Comments by "Israel Military Channel" (@IsraelMilitaryChannel) on "Israel Iran Missiles Drone Attack Explained" video.
-
34
-
19
-
12
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
@araztheman First you said Iran's launched missiles which were intended to be intercepted and then on the next line you said Iran put decoys to overwhelm the air defense systems. Which is it?
Out of 120 ballistic missiles, only 5 managed to get through. That is a 95.8% interception rate, world class performance. Arrow 2 and 3 conducted the interceptions. Out of the 120 ballistic missiles, the US intercepted 7. Which means Israel intercepted 113 ballistic missiles, which brings the interception rate at 95.5%. Even if we were to give Iran the benefit of doubt and say 9 ballistic missiles hit Israel, still Israel alone had an interception rate of 92%. 92% interception rate is still world class.
The US, UK, France and Jordan intercepted cruise missiles and drones which are relatively easier, Israel could have done it alone with its fighter jets if Jordan allowed it to its airspace. Even if the nations above didn't assist, Israel's fighter jets would take them down easily. I have not even brought up Iron Dome, Iron Dome does extremely well against drones and cruise missiles. Iron Dome didn't even get a chance to intercept the drones and cruise missiles since they were shot down too easily by the fighter jets.
The funny thing is you mentioned all of the nations above but you forgot to mention Lebanon launching 100 rockets coordinated to land during the same period, you also left out Iraq launching rockets and drones, you also left out Syria launching drones and rockets, you also left out Yemen launching missiles and drones during the same period. Which means in reality Israel intercepted a lot more.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Out of 120 ballistic missiles, only 5 managed to get through. That is a 95.8% interception rate, world class performance. Arrow 2 and 3 conducted the interceptions. Out of the 120 ballistic missiles, the US intercepted 7. Which means Israel intercepted 113 ballistic missiles, which brings the interception rate at 95.5%. Even if we were to give Iran the benefit of doubt and say 9 ballistic missiles hit Israel, still Israel alone had an interception rate of 92%. 92% interception rate is still world class.
The US, UK, France and Jordan intercepted cruise missiles and drones which are relatively easier, Israel could have done it alone with its fighter jets if Jordan allowed it to its airspace. Even if the nations above didn't assist, Israel's fighter jets would take them down easily. I have not even brought up Iron Dome, Iron Dome does extremely well against drones and cruise missiles. Iron Dome didn't even get a chance to intercept the drones and cruise missiles since they were shot down too easily by the fighter jets.
The funny thing is you mentioned all of the nations above but you forgot to mention Lebanon launching 100 rockets coordinated to land during the same period, you also left out Iraq launching rockets and drones, you also left out Syria launching drones and rockets, you also left out Yemen launching missiles and drones during the same period. Which means in reality Israel intercepted a lot more.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@marcelooofenwonken4251 Israel showed the world it hit S-300 radar with pinpoint accuracy deep in Iran. So your argument about "could have, would have" goes into the bin.
Israel has missiles the range that covers all of Iran. So your argument about area is irrelevant. Here are some examples, Jericho 2, Jericho 3, Popeye turbo cruise missiles, Blue sparrow, Silver sparrow air launched ballistic missiles range of 1,500 km - 2,000 km. These are equivalent to Russia's Kinzhal.
False. Israel didn't retaliate the way I portray is because Iran's 320 missiles and drone did close to zero damage. The west pressuring Israel not to is another factor. If a single Iranian ballistic missile hit a building, Israel would take Iran's economy back 30 years.
Again you are focusing on defense, you left out Israel's offense, read the paragraph above what Israel could do to Iran's economy and missile stockpile.
Already did, and Iran didn't do a thing about it. A single Israeli missile did more damage than the entirety of Iran's 320 missiles and drones. Go Look up what happened to Iran's S-300 radar.
1
-
@marcelooofenwonken4251 Israel showed the world it hit S-300 radar with pinpoint accuracy deep in Iran. So your argument about "could have, would have" goes into the bin.
Israel has missiles the range that covers all of Iran. So your argument about area is irrelevant. Here are some examples, Jericho 2, Jericho 3, Popeye turbo cruise missiles, Blue sparrow, Silver sparrow air launched ballistic missiles range of 1,500 km - 2,000 km. These are equivalent to Russia's Kinzhal.
False. Israel didn't retaliate the way I portray is because Iran's 320 missiles and drone did close to zero damage. The west pressuring Israel not to is another factor. If a single Iranian ballistic missile hit a building, Israel would take Iran's economy back 30 years.
Again you are focusing on defense, you left out Israel's offense, read the paragraph above what Israel could do to Iran's economy and missile stockpile.
Already did, and Iran didn't do a thing about it. A single Israeli missile did more damage than the entirety of Iran's 320 missiles and drones. Go Look up what happened to Iran's S-300 radar.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1