Comments by "Joe Mannion" (@MrBudgiejoe) on "Ukrainian opposition leader: Kursk incursion shows Putin is bluffing | Conflict Zone" video.

  1. Great interview actually 😊
    4
  2. Please contact your local representative and demand that they help Ukraine NOW!!
    3
  3.  @amalia_ag Russia was not attacked, Russia is the aggressor 😊
    3
  4.  @tombrazy12hunnit Ukraine gave up her nukes because she was promised protection from Russia. Always remember that fact 😊
    3
  5. Help Ukraine NOW! 🇺🇦
    2
  6. They were INVADED 😮
    2
  7. You are being immature 😊
    2
  8.  @JujuMasasa  At the start of January 2015, Russia sent another large batch of its regular military, which together with separatist forces of the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) and Luhansk People's Republic (LPR) began a new offensive on Ukrainian-controlled areas, resulting in the complete collapse of the Minsk Protocol ceasefire.
    1
  9.  @tombrazy12hunnit  Thousands of nuclear arms had been left on Ukrainian soil by Moscow after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. But in the years that followed, Ukraine made the decision to completely denuclearize. In exchange, the U.S., the U.K. and Russia would guarantee Ukraine's security in a 1994 agreement known as the Budapest Memorandum. So, the US and the UK are helping Ukraine to defend itself as per the agreement. Russia on the other hand, attacked Ukraine. It's easy know who the bad actor is. 😊
    1
  10.  @ainopouta5528  Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949. This has never changed. No treaty signed by NATO Allies and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. Decisions on NATO membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. Russia does not have a veto. The idea of NATO enlargement beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed until 1991. Mikhail Gorbachev said in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up either." Individual Allies cannot make agreements on NATO’s behalf. President Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer to commit that no former Soviet Republics would join NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so… NATO operates by consensus," he said. The wording “NATO expansion” is already part of the myth. NATO did not hunt for new members or want to “expand eastward.” NATO respects every nation’s right to choose its own path. NATO membership is a decision for NATO Allies and those countries who wish to join alone.
    1
  11. Just because you hate America, don’t let it blind your conscience of the difference between right and wrong 😊
    1
  12. Thank you 🙏
    1
  13.  @ssir5927  Don't be ridiculous 😂😂
    1
  14. What on earth are you attempting to say?
    1