Comments by "Kair Idon" (@kairidon3363) on "Hemmer: Pennsylvania results may not be known on election night" video.

  1. Proof? Still nothing?
    4
  2. Yay, Qultist conspiracies!
    3
  3.  @johnrobi0  Let's see if you can count. What number is bigger: 81m or 74m?
    3
  4.  @JFmK-sh5nh  I've looked at it, even watched your "200 Donkeys". You have no proof, just a bunch of whining.
    3
  5. The New Jersey snake oil salesman who votes in Turkish elections, but not American elections. The perfect candidate for Pennsylvania.
    3
  6. Any proof?
    3
  7. Silly Qultists, always whining about something.
    3
  8.  @JFmK-sh5nh  Please explain what I am incorrect about. With examples, please.
    2
  9.  @poolplayerpoolplayer7430  Why? They work just fine and they make things convient for us. You should look into how Colorado runs elections, we're one of the best.
    2
  10.  @poolplayerpoolplayer7430  Trump voted with a mail in ballot.
    2
  11.  @JFmK-sh5nh  You have a huge bundle of conspiracy theories. That's why you're afraid to give any "proof". I know you Qultists, this little dance is horribly predictable.
    2
  12.  @JFmK-sh5nh  Hahaha! You just give up. Ron Watkins is Q, buddy. Get over it.
    2
  13.  @tumbleweedweed3691  Oh, no. Another idiot film? Do you also believe the garbage in "Watch the Water" and "2000 Mules"?
    2
  14. Qultists gonna Qult.
    2
  15.  @normanhill1052  Proof? None? Yeah. of course not. Just a whole lot of whining.
    2
  16.  @ytSTOPCENSORING  If we didn't have you Qultist sheep, we wouldn't be here.
    2
  17.  @MrEkzotic  And for over 200 years they've taken days, or even weeks to count.
    2
  18. How many years is it going to take until you Qultists accept reality?
    1
  19.  @MrEkzotic  Or this one? PHOENIX - A report that was among the final items on the Arizona Senate’s partisan review of the 2020 election prompted by former President Donald Trump’s loss has found no evidence that ballot tabulation equipment used by the state’s most populous county was connected to the internet.
    1
  20.  @MrEkzotic  Hahaha! Yeah. I missed the non-existant report. You remember the MAGA Cyber Ninja's "audit" where they found more votes for Biden?
    1
  21.  @poolplayerpoolplayer7430  Colorado gives everyone a mail-in ballot. It's nice, convient and we haven't had a problem with it.
    1
  22.  @JFmK-sh5nh  Listen Qultist. 1960 was a perfectly normal election. 2000 had the issue with Florida. What's your point, Balnis? I don't care about your stupid scary videos from people living in their basement. Ron Watkins is Q. A bored kid made you waste your life trying to find connections between unrelated events. Get over it.
    1
  23.  @JFmK-sh5nh  States that accept late ballots, if they're postmarked on election day, physically can't finish counting. You realize that the news networks projecting a state isn't official. It's prediction. Most candidates accept the predictions, but they are not counts and they are not official. Most of the time, counting doesn't end for days or weeks after the election, it just usually doesn't matter because they can project a result.
    1
  24.  @shawnbuonarosa3188  Pick your county and we can try math with that.
    1
  25.  @hoppermantis7615  Yeah, I watched it. Here's my copy and paste rebuttal (I've done this before): That idiocy again? Did the scary music and magical "estimation" trick you? Or was it the inaccurate data superimposed on top of a map of Moscow (you can't make this up)? No, I bet it was the people with "insider knowledge" who never show up to lie--- sorry, say ---- those things under oath. You're easily fooled. That movie was almost as stupid as Watch the Water.
    1
  26. @Angela Pagano Cry more Qultist. Or try to find actual facts to back up your claims.
    1
  27.  @dustinnunez5077  The IRA was a lovely bill and he got an infrastructure bill done. How's Trump's infrastructure week going? Is that still happening?
    1
  28. Maybe you want to go to Turkey with Oz? You can be Erdoğan but-boy too.
    1
  29.  @andrewpriester6994  But he votes in Turkish elections and neglects US elections.
    1
  30.  @andrewpriester6994  Pompeo argued that Oz’s ties to the Turkish government raise serious national security concerns. "There are still things we don't know about his connections to the Turkish government," Pompeo told reporters at the event, arranged by GOP candidate Dave McCormick's campaign. Some national security experts say Oz's political and financial ties to Turkey could give Ankara leverage over him if elected. Pompeo focused heavily on Oz's June 2018 vote in the Turkish presidential race, saying it raises questions about Oz's "priorities." Oz's vote, which he cast at the Turkish consulate in New York City, seemingly contradicted his claim to have "never been politically involved in Turkey in any capacity." Pompeo also asserted Oz skipped a vote in a Republican primary just days before he voted in the Turkish presidential contest.
    1
  31.  @andrewpriester6994  Are you really this dense? Duel citizenship: 'Critics of GOP Senate candidate Dr. Mehmet Oz have accused him of posing a "clear and present danger to the United States" due to his ties to Turkey. An ad released Thursday by the liberal activist group Really American PAC warned that Oz had "defiantly" refused to renounce his Turkish citizenship and could not be "trusted" to serve in the Senate. Oz, who has been endorsed by former President Donald Trump, has faced fierce criticism from both ends of the political spectrum during his quest to secure his party's nomination and ultimately replace outgoing Republican Pennsylvania U.S. Senator Pat Toomey.'
    1
  32.  @andrewpriester6994  Yes. It does. Seriously, look it up. My goodness.
    1
  33. But electric cars are the devil...
    1
  34. Sure, why not? Crazy Qultist thinks something is wrong just because his master told him so. You're such a good little sheep.
    1
  35. So many Qultists here.
    1
  36. Yeah. Republicans lose and cry.
    1
  37. Here we go, the Qultists are out in numbers again.
    1
  38. It does take time. Always has.
    1
  39. Cry more. They were right.
    1
  40.  @rutherfordbhayes423  Remember when Trump increased the deficit and now Biden is lowering it?
    1
  41.  @rutherfordbhayes423  Want to see Republican policies at work? Look at Kansas and how Sam Brownback crashed their economy.
    1
  42. Just like 2020, Republicans are whining and claiming fruad without proof just because they're in the minority.
    1
  43. Ah, more Qultist conspiracies.
    1
  44.  @johnrobi0  Where they ruled on a number of ballots that wouldn't affect the results anyways?
    1
  45.  @MrEkzotic  Takes time to count and make sure it's accurate, yes?
    1
  46.  @thisismyyoutubecommentacco6302  No. Much of the counting took days, some states are faster and many times we can project the results before counting ends. We still don't have a problem with it, we just suddenly have people whining about it.
    1
  47.  @MrEkzotic  No. No we didn't. Many times the win is overwhelming enough that the results can be projected, but that doesn't mean it didn't take days, if not weeks, to count the ballots.
    1
  48.  @MrEkzotic  Yes, they have. Look it up.
    1
  49.  @richardpatrick2852  What happened in 2000?
    1
  50.  @thisismyyoutubecommentacco6302  Yes, the victory was solid enough we could project a winner. The vote did not finish counting, it was predicted what they would be. A projection. Not a count.
    1
  51.  @MrEkzotic  Actually many states allow time to recieve a ballot if it's been postmarked by election day. These states physically cannot finish counting until that time.
    1
  52.  @thisismyyoutubecommentacco6302  1.) They don't know for sure, but they look at polling and recent elections. Polling and the recent elections suggest that it will be a close race and it will also have mail-in ballots that Republicans made sure couldn't be counted beforehand to speed up the process. 2.) Mail-in ballots can slow things down, unless you start counting before election night, which Florida does. (As I said before, Republicans made sure PA couldn't.) Elections used to have more obvious winners, recently, partisanship has made elections closer.
    1
  53.  @thisismyyoutubecommentacco6302  When was Wisconson called for Trump?
    1
  54.  @thisismyyoutubecommentacco6302  Because it takes time to open and proccess ballots. No. We have seen a long streak of abnormally close elections.
    1