Comments by "yapdog" (@yapdog) on "Democratic presidential candidate: 'My party is completely delusional right now'" video.

  1. Name one thing--JUST ONE THING--that he said that was reasonable... and provide evidence to back it up.
    4
  2. The dude is Tulsi 2.0
    3
  3. Name one thing--JUST ONE THING--that he's right about... and provide evidence.
    3
  4. I was just about to write the same thing. And he's just as myopic and Trump/Republican Curious as Bill Maher, too.
    3
  5. Dean Phillips doesn't have a chance against Biden, let alone Trump. He knows this. So, if he really cared about where the country is headed, he'd stop being so delusional, himself, and he'd do everything he can to help Biden win.
    1
  6. ​ @elvenkind6072  You: "...but everything he say's sound reasonable ..." Reasonable is the word you used. So, can you explain what he said that is reasonable and how it's so?
    1
  7.  @elvenkind6072  Are you having a bit of trouble with thinking in context?
    1
  8.  @elvenkind6072  🤔Wow... you just gonna throw "psychopath" out there without even understanding what it is? That just shows that I was right about you having difficulty with context. Anyway, sorry for assuming you'd be able to understand that your own choice of words called for clarification, regardless of subjectivity. My bad.
    1
  9.  @elvenkind6072  Yeah, you're only affirming my point. You should stop while you're way behind.....
    1
  10.  @elvenkind6072  Hmmm... I'm finding it concerning that you took my words as "intense personal and very hostile". Let's review: You said that everything Dean Philips said was reasonable. I asked you to provide JUST ONE THING that he said was reasonable, along with evidence. You said it was just an opinion. I reminded that you used the word "reasonable" which indicates you has some reasoning. You said I was repeating the same thing. I surmised that you had difficulty understanding the context. You insinuated that I'm a psychopath. I marveled at your out-of-the-blue implication, which I stated that affirmed you do have issues with context. You accused me of lobbing an ad hominem attack ----------- So, basically, this whole thing started because you tried to hide behind opinion as if that's some sort of safe zone where no one is allowed to ask you why you hold such opinions. I'm not going to lob any attacks labeling your behavior. I'll just move on from this and, let's just say you're right about everything, okay? We good now, right? Take care.
    1