Youtube comments of (@asgaiyawaya3973).
-
1600
-
447
-
167
-
139
-
98
-
79
-
76
-
66
-
61
-
46
-
40
-
39
-
37
-
35
-
34
-
30
-
29
-
27
-
24
-
23
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
The CCP is guilty of crimes against humanity which is defined as For the purpose of this Statute, ‘crime against humanity’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:
Murder;
Extermination;
Enslavement;
Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
Torture;
Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
Enforced disappearance of persons;
The crime of apartheid;
Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
For the purpose of paragraph 1:
‘Attack directed against any civilian population’ means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;
All of which the CCP and it's goons including members of the HK police have committed. Source of this definition is here. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/crimes-against-humanity.shtml
14
-
13
-
@Soon Kwek i actually lived in Thailand for 6 years and rotated my time between Philippines, Laos, Singapore and China and by my observation people are generally happier and have a much better soul compared to China. So be more concerned for yourself and less concerned of others. " We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." Thomas Jefferson. In words you can understand it is my business because by being a dick to your own people you made it my business. Don't like it then try leaving your fellow citizens alone so it doesn't have to be my business.
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I remember when this started my father was in absolute disbelief because he actually lived in California for a time and even loved San Francisco it wasn't until facts about this, thanks to Tucker, were coming out that he actually realized how true it was. To a degree you can still tell that he knows this but he flat out wishes it wasn't true. Kind of like when a cult member finally wakes up and realizes what he got himself into. Now don't misinterpret he is a conservative I am just saying he always had fond memories of California, as did I, he just simply had difficulty accepting that despite their Governor California turned into a third world state so quickly. I honestly can't blame him because back when it was the international trade hub it was an economic powerhouse for the west coast. LA alone was on par with New York as the place to be for international commerce. If you ran a fortune 500 company either California or New York was where you wanted an office. Now it is so far gone I can't help but agree California, and New York, will never recover and if it does it will be because of a major overhaul of the entire state. I only wish I am exaggerating when I say the word, "Major". Surviving Californians still in the state by the time of such an overhaul will probably still be struggling for quite a while before they will feel any kind of relief trickle down to them. Granted they did it to themselves, no argument there, but it does make you pity them. You remember those commercials back in the day about little kids in Africa and so on where, granted some of them were scams, volunteer groups asked for donations to help feed clothe and provide education for them? It's sad to say but I wouldn't be surprised if in the near future we see something like that for Californians.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
9 mins even though we were taught over the years the exact opposite, typically along the lines of there is no better country in the world, I have lived in Thailand for 6 years and really I never felt my freedoms restricted at all. As long as I respected the monarchy in that country and I didn't become a general nuisance then I was never even bothered by anyone really. Now I have experienced where I do have to watch what I say and do but that was whenever I had to go to Laos for a visa renewel but that was only because Laos is a communist country so it's going to be the exact opposite especially if you are a white foreigner then you are generally treated with suspicion. Thailand was very good to me I had a job the food was great and the people, my students especially, were awesome. I was treated mostly as a curiosity in most rural places rather than someone they didn't trust. Even the fact I was Christian was a curiosity for many of them since they were mostly Buddhist with a small, yet growing, Christian population. Many of the foreigners who come to thailand come for the beer and woman when they encountered me it wouldn't take them long to figure out I didn't come there for that and I was really just not that kind of foreigner. Point is living overseas isn't that difficult you just have to be willing to adapt and have a skill or acquire a skill that gives you a niche. For me it was teaching but I have met other foreigners who opened up restaurants, worked in international law, some have even been Private Investigators and travel agents. My best advice is where ever you choose to go make sure you know and understand everything there is to know from that country, find your niche to make a living, make sure you know and understand the laws of that country so you know the boundaries of course so you don't do anything stupid, and I can't stress this enough be adaptive. Sometimes keeping your mouth shut and just observing is the best way to adapt because it's the easiest way to figure out the norms and that will help you adapt to the culture. Well that's just my 2 cents if that's what you want to do. Only thing left to say is good luck.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I always find it interesting that those who attack Christianity keep insisting Christians are a dangerous group, some will even accuse us of terrorism or engaging in it citing groups that did in fact exist and did associate themselves with Christianity. However, the second you confront them with a list of known terrorist, or just violent and dangerous groups in general and the START institute and the Institute for Global and Global Affairs in the Hague Netherlands does maintain such a list going as far back as the first historically accepted Terrorist group, and such groups are organized according to their affiliations you will find that the lists are dominated by left wing groups, like the Red Army Faction, the Black Hand, and Naradnaya Volya. Islam really dominates especially in the post 9/11 world but Christianity typically will have less than a handful of groups at any given time and for the most part they tend to be fringe groups. Even in countries where you wouldn't blame them for fighting back, like North Korea, it's almost unheard of. So it really raises the question where this accusation really comes from and why are they getting their information from them rather than doing the research themselves and seeing what is really the truth about it? Even their justifications for it are really from a stereotype about Christians but they still don't pay any attention to this fact when it should be making it crystal clear they overlooked something. Some of their justifications are in fact biblical but in 100% of times it's only half the story. As though they have no problem with reading the violent parts of the bible but hesitate when it comes to looking up the why behind that particular part and it shows whenever it turns out that particular Christian being asked the question responds with a more informed response and it turns out they in fact know the other half of the story then the attacker retorts by challenging the authenticity which becomes even more ironic because if they are skeptical of the back story which is part of scripture then why aren't they skeptical of the violent parts of the bible which is also in there? So they practice a double standard and it really just comes down to the fact they fear because they really don't know and they get their facts from people who only want to encourage that same fear rather than letting them know what the truth of it is. Before anyone challenges me on that answer one question In regards to anything you were told about Christianity from where ever it was you got it did you actually fact check it and got the whole story or did you just take their word for it? Yes, even if they have a Phd in whatever like Dawkins or Hitchens and even they got a ton of stuff wrong according to their own colleagues. Hitchens even admitted to being wrong in a debate with John Lennox. If the answer is yes you did fact check and you think this is true then how did the above fact escape your research? If the answer is no then at least you are being honest.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
So according to you culture and living by virtue is worthless? So then why is it the United States, whom at that very time you were talking about, not only fought back but actually beat the Japanese? Not only beat them but also showed mercy after they had surrendered, after all they had already surrendered so what point was there in punishing them further when they already realized their foolishness, they had retained their own traditions and self-respect. See to you they are superstitions which show weakness and stupidity, but it doesn't change the fact that it brings out those virtues which all people recognize. That Thomas Aquinas calls the 4 cardinal virtues of Justice, Fortitude, Prudence, and Temperance. Or as CS Lewis writes it, Straight Dealing, Love of Kindred, Pity, and Shame. Doesn't strike you as odd that regardless of ideology, religion, and as you put it superstition everyone without exception recognizes Justice? And everyone in that war fought based on this one virtue. So, if superstitions bring about weakness and stupidity then explain this phenomenon that is most associated with religion? Why, is it that according to you the whole world shouldn't have cared what Japan was doing but based on what you call superstitions they acted in the name of Justice following a tradition going back to the Old Testament that is based on this one virtue? Perhaps you want to see it as weakness because it makes it easy to attack the virtuous and the traditional but regardless if it wasn't for these specific traditions that every culture recognizes the Chinese People would most likely be extinct you included.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
To comment on Fry’s last point no wonder we look at atheists as not being in touch with reality? Now I can’t speak for every Christian, I wish I could in this instance because it depends how well studied he is about the Bible and what church he follows since in my experience no 2 churches are alike. They can share many views up until it crosses into anything uniquely taught there, SDA’s and the sabbath or the kosher diet being 2 examples of this. Anyway, ideally the monk would have responded, “well why would that matter?” And the reason I say ideally is because when you study the relationship between Jesus and his disciples you come across an interesting conversation in Matthew 18:1-4, “At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Who, then, is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” He called a little child to him, and placed the child among them. And he said: “Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” And what’s interesting about this is these disciples asked this expecting Jesus to say Peter or James or whatever but Jesus instead points to the children, because you ask them about such things they simply act like it’s a game of some kind because of course their innocence makes them see the world in such a way. In another conversation Jesus is asked by a wealthy man what can he do to become great in heaven and he said sell everything you have and give everything to the poor. And of course he runs away crying because he worked his whole life for it. The point of both messages is that Christians ideally are discouraged to think in such ways because generally we should be content with what is given to us even if it’s very little. When a Christian does the exact opposite, which I am afraid happens probably more often then not we deviate from that ideal. Should we work hard or please God of course but we do so knowing our reward is in heaven and if god blesses us on earth then praise god but it’s the reward in heaven which carries more because anything we are given on earth, our promotions good luck and so on is only here on Earth but we can’t take it with us. Imagine all those kings, east and west, who spent so much for these lavish tombs to put all their belongings in, some included their wives and concubines, and then they get to heaven or hell and find out it’s just them and nothing else? That is what Jesus was getting at and what I mean by that ideal. It’s that understanding that everything on Earth we cannot take with us our rewards in heaven are there waiting for us.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I might be reading too much into it, which I am willing to accept, but one thing I learned from history course especially the past 100 years is that the youth easily manipulated into some pretty messed up things. CRT is one example but in my opinion is one the "Nicer" examples. I say that for a very good reason because when you look up very extreme examples you notice that youth are impressionable and do get themselves involved in very dangerous political groups mainly because they tend to be the most naive and at times sheltered. These extreme examples would be groups like the Khmer Rouge who were involved in the killing fields, for those who watched the movie Blood Diamond with Leonardo DiCaprio then the RUF and their use of child soldiers being another. So, it emphases what I keep saying in these comment sections about a reform in our education systems. Because the democrats are taking advantage of our youth, marxists and socialists especially and because they are learning all the wrong things they don't know any better. We want this manipulation to stop then we need to change our schools starting with our High Schools where the demand is most needed and bring back classes like Critical Thinking, ethics, and Civics. Give them the true history of our country and ideologies like Marxism, and I mean what they were really about not this manufactured pro socialist garbage. They need to know about the Cultural Revolution in China, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia the real truth about these sad events in history. Amateur writers can get in on this too by focusing on writing thought provoking literature that is about faith, family, and traditional virtues. To help get our youth reading the right kind of books that encourage critical thinking and culture. We are already taking those first steps we need to go further and make it an all hands on deck kind of thing where anyone who can contribute to this reform can make a contribution to it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The CCP is guilty of crimes against humanity which is defined as For the purpose of this Statute, ‘crime against humanity’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:
Murder;
Extermination;
Enslavement;
Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
Torture;
Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
Enforced disappearance of persons;
The crime of apartheid;
Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
For the purpose of paragraph 1:
‘Attack directed against any civilian population’ means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;
All of which the CCP and it's goons including members of the HK police have committed. Source of this definition is here. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/crimes-against-humanity.shtml
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheJayJayYoung Jonah was never a prophet in his own region. He was a prophet chosen for a distant country called Ninevah which is in modern day Iraq. In fact, that was why he was punished in the first place because he didn't want to sermonize to foreigners but God basically said to him, "Yes, you are." That was how he ended up thrown into the sea and swallowed by a whale for 3 days until he finally gave in and said he was going. Did you even read the bible? I can clearly tell you never read the story of Jesus from any of the gospels because if you did you would have noticed Jesus says no such thing anywhere in his gospels. In fact John 3:16 states "For God so loved the world..." he does not say Israel, the Middle East, East west, Egypt, he say's the world, ".....that he gave his one and only son that whosoever shall believe in him shall not perish but have everlasting life." and in Matthew 28:19-20 Jesus commands, "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.” Notice he never says go find some dude from that country have him do this job he commanded ALL to do so as in it's every follower's job regardless of origin. Seriously, you never read the bible did you? How did I draw my conclusions? Well for one thing I ACTUALLY READ THE BIBLE how is that for starters. In fact I am on the 9th reading and I don't mean a scripture here and there I mean cover to cover. I don't just read it I study it. Didn't you happen to notice in all my rebuttles I wasn't giving opinion I was backing it up with what scripture actually said? Your only acceptable excuse for not noticing is if your blind as a bat.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
China, namely the CCP, is guilty of crimes against humanity. Which is defined by the United Nations by the following any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:
Murder;
Extermination;
Enslavement;
Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
Torture;
Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
Enforced disappearance of persons;
The crime of apartheid;
Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
For the purpose of paragraph 1:
‘Attack directed against any civilian population’ means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
For your statement to be true society, which tends to desire religion, would have to be in constant conflict with authority constantly and universally and nothing is further from the truth. The answer why can be found in Psychology. All healthy respect for authority is dependent upon a healthy relationship at childhood with one's father. Dad establishes healthy respect for authority by being an authority over the household mom establishes healthy relationships between just people in general. In other words, it's a scientically proven fact that if you can't establish a healthy relationship even with friends or you cannot respect authority it's a good indicator something went wrong during childhood between mom and dad and you. What does this have to do with religion, or Christianity for that matter? Easy exodus 20:12 honor your father and mother. In fact the 10 commandments even Exodus through Deuteronomy establishes healthy relationship between people, society, family, law, and authority. So if religion is in constant conflict with authority then what's this doing in the Bible? Let me propose an alternative it's the opposite that's true in the case of China. It's authority creating conflict with religion? Why? What's the motive? Because Christianity is not a religion the CCP can control and it has this really bad habit, I suppose you can say, of creating perfectly content people who are arguably more moral due to a diety that is beyond the party's sphere of influence. And that is something the CCP chooses not to allow and is threatened by.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@HiDefHDMusic Have you even looked at capitalistic countries? It has it's flaws but it's not coincidental that capitalistic countries flourish and Communistic countries failed. To start, Abraham Lincoln in a speech he gave defined slavery this way he said, "You make toil, you plant the fields, and you make bread and I will eat it." The relevance of that statement is that the benefit of a capitalist system is that you reap the fruit of your own labor this also means it encourages and even provides means of entrepreneurship which allows a given craft, let's say food production for example, to be perfected. Why? Because the laborer is reaping whatever he puts in. If he puts in everything he gets everything he puts in nothing he gets nothing. Communist systems want to be the entrepreneur not the laborer. Proof of this? Who is it that lives in the big houses, rides in limos, enjoys the high class status and so on? It certainly isn't the laborer. In fact the Chinese laborers biggest complaint is being overworked with barely enough pay to get by in China's current economy. And how many have actually been credited for some discovery, or innovation, or even making better a particular craft that isn't a party member? I sure as heck can't find 1 and why would they when there is no incentive for them to do so. They are just happy to have a job and a roof over their heads. Who is reaping the fruits of their labor? The State is. According to Abraham Lincoln who fought a war to end slavery and passed the 13th amendment to abolish slavery that is the very definition of slavery. Is Capitalism perfect? Of course not but then again no manmade thing ever is but compared to communism and fascism it gives the best incentive for ones labor.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@陆莹-e4m Ever heard of a thing called a book? Or maybe a thing called the internet? Do you even know what a class on Chinese history is for? Yes I did do all three that's how I know about it. And your defense is actually a fallacy called a tu quo que fallacy https://www.fallacyfiles.org/tuquoque.html whether I was there or not has no bearing whatsoever on what happened and whether or not you believe a few people or a few hundred people died and whether or not you believe there is no proof equally has no bearing on truth. Why because regardless of what you think happened it is not for you to decide what happened and what didn't happened. 2) how stupid do I think chinese people are, you tell me? You seem to overlook the fact that recently chinese authorities go after anyone who shares a view the CCP doesn't approve of, Christianity, prodemocracy, anti CCP criticism and so on is very Orwellian because regardless of how far ahead you think China is Orwell still predicted it and even refers to it as thought crime. I even know for a fact this does happen because many Chinese refugees openly speak about it. Then there is the facial recognition technology which is also in 1984. I can go on? Even the use of propaganda, such as getting their own people to hate Japanese and Americans, through the use of state approved information, is very 1984. I can go on. How did Orwell know this because during the Spanish Civil War he fought with the socialists. Which put him in a position to properly study socialism and communism and conclude it's end result. Oh really, you are aware that pulling the race card over a fact is a fallacy called an appeal to ignorance right? https://www.fallacyfiles.org/igno especially considering the fact that racism is a belief that ones own race, not nationality, is superior to another which is never mentioned. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism if what you say was true then i suppose you must be racist for trying to say no one was killed at Tiananmen square. Note how arbitrary that statement is even though you didn't once mention race. You got any more rather ignorant statements or are you done speaking out of your ass just because you don't like being on the defensive? 4) I honestly don't give a crap what government Chinese people choose. They could choose a wacky system of government where circus animals decide policy as long as it is their choice it came from their own conclusions that is what I mean by progress. Their choice not Xi's not the CCP's, not Trump, not even the entire western hemisphere, their choice. And if you are offended by that notion then you must be racist for thinking that the Chinese people are not smart enough to decide for themselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If anyone on this thread hasn't seen it yet look up an interview that took place 39 years ago with a KGB defector. None of this is coincidental the defector actually has a word for these people, he calls them Useful Idiots. That's not a word of mockery that's to imply they serve a purpose and once the purpose is fulfilled, they will be the first to be done away with before they figure out, they were brainwashed into committing and supporting something evil. Sounds paradoxical because it does imply, they had been dubbed but it begs the question of how so unless they knew this was BS. Well, the guy's name is Yuri Bezmenov btw explains how this is so. It's not so much willful ignorance, even though it's part of its a full indoctrination that was slowly introduce over time. Imagine if you wanted to slowly torture someone over time, not saying you would but imagine if you wanted to, that's exactly the kind of indoctrination I, and Yuri, is talking about. Whoopi, Joy Reid, AOC even Biden, are useful idiots. But anyway, I don't want to spoil it but look up the full interview and watch it from beginning to end if you haven't already done so because his words are very prophetic. We should have been listening to this guy starting in elementary school and the fact he flew under the radar for almost 4 decades really tells us how far up $hit creek we actually are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheJayJayYoung I should also point out that by pointing out Noah's flood there was an entire layer of God's core teaching you definitely left out and Jordan Peterson actually gave an interesting talk about this in an interview with Bill Mahr that stunned even him because Bill Mahr was expecting that Peterson as a Psychologist wouldn't dive this far into the narratives of Sodom and Gomorroh the flood story as well as the story of Jonah and they are all interconnected because they tell the same message. The message is that those that know there is evil and wickedness being practiced then they have an obligation to speak but what happens if no one speaks no matter how much they know themselves they need to say something. Like let's put God himself off to the side for a moment and look at this as a moral obligation. Well according to law that makes you an accomplice and even worse complacent absolutely no different then if you did the crime yourself, whatever it was. So of course when the flood comes, or the fire brimestone, or let's just say the disaster in general even if we are just talking about your day in court, well of course it's going to come for you just as it is going to come for the guilty. Even our Criminal Justice system follows this concept and calls it Aiding and Abetting. It doesn't matter what you think Aiding and Abetting means the law has it's own definition and it's by that definition and no other you are guilty by. That's just the way Justice is. And when you take that reality and plug it into the Flood story you mentioned you do find yourself asking the question. Surely Noah wasn't the only one who saw what was wrong so why isn't anyone telling these people, "Stop what you are doing." Let's assume there were plenty of people who had enough conscience to see that. Well, according to the narrative none of them were speaking and that was the problem. Noah and his family were the only ones who not only saw what was wrong but was speaking against it. Now can we relate that to China? Well let's face it Romance of the Three Kingdoms alone along with every other narrative which described China's woes the answer is definite yes. Since the beginning of China's history China has been plagued by horrible Emperors, corrupt officials, and cruel tyrants all of which took over subjugated and even enslaved a series of former independent kingdoms and nations we now refer to as China. I only need a history book to prove this. Even the book of Odes, one of the 5 confucian Classics, contains poems which describes their plight. So the necessity of a foreign missionary teaching a better way was in fact a very wise way to approach China.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A wiser leader named Thomas Jefferson once wrote, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.--That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness." It seems to me that if a government is leading you "hellward", as you put it, then it is your duty and responsibility to act regardless of who you are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You know I actually studied Chinese History for a time, and I noticed something about the History of China that, if a given government or even society is not careful, can be replicated elsewhere. What would happen with the different dynasties is that you get this charismatic leader who takes charge, then a honeymoon period occurs, and it tends to very depend on the government. Then the same leader, in most cases it's one of his successors, takes charge and he should never have been given power to begin with, kind of like Biden or Pelosi type person obviously there are others, but I don't want to get ahead of myself. Anyway, so they start passing policies that made the people of China a lot like the People of our country are right now but a little more authoritarian and the people are getting more and more poor and pissed off. To make a long story short the Bidens of Chinese history pissed off their own people to the point where they could not take it anymore. This then creates a civil war, a warring states period to be exact, opening the door for another charismatic leader to set things right and the whole process repeats itself. Can this happen to our own country, well that's why we study history because obviously we don't. Depending on how this cold Civil War between Libs and Conservatives ends it can turn into a hot war from there it is possible it could end like the last one did or we can end in the same repeatable cycle for as long as the United States or whatever replaces the United States exists just like in China it all depends. Personally I think the libs constantly getting exposed is making them more and more desperate. It wouldn't surprise me if they try to do another J6 except this is to deliberately turn the cold civil war into a hot civil war. I hope I am wrong about that because I am sure we are prepared for the worst but I would like to think none of us want to fight a war with our own countrymen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To Fomo For your statement to be true society, which tends to desire religion, would have to be in constant conflict with authority constantly and universally and nothing is further from the truth. The answer why can be found in Psychology. All healthy respect for authority is dependent upon a healthy relationship at childhood with one's father. Dad establishes healthy respect for authority by being an authority over the household mom establishes healthy relationships between just people in general. In other words, it's a scientically proven fact that if you can't establish a healthy relationship even with friends or you cannot respect authority it's a good indicator something went wrong during childhood between mom and dad and you. What does this have to do with religion, or Christianity for that matter? Easy exodus 20:12 honor your father and mother. In fact the 10 commandments even Exodus through Deuteronomy establishes healthy relationship between people, society, family, law, and authority. So if religion is in constant conflict with authority then what's this doing in the Bible? Let me propose an alternative it's the opposite that's true in the case of China. It's authority creating conflict with religion? Why? What's the motive? Because Christianity is not a religion the CCP can control and it has this really bad habit, I suppose you can say, of creating perfectly content people who are arguably more moral due to a diety that is beyond the party's sphere of influence. And that is something the CCP chooses not to allow and is threatened by.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
General George Washington once stated that what separates the Christian from all other peoples is that he would rather die on his feet then live on his knees. In case you are thinking it's because we fight or make wars or whatever the counter argument may be, no, it's actually because we know heaven awaits us when we die. If someone handed you a fully paid ticket to Hawaii, or whatever your dream vacation is or the place you want to retire to or whatever just the place you feel the happiest, with hotel and everything do you honestly think threats and intimidation, or actual violence is going to bother you? Thats just a place on Earth now imagine the promise of heaven. The Bible repeatedly teaches us to not be afraid. If persecuted pray for our persecutors and if we are put on trial use it as an opportunity to preach God's true message but when it comes to death do not fear. That's what George Washington is really describing about Christians. You can intimidate us, you can threaten us, you can even kill us, but we have nothing to be afraid of because we know where we will be. If you want to correct that with belief, fine makes no difference to me that's still our attitude. Doesn't it ever strike you as odd that Christian history is filled with martyrs so willing to go to their deaths for their beliefs? And I don't mean in battle although that has happened too, I mean being executed for their beliefs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First of all, I love all Chinese I have yet to meet one I didn't like in some way shape or form. Now the story, I walked into this one Chinese restaurant one time not sure what I really wanted, and I had never been to this place before but I smelled good food and thought about giving it a chance. So, I go in ask for a menu to see what they had any of my favorites on there and I hear the host, yes I was learning Chinese shortly before this, talking to one of the servers and both of them were middle aged gawdy dressed Chinese women. One of them said to the other, "Watch I bet 50 dollars....." yes, she seriously said 50 Dollars, " he is just going to look at the menu and leave." LOL I couldn't help myself I decided to stay just to make her look dumb and when I did, she had the most embarrassed look on her face that I had ever seen in my life. Talk about being caught with her foot in her mouth and it turned out she was my waitress. I didn't smile or anything like that I already knew she lost face in front of her friend, so I ordered my food in English, it was a good meal, and I was cordial and polite. I waited until the very end when I started speaking Chinese to her which not only shocked her but now she knew I overheard her talking to her friend. She retreated back into the kitchen after that and sent someone else to collect the tip. Like I said I have yet to meet one I didn't like and I am sure she learned a lesson about people after that but I definitely enjoyed surprising her like that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yiwu9968 cults according to whom? See Paul and Jesus made it clear. Jesus said Judge not lest you be judged. For the same standard you use to judge others will be used against you. Mathew 7:1-3 and what that means is if you are not an authority nor given authority to judge, as in terms if law, then it's not your place to judge. Are there churches that judge who is a cult and who isn't of course and those are the ones who forget what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 1:10-17 " 10 I urge you, my brothers and sisters, for the sake of the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, to agree to live in unity with one another[j] and put to rest any division that attempts to tear you apart.[k] Be restored[l] as one united body living in perfect harmony. Form a consistent choreography among yourselves, having a common perspective with shared values.
11 My dear brothers and sisters, I have a serious concern I need to bring up with you,[m] for I have been informed by those of Chloe’s house church[n] that you have been destructively arguing among yourselves. 12 And I need to bring this up because each of you is claiming loyalty to different preachers. Some are saying, “I am a disciple of Paul,” or, “I follow Apollos,” or, “I am a disciple of Peter the Rock,”[o] and some, “I belong only to Christ.” 13 But let me ask you, is Christ divided up into groups? Did I die on the cross for you? At your baptism did you pledge yourselves to follow Paul?[p]
14 Thank God I only baptized two from Corinth—Crispus and Gaius![q] 15 So now no one can say that in my name I baptized others.[r] 16 (Yes, I also baptized Stephanus and his family. Other than that, I don’t remember baptizing anyone else.) 17 For the Anointed One has sent me on a mission, not to see how many I could baptize,[s] but to proclaim the good news. And I declare this message stripped of all philosophical arguments that empty the cross of its true power. For I trust in the all-sufficient cross of Christ alone." What that means is that there are no cults that tie themselves to Christianity there is simply the church. The groups that you are trying to associate as cults and what I refer to as cults, which would be Jim Jones are nowhere close to being the same. What you want to call a cult is the part of the body of Christ just as Paul describes. So yes you are banning Christianity and hiding it behind semantics like a snake hiding in a bush. The cults, like Jones's church were declared cults because they failed, manipulated and even deviated from scripture. See what I mean when I said we use scripture to test for false prophets? And this isn't judgementalness. This is what it looks like,, really looks like,, when scripture makes the judgement.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You know what, maybe I am reading too much into this so mark this as something I am just curious about, this might be a good thing for feminists. For years feminists depreciated men for our traditional roles. Even the Church was hit heavily but the whole trans movement might actually be telling feminists, "Hold up let's back up a minute this is not how we wanted things to be." Granted this is the result of feminists taking things too far, which is fair to say but they see that too. All I am saying is that feminists might actually be becoming more appreciative of men and how we can be for them. I don't support this whole trans movement and I do believe it takes advantage of accomplishments for biological women, I can't believe I had to use that word as an adjective for women, men can be their helpers I want to be their helpers. If they can see that in men, then great. We can move forward together, and I think that is what we are now seeing. I think this is a positive outcome to an otherwise disturbing turn of events and it's doing something I don't think feminists saw coming 10 years ago. Feminists are now seeing that, yeah there are some pretty egotistical guys out there, especially who are trans, but there are also guys who were never their enemy to begin with. We never intended to be, and we actually can stand with them if they will let us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1