Youtube comments of the other Andrew (@theotherandrew5540).
-
1600
-
844
-
720
-
410
-
195
-
188
-
174
-
156
-
95
-
88
-
81
-
73
-
70
-
70
-
61
-
60
-
57
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
The view that all landlords are wicked misers simply out to screw their tenants is imply not true. Of course there are some lie that, but most, like me, look after our tenets who look after our houses. Of course tenants need protection to keep their homes, but landlords are also people and they must not be prisoners of their tenants, unable to get a bad tenant out without extensive delays, and get rent arrears paid, which is their income. They must also be able to sell, or alter their property, the building. We need reasonable laws that take into account the needs of both, without stigmatising their.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
At a local level, citizens assemblies have been seen to work. Citizens are randomly invited to participate, there is no compulsion.
For a representative democracy, we must have some form of PR, but we also need political education for all, beginning in school. (Of course it will be difficult to agree a syllabus, as it was sex for education.) We need to look around the world and see what works, and what doesn’t. The US have a tripartite system, but they’ve screwed it up. The power of money to control the system must be removed, and the judiciary must remain protected from political interference.
Getting rid of the ancient, impractical Palace of Westminster and replacing it with something suitable for 21st century government would be a start. (Sell it to Disney or Musk, as a museum/theme park.)
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
40% of the world is connected. So 60% is not, The idea that the transistor isTHE most significant invention is arrogant nonsense. It's one of many significant advances, like fire, farming, metallurgy, vaccines, Newton's discoveries, Relativity, paper, gunpowder and so many more. The transistor is just one step, nothing more.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ Ukraine has a unique place for Russia, being the birth place of the Russ. There were very close relationships between Ukrainians and Russians, their languages are almost the same (Ukrainian has a couple of different vowel letters). Ukraine is geographically significant, south of Belorussia and on the Black Sea. The little western orientated Baltic states present no significant threat and Finland and Russia managed to get along well. (NATO of course jumped at the opportunity the was in Ukraine presented to persuade the Finns to join their gang). Russia’s eastern border is with China, which isn’t part of NATO. (North ATLANTIC Treaty Organisation, not Baltic or Black Sea or Mediterranean.) its southern borders are mostly guarded by client states formerly part of the USSR. As Putin has explained, Russia needs neutral buffer states to protect its huge land borders. Unlike the USA it doesn’t have oceans on two sides and weaker friendly nations on two other sides. Russia doesn’t have 750 military bases in foreign countries, just two in Syria. During the 15 years I lived in Russia, 2006 - 2021, I saw real prosperity, huge improvements in public transport and infrastructure, clean streets, less crime. Putin in popular because for most people life is better. It’s true that pensions are still poor, and inflation is higher due to the cost of the war.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Like fossil fuels, this move is ferocious opposed by the farming lobby, who are a very powerful block in Britain, in the US and in Europe. When I learned about this, 50 (yes, fifty) years ago, I gave up meat as the most inefficient land use and cruelest way to get protein. While small amounts of animal protein are pleasant sometimes, and for a few people, necessary, the vast majority of the human population do no need to eat meat. With so many of us on the planet and so many eating meat, it’s time for a change, right now!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I have great respect for the professor’s knowledge and wisdom WRT economics and issues related to money, but WRT the invasion of Ukraine there is a common misunderstanding deliberately fostered by NATO and the US. I address this question as someone who lived in Russia for any years and came to understand their views. Russia has a huge land border, … while the USA has oceans on two side and friendly/weaker countries on two other sides. Historically Russia has endured devastating invasions, two from Western Europe. Russia lost around 27 million of its citizens during the last invasion (more than all the other allied countries put together) so understandably there is a visceral fear of invasion. After the collapse of the USSR, Gorbachev had an agreement with the US that if Russia agreed to German unification, NATO would not advance any further eastward towards Russia. Bush ignored this, planting missiles in Poland when Russia was still recovering and Putin was finding he feet.
Don’t forget that when the US learned of a potential missile base in Cuba there was near blind panic in Florida, and the world came to the brink of nuclear war. Putin explained the Russian strategic need for buffer stated, but NATO threatened to push right up to the most sensitive border. Now, I speak from information given by people who know much more than I do; Russia does not want or need more territory (it is already the largest country in the world), it doesn’t want to take over Belorussia of Kazakhstan or any other of those countries. If the little Baltic states and Finland don’t engage in military provocation, their former good relations with Russia can be restored. The invasion of Ukraine was deliberately provoked by NATO in order to pretend that they were the good guys without needing a single boot on the ground, and with the intention of weakening Russia, perhaps even breaking it up so the US could grab its resources.
The solution … after the end of WW2, the most terrible European (and global), it was recognised that cross border trade agreements would make war much more unlikely. Since the reign of Elizabeth 1, Russia has been trying to establish good trading relations with Europe but has been repeatedly thwarted by “the great powers” fear of having to accommodate the rising power of Russia. The sale of cheap Russian gas to Europe presented a major threat to American dominance of Europe … thus the destruction of the Nordsea pipeline and anti-Russian sanctions (which have greatly stimulated industrial and agricultural development within Russia). If we want peace and stability, we need more cross border trade, not more dead Ukrainians.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What the experiment also demonstrates is the Tory party’s religious commitment to privatisation, whatever the cost to the public, in spite of Thatcher’s comprehension of the impossibility if this. Rail, like roads, are essential Public Services, which should be owned by the public, and paid for through tax. It could be argued that as with roads, the use of the track should be paid by a reasonable, predictable tax to the train operator, but this does not resolve the questions of confusing ticketing, and subsidising small but essential branch lines and stations. Renationalisation of the entire system is essential. Let the new, publicly own BR learn from the improvements brought in by private companies, and provide the best possible Public Service.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In the UK, only money counts, and unless someone with connections to the Tories is going to massively profit, it won't happen. In Russia, where I used to live, things are happening, but slowly. I remain optimistic that there will eventually be a really high speed link right across the country, Petersburg to Vladivostok via Moscow, Ekaterinburg, Irkutsk, etc. Maybe one day even a line to the far north, connecting Petrozavodsk. Now that would really be amazing! (But very unlikely.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@notroll1279 BRICS is developing slowly, but it'll offer a serious alternative to the dollar in a very few years.
Having lived in Russia, I don't see governance there are worse than that in western countries. It's different, more chaotic at times, but more effective at other times. While I read about increasing poverty and collapsing infrastructure, pot holed roads etc, I watched an eye-watering increase in prosperity in Russia, a national program of road, rain and internet improvement across the country from Petersburg to Kamchatka. No one in Russia is fooled into thinking it's a democracy and few care. Yes there are demonstrations by the young and educated, mainly because job opportunities aren't great, and the education system is struggling to keep up with the pace of change, but don't underestimate the best. The best are truly excellent, just foolishly excluded from western academic flow (to the detriment of both). Unfortunately the Russian school system has followed the worst of the western systems, being much too prescriptive. But it also allows for experimental schools to deviat and try different methods.
WRT democracies, the EU is not a democratic institution, and was never set up as one. South Korea is unstable, Mexico might have a semi democratic government, but it's controlled by the US and the drug barons. NZ has swung to the right and Japan is economically paralysed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ Спасибо за интересный ответ. Мое поспешное несогласие с вашим видео касается не коммунизма или Советов, а ваших рассуждений о стиле лидерства в России. Как вы описали, существует напряженность, чтобы уничтожить огромную Российскую империю из более чем 200 различных этнических групп, поэтому неуверенные в себе лидеры должны навязать сильную власть. Ленин не был демократом, и, к сожалению, его фракция контролировала промышленное сердце. Политические системы и их общества не меняются легко и не быстро. (Парлатское правительство в Великобритании заняло много веков. Я увидел, как трудно хорватам адаптироваться к демократии.) Мой хороший друг Дмитрий Морозов, который был журналистом во время распада СССР, сказал: «Россия не готова к демократии, в конце концов она придет». Ваш российский телеканал 1 подчеркивает хаотичные недостатки американской «демократии». Здесь есть что обсудить, но не хватает места.
1
-
1
-
@ Ваша статья очень интересная. Жизнь грабежа ресурсов соседей (рабов, скот, других продуктов питания и ценных вещей) практиковалась на протяжении всей истории: в границах Римской империи, среди индейских племен, на шотландско-английской границе (Риверы), викингов, работорговля Западной Африки, которая эксплуатировалась европейцами. Это часто сопровождалось увеличением населения, которое, возможно, было результатом климатических изменений. Россия всегда терпела гораздо более суровые условия, чем европейские поселенцы в Америке. Я очень ценю отношение к взаимному сотрудничеству в России, совершенно не похожее на агрессивный индивидуализм Америки. Отношение поселенцев неизбежно более агрессивно, чем отношение коренных народов, которые просто пытаются выжить.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
HOW TO MAKE ENGLISH.
Take a little organic Celtic and cook slowly, adding just a pinch of Latin.
When it's off the boil, add a generous helping of old German, of the Friesland variety and cook slowly for a few centuries.
Add several handfuls of hot Scandinavian and stir well.
Once this is simmering nicely, cover it all with a thick layer of course French and put the lid on.
Wait for the grammar to begin to curdle.
Once this appears to have settled, skewer the mix with a sharp Caxton, which will instantly crystallise the spelling.
Keep well away from logic as this ruins the flavour.
Allow it to simmer gently for a century or two then top it with a sprinkling of Greek, and just a few odd words from random languages.
Allow it to cool and solidify. It travels well and makes an excellent base for Air, sea, commercial and diplomatic dishes.
(Store in a cool place, lest it goes rancid and becomes American.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Barely a handful of MPs present. Parliament has become a joke, and not even funny. These MPs paid for what? A job with no job description, for turning up once a week for a few hours to shout Raa Raa! when their man, or woman, stands up and makes a statement? They get paid £87,144, after their recent £3000 pay increase; nurses, who work at least five full days, every week, start on £27,000. So one MP, without the burden of a £10,000+ debt for training, working occasional hours, is valued at three nurses. Has Britain gone completely potty?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ Having lived in Russia, I understand their situation quite well. I also understand the fears of the Poles. The USSR did indeed treat its satellite states badly. But the USSR folded over 30 years ago. Russia is not a democratic state and while a cohort of the young and educated want more democracy, the vast majority of the people are content with the huge improvements they’ve seen in their lives under Putin. I saw improvements in infrastructure that would make Americans and Brits cry while their infrastructures crumble from neglect. Belorussia is a different country. Once it achieves the same economic level as Russia, there might be a union, but Russia has no need of burdensome dependencies like the southern Stans. The claim that countries need to beg for membership of NATO is frankly absurd. Every expansion of the EU has been followed by NATO. The Maidan Square incident was of course engineered to promote NATO advancements in a country known for spectacular political corruption. WRT Finland joining NATO, that border is less sensitive than Ukraine; Finns are not Slavic people. The current head of NATO is a Swede, no surprise there. Europe, historically lead by the British, has always been hostile to the big guy on the eastern side of Europe. Now the sanctions have hurt EU members who were enjoying significant trade with Russia and consuming cheap Russian gas, especially in Germany. Without this competition from Europe, Russian manufacturing has greatly benefited, and now trade eastward. America’s sphere of influence is shrinking and they know it. MAGA is a doomed concept.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@peterwarner553 Dear Peter, I lived in Russia for 15 years. They are wonderful warm people and the bureaucracy is sometimes difficult to negotiate. They are patient people, they know how to live with people they may not particularly like, and they help each other quite naturally (something I did NOT see in the US, where helping a stranger was so rare is was and still is a source of amazement). But don’t mess with Russians, when the patience expires, they’re not gentle. But for ordinary people, there is no brutality in daily life. Putin is popular because he restored self respect to the Russians after the squalid years of Yeltsin and the American attempt to exploit Russia, milk its recourses and destroy its economy. During the time I lived there 2006 - 2021 I witnessed astonishing prosperity including nation wide major upgrading of roads, railways, public transport, health facilities and a massive fall in petty corruption. It’s not perfect, the mafia still have a hold in Moscow, corruption still exists (do you know ANY country where there is no corruption?), the country is ruled by force, not law. Comparison with a similar sized country is valid. My impression of the US is that political corruption is the norm, as is gun violence - something almost unheard of in Russia. In the words of an American commentator, “America is a one party state, with two right wings.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ Whatever ethnic group they may or may not have belonged to, they were all citizens of the USSR. Your quibble is an irrelevant distracting from the massive sacrifice made by the Russian empire, greater than all the other alies together. Or perhaps you think it was the English who won the war, and the contribution of the Australians, New Zealanders, Indians, Kenyans, Nigerians, Ghanaians, and all the other British colonies, and the Scots and Welsh were mere add-on details.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Tensquaremetreworkshop Democracy may indeed be “the least worst” because it includes accountability. Since Athenian times there have been many versions of democracy. Then, only free men could vote, which meant less than 1/4 of the adult population. In Europe, many people simply voted with their feet, or their spears. Nowadays there are democratic systems of citizens assemblies which have proven to work very well. (But as they are extremely difficult to control, political leaders don’t like them.) There are several different voting systems, and different parliamentary systems. Westminster, being one of the oldest is stuck, petrified from the post English civil war era. (Scotland wasn’t and shouldn’t now be part of that system.) The UK could learn a lot from other systems, but once a leader is in power he doesn’t want to change the system that got him there. Thus “democracy” has become completely corrupted, as in the USA.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1