Comments by "" (@asgaiyawaya3973) on "The Japan Reporter"
channel.
-
9
-
5
-
I always find it interesting that those who attack Christianity keep insisting Christians are a dangerous group, some will even accuse us of terrorism or engaging in it citing groups that did in fact exist and did associate themselves with Christianity. However, the second you confront them with a list of known terrorist, or just violent and dangerous groups in general and the START institute and the Institute for Global and Global Affairs in the Hague Netherlands does maintain such a list going as far back as the first historically accepted Terrorist group, and such groups are organized according to their affiliations you will find that the lists are dominated by left wing groups, like the Red Army Faction, the Black Hand, and Naradnaya Volya. Islam really dominates especially in the post 9/11 world but Christianity typically will have less than a handful of groups at any given time and for the most part they tend to be fringe groups. Even in countries where you wouldn't blame them for fighting back, like North Korea, it's almost unheard of. So it really raises the question where this accusation really comes from and why are they getting their information from them rather than doing the research themselves and seeing what is really the truth about it? Even their justifications for it are really from a stereotype about Christians but they still don't pay any attention to this fact when it should be making it crystal clear they overlooked something. Some of their justifications are in fact biblical but in 100% of times it's only half the story. As though they have no problem with reading the violent parts of the bible but hesitate when it comes to looking up the why behind that particular part and it shows whenever it turns out that particular Christian being asked the question responds with a more informed response and it turns out they in fact know the other half of the story then the attacker retorts by challenging the authenticity which becomes even more ironic because if they are skeptical of the back story which is part of scripture then why aren't they skeptical of the violent parts of the bible which is also in there? So they practice a double standard and it really just comes down to the fact they fear because they really don't know and they get their facts from people who only want to encourage that same fear rather than letting them know what the truth of it is. Before anyone challenges me on that answer one question In regards to anything you were told about Christianity from where ever it was you got it did you actually fact check it and got the whole story or did you just take their word for it? Yes, even if they have a Phd in whatever like Dawkins or Hitchens and even they got a ton of stuff wrong according to their own colleagues. Hitchens even admitted to being wrong in a debate with John Lennox. If the answer is yes you did fact check and you think this is true then how did the above fact escape your research? If the answer is no then at least you are being honest.
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1