Comments by "yapdog" (@yapdog) on "Racists Take a DNA Test" video.
-
12
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
@peterfrance702 It's possible to construe this right here as victimhood: "How am I playing the victim? You make a special case out of a possible white ancestor when...."
You obviously feel slighted in some way by my simply sharing facts of my own life with someone. I never attacked the person I was communicate with, nor had I ever said they should pity me as some kind of victim. I just tried to help him understand where some people might be coming from. He and I had a great back-and-forth about it, and I picked up some new perspectives from him. Yet, somehow, that angered you, as indicated by your previous line: "Sick of this victimhood BS."
Ask yourself this: Had I wronged you? Had I come off as angry? Had I said anything that would lead you to believe that I blamed you or any other person in these comments? Obviously I had not, so why have you directed your anger toward me, lobbing charges of victimhood? For that matter, why are you even angry in the first place? Do you even know why? That's not intended as some kind of attack, mind you. I just think that we're made to feel that we should be perpetually angry by/for things others have done and created.
To be clear, no person today is responsible for slavery, and should never be made to feel as such. In fact, I feel that white people tend to be harmed just as much today by the sins of others in the past. It seems to be part of what drives white anger, something that lies beneath within fundamentally good people, something that recognizes those sins but just don't want to be judged by them. And, quite frankly, you shouldn't be. The problem is that most don't seem to realize it... regardless of race.
3
-
2
-
@nikobellik8491 You said: "You shouldn't generalize people like you are."
Uuuh... calling all light skinned folks "white" is the very absolute height of generalization.🤨 You're inadvertently "whitewashing" the identities of the peoples you're trying to connect.
In any case, in this country, Italian, Irish, and Jewish immigrants weren't considered white back in the day. Yet today they are. What's different? You can't say it's science; the science says that race is a social construct. However, societal changes (e.g. the social justice) movement, caused a shift. And so, white is a societal class designation, not a race.
Having said that, I get where you're coming from; everything you find online will tell you that white is a racial group, even Wikipedia. But most haven't thought deeply enough about that term and how damaging it is to the people it is intended to classify.
Thank you for the discussion 👍
1