Comments by "Tracy Barhite" (@tracybarhite1764) on "Mark Levin: Jan 6 Committee has no evidence Trump committed any of these crimes" video.

@jahhebrew4968 Riffett was not arrested at the Capitol with a gun. The gun charge was for transporting a gun.
5
@truzar100 Cassidy Hutchins was not in the SUV. She didn't have direct evidence. The testimony she gave was learned from someone else therefore, most of what she said was hearsay.
4
@peaceloveharmony7213 Yes, I know who Cassidy Hutchinson is. She worked for Mark Meadows who was Trump's Chief of Staff. Did you know she worked for Trump after he left the White House? If she was so "disgusted" as she said with Trump's Tweet from January 6th why would she work for Trump after he left the WH?
2
@jahhebrew4968 "Armed" supporters? No guns were found on any supporters at the Capitol. Why were there not enough police officers on duty to adequately secure the Capitol? Why was the request for National Guard (by Steven Sund) denied? These are questions that the January 6th committee aren't going to answer because it doesn't fit their narrative.
1
@nataliewalton5118 Just from what has been presented at the J6 hearing, do we definitively know what Trump was or wasn't doing for those 180 minutes? There has been lots of speculation and some hearsay testimony, but does the J6 committee actually have concrete evidence? I have condemned the violence on January 6th. Those who committed violent crimes need to be held accountable. However, there remains a lot of unanswered questions that the J6 committee isn't addressing. For example: Why was Steven Sund's request (before January 6th) for National Guard denied? The committee hasn't addressed the lack of security and preparedness at the Capitol.
1
@truzar100 There has been some evidence presented from the J6 committee. However, a lot of the testimony has been hearsay. If there is no direct evidence to back up someone's testimony, it's not admissible in a court. I realize these committee hearings are not a real court, but they would like you to think they are providing you factual evidence. They are only showing you what they want you to see and hear.
1
@grahampaterson4368 Is there an actual recording of Trump saying those words? If not then that is hearsay and therefore, not admissible in a court of law.
1
@grahampaterson4368 Do you know for certain that someone hasn't come forward to refute Cassidy Hutchins testimony? There were several Secret Service Agents who refuted her testimony. One of them said they were going to give a deposition. Will we hear it? As far as the texts being erased, that is standard procedure when a new administration comes in according to the DOD.
1