Comments by "Remnant Disciple Lazzaro - Revelation 12:17" (@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217) on "MGUY Australia" channel.

  1. 63
  2. 36
  3. 32
  4. 26
  5. 26
  6. 25
  7. 25
  8. 24
  9. 23
  10. 23
  11. 21
  12. 20
  13. 19
  14. 19
  15. 18
  16. 18
  17. 18
  18. 17
  19. 17
  20. 17
  21. 17
  22. 15
  23. 15
  24. 15
  25. 15
  26. 14
  27. 14
  28. 13
  29. 13
  30. 12
  31. 12
  32. 12
  33. 11
  34. 11
  35. 11
  36. 11
  37. 11
  38. 10
  39. 10
  40. 10
  41. 10
  42. 10
  43. 10
  44. 10
  45. 9
  46. 9
  47. 9
  48. 9
  49. 9
  50. 9
  51. 9
  52. 9
  53. 9
  54. 9
  55. 9
  56. 9
  57. 9
  58. 9
  59. 9
  60. 9
  61. 8
  62. 8
  63. 8
  64. 8
  65. 8
  66. 8
  67. 8
  68. 8
  69. 8
  70. 8
  71. 8
  72. 8
  73. 8
  74. 8
  75. 8
  76. 7
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79. 7
  80. 7
  81. 7
  82. 7
  83. 7
  84. 7
  85. 7
  86. 7
  87. 7
  88. 7
  89. 7
  90. 7
  91. 7
  92. 7
  93. 7
  94. 7
  95. 7
  96. 7
  97. 7
  98. 7
  99. 6
  100. 6
  101. 6
  102. 6
  103. 6
  104. 6
  105. 6
  106.  @nicolagianaroli2024  i shudder when i read this... i know it's true in some sense. Let me share something with you as one who studies on and off Orwell's work; In his important essay, ‘Politics and the English Language’, George Orwell foresaw the corrosive impact of Socialist and Communist “verbal purification” [read: the hijacking then bulldozing, corroding, corrupting, degrading, disintegrating, eroding, massacring, mutilating, polluting, poisoning, ruining and destruction of that same ACOPPSI/accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper, sound intelligent English (and language in general)] of the life of mankind. He warned that: “If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation even among people who should and do know better.” Cultural Marxism a.k.a. political correctness is indisputably intellectual colonialism and mental fascism for the gendering/begetting [true definition] of “thought-crime.” Thus; "The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words." - Philip K Dick. "As societies grow decadent, the language grows decadent, too. Words are used to disguise, not to illuminate, action: You liberate a city by destroying it. Words are used to confuse, so that at election time people will solemnly vote against their own interests." - Gore Vidal, Imperial America, 2004 "And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'" - George Orwell, "Nineteen Eighty-Four" pg. 32 "The thing about words is that meanings can twist just like a snake, and if you want to find snakes look for them behind words that have changed their meaning." - British author Terry Pratchett (1992) "Political language.... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give a appearance of solidity to pure wind." - George Orwell "It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words." - "Nineteen Eighty-Four" by George Orwell. "How strangely will the tools of a tyrant pervert the plain meaning of words." - Samuel Adams [Note: Left hand path walkers/Leftists, what you have read above this is what ruling Leftists teach weak minds to justify gaining power over others. I'm Italian, learned in Latin, Greek _[those two make up around 70% of English] and a few other Indo-European languages in all different strengths. I'm a linguist in part, lover of accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper and sound intelligent English and etymology etc. Certain English words only started to change meanings in a drastic way that as not etymologically justified beginning in the very late 1800s by the powers that be, and i know this because i have taken years to study such things since i'm a logophile and thus aletheia-phile.]_
    6
  107. 6
  108. 6
  109. 6
  110. 6
  111. 6
  112. 6
  113. 6
  114. 6
  115. 6
  116. 6
  117. 6
  118. 6
  119. 6
  120. 6
  121. 6
  122. 6
  123. 6
  124. 6
  125. 6
  126. 6
  127. 6
  128. 6
  129. 6
  130. 6
  131. 6
  132. 6
  133. 5
  134. 5
  135. 5
  136. 5
  137. 5
  138. 5
  139. 5
  140. 5
  141. 5
  142. 5
  143. 5
  144. 5
  145. 5
  146. 5
  147. 5
  148. 5
  149. 5
  150. 5
  151. 5
  152. 5
  153. 5
  154. 5
  155. 5
  156. 5
  157. 5
  158. 5
  159. 5
  160. 5
  161. 5
  162. 5
  163. 5
  164. “CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving ‚ I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not pollution and Global Warming has nothing to do with pollution. The average man, woman and child has been misled and is confused about what the current Global Warming debate is about, greenhouse gases. None of which has anything to do with air pollution. People are confusing Smog, Carbon Monoxide (CO) and the pollutants in car exhaust with the life supporting, essential trace gas in our atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Pollution is already regulated under the Clean Air Act and regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) will do absolutely nothing to make the air you breath “cleaner”. Regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions through either ‘Carbon Taxes’, ‘Cap and Trade’ or the EPA will cause energy prices [electricity, gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, heating oil etc...] to skyrocket. I absolutely detest EV cars... they symbolise the NewWorldOrder/UnitedNationsgenda2100 A.D./WEF Technocracy of owning nothing and being supposedly happy = a mix of Communism, Fascism, Socialism... beyond words dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold cacotopia nightmare. I am one of the many resistors, if we do not acquiesce, do not comply, do not submit, do not give, truly resist, millions upon millions of us, we shall win this particular part of the battle. If you have been suckered to believe you want an EV car, that's because you do not know enough to see you are being heavily bamboozled, beguiled, betrayed, bewitched into attaching the permanent shackles to your ankles all by yourself.
    5
  165. 5
  166. 5
  167. 5
  168. 5
  169. 5
  170. 5
  171. 5
  172. 5
  173. 5
  174. 5
  175. 5
  176. 5
  177. 5
  178. 4
  179. 4
  180.  @dps615  Here's a list i saw another post; 1. Child battery mineral labor 2. Range anxiety 3. Risk of garage fires 4. Paying 20k more than a comparable vehicle 5. every time you fuel up an EV, the fuel tank gets smaller and smaller. Battery degeneration. 6. Poor resale value 7. Reduced performance in cold, highway. 8. Higher repair costs 9. Awful charging network experiences in the weather without restrooms 10. Higher insurance rates 11. Replacing tires more frequently. Michelin states that tires wear out 20% faster on an Ev, and could be as high as 50% faster! Ev tires made for ev's, cost 20 to 30% more, than regular tires for ice cars. As Ev tires wear out, they leave behind more tiny particles of rubber than normal ice cars. This causes more pollution. 12. Death by autopilot 13. $25k - $35k battery 14. Low km range per tank of energy. 15. must wait in-line 1-2 hrs to charge. 16. Then wait more time to charge, while charging. 17. Spontaneous combustion, with no way to put out the fire storm. 18. If they catch fire in a tunnel, many people will die. 19. People without a pro charger system or a parking spot at their house, will run an extension cord to the road, which is dangerous and could lead to people tampering with your charging setup (super slow charging at the road) 20. If you're in California, you won't be able to charge your car past 4pm because of a shortage of electricity supply on the cheesy grid. 21. It is not actually "green". The pollution is made at the power station, not the car. 22. Only 5% of used junk batteries get recycled, the rest go directly into the bin. It's cheaper to mine for new minerals. 23. Chhinna actually does 70% of all the refining of the minerals and production of the batteries. 24. Minerals are becoming more and more scarce, and the cost will only go up, not down. 25. Some countries where they mine for lithium, actually use a very big boat load of fresh water to only produce a ton of lithium, so they are afraid of running out of water. It takes over 2 million liters of fresh clean water to produce 1 ton of lithium. 26. Ev cars will soon not be able to drive in tunnels or be able to park in underground parking garage and probably will eventually void your house insurance if you park it in your personal garage.... 27. You can't charge your battery at super stations when it is bitter cold out. 28. If a fire truck comes to put out an Ev fire, all the chemicals go directly into the sewer system, poisoning everything. They need tons of water to slow down the burn. They can't put them out. They are only trying to prevent over things near by from catching fire. 29. Ok, there is 2 good things; regenerative braking, which charges the battery while you are slowing down on the highway, which saves your brakes from much wear. 30. Loss of fuel tax revenue, so now the roads will only get worse, not better. 31. in Dublin, huge generators are being used to charge EV buses, due to electrical grid strain. buses in Athlone also cannot be put on charge until midnight, for the same reason. Bus Éireann is saying that they can't charge their buses until 11pm for the same reason, and to avail of a lower tariff. 32. Not everyone on earth even has electricity to charge their cars. What are they supposed to do in 2035? It's easy to get a bucket of fuel to power up a regular car. 33. VCE, or "vapour cloud explosion" is very bad. If any battery, typically anything larger than an E-scooter battery, and especially only "half" charged. If a problem occurs in the cells, it might not catch on fire right away. Instead, a cloud appears, and then may be ignited a short period afterwards. There are 2 different types of vapour clouds that appear; heavier and lighter than air, which form will be dominate, can not be predicted yet. This produces a bomm. 34. For Ev transport trucks, they aren't allowed to carry the same payload as a diesel truck, because of the massive weight of the battery. The owner of the Ev truck therefore loses potential profit, every day. They also lose more profit for the waiting times for charging that Ev truck. The driver will get paid to charge the truck, which in turn forces the owner of the truck to lose more money. 35. Ev cars are more likely to be written off, if they experience a minor collision. After the collision, something could have upset the structural integrity of the battery. 36. Ev cars lie to you. If you are bold enough to go out on a decent road trip and its 210 miles, one way, and your Ev tells you that your battery will last you 223 miles, there had better be no hills, or excessively cold out.... You'll probably get stranded, trying to get to the charger, at the end of the trip. Ev's have left many families stranded already. 37. Ev's and their batteries, will soon need their very own "passport". With all info about them when born, and current info about them (power output, resistance, mineral composition, etc.) 38. Thieves stealing charging cables, will soon make it impossible to "fuel" an Ev car. They take a long time to replace the cables, just to have them cut again for scrape money. 39. Cars were typically being made lighter and lighter using aluminum and or fiberglass and or carbon fiber, to reduce emissions and pollution. Ev's are only getting heavier and heavier, causing more pollution than ever. Remember, an ev's pollution is made at the power station and the dump, not at the actual Ev, except for the tire particles as mentioned above. 40. More on spontaneous combustion of the battery. What if you had 3 kids strapped into car seats, in the back seat ,which kid do you rescue? More fires start so fast, there is hardly any time for even the driver to escape, let alone 3 kids strapped in. Ev's (External combustion vehicles) suck, and it's a bridge to nowhere. But they do sometimes convert themselves into "internal combustion", but sadly, they can only do that 1 time.
    4
  181. 4
  182. 4
  183. 4
  184. 4
  185. 4
  186. 4
  187. 4
  188. 4
  189. 4
  190. 4
  191. 4
  192. 4
  193. 4
  194. 4
  195. 4
  196. 4
  197. 4
  198. 4
  199. 4
  200. 4
  201. 4
  202. 4
  203. 4
  204. 4
  205. 4
  206. 4
  207. 4
  208. 4
  209. 4
  210. 4
  211. 4
  212. 4
  213. 4
  214. 4
  215. 4
  216. 4
  217. 4
  218. 4
  219. 4
  220. 4
  221. 4
  222. 4
  223. 4
  224. 4
  225. 4
  226. 4
  227. 4
  228. 4
  229. 4
  230. 4
  231. 4
  232. 4
  233. 4
  234. 4
  235. 4
  236. 4
  237. 4
  238. 4
  239. 4
  240. 4
  241. 4
  242. 4
  243. 4
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 3
  253. 3
  254. 3
  255. 3
  256. 3
  257. 3
  258. 3
  259. 3
  260. 3
  261. 3
  262. 3
  263. 3
  264. 3
  265. 3
  266. 3
  267. 3
  268. 3
  269. 3
  270. 3
  271. 3
  272. 3
  273. 3
  274. 3
  275. 3
  276. 3
  277. 3
  278. 3
  279. 3
  280. 3
  281. 3
  282. 3
  283. 3
  284. 3
  285. 3
  286. 3
  287. 3
  288. 3
  289. 3
  290.  @artistjoh  "Nevertheless, there is another threat on the horizon. I see this threat in environmentalism which is becoming a new dominant ideology, if not a religion. Its main weapon is raising the alarm and predicting the human life endangering climate change based on man-made global warming." ---- "The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity, is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious, arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism." ---- "I'm convinced that after years of studying the phenomenon, global warming is not the real issue of temperature. That is the issue of a new ideology or a new religion. A religion of climate change or a religion of global warming. This is a religion which tells us that the people are responsible for the current, very small increase in temperatures. And they should be punished." --- "The attempts to command the climate and decide about the temperature on our planet are wrong and arrogant. I wrote a book about it which was published in English under the title 'Blue Planet in Green Shackles." --- "The climate change debate is basically not about science; it is about ideology. It is not about global temperature; it is about the concept of human society. It is not about nature or scientific ecology; it is about environmentalism, about one - recently born - dirigistic and collectivistic ideology, which goes against freedom and free markets." ---- "Environmentalism is a dangerous ideology endangering human freedom." ~ Václav Klaus, Czech economist and politician, served as the second president of the Czech Republic from 2003 to 2013. From July 1992 until the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in January 1993, he served as the second and last prime minister of the Czech Republic while it was a federal subject of the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic, and then as the first prime minister of the newly independent Czech Republic from 1993 to 1998. "There is no experimental data that exists that supports the view that the Earth's climate is changing in any dangerous way." ---- "The close relationships between the abrupt ups and downs of solar activity and of temperature that I have identified occur locally in coastal Greenland; regionally in the Arctic Pacific and north Atlantic; and hemispherically for the whole circum-Arctic, suggesting that changes in solar activity drive Arctic and perhaps even global climate." ---- "I am a scientist. I go where the facts take me." ---- "Changes in clouds and rainfall can overwhelm what little effect CO2-water vapour has on temperature." ---- "Science and its practice are no longer free and willing today but instead are constantly terrorized by research funding gravy trains and group thinking. This is why science needs defending and it takes courage to cleanse science from those cancerous elements and to bring her forward in its rightful place again. I am humbled and honored by this recognition." ---- "The warming we've experienced in the late 20th century could just as easily be explained by small decreases in cloud cover - natural changes in the system - and have nothing to do with CO2." ---- "The climate system is constantly readjusting naturally in a large way - more than we would ever see from CO2. The CO2 kick [impact of CO2 emissions] is extremely small compared to what is happening in a natural way. Within the framework of a proper study of the sun-climate connection, you don't need CO2 to explain anything." ---- "There is some CO2-water vapor feedback. But it's not operating on a global scale. The modellers cannot accurately separate water vapour from the effects of clouds and rainfall." ---- "Too much ice is really bad for polar bears." ~ Willie Wei-Hock Soon, Malaysian astrophysicist and aerospace engineer employed as a part-time externally funded researcher at the Solar and Stellar Physics (SSP) Division of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
    3
  291. 3
  292. 3
  293. 3
  294. 3
  295. 3
  296. 3
  297. 3
  298. 3
  299. 3
  300. 3
  301. 3
  302. 3
  303. 3
  304. 3
  305. 3
  306. "Organisms don't think of CO2 as a poison. Plants and organisms that make shells, coral, think of it as a building block." ~ Janine Benyus, Natural Sciences author, Natural Resource Management "These proven positive consequences of elevated CO2 are infinitely more important than the unsubstantiated predictions of apocalypse that are hypothesised to result from global warming, which itself, may not be occurring from rising atmospheric CO2 levels. The aerial fertilization effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment is the only aspect of global environmental change about which we can be certain; and to restrict CO2 emissions is to assuredly deny the biosphere the many benefits that accrue from this phenomenon." ---- "There are many direct biological benefits that result from higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Two of the most important are increased plant photosynthesis and water-use efficiency." ---- "With this information, in light of the increasing human demands on vegetation, it is my personal opinion that capping CO2 emissions or reducing them to some prior level would be akin to 'biting the hand that feeds us." ---- "There appears to be a lot of confusion about the biological benefits of elevated CO2 because the popular media typically fails to report them. Doomsday scenarios of global warming are much more dramatic than the good news of global greening." ~ Keith E. Idso, Botanist, VP of Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, B.S. in Agriculture with a major in Plant Sciences from the University of Arizona, M.S. from the same institution with a major in Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Ph.D. in Botany at Arizona State University. [In 1994, Idso, along with his father, published a review paper on the topic of increased CO2 levels and their effects on plant growth. The paper concluded that not only did other factors not diminish the ability of CO2 to increase plant growth rates, that "the data show the relative growth-enhancing effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment to be greatest when resource limitations and environmental stresses are most severe." As of 1999, he was teaching biology in the Maricopa County Community College District as an adjunct professor, a post to which he was appointed in 1996.] "I am quite surprised and rather disappointed by the loneliness, isolation and indeed demonisation the sadly misunder­stood CO2 is experiencing. Thus, upon leaving the parliament, I am contemplating the foundation of an organisation called 'The Friends of Carbon Dioxide'. Membership will of course be open to all, including the plants whose very existence depends on CO2. I think this organisation's slogan, 'CO2 is not pollution', self-selects. It has both accuracy and melody to commend it." ---- "Making the documentary was an extraordinary experience and it really hit home to me the quasi-religious nature of this anthropogenic global warming cause. These people really have found religion." ---- "I am not at all convinced that human emissions of CO2 are adding to global warming.... I remain to be convinced about the theory of anthropogenic global warming." ---- *" ~ Nick Minchin, Australian Politician, former Australian Consul-General in New York, USA. "Global warming hysterics generally have limited scientific knowledge, and of geology and meteorology in particular. Their belief is not science; it's more akin to religion. The main epicenter of hysteria is not the scientific community but seems to be Hollywood." ---- "*They've been changing the cry from "global warming" to "climate change" because there's so little evidence there's actually any warming going on. I believe that as little as a decade from now, global warming will be recognized as one of the greatest swindles in world history. It has so little scientific basis, it can only rationally be considered a political scam."* ~ American writer, speculator, founder and chairman of Casey Research. He describes himself as an anarcho-capitalist influenced by the works of novelist Ayn Rand.
    3
  307. 3
  308. 3
  309. 3
  310. 3
  311. 3
  312. 3
  313. 3
  314. 3
  315. 3
  316. 3
  317. 3
  318. 3
  319. 3
  320. 3
  321. 3
  322. 3
  323. 3
  324. 3
  325. 3
  326. 3
  327. 3
  328. 3
  329. 3
  330. 3
  331. 3
  332. 3
  333. 3
  334. 3
  335. 3
  336. 3
  337. 3
  338. 3
  339. 3
  340. 3
  341. 3
  342. 3
  343. 3
  344. 3
  345. 3
  346. 3
  347. 3
  348. 3
  349.  @teardowndan5364  We would be MUCH better off to continue with oil and gas than EV cars due to how we have had at least a hundred years to refine diesel and gas motors making them so efficient and are still able to be made more so, powered by fuel that is quite high in energy density and efficiency. The mining of just the lithium required for one battery is about 22 tons of lithium ore. That doesn’t take into consideration the nickel and cobalt. The mining is done with off road equipment that doesn’t use low sulphur diesel, have catalytic converters, or use DEF. The highway fuels have road tax added to pay for road maintenance. What you pay depends on how much you drive. With EVs, the added weight will increase road wear and ALL electric use will be taxed to pay for it. If you don’t even own a vehicle you will be pay road tax to heat and cool your home and cook your food. Most electricity in this country comes from hydrocarbons **erroneously called "fossil fuels."** The friction and heat from the generators plus the line loss from transmission leads to less efficiency than just burning the fuel in an efficient ice engine. When it comes to changing, homes with a driveway or garage can home charge. People who live in apartments, condos, or places with only street parking will be out of luck. If you charge outside, the charging cables are prime targets for theft. If you charge in your garage and the battery catches fire, your house burns down because you are unable to put it out. With a gasoline powered car you may have been sometimes 5th or 6th in line to refuel. 15-30 minutes. An EV with the same line could easily be 6-12 hours before you even get to the charger. If your gas car runs out of fuel in the middle of nowhere, you can call your roadside assistance and they will bring you a couple of gallons of fuel and you are on your way. EV cars can also be remotely disabled to restrict your movement. The word that comes to mind is SUPER SCAM + SUPER ANTI-FREEDOM. Oil/gas powered engines are still truly the best choice for a very long time, especially when you learn oil is **ABIOTIC.**
    3
  350. 3
  351. 3
  352. 3
  353. 3
  354. 3
  355. 3
  356. 3
  357. 3
  358. 3
  359. 3
  360. 3
  361. 3
  362. 3
  363. 3
  364. 3
  365. 3
  366. 3
  367. 3
  368. 3
  369. 3
  370. 3
  371. 3
  372. 3
  373. 3
  374. 3
  375. 3
  376. 3
  377. 3
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. "What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition, of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that CO2 from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that CO2 the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison." ~ Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. is an [Alfred P. Sloan] Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving ‚ I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT CO2... well.. it's required for photosynthesis, it's a certain miracle molecule that only takes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, that miracle molecule is required for life on this earth = it's plant food, we as mankind have a reciprocal relationship with plants, we exhale CO2, plants absorb it and convert it to oxygen which they give us - we are carbon based life.. Please consider the following experiential knowledge from a decades well learned honourable forthright truthful quality scientist so that you may see it is overt science misinformation to feed an audience who that obviously failed basic science class that supposedly CO2 is supposedly the enemy. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not pollution and Global Warming has nothing to do with pollution. The average man, woman and child has been misled and is confused about what the current Global Warming debate is about, greenhouse gases. None of which has anything to do with air pollution. People are confusing Smog, Carbon Monoxide (CO) and the pollutants in car exhaust with the life supporting, essential trace gas in our atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Pollution is already regulated under the Clean Air Act and regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) will do absolutely nothing to make the air you breath “cleaner”. Regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions through either ‘Carbon Taxes’, ‘Cap and Trade’ or the EPA will cause energy prices [electricity, gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, heating oil etc...] to skyrocket.
    2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. We are carbon based life. We are the carbon they want to reduce = net-zero. Dangerous malicious Socialist fantasies. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH RARE EARTH MINERALS to make the batteries and THE PROFOUND IMMENSE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE done to the earth to get to Cobalt, Lithium etc ravages the earth, oh these absolute **frauds** in morality! The useful f/tools of the Collectivists [Communists, Socialists, Fascists] of course have been put into a potent delusion owning nothing and supposedly be "hiappy"...oh these NewWorldOrderAgenda via hydra heads UN Agenda 2100 A.D./WEF cult fan/worshipper of the state as "God", who basically are assisting the destruction of the ethical Free Market West [meaning when it's not crony Capitalism] by the World Economic Fascists. Capitalism might not be perfect but IT IS WHAT HAS GIVEN MANKIND THE FIRST WORLD FRUITS LIKE GOD-GIFTED FREEDOM WE HAVE! And thus made possible advanced sophisticated computers we are using whether it is on our desk or our cell phone, and our ability to have running water, food delivery to our door and so many other fruits of the first world life. As one as myself who studies the damn colossal lies of going to EV cars, many masses of imbecility clearly do not care about the colossal Electric Car lie - they live in this "Just Stop Oil" profound sun sized delusion. Batteries in the cold do not do as well especially in the UK just like here in Canada, even if they were to put in the car something to keep the batteries from freezing, that takes MORE battery power, thus again shorter range! As for the charging stations, they same Gaia-worshipping maniacs are unable to accept obviously this is all one mind-traffic-stopping profound global swindle, they do *NOT* really care about the environment, they care about CONTROL AND POWER. Part of the GlobalGovernance/NovusOrdosSeclorum agenda, is this supposed 'transition to "green energy" which really, is TRANSITIONN TO NIGHTMARE TECHNOCRACY, and the utmost kings/rulers of this grand great international plot have planned, of course, that if they successfully sell us on going to EVs even though they ARE LYING TO US THEY ARE "ZERO EMISSION"...well they have already planned TO SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE ELECTRICITY PRICES which of course is to ensure you DO NOT GO ANYWHERE with your 'green' car or even leave your home! ALSO pro-EV car types MUST learn this now: **according to honest electrical engineers, the mind-boggling energy, resources, money, rare earth elements you would need to upgrade the infrastructure for there to be enough power required to ensure no blackouts or brownouts due to heavy load for electricity is A COLOSSAL DELUSIONAL DAM PIPE DREAM!!!! - it is indisputably NOT POSSIBLE among those who do the mining etc!** Also, EV cars are much heavier, when they hit you at even 30 mph, ITS MUCH EASIER TO KILL YOU because of the amount of momentum the car is carrying due to the significant weight increase due to the batteries AND the tires wear out faster due to the much more weight AND it actually will cause accelerated road damage AND the lithium battery raging inferno fires are becoming more well known and common and more! And those pro "net-zero" top level Dunning-Kruger Effect ones = super underwits, THIS IS ANOTHER DAM ABOMINABLE LIE - a SUPRA PIPE DREAM THEY ARE SELLING THE DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT gullible sucker-dolts who are EASILY emotionally and mentally manipulated! **We are carbon based life. Our bones, skin, organs, nerves, all creatures on earth, plants, trees etc ARE ALL MADE OUT OF CARBON! WE are the carbon they want to reduce = net-zero.** WAKE UP and learn about the GlobalGovernance/NovusOrdosSeclorum agenda ASAP by learning about one of the hydra heads of this super Antichrist agenda named = The WEF/WorldEconomicForum. Go view this net-site fact-based piece i authored about WHY you do NOT WANT AN EV CAR ONE BIT AND WHY WE MUST NOT COMPLY TO BUY ONE OR ELSE WE ARE ONLY FURTHER ENSURING THE BANKRUPTING OF THE MIDDLE CLASS! cl1p [insert the period] net [forward slash] EVsNWOAgenda Lastly, go start viewing videos on this site exposing why YOU DO NOT WANT an EV car! Look up these video titles on this net-site: "The Disturbing Reality of Cobalt Mining for Rechargeable Batteries" "Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives' w/Siddharth Kara" "Car Company Executives Just Admitted Electric are a Scam." "New Study Shows Electric Cars are a Scam" "Toyota's CEO Just Quite and Said "To Hell With Electric Cars"" "The Final Nail in the Coffin for These Cars" "Proof Electric Cars are a Scam" "HUGE NEWS! Jeep CEO Shocks All Ev Car Makers!" "Chinese E-Bikes are Exploding like Crazy - Self Destructing Spectacularly" [this still applies since the reality more signicantly a problem in EV cars] "An Electric Bus Caught Fire After Battery Explosion in Paris" "Hidden - China's Flagship EVs are Exploding in Huge Numbers" "Covered Up! - Chinas Electric Car Safety - You're Being Sold a Lie!" "Why You Should NOT Buy an Electric Car!" "The True Cost of Electric Car Batteries" "Here's the Truth" [bys Scotty Kilmer channel] "Examples of Lithium Battery Fires" "TERRIBLE news for electric vehicle owners!" "No One is Telling You the Truth About Electric Cars, So I Have To" "Rowan Atkinson's EXCELLENT article on why EV = NO." There are plenty more!
    2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. Forget EVs ang buy a ICE vehicle instead. EVs are part of a drive to get private cars OFF the road altogether. Second hand EVs are unpopular with buyers. There’s poor charging infrastructure, battery safety issues and obsolescence of present batteries as improved batteries reach the market. We would be MUCH better off to continue with oil and gas than EV cars due to how we have had at least a hundred years to consistently refine diesel and gas motors making them run more clean and so efficient and are still able to be made more so, powered by fuel that is quite high in energy density and efficiency. The mining of just the lithium required for one battery is about 22 tons of lithium ore. That doesn’t take into consideration the nickel and cobalt and other hard to obtain metals used. The mining is done with off road equipment that requires hydrocarbon fuel for the power and lesser weight of fluid fuels, and to even think batteries could be used is absolute bonkers lunacy delusions of having experiential sound minded knowledge on why this would supposedly work when no way, since the increase in weight would be colossal and only cause such mega-machines to be so more greatly heavy that it defeats the purpose of using the vehicle to mine since it would take more resources and energy to use the vehicle than compared to hydrocarbon fuels, it's such a mindless fool idea. Sure the megamachines my not have catalytic converters, or use DEF, but one volcano eruption puts out profoundly more amount of carbon monoxide and other noxious gases than mining operations have done in roughly half a century. Also: The highway fuels have road tax added to pay for road maintenance. What you pay depends on how much you drive. With EVs, the added weight will increase road wear and ALL electric use will be taxed to pay for it. If you don’t even own a vehicle you WILL be pay road tax to heat and cool your home and cook your food. Most electricity in this country [Canada] comes from hydrocarbons **erroneously called "fossil fuels."** The friction and heat from the generators plus the line loss from transmission leads to less efficiency than just burning the fuel in an efficient ice engine. When it comes to changing, homes with a driveway or garage can home charge - but the cost of that is already designed to increase as part of the agenda to further bankrupt the middle class. People who live in apartments, condos, or places with only street parking will have no real place to charge their EVs if they buy into this profound facinorous NewWorlOrderAgenda swindle. If you charge outside, the charging cables are prime targets for theft and isn't that interesting how crime levels in all major cities in the West continue to increase dramatically. If you charge in your garage and the battery catches fire, your house burns down because you are unable to put it out due to the blow torch flames at 5000F and the nature of the type of fire. With a gasoline powered car you may have been sometimes 5th or 6th in line to refuel. 15-30 minutes. An EV with the same line could easily be 6-12 hours before you even get to the charger. If your gas car runs out of fuel in the middle of nowhere, you can call your roadside assistance and they will bring you a couple of gallons of fuel and you are on your way. EV cars are also able to be REMOTELY DISABLED TO RESTRICT YOUR MOVEMENT, how's that for "freedom" eh? The word that comes to mind is SUPER SCAM + SUPER ANTI-FREEDOM. Oil/gas powered engines are still truly the best choice for a very long time, especially when you learn oil is **ABIOTIC.**
    2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587. 2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. "AI" controller enforcer robots. Sigh... smh. Another one who has watched one too many science fantasy/fiction movies inherently based on materialist view of reality that is intrinsically and inescapable fatally flawed. "Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful." ~ Philip K. Dick This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view; cybernews [insert the period] kom [forward slash] editorial [forward slash] machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine [what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems] does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a part, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot. "AI" only "exists" in the realm of science fantasy/fiction and the NewWorldOrder kings/rulers refer to the great myriads of society they have been spending decades stultifying as the actual 'artificial intelligence'. The more dim-witted and dulled-down they make the society, the easier it is to deceive them that something is true, when it's not true. What is called ''AI'' [a great made up lie by satan] by premier swindlers and their victims, is not no matter how much they claim it is and it will never exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. Leave it where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist".
    1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. I absolutely abhor, detest, hate, loathe censorship, i am becoming so sick and tired this increasing reality. I left a reply and yet again it was nuked! Let me try again: "What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition, of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that CO2 from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that CO2 the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison." ~ Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. is an [Alfred P. Sloan] Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving ‚ I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT CO2... well.. it's required for photosynthesis, it's a certain miracle molecule that only takes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, that miracle molecule is required for life on this earth = it's plant food, we as mankind have a reciprocal relationship with plants, we exhale CO2, plants absorb it and convert it to oxygen which they give us - we are carbon based life.. Please consider the following experiential knowledge from a decades well learned honourable forthright truthful quality scientist so that you may see it is overt science misinformation to feed an audience who that obviously failed basic science class that supposedly CO2 is supposedly the enemy. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not pollution and Global Warming has nothing to do with pollution. The average man, woman and child has been misled and is confused about what the current Global Warming debate is about, greenhouse gases. None of which has anything to do with air pollution. People are confusing Smog, Carbon Monoxide (CO) and the pollutants in car exhaust with the life supporting, essential trace gas in our atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Pollution is already regulated under the Clean Air Act and regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) will do absolutely nothing to make the air you breath “cleaner”. Regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions through either ‘Carbon Taxes’, ‘Cap and Trade’ or the EPA will cause energy prices [electricity, gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, heating oil etc...] to skyrocket.
    1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667.  @kathym6603  I've warning people for some time about the remote control deception with EV cars especially how the elite have been using movies for example much fiction with some seeds of truth that our NewWorldOrder kings are showing us of where they seek to steer society so that there is not escape, no more God-gifted freedom/liberty, that they have gained full control over us, and this nefarious sinister megalomaniacal pinnacle lust for power and control over us is always presented as anything but such a dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold, cacotopia diabolic agenda but sold to us as though it's such a desirable future. They show us this in movies, novels, comics, shows, games etc to get us to believe it's an inevitable future, so we just accept it as a done deal... but no... it's not if enough wake up, do not comply/resist the NewWorldOrder agenda. If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self"] cars, they are SGCs or SCCs = Software Controlled/Guided Conveyances. MGUY, the point of this technology being pushed is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death, will you?
    1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. I mostly know what you shard and some i didn't... still i mainly agree. I've been learning about such things for some years now. This is where i strongly disagree: There is more than ever the coming to light indisputable evidence exposing the little over a century old great deception that petrol/gas and diesel come from "fossils" hence "fossil fuels" and that they are supposedly as bad as they are when there have been inventors over the last several decades who have invented quite the very clean petrol and diesel burning motors but such industry changing inventions have been suppressed by The Powers That Be. Also to add to that, we have petrol and diesel motors that are burning cleaner than ever due to constant refining of the technology and when a volcano erupts and releases the mega-tons of carbon monoxide and other noxious gases, such an eruption releases far more toxic forms of carbon [CO2 Is NOT a pollutant - it's a trace natural gas required for life on this earth like PHOTOSYNTHESIS] than all the cars and machinery in the world do in around a hundred years...volcano eruptions release significant amount of forms of toxic carbon to mankind not so much the environment [since God knew of course what He was doing when He created the universe and all that is in it since only He is the Creator not us] and so these are truths we are not told of course because they need to keep us heavily deceived and rape us monetarily for all they are able to. So about that 'fossil' fuels great profound colossal lie since the late 1800s; We have been greatly and heavily deceived by the claims hydro-carbons are from 'fossils' + about peak oil grand deception by the serious scoundrel top level swindlers. **Oil is abiotic, the earth will never run out.** I strongly advise you and encourage you to search for this title on here **"Fletcher Prouty Explains Invention and Use of Term "Fossil Fuels""** which is on "The Auto Channel" - do ensure you read the description for the video to learn of the credentials of the man talking. The clip is an excerpt from a longer interview.
    1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. Thumbs up to you and all in this thread minus "Jimmy". Here's something to further substantiate the hard factual operational scientific truth you pointed out. "What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition, of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that CO2 from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that CO2 the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison." ~ Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. is an [Alfred P. Sloan] Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving ‚ I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT CO2... well.. it's required for photosynthesis, it's a certain miracle molecule that only takes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, that miracle molecule is required for life on this earth = it's plant food, we as mankind have a reciprocal relationship with plants, we exhale CO2, plants absorb it and convert it to oxygen which they give us - we are carbon based life.. The experiential knowledge from a decades well learned honourable forthright truthful quality scientist as the one above exposes the overt science misinformation and mal-information to feed audiences that obviously failed basic science class that supposedly CO2 is supposedly the enemy. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not pollution and Global Warming has nothing to do with pollution. The average man, woman and child has been misled and is confused about what the current Global Warming debate is about, greenhouse gases. None of which has anything to do with air pollution. People are confusing Smog, Carbon Monoxide (CO) and the pollutants in car exhaust with the life supporting, essential trace gas in our atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Pollution is already regulated under the Clean Air Act and regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) will do absolutely nothing to make the air you breath “cleaner”. Regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions through either ‘Carbon Taxes’, ‘Cap and Trade’ or the EPA will cause energy prices [electricity, gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, heating oil etc...] to skyrocket.
    1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. "Auto" is Greek for "self", thus...."auto-pilot" / "self-driving" is yet another damn dishonest term invented by of course, the advertising/marketing industry. Only living beings, like men, women, dogs, cats etc can be a 'self', not an inanimate object. I constructed my own terms according to accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper and sound intelligent English rules, thus, SCVs/SCCs = Software Controlled Vehicles/Conveyances or CCV's/CCCs = Computer Controlled Vehicles/Conveyances. If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self" and autonomous] cars. The nefarious purpose of this technology being pushed by the kings of the earth is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death, i hope you as well make that choice, i hope tens of millions due to really put an huge obstacle into the NewWorldOrder agenda.
    1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. I will state this again due to how important it is; Please do not use that word sustainable. Here's why: That word was hijacked by United Nations, with their United Nations Agenda 2100 A.D., a quite nefarious and sinister plot in motion as i type this and as more people wake up to it over the years of what this agenda is truly about. So again i MUST state this again, this is ***pure UN Agenda 2100 A.D.*** So this word "sustainability" ...dear Lord how it's become ubiquitous now as part of the global mass mind control by the so facinorous underhanded United Nations Agenda 2100 A.D. If you spend the time to do assiduous competent, critically reasoned, deep digging, diligent, rigorous investigation in that agenda, you will learn they are the ones it may be argued that popularised the word "sustainability" and it does *NOT* mean what you think it actually means, **it means people have to die aka depopulation.** Learn who ***Rosa Korie*** [look up the video "Behind the Green Mask - Agenda 21 - Rosa Koire" - a quite eye and mind opening quite important rea and frightening agenda behind this push towards EVs and all that relates to it - and keep in mind the age of the presentation, she was one of the main voices warning us some time ago, which i myself have been also since i learned about this so wicked plot around 2008 or so] is as soon as possible, i may not agree with her choice of who to be partnered with nor her political position nor her pro-feticide position, but on these matters she did actually quite top notch investigation of what this whole "Sustainable Development" really is, and i will tell you like this, it's like a watermelon, red on the inside green on the outside, in other words there verily is a quite evil agenda where the Collectivists are using the environmental movement as a vehicle [excuse the pun] to force us into a dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold cacotopia Technocracy nightmare. We MUST NOT COMPLY/RESIST WITH ALL WE ARE or we shall never know what a middle class life is ever again, and only what being truly impoverished, chipped, databased, tagged, and monitored no different than a product on the stock market with a certain value given to it by the rulers is.
    1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. Thumbs up. It's sad man how many do not even realise that the more you allow a device to do the work for you physically and mentally, the more we lose the ability to be able to operate w/o them. Sure we do need calculators for bigger numbers, sure there are a plenitude of inventions that do make our lives easier and more qualitative, but when those inventions begin to be quite contributive to becoming more slothful in the name of "convenience" as the diabolic ever deceiving marketing/advertising industry seduces mankind into and thus such inventions becoming ubiquitous that we start to lose for e.g., our own mental and physical abilities, acuity, dexterity, skill etc to pilot a car as you pointed out, then we are actually being increasingly dulled down/stupefied [i argue this is all by design of the rulers over us] so that eventually we become like the people in "WALL-E" and we will not know how to do with one damn thing w/o some form of contraption and/or machine "helping" us to do it because we let the technology go too far in how much control we have over our own lives, hence; **"Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."** ~ Frank Herbert, Dune One more thing: If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self" and autonomous] cars, they are SGCs or SCCs = Software Controlled/Guided Conveyances. The point of this technology being pushed is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death.
    1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. I abhor these types of claim, they are self refuting since if what you stated was true, you would not be leaving the comment due to absolute fear of having the secret police bust down your door at 3am terrorisingly ripping you out of bed taking you to the Joycamps due to crimethink. Such claims are obviously made by a f/tool who didn't read the book correctly ot caring about accuracy which only further pollutes the collective consciousness, or, did read the book and is another who clearly did not truly comprehend as well as they could of the actual novel showing such a claim is intellection incompetent because. Even if we state "make Nineteen Eighty-Four [NOT "1984"] fiction again".. EVEN THAT is false because NE-F has NOT come into full fruition, NE-F is NOT fact in our reality, only some parts are which is due to Orwell's KJV influenced intelligent keen luminous mind in being able to forecast due to his experiential knowledge of having fought for the Communists in Spain [then becoming disillusioned with the mass murderous Collectivist ideology when the horrors of Stalin's actions reached the UK] and due to his well-read nature of what could be possible scenarios of how the more refined technology that would spring from what they had at that time could be used by authoritarians to stifle and silence any opposition to the ruling party to ensure full spectrum compliance and dominance. Sigh.. paralysingly stupid or even mediocre ones making such untenable claims only further stultifies society thereby causing lies and falsehood to reign supreme over truth.
    1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. See my reply to "user-zu6qn9ux9n" about "net-zero" and more information. I hope your figures are accurate. About "CO2": “CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving ‚ I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not pollution and Global Warming has nothing to do with pollution. The average man, woman and child has been misled and is confused about what the current Global Warming debate is about, greenhouse gases. None of which has anything to do with air pollution. People are confusing Smog, Carbon Monoxide (CO) and the pollutants in car exhaust with the life supporting, essential trace gas in our atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Pollution is already regulated under the Clean Air Act and regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) will do absolutely nothing to make the air you breath “cleaner”. Regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions through either ‘Carbon Taxes’, ‘Cap and Trade’ or the EPA will cause energy prices [electricity, gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, heating oil etc...] to skyrocket. CO2... well.. it's required for photosynthesis, it's a certain miracle molecule that only takes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, that miracle molecule is required for life on this earth = it's plant food, we as mankind have a reciprocal relationship with plants, we exhale CO2, plants absorb it and convert it to oxygen which they give us - we are carbon based life.. Please consider the following experiential knowledge from a decades well learned honourable forthright truthful quality scientist so that you may see it is overt science misinformation to feed an audience who that obviously failed basic science class that supposedly CO2 is supposedly the enemy; "What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition, of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that CO2 from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that CO2 the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison." ~ Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. is an [Alfred P. Sloan] Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. Thumbs up... i've been studying the NewWorldOrderAgenda since early 2001 when i was told about it.... tens of thousands of hours later, i agree quite a bit with your very well-read points you make, also because of having much experiential knowledge with cars, motorcycles etc and some erudite knowledge also with the things like 4G LTE+ [the inventor of 2G, 3G, 4G, 4G LTE, 4G LTE+ makes clear it's an advertising/marketing lie there is such a thing at "5G"... honestly, look up "5G does not exist"..with enough competent diligent searching you will see it's another scam that supposedly it exist but really as the inventor stated, it does not really exist but for advertising/marketing reasons... 4G LTE+ is what they call "5G", anyway[ and the other things you mention, and you gave me also some further insight so i mainly agree with you especially those 15 minute prison cities we ****MUST ALL NOT COMPLY WITH/RESIST**** ... so you make good points.. quite valid and reasoned. The below is where i disagree with you, hopefully you may find what i share edifying and consider refining your own position on such things and of course you don't have to, God gave us free choice. If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self" and autonomous] cars, they are SGCs or SCCs = Software Controlled/Guided Conveyances. The point of this technology being pushed is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death, i hope you as well make that choice, i hope tens of millions due to really put an huge obstacle into the NewWorldOrder agenda.
    1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882.  @tobycolin6271  Search for this article title on the net: "Carbon dioxide isn’t a “pollutant” causing global warming, it’s the elixir of life itself" Here's an excerpt; Without CO2, all plant life would die – which means all humans and animals would also die. CO2 is plant food, after all, facilitating photosynthesis and the life cycle itself. Removing CO2 from the planet like the climate cultists are demanding would render the entire world barren of life. It would quickly become a wasteland marked with death and destruction – and would certainly not be a paradise. For the past several years, the corporate-controlled media, Leftist politicians, and members of the Church of Global Warming have been telling us all that CO2 is a "pollutant." Nothing could be further from the truth. [Related: CO2 has absolutely nothing to do with global temperatures.] "CO2 emissions from industrial processes of the last two centuries have been highly beneficial to plant growth," writes Vijay Jayaraj. "Scientific studies show that CO2 has played a significant role in the re-greening of the earth after abnormally low CO2 levels had limited much of the planet's vegetation due to CO2 starvation." The massive increase in food production over the past century, which allows for the feeding of eight billion people worldwide, would also not have been possible without CO2 – not to mention slightly warmer temperatures in some areas that are more suited for agriculture. Ironically enough, CO2 is also responsible for keeping the planet green, as in rich and lush with trees, fauna, and other plant life. Without CO2, the entire planet would be brown and barren. For all of their talk about embracing a "green" agenda, the greenies are fighting against the very things that actually keep the planet green in color. Talk about insanity. According to Scientific American, CO2 acts as a fertilizer to keep natural ecosystems intact. Forests, jungles, savannahs, tundra, and everything in between all rely on CO2 to thrive, keeping animals and humans alive as part of the food chain. Amazingly, increases in CO2 from the pre-industrial age until now have allowed for "increased trees" productivity of around 23 percent. This means that CO2 is actively greening the planet and making it more livable. "For most of the other plants humans eat – including wheat, rice and soybeans – having higher CO2 will help them directly ... Doubling CO2 from pre-industrial levels does boost the productivity of crops like wheat by some 11.5 percent and of those such as corn by around 8.4 percent," says Francis Moore, a professor at the UC Davis. [end of excerpt].
    1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. "Organisms don't think of CO2 as a poison. Plants and organisms that make shells, coral, think of it as a building block." ~ Janine Benyus, Natural Sciences author, Natural Resource Management "These proven positive consequences of elevated CO2 are infinitely more important than the unsubstantiated predictions of apocalypse that are hypothesised to result from global warming, which itself, may not be occurring from rising atmospheric CO2 levels. The aerial fertilization effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment is the only aspect of global environmental change about which we can be certain; and to restrict CO2 emissions is to assuredly deny the biosphere the many benefits that accrue from this phenomenon." ---- "There are many direct biological benefits that result from higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Two of the most important are increased plant photosynthesis and water-use efficiency." ---- "With this information, in light of the increasing human demands on vegetation, it is my personal opinion that capping CO2 emissions or reducing them to some prior level would be akin to 'biting the hand that feeds us." ---- "There appears to be a lot of confusion about the biological benefits of elevated CO2 because the popular media typically fails to report them. Doomsday scenarios of global warming are much more dramatic than the good news of global greening." ~ Keith E. Idso, Botanist, VP of Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, B.S. in Agriculture with a major in Plant Sciences from the University of Arizona, M.S. from the same institution with a major in Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Ph.D. in Botany at Arizona State University. [In 1994, Idso, along with his father, published a review paper on the topic of increased CO2 levels and their effects on plant growth. The paper concluded that not only did other factors not diminish the ability of CO2 to increase plant growth rates, that "the data show the relative growth-enhancing effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment to be greatest when resource limitations and environmental stresses are most severe." As of 1999, he was teaching biology in the Maricopa County Community College District as an adjunct professor, a post to which he was appointed in 1996.] "Global warming hysterics generally have limited scientific knowledge, and of geology and meteorology in particular. Their belief is not science; it's more akin to religion. The main epicenter of hysteria is not the scientific community but seems to be Hollywood." ---- "*They've been changing the cry from "global warming" to "climate change" because there's so little evidence there's actually any warming going on. I believe that as little as a decade from now, global warming will be recognized as one of the greatest swindles in world history. It has so little scientific basis, it can only rationally be considered a political scam."* ~ American writer, speculator, founder and chairman of Casey Research. He describes himself as an anarcho-capitalist influenced by the works of novelist Ayn Rand. "Nevertheless, there is another threat on the horizon. I see this threat in environmentalism which is becoming a new dominant ideology, if not a religion. Its main weapon is raising the alarm and predicting the human life endangering climate change based on man-made global warming." ---- "The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity, is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious, arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism." ---- "I'm convinced that after years of studying the phenomenon, global warming is not the real issue of temperature. That is the issue of a new ideology or a new religion. A religion of climate change or a religion of global warming. This is a religion which tells us that the people are responsible for the current, very small increase in temperatures. And they should be punished." --- "The attempts to command the climate and decide about the temperature on our planet are wrong and arrogant. I wrote a book about it which was published in English under the title 'Blue Planet in Green Shackles." --- "The climate change debate is basically not about science; it is about ideology. It is not about global temperature; it is about the concept of human society. It is not about nature or scientific ecology; it is about environmentalism, about one - recently born - dirigistic and collectivistic ideology, which goes against freedom and free markets." ---- "Environmentalism is a dangerous ideology endangering human freedom." ~ Václav Klaus, Czech economist and politician, served as the second president of the Czech Republic from 2003 to 2013. From July 1992 until the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in January 1993, he served as the second and last prime minister of the Czech Republic while it was a federal subject of the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic, and then as the first prime minister of the newly independent Czech Republic from 1993 to 1998.
    1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959.  @GregNangle "Organisms don't think of CO2 as a poison. Plants and organisms that make shells, coral, think of it as a building block." ~ Janine Benyus, Natural Sciences author, Natural Resource Management "These proven positive consequences of elevated CO2 are infinitely more important than the unsubstantiated predictions of apocalypse that are hypothesised to result from global warming, which itself, may not be occurring from rising atmospheric CO2 levels. The aerial fertilization effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment is the only aspect of global environmental change about which we can be certain; and to restrict CO2 emissions is to assuredly deny the biosphere the many benefits that accrue from this phenomenon." ---- "There are many direct biological benefits that result from higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Two of the most important are increased plant photosynthesis and water-use efficiency." ---- "With this information, in light of the increasing human demands on vegetation, it is my personal opinion that capping CO2 emissions or reducing them to some prior level would be akin to 'biting the hand that feeds us." ---- "There appears to be a lot of confusion about the biological benefits of elevated CO2 because the popular media typically fails to report them. Doomsday scenarios of global warming are much more dramatic than the good news of global greening." ~ Keith E. Idso, Botanist, VP of Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, B.S. in Agriculture with a major in Plant Sciences from the University of Arizona, M.S. from the same institution with a major in Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Ph.D. in Botany at Arizona State University. [In 1994, Idso, along with his father, published a review paper on the topic of increased CO2 levels and their effects on plant growth. The paper concluded that not only did other factors not diminish the ability of CO2 to increase plant growth rates, that "the data show the relative growth-enhancing effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment to be greatest when resource limitations and environmental stresses are most severe." As of 1999, he was teaching biology in the Maricopa County Community College District as an adjunct professor, a post to which he was appointed in 1996.] "I am quite surprised and rather disappointed by the loneliness, isolation and indeed demonisation the sadly misunder­stood CO2 is experiencing. Thus, upon leaving the parliament, I am contemplating the foundation of an organisation called 'The Friends of Carbon Dioxide'. Membership will of course be open to all, including the plants whose very existence depends on CO2. I think this organisation's slogan, 'CO2 is not pollution', self-selects. It has both accuracy and melody to commend it." ---- "Making the documentary was an extraordinary experience and it really hit home to me the quasi-religious nature of this anthropogenic global warming cause. These people really have found religion." ---- "I am not at all convinced that human emissions of CO2 are adding to global warming.... I remain to be convinced about the theory of anthropogenic global warming." ---- *" ~ Nick Minchin, Australian Politician, former Australian Consul-General in New York, USA. "Global warming hysterics generally have limited scientific knowledge, and of geology and meteorology in particular. Their belief is not science; it's more akin to religion. The main epicenter of hysteria is not the scientific community but seems to be Hollywood." ---- "*They've been changing the cry from "global warming" to "climate change" because there's so little evidence there's actually any warming going on. I believe that as little as a decade from now, global warming will be recognized as one of the greatest swindles in world history. It has so little scientific basis, it can only rationally be considered a political scam."* ~ American writer, speculator, founder and chairman of Casey Research. He describes himself as an anarcho-capitalist influenced by the works of novelist Ayn Rand. "Nevertheless, there is another threat on the horizon. I see this threat in environmentalism which is becoming a new dominant ideology, if not a religion. Its main weapon is raising the alarm and predicting the human life endangering climate change based on man-made global warming." ---- "The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity, is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious, arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism." ---- "I'm convinced that after years of studying the phenomenon, global warming is not the real issue of temperature. That is the issue of a new ideology or a new religion. A religion of climate change or a religion of global warming. This is a religion which tells us that the people are responsible for the current, very small increase in temperatures. And they should be punished." --- "The attempts to command the climate and decide about the temperature on our planet are wrong and arrogant. I wrote a book about it which was published in English under the title 'Blue Planet in Green Shackles." --- "The climate change debate is basically not about science; it is about ideology. It is not about global temperature; it is about the concept of human society. It is not about nature or scientific ecology; it is about environmentalism, about one - recently born - dirigistic and collectivistic ideology, which goes against freedom and free markets." ---- "Environmentalism is a dangerous ideology endangering human freedom." ~ Václav Klaus, Czech economist and politician, served as the second president of the Czech Republic from 2003 to 2013. From July 1992 until the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in January 1993, he served as the second and last prime minister of the Czech Republic while it was a federal subject of the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic, and then as the first prime minister of the newly independent Czech Republic from 1993 to 1998.
    1
  960.  @GregNangle  "There is no experimental data that exists that supports the view that the Earth's climate is changing in any dangerous way." ---- "The close relationships between the abrupt ups and downs of solar activity and of temperature that I have identified occur locally in coastal Greenland; regionally in the Arctic Pacific and north Atlantic; and hemispherically for the whole circum-Arctic, suggesting that changes in solar activity drive Arctic and perhaps even global climate." ---- "I am a scientist. I go where the facts take me." ---- "Changes in clouds and rainfall can overwhelm what little effect CO2-water vapour has on temperature." ---- "Science and its practice are no longer free and willing today but instead are constantly terrorized by research funding gravy trains and group thinking. This is why science needs defending and it takes courage to cleanse science from those cancerous elements and to bring her forward in its rightful place again. I am humbled and honored by this recognition." ---- "The warming we've experienced in the late 20th century could just as easily be explained by small decreases in cloud cover - natural changes in the system - and have nothing to do with CO2." ---- "The climate system is constantly readjusting naturally in a large way - more than we would ever see from CO2. The CO2 kick [impact of CO2 emissions] is extremely small compared to what is happening in a natural way. Within the framework of a proper study of the sun-climate connection, you don't need CO2 to explain anything." ---- "There is some CO2-water vapor feedback. But it's not operating on a global scale. The modellers cannot accurately separate water vapour from the effects of clouds and rainfall." ---- "Too much ice is really bad for polar bears." ~ Willie Wei-Hock Soon, Malaysian astrophysicist and aerospace engineer employed as a part-time externally funded researcher at the Solar and Stellar Physics (SSP) Division of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "NASA should be at the forefront in the collection of scientific evidence and debunking the current hysteria over human-caused, or Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Unfortunately, it is becoming just another agency caught up in the politics of global warming, or worse, politicized science." ---- "... For nearly a decade now, there has been no global warming. Even though atmospheric CO2 has continued to accumulate - up about 4 percent in the last 10 years - the global mean temperature has remained flat. That should raise obvious questions about CO2 being the cause of climate change." [hint: The sun is the supreme driver of weather and climate on earth in the physical realm.] ---- "Global warming alarmists invariably try to make their case by resorting to rhetoric, dogma, opinion, and emotion. The closest thing to scientific data in their articles is the occasional chart claiming a poorly understood correlation between atmospheric CO2 and the Earth's temperature." ---- "NASA's Aqua satellite is showing that water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas, works to offset the effect of carbon dioxide - CO2. This information, contrary to the assumption used in all the warming models, is ignored by global warming alarmists." ---- "... The reality is that atmospheric CO2 has a minimal impact on greenhouse gases and world temperature. Water vapor is responsible for 95 percent of the greenhouse effect. CO2 contributes just 3.6 percent, with human activity responsible for only 3.2 percent of that. That is why some studies claim CO2 levels are largely irrelevant to global warming." ~ Ronnie Walter Cunningham, retired American astronaut. He was NASA's third civilian astronaut, has also been a fighter pilot, physicist, entrepreneur, venture capitalist, and author of The All-American Boys. "By geo-historical standards, today's atmospheric CO2 levels are remarkably - indeed dangerously - low. We need CO2 in the air to support plant growth and agricultural yields, and more would be better." ---- "I believe, AGW is simply a kind of collective hysteria with no basis in science." ---- "The truth is that climate alarmism has become the most expensive, and the most wasteful, project in the history of the world. It is junk economics built on junk science. It amounts to no more than hot air, yet it looks set to beggar our grandchildren." ~ Roger Helmer is a British politician and businessman. He was a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for the East Midlands region from 1999 to 2017. Before becoming an MEP, he was a business executive. "The oceans that surround the world produce 185 billion tons of CO2 per annum. *Man per annum only produces six billion tons, so what could possibly be the concern? One volcano puts out more toxix gases-one volcano-than man makes in a whole year. And when you look at this "climate change," and when you look at the regular climate change that we all have in the world, we have warm and we have cooling spells."* ~ John Raese, American Businessman "CO2 is not a pollutant in any normal definition of the term." ~ Joe Barton, [R-Texas] GOP Congressman
    1
  961. "Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful." ~ Philip K. Dick - This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view; cybernews [insert the period] kom [forward slash] editorial [forward slash] machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers - It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine [what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems] does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated pattern recognition software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a parrot, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot. "AI" only "exists" in the realm of science fantasy/fiction and the NewWorldOrder kings/rulers refer to the great myriads of society they have been spending decades stultifying as the actual 'artificial intelligence'. The more dim-witted and dulled-down they make the society, the easier it is to deceive them that something is true, when it's not true. What is called ''AI'' [a great made up lie by satan] by premier swindlers and their victims, is not no matter how much they claim it is and it will never exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. Leave it where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist".
    1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. Dear Lord you are intellectually inert, thus suffering severe cognoscenti position on the matter or you sold out to sell lies, damn lies, and statistics. @artistjoh  Are you a member of Just Stop Oil also? Your first paragraph is indisputable evidence of how easy it is to fool you with such profoundly facinorous Faustian full faux science due to suffering severe Dunning-Kruger Effect. "Organisms don't think of CO2 as a poison. Plants and organisms that make shells, coral, think of it as a building block." ~ Janine Benyus, Natural Sciences author, Natural Resource Management "These proven positive consequences of elevated CO2 are infinitely more important than the unsubstantiated predictions of apocalypse that are hypothesised to result from global warming, which itself, may not be occurring from rising atmospheric CO2 levels. The aerial fertilization effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment is the only aspect of global environmental change about which we can be certain; and to restrict CO2 emissions is to assuredly deny the biosphere the many benefits that accrue from this phenomenon." ---- "There are many direct biological benefits that result from higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Two of the most important are increased plant photosynthesis and water-use efficiency." ---- "With this information, in light of the increasing human demands on vegetation, it is my personal opinion that capping CO2 emissions or reducing them to some prior level would be akin to 'biting the hand that feeds us." ---- "There appears to be a lot of confusion about the biological benefits of elevated CO2 because the popular media typically fails to report them. Doomsday scenarios of global warming are much more dramatic than the good news of global greening." ~ Keith E. Idso, Botanist, VP of Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, B.S. in Agriculture with a major in Plant Sciences from the University of Arizona, M.S. from the same institution with a major in Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Ph.D. in Botany at Arizona State University. [In 1994, Idso, along with his father, published a review paper on the topic of increased CO2 levels and their effects on plant growth. The paper concluded that not only did other factors not diminish the ability of CO2 to increase plant growth rates, that "the data show the relative growth-enhancing effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment to be greatest when resource limitations and environmental stresses are most severe." As of 1999, he was teaching biology in the Maricopa County Community College District as an adjunct professor, a post to which he was appointed in 1996.] "I am quite surprised and rather disappointed by the loneliness, isolation and indeed demonisation the sadly misunder­stood CO2 is experiencing. Thus, upon leaving the parliament, I am contemplating the foundation of an organisation called 'The Friends of Carbon Dioxide'. Membership will of course be open to all, including the plants whose very existence depends on CO2. I think this organisation's slogan, 'CO2 is not pollution', self-selects. It has both accuracy and melody to commend it." ---- "Making the documentary was an extraordinary experience and it really hit home to me the quasi-religious nature of this anthropogenic global warming cause. These people really have found religion." ---- "I am not at all convinced that human emissions of CO2 are adding to global warming.... I remain to be convinced about the theory of anthropogenic global warming." ---- *" ~ Nick Minchin, Australian Politician, former Australian Consul-General in New York, USA. "Global warming hysterics generally have limited scientific knowledge, and of geology and meteorology in particular. Their belief is not science; it's more akin to religion. The main epicenter of hysteria is not the scientific community but seems to be Hollywood." ---- "*They've been changing the cry from "global warming" to "climate change" because there's so little evidence there's actually any warming going on. I believe that as little as a decade from now, global warming will be recognized as one of the greatest swindles in world history. It has so little scientific basis, it can only rationally be considered a political scam."* ~ American writer, speculator, founder and chairman of Casey Research. He describes himself as an anarcho-capitalist influenced by the works of novelist Ayn Rand.
    1
  972.  @artistjoh  "NASA should be at the forefront in the collection of scientific evidence and debunking the current hysteria over human-caused, or Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Unfortunately, it is becoming just another agency caught up in the politics of global warming, or worse, politicized science." ---- "... For nearly a decade now, there has been no global warming. Even though atmospheric CO2 has continued to accumulate - up about 4 percent in the last 10 years - the global mean temperature has remained flat. That should raise obvious questions about CO2 being the cause of climate change." [hint: The sun is the supreme driver of weather and climate on earth in the physical realm.] ---- "Global warming alarmists invariably try to make their case by resorting to rhetoric, dogma, opinion, and emotion. The closest thing to scientific data in their articles is the occasional chart claiming a poorly understood correlation between atmospheric CO2 and the Earth's temperature." ---- "NASA's Aqua satellite is showing that water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas, works to offset the effect of carbon dioxide - CO2. This information, contrary to the assumption used in all the warming models, is ignored by global warming alarmists." ---- "... The reality is that atmospheric CO2 has a minimal impact on greenhouse gases and world temperature. Water vapor is responsible for 95 percent of the greenhouse effect. CO2 contributes just 3.6 percent, with human activity responsible for only 3.2 percent of that. That is why some studies claim CO2 levels are largely irrelevant to global warming." ~ Ronnie Walter Cunningham, retired American astronaut. He was NASA's third civilian astronaut, has also been a fighter pilot, physicist, entrepreneur, venture capitalist, and author of The All-American Boys. "By geo-historical standards, today's atmospheric CO2 levels are remarkably - indeed dangerously - low. We need CO2 in the air to support plant growth and agricultural yields, and more would be better." ---- "I believe, AGW is simply a kind of collective hysteria with no basis in science." ---- "The truth is that climate alarmism has become the most expensive, and the most wasteful, project in the history of the world. It is junk economics built on junk science. It amounts to no more than hot air, yet it looks set to beggar our grandchildren." ~ Roger Helmer is a British politician and businessman. He was a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for the East Midlands region from 1999 to 2017. Before becoming an MEP, he was a business executive. "The oceans that surround the world produce 185 billion tons of CO2 per annum. *Man per annum only produces six billion tons, so what could possibly be the concern? One volcano puts out more toxix gases-one volcano-than man makes in a whole year. And when you look at this "climate change," and when you look at the regular climate change that we all have in the world, we have warm and we have cooling spells."* ~ John Raese, American Businessman "CO2 is not a pollutant in any normal definition of the term." ~ Joe Barton, [R-Texas] GOP Congressman
    1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. Dear Braying David... @davidbrayshaw3529  Your claim that there is not enough vegetation to "clean up" the CO2 is pure Leftist climate hysteria propaganda...i'm so sick and tired of it. "Organisms don't think of CO2 as a poison. Plants and organisms that make shells, coral, think of it as a building block." ~ Janine Benyus, Natural Sciences author, Natural Resource Management "These proven positive consequences of elevated CO2 are infinitely more important than the unsubstantiated predictions of apocalypse that are hypothesised to result from global warming, which itself, may not be occurring from rising atmospheric CO2 levels. The aerial fertilization effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment is the only aspect of global environmental change about which we can be certain; and to restrict CO2 emissions is to assuredly deny the biosphere the many benefits that accrue from this phenomenon." ---- "There are many direct biological benefits that result from higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Two of the most important are increased plant photosynthesis and water-use efficiency." ---- "With this information, in light of the increasing human demands on vegetation, it is my personal opinion that capping CO2 emissions or reducing them to some prior level would be akin to 'biting the hand that feeds us." ---- "There appears to be a lot of confusion about the biological benefits of elevated CO2 because the popular media typically fails to report them. Doomsday scenarios of global warming are much more dramatic than the good news of global greening." ~ Keith E. Idso, Botanist, VP of Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, B.S. in Agriculture with a major in Plant Sciences from the University of Arizona, M.S. from the same institution with a major in Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Ph.D. in Botany at Arizona State University. [In 1994, Idso, along with his father, published a review paper on the topic of increased CO2 levels and their effects on plant growth. The paper concluded that not only did other factors not diminish the ability of CO2 to increase plant growth rates, that "the data show the relative growth-enhancing effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment to be greatest when resource limitations and environmental stresses are most severe." As of 1999, he was teaching biology in the Maricopa County Community College District as an adjunct professor, a post to which he was appointed in 1996.] "Nevertheless, there is another threat on the horizon. I see this threat in environmentalism which is becoming a new dominant ideology, if not a religion. Its main weapon is raising the alarm and predicting the human life endangering climate change based on man-made global warming." ---- "The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity, is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious, arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism." ---- "I'm convinced that after years of studying the phenomenon, global warming is not the real issue of temperature. That is the issue of a new ideology or a new religion. A religion of climate change or a religion of global warming. This is a religion which tells us that the people are responsible for the current, very small increase in temperatures. And they should be punished." --- "The attempts to command the climate and decide about the temperature on our planet are wrong and arrogant. I wrote a book about it which was published in English under the title 'Blue Planet in Green Shackles." --- "The climate change debate is basically not about science; it is about ideology. It is not about global temperature; it is about the concept of human society. It is not about nature or scientific ecology; it is about environmentalism, about one - recently born - dirigistic and collectivistic ideology, which goes against freedom and free markets." ---- "Environmentalism is a dangerous ideology endangering human freedom." ~ Václav Klaus, Czech economist and politician, served as the second president of the Czech Republic from 2003 to 2013. From July 1992 until the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in January 1993, he served as the second and last prime minister of the Czech Republic while it was a federal subject of the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic, and then as the first prime minister of the newly independent Czech Republic from 1993 to 1998. "There is no experimental data that exists that supports the view that the Earth's climate is changing in any dangerous way." ---- "The close relationships between the abrupt ups and downs of solar activity and of temperature that I have identified occur locally in coastal Greenland; regionally in the Arctic Pacific and north Atlantic; and hemispherically for the whole circum-Arctic, suggesting that changes in solar activity drive Arctic and perhaps even global climate." ---- "I am a scientist. I go where the facts take me." ---- "Changes in clouds and rainfall can overwhelm what little effect CO2-water vapour has on temperature." ---- "Science and its practice are no longer free and willing today but instead are constantly terrorized by research funding gravy trains and group thinking. This is why science needs defending and it takes courage to cleanse science from those cancerous elements and to bring her forward in its rightful place again. I am humbled and honored by this recognition." ---- "The warming we've experienced in the late 20th century could just as easily be explained by small decreases in cloud cover - natural changes in the system - and have nothing to do with CO2." ---- "The climate system is constantly readjusting naturally in a large way - more than we would ever see from CO2. The CO2 kick [impact of CO2 emissions] is extremely small compared to what is happening in a natural way. Within the framework of a proper study of the sun-climate connection, you don't need CO2 to explain anything." ---- "There is some CO2-water vapor feedback. But it's not operating on a global scale. The modellers cannot accurately separate water vapour from the effects of clouds and rainfall." ---- "Too much ice is really bad for polar bears." ~ Willie Wei-Hock Soon, Malaysian astrophysicist and aerospace engineer employed as a part-time externally funded researcher at the Solar and Stellar Physics (SSP) Division of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
    1
  1067.  @davidbrayshaw3529  "Global warming hysterics generally have limited scientific knowledge, and of geology and meteorology in particular. Their belief is not science; it's more akin to religion. The main epicenter of hysteria is not the scientific community but seems to be Hollywood." ---- "*They've been changing the cry from "global warming" to "climate change" because there's so little evidence there's actually any warming going on. I believe that as little as a decade from now, global warming will be recognized as one of the greatest swindles in world history. It has so little scientific basis, it can only rationally be considered a political scam."* ~ American writer, speculator, founder and chairman of Casey Research. He describes himself as an anarcho-capitalist influenced by the works of novelist Ayn Rand. "NASA should be at the forefront in the collection of scientific evidence and debunking the current hysteria over human-caused, or Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Unfortunately, it is becoming just another agency caught up in the politics of global warming, or worse, politicized science." ---- "... For nearly a decade now, there has been no global warming. Even though atmospheric CO2 has continued to accumulate - up about 4 percent in the last 10 years - the global mean temperature has remained flat. That should raise obvious questions about CO2 being the cause of climate change." [hint: The sun is the supreme driver of weather and climate on earth in the physical realm.] ---- "Global warming alarmists invariably try to make their case by resorting to rhetoric, dogma, opinion, and emotion. The closest thing to scientific data in their articles is the occasional chart claiming a poorly understood correlation between atmospheric CO2 and the Earth's temperature." ---- "NASA's Aqua satellite is showing that water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas, works to offset the effect of carbon dioxide - CO2. This information, contrary to the assumption used in all the warming models, is ignored by global warming alarmists." ---- "... The reality is that atmospheric CO2 has a minimal impact on greenhouse gases and world temperature. Water vapor is responsible for 95 percent of the greenhouse effect. CO2 contributes just 3.6 percent, with human activity responsible for only 3.2 percent of that. That is why some studies claim CO2 levels are largely irrelevant to global warming." ~ Ronnie Walter Cunningham, retired American astronaut. He was NASA's third civilian astronaut, has also been a fighter pilot, physicist, entrepreneur, venture capitalist, and author of The All-American Boys. "By geo-historical standards, today's atmospheric CO2 levels are remarkably - indeed dangerously - low. We need CO2 in the air to support plant growth and agricultural yields, and more would be better." ---- "I believe, AGW is simply a kind of collective hysteria with no basis in science." ---- "The truth is that climate alarmism has become the most expensive, and the most wasteful, project in the history of the world. It is junk economics built on junk science. It amounts to no more than hot air, yet it looks set to beggar our grandchildren." ~ Roger Helmer is a British politician and businessman. He was a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for the East Midlands region from 1999 to 2017. Before becoming an MEP, he was a business executive. "The oceans that surround the world produce 185 billion tons of CO2 per annum. *Man per annum only produces six billion tons, so what could possibly be the concern? One volcano puts out more toxic gases-one volcano-than man makes in a whole year. And when you look at this "climate change," and when you look at the regular climate change that we all have in the world, we have warm and we have cooling spells."* ~ John Raese, American Businessman "CO2 is not a pollutant in any normal definition of the term." ~ Joe Barton, [R-Texas] GOP Congressman
    1
  1068. 1
  1069. I've warning people for some time about the remote control deception with EV cars especially That scene you refer to, is the inherent process of seeds of truth that our NewWorldOrder kings are showing us of where they seek to steer society so that there is not escape, no more God-gifted freedom/liberty, that they have gained full control over us, and this nefarious sinister megalomaniacal pinnacle lust for power and control over us is always presented as anything but such a dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold, cacotopia diabolic agenda but sold to us as though it's such a desirable future. They show us this in movies, novels, comics, shows, games etc to get us to believe it's an inevitable future, so we just accept it as a done deal... but no... it's not if enough wake up, do not comply/resist the NewWorldOrder agenda. If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self"] cars, they are SGCs or SCCs = Software Controlled/Guided Conveyances. MGUY, the point of this technology being pushed is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death, will you?
    1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115.  @savagegfry  Talk about abusing, confusing, and misusing intelligent English. In his important essay, ‘Politics and the English Language’, George Orwell foresaw the corrosive impact of Socialist and Communist “verbal purification” [read: the hijacking then bulldozing, corroding, corrupting, degrading, disintegrating, eroding, massacring, mutilating, polluting, poisoning, ruining and destruction of that same ACOPPSI/accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper, sound intelligent English (and language in general)] of the life of mankind. He warned that: “If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation even among people who should and do know better.” Cultural Marxism a.k.a. political correctness is indisputably intellectual colonialism and mental fascism for the gendering/begetting [true definition] of “thought-crime.” Thus; "The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words." - Philip K Dick. "As societies grow decadent, the language grows decadent, too. Words are used to disguise, not to illuminate, action: You liberate a city by destroying it. Words are used to confuse, so that at election time people will solemnly vote against their own interests." - Gore Vidal, Imperial America, 2004 "And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'" - George Orwell, "Nineteen Eighty-Four" pg. 32 "The thing about words is that meanings can twist just like a snake, and if you want to find snakes look for them behind words that have changed their meaning." - British author Terry Pratchett (1992) "Political language.... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give a appearance of solidity to pure wind." - George Orwell "It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words." - "Nineteen Eighty-Four" by George Orwell. "How strangely will the tools of a tyrant pervert the plain meaning of words." - Samuel Adams
    1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141.  @CANAFUCT 👎👎Oh dear Lord, yet another Dunning-Kruger Effect one on the matter. "Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful." ~ Philip K. Dick This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view; cybernews [insert the period] kom [forward slash] editorial [forward slash] machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers It's not even machine learing since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine [what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems] does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a parrot, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot. "AI" only "exists" in the realm of science fantasy/fiction and the NewWorldOrder kings/rulers refer to the great myriads of society they have been spending decades stultifying as the actual 'artificial intelligence'. The more dim-witted and dulled-down they make the society, the easier it is to deceive them that something is true, when it's not true. What is called ''AI'' [a great made up lie by satan] by premier swindlers and their victims, is not no matter how much they claim it is and it will never exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. Leave it where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist".
    1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221.  @csjrogerson2377  EV cars good for the environment? ummm....no. Allow me to share what another posted; 1. Child battery mineral labour 2. Range anxiety 3. Risk of garage fires 4. Paying 20k more than a comparable vehicle 5. every time you fuel up an EV, the fuel tank gets smaller and smaller. Battery degeneration. 6. Poor resale value 7. Reduced performance in cold, highway. 8. Higher repair costs 9. Awful charging network experiences in the weather without restrooms 10. Higher insurance rates 11. Replacing tires more frequently. Michelin states that tires wear out 20% faster on an Ev, and could be as high as 50% faster! Ev tires made for ev's, cost 20 to 30% more, than regular tires for ice cars. As Ev tires wear out, they leave behind more tiny particles of rubber than normal ice cars. This causes more pollution. 12. Death by autopilot 13. $25k - $35k battery 14. Low km range per tank of energy. 15. must wait in-line 1-2 hrs to charge. 16. Then wait more time to charge, while charging. 17. Spontaneous combustion, with no way to put out the fire storm. 18. If they catch fire in a tunnel, many people will die. 19. People without a pro charger system or a parking spot at their house, will run an extension cord to the road, which is dangerous and could lead to people tampering with your charging setup (super slow charging at the road) 20. If you're in California, you won't be able to charge your car past 4pm because of a shortage of electricity supply on the cheesy grid. 21. It is not actually "green". The pollution is made at the power station, not the car. 22. Only 5% of used junk batteries get recycled, the rest go directly into the bin. It's cheaper to mine for new minerals. 23. Chhinna actually does 70% of all the refining of the minerals and production of the batteries. 24. Minerals are becoming more and more scarce, and the cost will only go up, not down. 25. Some countries where they mine for lithium, actually use a very big boat load of fresh water to only produce a ton of lithium, so they are afraid of running out of water. It takes over 2 million liters of fresh clean water to produce 1 ton of lithium. 26. Ev cars will soon not be able to drive in tunnels or be able to park in underground parking garage and probably will eventually void your house insurance if you park it in your personal garage.... 27. You can't charge your battery at super stations when it is bitter cold out. 28. If a fire truck comes to put out an Ev fire, all the chemicals go directly into the sewer system, poisoning everything. They need tons of water to slow down the burn. They can't put them out. They are only trying to prevent over things near by from catching fire. 29. Ok, there is 2 good things; regenerative braking, which charges the battery while you are slowing down on the highway, which saves your brakes from much wear. 30. Loss of fuel tax revenue, so now the roads will only get worse, not better. 31. in Dublin, huge generators are being used to charge EV buses, due to electrical grid strain. buses in Athlone also cannot be put on charge until midnight, for the same reason. Bus Éireann is saying that they can't charge their buses until 11pm for the same reason, and to avail of a lower tariff. 32. Not everyone on earth even has electricity to charge their cars. What are they supposed to do in 2035? It's easy to get a bucket of fuel to power up a regular car. 33. VCE, or "vapour cloud explosion" is very bad. If any battery, typically anything larger than an E-scooter battery, and especially only "half" charged. If a problem occurs in the cells, it might not catch on fire right away. Instead, a cloud appears, and then may be ignited a short period afterwards. There are 2 different types of vapour clouds that appear; heavier and lighter than air, which form will be dominate, can not be predicted yet. This produces a bomm. 34. For Ev transport trucks, they aren't allowed to carry the same payload as a diesel truck, because of the massive weight of the battery. The owner of the Ev truck therefore loses potential profit, every day. They also lose more profit for the waiting times for charging that Ev truck. The driver will get paid to charge the truck, which in turn forces the owner of the truck to lose more money. 35. Ev cars are more likely to be written off, if they experience a minor collision. After the collision, something could have upset the structural integrity of the battery. 36. Ev cars lie to you. If you are bold enough to go out on a decent road trip and its 210 miles, one way, and your Ev tells you that your battery will last you 223 miles, there had better be no hills, or excessively cold out.... You'll probably get stranded, trying to get to the charger, at the end of the trip. Ev's have left many families stranded already. 37. Ev's and their batteries, will soon need their very own "passport". With all info about them when born, and current info about them (power output, resistance, mineral composition, etc.) 38. Thieves stealing charging cables, will soon make it impossible to "fuel" an Ev car. They take a long time to replace the cables, just to have them cut again for scrape money. 39. Cars were typically being made lighter and lighter using aluminium and or fiberglass and or carbon fiber, to reduce emissions and pollution. Ev's are only getting heavier and heavier, causing more pollution than ever. Remember, an ev's pollution is made at the power station and the dump, not at the actual Ev, except for the tire particles as mentioned above. 40. More on spontaneous combustion of the battery. What if you had 3 kids strapped into car seats, in the back seat ,which kid do you rescue? More fires start so fast, there is hardly any time for even the driver to escape, let alone 3 kids strapped in. Ev's (External combustion vehicles) suck, and it's a bridge to nowhere. But they do sometimes convert themselves into "internal combustion", but sadly, they can only do that 1 time.
    1
  1222. 1
  1223. The users "David 'Bray like a donkey' Shaw" and "rattusfinkus" truly either are suffering from severe Dunning-Kruger Effect or are knowingly spreading unconscionable falsehoods. CO2... well.. it's required for photosynthesis, it's a certain miracle molecule that only takes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, that miracle molecule is required for life on this earth = it's plant food, we as mankind have a reciprocal relationship with plants, we exhale CO2, plants absorb it and convert it to oxygen which they give us - we are carbon based life.. Please consider the following experiential knowledge from a decades well learned honourable forthright truthful quality scientist so that you may see it is overt science misinformation to feed an audience who that obviously failed basic science class that supposedly CO2 is supposedly the enemy; "What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition, of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that CO2 from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that CO2 the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison." ~ Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. is an [Alfred P. Sloan] Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It saddens me much still...SHAKING MY HEAD... and blows my mind still.. how you types and those who may have voted you up have been so successfully mind-poisoned/pinnacle deceived to actually believe CO2 is a pollutant exactly because you must have failed basic elementary level factual operational science or copied someone else's answers on the test to pass! Dear Lord! WE ARE CARBON BASED LIFE! Farmers take it and gardeners and plant life will also as much as possible due to lower levels these days, they need to increase crop yields [for the farmer] you are the carbon they want to reduce as Gates said [NET ZERO] ; CO2 = P x E x S x CO2 .....Use your math skills and solve for P. It's right in your face , I mean if you can do above grade 12 mathematics. People either so sadly not well educated today by design of the rulers of if they are and are Leftists, like to completely forget about photosynthesis... That's like grade 4 science stuff right there... Try living with an oxygen pure environment. Wait a minute.... Isn't oxygen extremely flammable? Like explosive level flammable? Do you know what happens when CO2 drops below 120 parts per million? A little thing called deforestation. That would cause the opposite of what you want and in a short matter of time, we would have an oxygen depleted environment with nothing but CO2. "Organisms don't think of CO2 as a poison. Plants and organisms that make shells, coral, think of it as a building block." ~ Janine Benyus, Natural Sciences author, Natural Resource Management "These proven positive consequences of elevated CO2 are infinitely more important than the unsubstantiated predictions of apocalypse that are hypothesised to result from global warming, which itself, may not be occurring from rising atmospheric CO2 levels. The aerial fertilization effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment is the only aspect of global environmental change about which we can be certain; and to restrict CO2 emissions is to assuredly deny the biosphere the many benefits that accrue from this phenomenon." ---- "There are many direct biological benefits that result from higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Two of the most important are increased plant photosynthesis and water-use efficiency." ---- "With this information, in light of the increasing human demands on vegetation, it is my personal opinion that capping CO2 emissions or reducing them to some prior level would be akin to 'biting the hand that feeds us." ---- "There appears to be a lot of confusion about the biological benefits of elevated CO2 because the popular media typically fails to report them. Doomsday scenarios of global warming are much more dramatic than the good news of global greening." ~ Keith E. Idso, Botanist, VP of Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, B.S. in Agriculture with a major in Plant Sciences from the University of Arizona, M.S. from the same institution with a major in Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Ph.D. in Botany at Arizona State University. [In 1994, Idso, along with his father, published a review paper on the topic of increased CO2 levels and their effects on plant growth. The paper concluded that not only did other factors not diminish the ability of CO2 to increase plant growth rates, that "the data show the relative growth-enhancing effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment to be greatest when resource limitations and environmental stresses are most severe." As of 1999, he was teaching biology in the Maricopa County Community College District as an adjunct professor, a post to which he was appointed in 1996.]
    1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. Consider this please to any who reads this: the term "self-driving" is yet another damn dishonest term invented by of course, the advertising/marketing industry. Only living beings, like men, women, dogs, cats etc can be a 'self', not an inanimate object. I constructed my own terms according to accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper and sound intelligent English rules, thus, SCVs/SCCs = Software Controlled Vehicles/Conveyances or CCV's/CCCs = Computer Controlled Vehicles/Conveyances. If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self" and autonomous] cars. The nefarious purpose of this technology being pushed by the kings of the earth is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death, i hope you as well make that choice, i hope tens of millions due to really put an huge obstacle into the NewWorldOrder agenda.
    1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238.  @LoremIpsum1970  Replicants will always be fiction, sci-fantasy/fiction always has been an invention of the diabolist. "Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful." ~ Philip K. Dick This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view, just like another great lie in our modern day that supposedly "AI" exists. cybernews [insert the period] kom [forward slash] editorial [forward slash] machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine [what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems] does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a part, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot.
    1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. ​ @TeaBreak. Denial is not only a river in Egypt. Yes you are lying, mixing it with some truth, which is what crooks do or delusionists who are cult members of the Greeniac movement... Collectivists took the environmental movement years ago as the former CEO of WWF admitted, green is the new red... you're a watermelon Collectivist now Yea.. all that BLOOD COBALT with African children slave labour being used to help you feel supposedly morally superior that your EV is supposedly so safe and environmentally limited in it's affect on the earth is lunacy... it's a rolling inferno waiting to happen... batteries/lithium is one of the toxic substances on earth, huge lithium pools for mining require colossal amounts of water which then become toxified, mining for rare earth minerals cause indisputably far more environmental damage in scope and size than a quite clean oil drilling operation like in Alberta Canada. At minimum, twice the resources are required to build a EV car, they should be called REVs [Remote Emissions Vehicles] ...then there is the whole electro-magnetic-frequency carcinogenic effect due to the strength of the electric motors that verified growing operational scientific studies are showing have a detrimental effect on DNA like a cell phone causing accelerated apoptosis and other dysgenic effects, even a sterilising effect in terms of reproduction. I've been studying such things long before your 2019 road to Electricopolis conversion, and i'm not the one out of us two who is the rookie in knowledge of such matters.
    1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294.  @TeaBreak.  "Electricity is all around you. It isn't buried in a hole in tbe ground." wow.. some bit of truth from you.. Nikola Tesla discovered radiant energy.. but we are not allowed to know about that, not by the hydrocarbon rulers, but THE ELECTRICTY ENERGY CARTEL. "Noone owns it." God does since He created it. "Regarding grid capacity. In the years to come the most likely scenario is when you come home from work and plug the car in to the house. Between 4 and 7 pm you will run your house off the car, then refill the car later on in the night. If anything there will be a much lower strain on the grid at peak times and you also benefit from using off peak electricity at peak times. These facts don't make good click content though. 😂" See... this is where you show yourself to be Dunning-Kruger Effect truly... I know of a bunch of electric and electronic engineers who would tell you kindly you suffer severe delusions of knowing what you are claiming and are able to easily see you have no true verbose long term knowing being an electrician of any level to see why your claims are divorced from factual daily reality and how your word selections show you're trying to look like you know the jargon of such matters but do not. You do not have facts, what you have is high utopian fever dreams that what you see will actually happen as you've bough hook line and sinker when cold hard reality of who rules this world shows you clearly are the very desirable sucker-fool the elite cherish for how useful of a f/tool you are to them to achieve their agenda. The more i read your replies, the more profound your delusion is discernible.. you are so profoundly deceived.. the deception you've been presented by the rulers will be so tantalising, those as yourself will attach the shackles to their ankles themselves and why? "Most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution." — Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
    1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. ​ @phredflypogger4425  WEF is one of many hydra heads of the NewWorldOrder/NovusOrdoSeclorum Agenda. The Banksters are at the top [see the documentary, recent one called "The Great Taking" and an older one called "The Money Masters"] and with them is the United Nations 2100 A.D. Agenda = Go view a talk by the late Rosa Koire - It's called The Green Mask"" - i do not agree with her being a Democrat + Romans 1:18-32 choices etc but surprisingly she actually is more Libertarian and exposes quite a bit the true nefarious and sinister UN Agenda 2100 A.D. which is all part of the Global Governance Agenda = Technocracy = a nightmare monster hybrid of Communism, Fascism, and Socialism. The aim in part for this push to put us on all electric for energy sources is to purposely have a way they are able to micro-manage us, track us down to the micro-watt and tax us and thus supremely to gain control over the smallest parts of our lives, the minutia, so they will have an unprecedented control and power over our lives - an invisible electronic prison, thus a panopticon, all is monitored, tagged, tracked, databased etc. An indisputable dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold cacotopia nightmare never seen on earth, hence why we **MUST** with all we are resist this Technocratic takeover by the most powerful and wealthy nihilists / diabolists [the kings of the earth] in the world for there are far more of us than them, if we enough of us do not comply, they are unable to gain such far and wide and deep and great control over us.
    1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. Stop calling it "cyber" whatever, call it ELT - Electric Lemon Truck or EBT - Electric Brick Truck or something. I will tell you what "cyber" means as a Rightist linguist in part [thus lover of accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper and sound intelligent English]. Cyber comes into English from the Greek "Kibernetes" which means basically "To steer, to guide, to govern". I've been on-line since around the mid 1980s and it was around in the mid 90s or so if i recall correctly, that companies were seeking to make the use of the internet sound appealing to normal folks since at that time it was really only nerds/geeks like us who were using it, and so marketing/advertising firms like usual, took words and did not give one flying Red Baron care about the true definition and usage of a word or words, and corrupted and perverted those words to as usual try and sell you something, to make the net sound so much more appealing etc using terms like "information highway" and "world library" etc and "cyber" was one of them in the use of "cyberspace" etc, and of course the boardroom language hijackers and destroyers idiots were like "hey! that sounds futuristic and cool and technological!, let's use that!" said the boss of such marketing/advertising firms who decided to go with such terms. And so today, many by work of those advertising/marketing terms, associate 'cyber' with "the internet or something" as if "cyber" means "internet"/"the net" when really it does not, it's a corruption and perversion of the word in English. So hopefully you can see why the use of phrases like "cyber-security" ["cyber" whatever] etc, they have to force the term to mean 'internet security', it really does NOT mean that but they don't care of course, it's about deception not truth. What is interesting is if you go with the etymology/true meaning of 'cyber', then 'cyber space' is 'total control/steering of you when you use the internet., if we go with the corrupted meaning of the word "cyber" in English. If we go with false definition, "cyber space" doesn't make all that sense - the internet is not a physical place _[but if we go with the factual etymology , "cyber security" somewhat makes sense but why not just call it Net-Security? Anyway... take care and have a always truth-learning day.
    1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. Calling it a clown show is not a wise comparison since calling it a clown show is intensely trivialising the immensity of the reality of what this is really about. This is all about the NewWorldOrder agenda via the United Nations Agenda 2100 A.D, BIS, IMF, WEF etc... no more middle class, the megalomaniacal lust for control and power most wealthy and powerful rulers want to force us back to a time not that long ago where there was no such thing as a middle class... what they seek now is a Technocracy... a never seen on earth before leviathan totalitarian tyrannical govt which is dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold, cacotopia nightmare hybrid of Communism, Fascism, Socialism. They will own everything, we will own nothing [we will rent paid by our labour] and they not us, will be happy. From a Scriptural view, this is what is the paramount understanding is of the above: Read Isaieh 5:19-23, God [whose name is Jesus] foretold how lunatic evil it would become. Calling it a clown show is not a wise comparison since calling it a total clown show is intensely trivialising the immensity of the reality of what God/Jesus foretold. We are witnessing the rise and realisation of the Antichrist kingdom, the final empire of man which God/Jesus foretold, anything but a total clown show, you are witnessing the total inversion of God's/Jesus' order which our sole Creator foretold, that as the world becomes seduced increasingly by the Antichrist to worship him in countless ways which do not at all seem to be such for the Bible illiterate or mal-learned, the more you will see the diabolisation of mankind until the Antichrist spirit comes to full power in most of mankind which will be closer than ever to Jesus' return. Get on John 3:1-21 Ark while you still are able, the door is closing and the firestorm is approaching, most shall not escape, will you?
    1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. "Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful." ~ Philip K. Dick |||| This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view; cybernews [insert the period] kom [forward slash] editorial [forward slash] machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine [what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems] does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a part, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot. "AI" only "exists" in the realm of science fantasy/fiction and the NewWorldOrder kings/rulers refer to the great myriads of society they have been spending decades stultifying as the actual 'artificial intelligence'. The more dim-witted and dulled-down they make the society, the easier it is to deceive them that something is true, when it's not true. What is called ''AI'' [a great made up lie by satan] by premier swindlers and their victims, is not no matter how much they claim it is and it will never exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. Leave it where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist".
    1
  1371. As i told another on this page and seemingly i'm being censored again; WEF is one of many hydra heads of the NewWorldOrder/NovusOrdoSeclorum Agenda. The Banksters are at the top [see the documentary, recent one called "The Great Taking" and an older one called "The Money Masters"] and with them is the United Nations 2100 A.D. Agenda = Go view a talk by the late Rosa Koire - It's called The Green Mask"" - i do not agree with her being a Democrat + Romans 1:18-32 choices etc but surprisingly she actually is more Libertarian and exposes quite a bit the true nefarious and sinister UN Agenda 2100 A.D. which is all part of the Global Governance Agenda = Technocracy = a nightmare monster hybrid of Communism, Fascism, and Socialism. The aim in part for this push to put us on all electric for energy sources is to purposely have a way they are able to micro-manage us, track us down to the micro-watt and tax us and thus supremely to gain control over the smallest parts of our lives, the minutia, so they will have an unprecedented control and power over our lives - an invisible electronic prison, thus a panopticon, all is monitored, tagged, tracked, databased etc. An indisputable dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold cacotopia nightmare never seen on earth, hence why we **MUST** with all we are resist this Technocratic takeover by the most powerful and wealthy nihilists / diabolists [the kings of the earth] in the world for there are far more of us than them, if we enough of us do not comply, they are unable to gain such far and wide and deep and great control over us.
    1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. I would agree totally with you but the whole "oh the Russians, the Russians, the Russians, the Russians" is pure, unadulterated, unrestrained, sickening Washington + Pentagon Imperialist thick and dense cold war propaganda to scare the lemmings into giving up more of their God-gifted freedoms in the name of "security" by the state ...this method is one of the oldest stratagems used by the rulers to corral us into giving up our God-gifted rights by deceiving us through something called in contemporary parlance "Problem, Reaction, Solution, Conclusion"... they secretly cause the problem/invent a problem, they get our reaction _[we're beguiled to believe the govt is telling us the 'truth'], they come with the solution as if they are our saviours, and conclusion, they gain even more control and power of us by bamboozling us greatly to give up our freedoms for "security". You should be far more fearful of the British/Anglo-American Deep State empire with all their alphabet agencies like NSA, SEE-EYE-EH etc than Russia. You ought to take the time to learn about the Novus Ordo Seclorum / United Nations 2100 A.D. and all it branches out to so you may see and learn you are being supra-swindled to believe "oh those Russians!" cold war sickening propaganda that the Western Illuminist powers continue to beguile many uninformed people that supposedly Russia is still Soviet etc...sigh...smh... they are returning to Russian Orthodox Bible believing more than ever, and if Putin was so about bringing back the Soviet Empire, he wouldn't be allowing Russian Orthodox religion to grow more than ever, he wouldn't be allowing more Russian Churches to be built, he wouldn't be encouraging Bible based family structure and on and on and on and on, rather he would be like Stalin and Lenin etc murdering tens of millions of ethnic Russians + destroying churches razing them to the ground, sending priests and bishops to the Siberian gulags and killing them etc. Wake up man... wake up, you're being profoundly and colossally facinorously beguiled by the true most evil empire existing today, the NewWorldOrder rising empire/the Antichrist empire that the Vatican+London+Washington trinity powers seek to force us into this absolute Antichrist Technocracy.
    1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438.  @jevgeniardassov  Search for this article title on the net: "Carbon dioxide isn’t a “pollutant” causing global warming, it’s the elixir of life itself" Here's an excerpt; Without CO2, all plant life would die – which means all humans and animals would also die. CO2 is plant food, after all, facilitating photosynthesis and the life cycle itself. Removing CO2 from the planet like the climate cultists are demanding would render the entire world barren of life. It would quickly become a wasteland marked with death and destruction – and would certainly not be a paradise. For the past several years, the corporate-controlled media, Leftist politicians, and members of the Church of Global Warming have been telling us all that CO2 is a "pollutant." Nothing could be further from the truth. [Related: CO2 has absolutely nothing to do with global temperatures.] "CO2 emissions from industrial processes of the last two centuries have been highly beneficial to plant growth," writes Vijay Jayaraj. "Scientific studies show that CO2 has played a significant role in the re-greening of the earth after abnormally low CO2 levels had limited much of the planet's vegetation due to CO2 starvation." The massive increase in food production over the past century, which allows for the feeding of eight billion people worldwide, would also not have been possible without CO2 – not to mention slightly warmer temperatures in some areas that are more suited for agriculture. Ironically enough, CO2 is also responsible for keeping the planet green, as in rich and lush with trees, fauna, and other plant life. Without CO2, the entire planet would be brown and barren. For all of their talk about embracing a "green" agenda, the greenies are fighting against the very things that actually keep the planet green in color. Talk about insanity. According to Scientific American, CO2 acts as a fertilizer to keep natural ecosystems intact. Forests, jungles, savannahs, tundra, and everything in between all rely on CO2 to thrive, keeping animals and humans alive as part of the food chain. Amazingly, increases in CO2 from the pre-industrial age until now have allowed for "increased trees" productivity of around 23 percent. This means that CO2 is actively greening the planet and making it more livable. "For most of the other plants humans eat – including wheat, rice and soybeans – having higher CO2 will help them directly ... Doubling CO2 from pre-industrial levels does boost the productivity of crops like wheat by some 11.5 percent and of those such as corn by around 8.4 percent," says Francis Moore, a professor at the UC Davis. [end of excerpt].
    1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 👍👍“CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving ‚ I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not pollution and Global Warming has nothing to do with pollution. The average man, woman and child has been misled and is confused about what the current Global Warming debate is about, greenhouse gases. None of which has anything to do with air pollution. People are confusing Smog, Carbon Monoxide (CO) and the pollutants in car exhaust with the life supporting, essential trace gas in our atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Pollution is already regulated under the Clean Air Act and regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) will do absolutely nothing to make the air you breath “cleaner”. Regulating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions through either ‘Carbon Taxes’, ‘Cap and Trade’ or the EPA will cause energy prices [electricity, gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, heating oil etc...] to skyrocket. We would be MUCH better off to continue with oil and gas than EV cars due to how we have had at least a hundred years to refine diesel and gas motors making them so efficient and are still able to be made more so, powered by fuel that is quite high in energy density and efficiency. The mining of just the lithium required for one battery is about 22 tons of lithium ore. That doesn’t take into consideration the nickel and cobalt. The mining is done with off road equipment that doesn’t use low sulphur diesel, have catalytic converters, or use DEF. The highway fuels have road tax added to pay for road maintenance. What you pay depends on how much you drive. With EVs, the added weight will increase road wear and ALL electric use will be taxed to pay for it. If you don’t even own a vehicle you will be pay road tax to heat and cool your home and cook your food. Most electricity in this country comes from hydrocarbons **erroneously called "fossil fuels."** The friction and heat from the generators plus the line loss from transmission leads to less efficiency than just burning the fuel in an efficient ice engine. When it comes to changing, homes with a driveway or garage can home charge. People who live in apartments, condos, or places with only street parking will be out of luck. If you charge outside, the charging cables are prime targets for theft. If you charge in your garage and the battery catches fire, your house burns down because you are unable to put it out. With a gasoline powered car you may have been sometimes 5th or 6th in line to refuel. 15-30 minutes. An EV with the same line could easily be 6-12 hours before you even get to the charger. If your gas car runs out of fuel in the middle of nowhere, you can call your roadside assistance and they will bring you a couple of gallons of fuel and you are on your way. EV cars can also be remotely disabled to restrict your movement. The word that comes to mind is SUPER SCAM + SUPER ANTI-FREEDOM. Oil/gas powered engines are still truly the best choice for a very long time, especially when you learn oil is **ABIOTIC.**
    1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. I've been learning about such things for some years now, i mainly agree. We would be MUCH better off to continue with oil and gas than EV cars due to how we have had over one hundred to refine diesel and petrol motor technology making them so efficient and are still able to be made even more so, powered by fuel that is quite high in energy density, clean and efficiency. Oil/gas powered engines are still truly the best choice for a very long time, especially when you learn oil is **ABIOTIC** meaning ***there is NO SUCH THING as "Fossil" fuels, they are naturally produced by the earth hydrocarbons. As you well explained in short, hydrogen would not be good choice in the way you describe. It does make me wonder though if you know about Stanley Meyer and his water car. If we truly had no power in the people to reject going only to hydrogen, well i believe then Stanley Meyer's water car would be a quite safer choice. His water car, using HHO technology, videos on this are on youtube, and you will learn about his invention of a HHO producer and what happened to him. I would not be surprised if Toyota is using some of his ideas, since after all, what Japanese are really good at, is taking something invented by Europeans and refining it further in their own way. Also about Abiotic oil, one ****MUST**** take the time to learn about the following to see how the following information is one of the most colossal great lies we've been told since the late 1800s by the Rockefellers of supposed "fossil" fuels: We have been greatly and heavily deceived by the claims hydro-carbons are from 'fossils' + about peak oil grand deception by the supra serious scoundrel wealthy and powerful top level swindlers aka the Oil Barons [don't get me wrong, there have been inventors like Paul Pantone who recently died who invented the "GEET Fuel Reactor" that causes petrol to burn so clean no toxic form of carbon comes out the tail pipe] that means we are able to still keep our petrol cars, burn so clean and still have power and do even better on miles travelled - his son took over when he died but there seems to be nowadays a French company or something buying the technology... i got to speak with Paul that man was a intelligent delightful man, sadly he died recently.]_ There have been other inventors i indagated heuristically over the years that made petrol motors that could go 1200 miles at last on a tank of petrol and burn so clean also but at times it seems there may have been treated like Stanley Meyer was as in an extreme case if that is truly what happened to him or the other inventors were bought out and the technology was shelved by the such powerful companies etc or something like that]._ **Oil is abiotic, the earth will never run out.** I strongly advise you and encourage you to search for this title on here **"Fletcher Prouty Explains Invention and Use of Term "Fossil Fuels""** which is on "The Auto Channel" - do ensure you read the description for the video to learn of the credentials of the man talking. The clip is an excerpt from a longer interview. [continued]
    1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. We are carbon based life. We are the carbon they want to reduce = net-zero. "Wealth Redistribution" = A Collectivist Agenda!! PLEASE consider this; *"We [UN-IPCC] redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy...." "One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost **nothing* to do with environmental policy anymore...."** ~ Dr. Ottmar Endenhofer, IPCC co-chair of Working Group 3, November 13, 2010 Interview [H/t Dr. Charles Battig] ~~ The PROFOUND lie is that CO2 is supposedly bad for Earth and the supposed solution is Carbon Taxes: *Racketeering* : often associated with organised crime, is the act of offering of a dishonest service [a "racket"]to solve a problem that would not otherwise exist without the enterprise offering the service. *Racketeering* as defined by the RICO act includes a list of at least 35 crimes. Thus, "Climate Change" causes organised crime!! CO2... well.. it's required for photosynthesis, it's a certain miracle molecule that only takes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, that miracle molecule is required for life on this earth = it's plant food, we as mankind have a reciprocal relationship with plants, we exhale CO2, plants absorb it and convert it to oxygen which they give us - we are carbon based life.. Please consider the following experiential knowledge from a decades well learned honourable forthright truthful quality scientist so that you may see it is overt science misinformation to feed an audience who that obviously failed basic science class that supposedly CO2 is supposedly the enemy; "What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition, of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that CO2 from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that CO2 the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison." ~ Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. is an [Alfred P. Sloan] Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503.  @raywhitehead730  So sick and tired of the heavy censorship of my comments and replies. Let me try again: Also.... THX1138, Elysium, Nineteen Eighty-Four, Soylent Green, The Purge: Anarchy, Mad Max, Metropolis, Logan's Run, Gattaca, The Matrix, They Live, WALL-E, I Am Legend, Gamer, Clockwork Orange, Blade Runner, RoboCop, Minority Report, The Island, World War Z, Planet of the Apes etc.... = Technocratic Feudalism is such a "awes0me" world! The kings/rulers of the earth ALWAYS ALWAYS tell their lower level movie + TV Show + Comic Book authors + Video Game makers etc to sell the idea of Technocratic Feudalism as this supposedly profoundly desirable attainable reality when it's truly a Techno hellscape hellacious Hadean hellhole... a urban prison where you're not allowed to travel from one party of the city to another. I would love to see if all the Technocratic disciples would still state that being microchipped like a product, where every breathe you take, every move you make, is monitored, tracked, databased, archived to ensure you never know what God-given freedom/liberty is. I'm not one will be seduced into being beguiled by the imaginary "desirable" world that the Novus Ordo Seclorum beckons and causes the gullible to buy into... that indoctrinates people to be seduced into accepting a Technocracy aka Collectivism in the age of advanced technology, which here's one way to sum it up; "People will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think." ~ Aldous Huxley
    1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512.  @kiae-nirodiariesencore4270  "The W12, along with the V8 are over-complex and a waste of resources as they guzzle non-renewable fuels and pump out a ton of pollution. Best just pop an electric motor in there, no reciprocating motion to worry about, just pure, smooth power." Sigh... there's more of that over-confident sickening potent Dunning-Kruger Effect Olympian level, how so? Here, firstly as i told another on this page, one of your brethren in your religion Electric Car-ianity; You are lying, mixing it with some truth, which is what crooks do or delusionists who are cult members of the Greeniac movement... Collectivists took the environmental movement years ago as the former CEO of WWF admitted, green is the new red... you're a watermelon Collectivist now Yea.. all that BLOOD COBALT with African children slave labour being used to help you feel supposedly morally superior that your EV is supposedly so safe and environmentally limited in it's affect on the earth is lunacy... it's a rolling inferno waiting to happen... batteries/lithium is one of the toxic substances on earth, huge lithium pools for mining require colossal amounts of water which then become toxified, mining for rare earth minerals cause indisputably far more environmental damage in scope and size than a quite clean oil drilling operation like in Alberta Canada. At minimum, twice the resources are required to build a EV car, they should be called REVs [Remote Emissions Vehicles] ...then there is the whole electro-magnetic-frequency carcinogenic effect due to the strength of the electric motors that verified growing operational scientific studies are showing have a detrimental effect on DNA like a cell phone causing accelerated apoptosis and other dysgenic effects, even a sterilising effect in terms of reproduction. I've been studying such things long before your 2019 road to Electricopolis conversion, and i'm not the one out of us two who is the rookie in knowledge of such matters. Now let's deal with your claim of hydrocarbon fuel not being supposedly 'renewable'; Infrastructure electricians awake to the NewWorldOrderAgenda know that electric car transition is a Socialist pipe dream due to the mind-boggling amount of resources, energy, time and money needed to make such a reality. From my own years of much investigation, electric cars symbolise the NewWorldOrderAgenda of track, trace, database,, monitor, and control you by controlling your car remotely. If you do not comply, the powers that be will have total control to shut down your EV car since the goal is to have internet connected EV cars and not allow you to use you car etc if you disagree with your govt and their policy enforcers/police. I will NOT COMPLY and gas will NEVER die, why? We have been greatly and heavily deceived by the claims hydro-carbons are from 'fossils' + about peak oil grand deception by the serious scoundrel top level swindlers. **Oil is abiotic, the earth will never run out.** I strongly advise you and encourage you to search for this title on here **"Fletcher Prouty Explains Invention and Use of Term "Fossil Fuels""** which is on "The Auto Channel" - do ensure you read the description for the video to learn of the credentials of the man talking. The clip is an excerpt from a longer interview.
    1
  1513. ​ @kiae-nirodiariesencore4270 Also: We would be MUCH better off to continue with oil and gas than EV cars due to how we have had at least a hundred years to consistently refine diesel and gas motors making them run more clean and so efficient and are still able to be made more so, powered by fuel that is quite high in energy density and efficiency. The mining of just the lithium required for one battery is about 22 tons of lithium ore. That doesn’t take into consideration the nickel and cobalt and other hard to obtain metals used. The mining is done with off road equipment that requires hydrocarbon fuel for the power and lesser weight of fluid fuels, and to even think batteries could be used is absolute bonkers lunacy delusions of having experiential sound minded knowledge on why this would supposedly work when no way, since the increase in weight would be colossal and only cause such mega-machines to be so more greatly heavy that it defeats the purpose of using the vehicle to mine since it would take more resources and energy to use the vehicle than compared to hydrocarbon fuels, it's such a mindless fool idea. Sure the megamachines my not have catalytic converters, or use DEF, but one volcano eruption puts out profoundly more amount of carbon monoxide and other noxious gases than mining operations have done in roughly half a century. Also: The highway fuels have road tax added to pay for road maintenance. What you pay depends on how much you drive. With EVs, the added weight will increase road wear and ALL electric use will be taxed to pay for it. If you don’t even own a vehicle you WILL be pay road tax to heat and cool your home and cook your food. Most electricity in this country [Canada] comes from hydrocarbons **erroneously called "fossil fuels."** The friction and heat from the generators plus the line loss from transmission leads to less efficiency than just burning the fuel in an efficient ice engine. When it comes to changing, homes with a driveway or garage can home charge - but the cost of that is already designed to increase as part of the agenda to further bankrupt the middle class. People who live in apartments, condos, or places with only street parking will have no real place to charge their EVs if they buy into this profound facinorous NewWorlOrderAgenda swindle. If you charge outside, the charging cables are prime targets for theft and isn't that interesting how crime levels in all major cities in the West continue to increase dramatically. If you charge in your garage and the battery catches fire, your house burns down because you are unable to put it out due to the blow torch flames at 5000F and the nature of the type of fire. With a gasoline powered car you may have been sometimes 5th or 6th in line to refuel. 15-30 minutes. An EV with the same line could easily be 6-12 hours before you even get to the charger. If your gas car runs out of fuel in the middle of nowhere, you can call your roadside assistance and they will bring you a couple of gallons of fuel and you are on your way. EV cars are also able to be REMOTELY DISABLED TO RESTRICT YOUR MOVEMENT, how's that for "freedom" eh? The word that comes to mind is SUPER SCAM + SUPER ANTI-FREEDOM. Oil/gas powered engines are still truly the best choice for a very long time, especially when you learn oil is **ABIOTIC.**
    1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. I agree with you but please do not use that word sustainable. Here's why: That word was hijacked by United Nations, with their United Nations Agenda 2100 A.D., a quite nefarious and sinister plot in motion as i type this and as more people wake up to it over the years of what this agenda is truly about. So again i MUST state this again, this is ***pure UN Agenda 2100 A.D.*** So this word "sustainability" ...dear Lord how it's become ubiquitous now as part of the global mass mind control by the so facinorous underhanded United Nations Agenda 2100 A.D. If you spend the time to do assiduous competent, critically reasoned, deep digging, diligent, rigorous investigation in that agenda, you will learn they are the ones it may be argued that popularised the word "sustainability" and it does *NOT* mean what you think it actually means, **it means people have to die aka depopulation.** Learn who ***Rosa Korie*** [look up the video "Behind the Green Mask - Agenda 21 - Rosa Koire" - a quite eye and mind opening quite important rea and frightening agenda behind this push towards EVs and all that relates to it - and keep in mind the age of the presentation, she was one of the main voices warning us some time ago, which i myself have been also since i learned about this so wicked plot around 2008 or so] is as soon as possible, i may not agree with her choice of who to be partnered with nor her political position nor her pro-feticide position, but on these matters she did actually quite top notch investigation of what this whole "Sustainable Development" really is, and i will tell you like this, it's like a watermelon, red on the inside green on the outside, in other words there verily is a quite evil agenda where the Collectivists are using the environmental movement as a vehicle [excuse the pun] to force us into a dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold cacotopia Technocracy nightmare. We MUST NOT COMPLY/RESIST WITH ALL WE ARE or we shall never know what a middle class life is ever again, and only what being truly impoverished, chipped, databased, tagged, and monitored no different than a product on the stock market with a certain value given to it by the rulers is.
    1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1