Comments by "Victoria Eads" (@victoriaeads6126) on "Casanova’s Life \u0026 Lovers" video.

  1.  @Layra.wawa1234  not sure why, but my explanation of pansexuality was deleted. It's not about attraction to certain body types or genders. It's about being attracted to a person. The reason this is different from bisexuality is that bisexuality presumes a binary, an A vs. B choice. The difference might be subtle to someone who doesn't feel this way, but it is different. There are, however, many who use the terms interchangeably. I don't typically feel that using such modern terms for historical figures makes sense, but in this ONE case, it does seem to fit.
    6
  2. Lol, nice topic for the week of the 14th, you've been hitting them out of the park this month so far!! 💙💙💙👍
    2
  3. ​ @Lucy-uf6oi  It has more to do with personality than body or gender. You are attracted to people, not specific types of bodies or genders. That's why it's different, and in this case, though it's often virtually impossible to say about historical figures, I would agree with the usage of pansexual.
    1