Comments by "Remnant Disciple Lazzaro - Revelation 12:17" (@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217) on "GBNews" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9.  @avit719  You have a somewhta serious contorted, distorted, twisted and warped understanding of what is actually lawful and what is unlawful. Firstly i'm not religious, you are if you are not John 3:3-16 qualified. Secondly, where am i forcing people to murder the unborn? The intentional termination of the life of the unborn is murder by factual definition. And the intentional aspect means premeditation; in other words murder in the 1st degree. We already have laws on the books for this. This is NOT difficult to understand! IT IS QUITE SIMPLE: You have one side who honestly acknowledge that God/Jesus is the moral law giver/the only true standard of what law is and is not and thus put into action the morality of defending the unborn fetus being their voice since the unborn fetus has no voice and has right to life, and then you have the other side who are profoundly wilfully dishonest and wickedly abominably dishonest who deny that sex was created by God/Jesus to multiply mankind within a committed marriage between MAN AND WOMAN and they seek to circumvent it's God's/Jesus' design in order please carnal lecherous libidinous licentious lusts, affections, desires and passions to escape to attempt to escape the great spiritual and physical responsibility of dealing with gendering a child into the world - the fetus is the one who gets selected to die for the irresponsibility of ones engaging in sex knowing the woman could get pregnant even contraception at times. Picture in mind being frothing at the mouth devil-crazed lunatic furious that the government does not give the right for infants skulls can’t be crushed. Utterly abominably Antichrist, and according to the Scriptures [God's/Jesus' love letter written to mankind in His blood] those people indisputable megalomaniacal mass homicidalist devil-possessed lunatics.
    1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. Oliver, i tell you with honour as one as myself who is a word nerd/logophile [Rightist linguist/etymphile etc], as far as i comprehend, "mal-information" is the correctly formed compound word we ought to use in **intelligent English** not "dis-information" for the latter is a recent history inaccurate improper compound word construction by American "English" [as expected, they do not communicate in English but "American", there's a reason for this, it has to do with 1776 A.D.]. "Mal-" comes out of Latin ["mal-", word-forming element of Latin origin meaning "bad, badly, ill, poorly, wrong, wrongly," - as in malicious, malevolent, maleficent, malignant etc] I suggest we may use either mal-information or "Dys-" [word-forming element meaning "bad, ill; hard, difficult; abnormal, imperfect," from Greek dys-, inseparable prefix "destroying the good sense of a word or increasing its bad sense" [Liddell & Scott], hence "bad, hard, unlucky," from] if we truly seek truth [Oldspeak = Truespeak/Wisespeak/Biblespeak] for accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper and sound intelligent English. The meaning we are told for "dis-information" is false [yes OED in recent years is being manipulated to allow false etymological derivative definitions due to Leftist ideology] either due to incompetence [Dunning-Kruger Effect] or mal-information. If you do a correct indagation into the correct etymology ****of the word forming elements "dis-" and "mal-**** you will see they both come out of Latin into English with different meanings. "Dis-" [word-forming element of Latin origin meaning 1. "lack of, not" (as in dishonest); 2. "opposite of, do the opposite of" (as in disallow); 3. "apart, away" (as in discard), from Old French des- or directly from Latin dis- "apart, asunder, in a different direction, between," figuratively "not, un-," also "exceedingly, utterly."]
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26.  @stevehayward1854 Another parroting such NWO - UN - WEF falsehood. You people make me sick. All your claims have been repeatedly refuted by honest owners of these mobile toxic waste inferno fires. As one who studies the damn colossal lies of going to EV cars, i strongly encourage you to start watching videos on the Electric Car but i doubt you will, your mind is made up, don't let me confuse you with the facts. Batteries in the cold do not do well, even if they were to put in the car something to keep the batteries from freezing, that takes more battery power, thus again shorter range. As for the charging stations, this is all one mind-traffic-stopping profound global swindle, they do *NOT* really care about the environment, they care about CONTROL AND POWER. Part of the ....n....w.....o.... agenda, is this supposed 'transition to green energy' which really, is TRANSITIONN TO NIGHTMARE TECHNOCRACY, and they the ...nwo... kings/rulers have planned, of course, that if they successfully sell us on going to EVs even though they ARE DECEIVING/LYING TO US THEY ARE "ZERO EMISSION", well they have already planned TO SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE ELECTRICITY PRICES which of course is to ensure you DO NOT GO ANYWHERE with your 'green' car or even leave your home! Learn this now: **according to honest electrical engineers, the mind-boggling energy, resources, money, rare earth elements you would need to upgrade the infrastructure for there to be enough power required to ensure no blackouts or brownouts due to heavy load for electricity is A DAMN PIPE DREAM!!!! - it is NOT POSSIBLE!** Also EV cars are much heavier, when they hit you at even 30 mph, ITS MUCH EASIER TO KILL YOU because of the amount of momentum the car is carrying due to the weight + the tires wear out faster due to the increased weight AND it actually will cause accelerated road damage AND the lithium battery raging inferno fires are becoming more well known and common and more! "Net zero goals", THIS IS ANOTHER DAMN ABOMINABLE LIE - a PIPE DREAM THEY ARE SELLING THE DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT gullible suckers who are EASILY emotionally manipulated! We are carbon based life. Our bones, skin, organs, nerves, all creatures on earth, plants, trees etc ARE ALL MADE OUT OF CARBON! WE are the carbon they want to reduce = net-zero. WAKE UP and learn about the .....nwo..... agenda ASAP by learning about one of the hydra heads of this super Antichrist agenda named = The WEF/WorldEconomicForum. Go view this net-site i authored about WHY you do NOT WANT AN EV CAR ONE BIT AND WHY WE MUST NOT COMPLY TO BUY ONE OR ELSE WE ARE ONLY FURTHER ENSURING THE BANKRUPTING OF THE MIDDLE CLASS! cl1p [insert the period] net [forward slash] EVsNWOAgenda Lastly, go start viewing videos on this site exposing why YOU DO NOT WANT an EV car! Look up these video titles on this net-site: "The Disturbing Reality of Cobalt Mining for Rechargeable Batteries" "Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives' w/Siddharth Kara" "Car Company Executives Just Admitted Electric are a Scam." "New Study Shows Electric Cars are a Scam" "Toyota's CEO Just Quite and Said "To Hell With Electric Cars"" "The Final Nail in the Coffin for These Cars" "Proof Electric Cars are a Scam" "HUGE NEWS! Jeep CEO Shocks All Ev Car Makers!" "Chinese E-Bikes are Exploding like Crazy - Self Destructing Spectacularly" [this still applies since the reality more signifcantly a problem in EV cars] "An Electric Bus Caught Fire After Battery Explosion in Paris" "Hidden - China's Flagship EVs are Exploding in Huge Numbers" "Covered Up! - Chinas Electric Car Safety - You're Being Sold a Lie!" "Why You Should NOT Buy an Electric Car!" "The True Cost of Electric Car Batteries" "Here's the Truth" [by Scotty Kilmer channel] "Examples of Lithium Battery Fires" "TERRIBLE news for electric vehicle owners!" "No One is Telling You the Truth About Electric Cars, So I Have To" "Rowan Atkinson's EXCELLENT article on why EV = NO." "I DESPISE my ELECTRIC CAR. EV Owners HATE EACH OTHER My trip home from London almost ENDED in DEATH!" *"THE BIG EV LIE. Why They Won't Save the Planet & All About Dirty Electricity | TheCarGuys.tv"* "New Toyota CEO Shocks Everybody | Huge News" "The Real Reason Toyota Won't Switch to EV" "The western Worlds War against motorists! Are Electric vehicles just a new tool for state control?" "New Study on Electric Car Deaths Shocks the Entire Car Industry" "This Just Killed the Future of Electric Cars" '"Electric Cars it's ALL LIES, MANIPULATION & PROPAGANDA! Here's what it's REALLY LIIKE to OWN an EV!" "New Study on Electric Deaths Shocks the Entire Car Industry" "Everything You've Heard About Electric Cars is a Lie, Here's the Truth" "No One is Telling You the Truth About Electric Cars, So I Have To" 'No One is Talking About Electric Car Deaths, So I Have to" "Here's Why Electric Cars are a Scam (Tesla, Toyota, and More Exposed)" "Texas Just Killed the Future of Electric Cars."
    1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34.  @metalworker007 My reply does not disagree with you on that, but consider this: Our evil leaders, NE-F is one of the novels they use as a blueprint to rule us, it's not the only book, for example "A Brave New World" + "Fahrenheit 451" + H.G. Wells "A New World Order" and many more they pick and choose from as a buffet to come up with a ratioed mixture of these ideas. Aldous Huxley was Orwell's teacher in French i think it was, for a semester, and Huxley wrote a letter to Orwell that his novel "A Brave New World" was actually coming more true than Orwell's militaristic Communist vision boots on the neck and street Technocracy. It is grave error/irresponsible and/or wilfully ignorant to claim that Orwell's NE-F no longer takes lease in the realm of science fiction, it actually still has many parts in it that will always remain science fiction, you must remember always, when you think of Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four [which if people really honoured Orwell's work as they claim they would keep the title alphabetical as Orwell wanted it (correct English) not numerical] it is Orwell's vision of what Soviet Communism could look in the future if certain criteria were met. Selah. There are more parts of the novel that refute the claim NE-F is not science fiction. According to some surveys in Britain and even Canada, Nineteen Eighty-Four is the book people most often claim to have read when they haven’t. When Orwell wrote NE-F, he did so because of this: when the horrors of what Stalin was doing in Soviet Russia with murdering millions reached the shores of Britain, he became disillusioned with Socialism and thus this was the impetus of why he wrote the novel. He was acutely intelligent having good foresight, and his novel was him thinking, not predicting which he infers, what would Soviet style Communism be like in the future if it became a powerhouse again in an age with much more refined more developed technology? He was following a trend of how Soviet Russia operated, of what it might look like in the future if we did not resist the rise of the totalitarian nightmare kakotopia state. It was not prophecy.
    1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39.  @richardjohnson8009  Where you are in mis-conception is that, when Orwell wrote NE-F, he did so because of this: when the horrors of what Stalin was doing in Soviet Russia with murdering millions reached the shores of Britain, he became disillusioned with Socialism and thus this was the impetus of why he wrote the novel. He was acutely intelligent having good foresight, and his novel was him thinking, not predicting which he infers, what would Soviet style Communism be like in the future if it became a powerhouse again in an age with much more refined more developed technology? He was following a trend of how Soviet Russia operated, of what it might look like in the future if we did not resist the rise of the totalitarian nightmare kakotopia state. It was not prophecy. Our evil leaders, NE-F is one of the novels they use as a blueprint to rule us, it's not the only book, for example "A Brave New World" + "Fahrenheit 451" + H.G. Wells "A New World Order" and many more they pick and choose from as a buffet to come up with a ratioed mixture of these ideas. Aldous Huxley was Orwell's teacher in French i think it was, for a semester, and Huxley wrote a letter to Orwell that his novel "A Brave New World" was actually coming more true than Orwell's militaristic Communist vision boots on the neck and street Technocracy. It is grave error/irresponsible and/or wilfully ignorant to claim that Orwell's NE-F no longer takes lease in the realm of science fiction, it actually still has many parts in it that will always remain science fiction, you must remember always, when you think of Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four [which if people really honoured Orwell's work as they claim they would keep the title alphabetical as Orwell wanted it (correct English) not numerical] it is Orwell's vision of what Soviet Communism could look in the future if certain criteria were met. Selah. There are more parts of the novel that refute the claim NE-F is not science fiction. According to some surveys in Britain and even Canada, Nineteen Eighty-Four is the book people most often claim to have read when they haven’t.
    1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1