Comments by "Joe Mannion" (@MrBudgiejoe) on "COURT TV" channel.

  1. A conversation about the cold may well have been discussed in the house innocently, which in turn led to somebody googling how long it takes for a human to die in the cold. Nothing strange or weird about that, just coincidental. Also, the phone evidence relating to the movement and position of the actual phone will trump any silly step-counting app data that can be altered by merely shaking the phone. If the phone never entered the house then neither did John. End of.
    10
  2.  @ALadyJett  what I said was that a discussion about snow and cold weather could have been taking place amongst those in the house. This is quite normal during such weather. Somebody could have said that you’d be dead within a half hour of hypothermia in weather like that. That could have then been debated which lead to someone innocently googling how long it would actually take. It’s not beyond the realm of possibilities you know. Coincidences like that can, and do happen. It doesn’t always have to be incriminating,that’s all I’m trying to put across 😊
    4
  3.  @jamesallen2851  Dogs aren’t ‘violent’ lol…they’re vicious!
    3
  4. You cannot say that they were not caused by a car! When a human being goes under a car all sorts of injuries occur. Sometimes an arm when rolled over will follow the wheel around and get lodged between the wheel and the wheel-guard/mud-flap. This would cause exactly such an injury. There are also plenty of other points beneath the body of a car which can cause such marks whilst rolling over it. So, you're '100%' wrong about that!
    3
  5. Really? You will never prove that because it never happened. She had no knowledge, hand, act or part in it. Fact!
    2
  6.  @naima7881 of course she told her family of her problems. This is normal practice in most families. However, this does not make her culpable for what they chose to do.
    2
  7. Julie Nagle saw nothing and said nothing to anyone in the car, she’s definitely delusional. He was hit by Karen Reed in the car. The only question is whether it was on purpose or not. I don’t think she herself can actually remember. I’m sure all in the house are innocent.
    2
  8. A conversation about the cold may well have been discussed in the house innocently, which in turn led to somebody googling how long it takes for a human to die in the cold. Nothing strange or weird about that, just coincidental. Also, the phone evidence relating to the movement and position of the actual phone will trump any silly step-counting app data that can be altered by merely shaking the phone. If the phone never entered the house then neither did John. End of.
    2
  9.  @naima7881  A simple case of misplaced loyalty. Wendi did not want Dan dead but her stupid mother and brother thought that this would be best. Wendi is no killer and she knew nothing of their sick plans. Time will show that I’m correct. Wendi will remain free, and rightly so.
    1
  10. One word; GUILTY
    1
  11. That Philip Dube is an idiot. Wendi knew nothing about this murder of her husband and if she even thought for a moment that her brother and mother were planning it she would have blown a fuse. Fact!
    1
  12. Wendi will NOT be convicted for having played any part whatsoever in her husband Dan Markel’s murder. Simply because she had no hand, act, or part in it. That is a fact,
    1
  13. That boy never left the house. He died and his body is in or around that house.
    1
  14. I think you’re right, something happened in the house 🏠
    1