. But I don't believe in a multiracial society. It's bound to fail. I don't see how white people benefit from living in a multiracial society. And I know you may disagree, but I do find characteristics of Jews troubling. They do seem to undermine my peoples interests and also seem to insert themselves into positions of power and then cry anti-semitism all the while promoting each other. I just want to see more Jewish plumbers and ditch diggers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidmorris8121 . . . what's so twisted about that? Most races already do pretty much live segregated from one another. The world pretty much self-segregates and for good reason. Our cities, neighborhoods, churches, etc. self-segregate. Even to this day college lunch rooms self-segregate. That doesn't mean you need to strive for a pure one race society. But you need a dominate/majority of one race with any minority living within that country/society to admire, adhere, accept, appreciate, etd. the values, norms, customs, language, history, etc. of the majority. And that minority must stay a minority.
Do you think Nigeria would remain Nigerian if say 50 million Chinese decided to emigrate to Nigeria?
I'm a twisted bigot, but have you read some of the comments on this thread? Have you not seen the hatred and vitriol projected at white people these days? Has it ever crossed your mind as to why any white victims of black crime barely make national news and yet you have a neighborhood dispute/fight and it makes national headlines. Give me a break. I guess it's not racist to have separate graduation ceremonies for "people of color" and yet if a group of white students did that they'd be called racists and kicked out of school.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SexyyetSweet94 . . . The United States will no longer exist once the white majority becomes a minority. I know you think that may be wacist but people make a country not the land.
The United States was mostly founded by white Europeans (actually, founded mainly by White Englishmen). The Great Replacement is real and it was planned long ago. White people have been duped into giving up their countries and are on the verge of genocide.
The different races are just that. . . different. And they will structure their societies differently from one another. You need a supermajority of one race with a dominate culture, language, history, norms, customs, laws, etc. and any minority willingly living in that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. those characteristics of that country. A large multiracial society in which you have large %s of different races inhabiting it will inevitably fail. All other non-white countries know this which is why they structure their immigration/citizenship laws to keep their ethnic/racial majority the same.
A little diversity is fine and probably a good thing. Too much diversity brings division and conflict.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nope. It's part of their nature. It really is amazing how they've convinced so many people to not see the truth.
People don't realize that all the madness, division, degeneracy, lunacy, etc. was what the Germans were dealing with in the 1920's after WWI and the TOV. But the Germans also were dealing with the fact that millions of their own countrymen that just died in a war that could be argued they didn't start and a war they lost on paper (stabbed in the back). Not to mention lost lands, reparations, hyperinflation, Communist Agitators (Spartacists), Degeneracy, Humiliation, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rogergeyer9851 . . . well I guess you have reading comprehension problems as I said "as a whole".
Do doctors & dentists need 2 years of general core classes and pre-req's in order to perform their job? Do they need womens' studies or African Civ or Sociology?
So if my father was a dentist and I worked with him for 5 years learning all I could about dentistry in order to take over his business and I was able to take 10 to 20 very useful classes do you not think I'd be just as capable, if not more capable, than a fully schooled dental student just out of school?
Now you're right that maybe a little more schooling for a Medical Doctor is necessary. But not as much as they put them through.
Or how about this. . . I think in order to get your college degree and become certified in a profession we should have students go to college for 8 years. That means they'll be even more educated and better at their jobs right? And if not 8 years. . . how about just 6 years. You see how silly a time of 4 to 5 years is. . .it's arbitrary. Especially since much of that curriculum is unnecessary.
I'm an accountant. I can tell you right now that you don't need a 4 year degree to work in accounting. You probably need maybe 10 good classes and some real world experience working in the real world under many different industries because accounting for each industry is different and if you think it's not then you're just thinking of a book keeping staff accountant.
I work on my own vehicles. I've gotten pretty good at it. I just finished my basement from the studs, drywall, tape and mudd, electrical, plumbing, flooring, etc. . . all of it. I fix my own appliances. I try to do everything. And platforms like youtube have been a game changer. Most people learn by doing things and have to do something after they learn it from a book/classroom in order to fully retain it. And those that are good at learning in a classroom are usually not good at "doing".
Do you understand the macroeconomic inefficiencies that are created by useless college curriculum? Students study in order to get a good grade on the exam and forget half of what they thought they might have learned by the time next semester rolls around. And most students have no idea what they want to do because they have no real world experience. So they change majors 3 times and then eventually pick their final major by their junior year because they have to graduate in something. So now you have a mismatch of desire, passion, skill set, competency, etc. which creates unseen inefficiencies in the market. Someone may be smart enough to be an Engineer but they're cut from he cloth of an electrician. And you wonder why inflation is increasing. You can attribute it to government spending, lack of supply, national debt, lack of workers, etc. but some of that is related to college. Student loans, lack of skilled trades, many students not finding a job good enough to pay off those student loans, mismatch of skill set, etc.
Anyway, I can go on and on for hours about this. And yes I will stand by my original argument that our "education" as a whole is not benefiting society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@init100 . . . but these "people of color" that we've admitted are trying to transform our society into something that is not as it was founded. The 1965 Immigration Act was purposefully passed to bring in "people of color" to transform this country. Get a clue. It's been known for as long as man has been on this planet that the different races are just that. . .different. Different races build different societies. Different races have different values. Didn't the Smithsonian post some article telling white people to be less white. . .basically admitting that white people have distinct characteristics?
Take a look around you. Take a look at history. Just because there is an exception to the rule of an African having Western Values does not mean that there are enough "Africans" that will adopt a Western Valued lifestyle.
Now my argument doesn't mean that we need to strive for a pure one race society. But in order for society to sustain and prosper you need a dominate/majority of the same race where any minority willingly living in that country adheres, accepts, appreciates, admires, etc. the norms, customs, culture, language, traditions, history, laws, etc. of the majority. And that minority must stay a minority. Large groups of different races living in the same area/country brings division and conflict. Just look around you and you'll see IT'S NOT WORKING.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ldiggs9072 . . . are you sure it oozes ignorance? So what about Hungarian, Irish, German, Polish, etc. Americans who's ancestors never owned slaves, never displaced Native Indigenous tribes of the Americas, and even after they emigrated here in the late 1800's/early 1900's went to war in WWI and WWII against their own relatives? You do realize it was the English, French, and Spanish that colonized the Americas right?
I also mention that "if" they decide to take reparations that they have a "choice" of either repatriation to Africa OR land can be sectioned off here in the United States. See. . .it's a choice.
And what about Chinese Americans? Do Americans deserve an apology from them for the bombing Pearl Harbor? After all. . .they're Asians too. And what about the 11,000 Germans that were put into concentration camps during WWII? Do they deserve reparations like the Japanese received?
And what about Hispanics that have Spanish ancestry? AOC has stated her ancestors are from Spain. Is she and many other countries with Spanish heritage going to "chip in" for reparations for their colonizing/slavery history?
And if people with European ancestry are to repatriate to Europe can we force those "Europeans" that have mixed ancestry from "countries of color" to go back to their countries of origin?
Actually, I think I might be willing to go back to Europe. But any of those "Europeans" that have blood from other "people of color" need to leave immediately.
And when did the United States become systemically racist? Was it during the Civil War? Was it during WWII (fighting a war against the "supposed" biggest "racist" of them all), Was it during the Civil Rights Act? Is systemic racism prevalent in the NBA/NFL? Why not? Does evolution only work from the Neck down?
I have plenty more of example of how you see everything from an anti-white perspective.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1