Comments by "sirBrouwer" (@sirBrouwer) on "The Insane Engineering of the X-15" video.

@saikiran2310 because budgets. A typical high quality YouTube video like this has a budget set in the hundreds of dollars. (including both man hour, equipment use (and there maintenance), licensing's, rental, administrative work and more) A high quality tv production can have a budget in to the tens of thousands to even extremes of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The things you could do are much much bigger then you can dream of with a YouTube production budget. Where a YouTube production crew exist between 1 and 10 people for everything. A tv crew might already have that amount of people only in the pre production. a full on production work can involve in to 100 people in the whole chain. that is the biggest difference.
9
@christopherdahle9985 That is do to them all being corporate networks. there first incentive is to make money (on the add around a show) a public network like the BBC is public funded with a portion of the national taxation funds. Giving room for shows like Blue earth. And yes YouTube can bring allot but if someone would give them the budget, space and man power of a high production show imagine what would be possible. the problem is who would want to give someone that amount of money if the return investment would not hold up .
3
@samsplaying have you seen what a high quality BBC production can create? To the point that people go to a cinema to experience it. They are in no way or shape dead. It's the same here in the Netherlands high quality nature documents can go all out. It might be important to know they are often made by the public broadcaster. They have the very deep pockets to do make those even if it takes up to 5 years to make them. (from idea to being aired.
2