Remnant Disciple Lazzaro - Revelation 12:17
MGUY Australia
comments
Comments by "Remnant Disciple Lazzaro - Revelation 12:17" (@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217) on "Driverless cars are POINTLESS and DANGEROUS | MGUY Australia" video.
5
5
4
@teardowndan5364 We would be MUCH better off to continue with oil and gas than EV cars due to how we have had at least a hundred years to refine diesel and gas motors making them so efficient and are still able to be made more so, powered by fuel that is quite high in energy density and efficiency. The mining of just the lithium required for one battery is about 22 tons of lithium ore. That doesn’t take into consideration the nickel and cobalt. The mining is done with off road equipment that doesn’t use low sulphur diesel, have catalytic converters, or use DEF. The highway fuels have road tax added to pay for road maintenance. What you pay depends on how much you drive. With EVs, the added weight will increase road wear and ALL electric use will be taxed to pay for it. If you don’t even own a vehicle you will be pay road tax to heat and cool your home and cook your food. Most electricity in this country comes from hydrocarbons **erroneously called "fossil fuels."** The friction and heat from the generators plus the line loss from transmission leads to less efficiency than just burning the fuel in an efficient ice engine. When it comes to changing, homes with a driveway or garage can home charge. People who live in apartments, condos, or places with only street parking will be out of luck. If you charge outside, the charging cables are prime targets for theft. If you charge in your garage and the battery catches fire, your house burns down because you are unable to put it out. With a gasoline powered car you may have been sometimes 5th or 6th in line to refuel. 15-30 minutes. An EV with the same line could easily be 6-12 hours before you even get to the charger. If your gas car runs out of fuel in the middle of nowhere, you can call your roadside assistance and they will bring you a couple of gallons of fuel and you are on your way. EV cars can also be remotely disabled to restrict your movement. The word that comes to mind is SUPER SCAM + SUPER ANTI-FREEDOM. Oil/gas powered engines are still truly the best choice for a very long time, especially when you learn oil is **ABIOTIC.**
3
2
2
1
@kathym6603 I've warning people for some time about the remote control deception with EV cars especially how the elite have been using movies for example much fiction with some seeds of truth that our NewWorldOrder kings are showing us of where they seek to steer society so that there is not escape, no more God-gifted freedom/liberty, that they have gained full control over us, and this nefarious sinister megalomaniacal pinnacle lust for power and control over us is always presented as anything but such a dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold, cacotopia diabolic agenda but sold to us as though it's such a desirable future. They show us this in movies, novels, comics, shows, games etc to get us to believe it's an inevitable future, so we just accept it as a done deal... but no... it's not if enough wake up, do not comply/resist the NewWorldOrder agenda.
If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self"] cars, they are SGCs or SCCs = Software Controlled/Guided Conveyances. MGUY, the point of this technology being pushed is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death, will you?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Thumbs up. It's sad man how many do not even realise that the more you allow a device to do the work for you physically and mentally, the more we lose the ability to be able to operate w/o them. Sure we do need calculators for bigger numbers, sure there are a plenitude of inventions that do make our lives easier and more qualitative, but when those inventions begin to be quite contributive to becoming more slothful in the name of "convenience" as the diabolic ever deceiving marketing/advertising industry seduces mankind into and thus such inventions becoming ubiquitous that we start to lose for e.g., our own mental and physical abilities, acuity, dexterity, skill etc to pilot a car as you pointed out, then we are actually being increasingly dulled down/stupefied [i argue this is all by design of the rulers over us] so that eventually we become like the people in "WALL-E" and we will not know how to do with one damn thing w/o some form of contraption and/or machine "helping" us to do it because we let the technology go too far in how much control we have over our own lives, hence;
**"Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."** ~ Frank Herbert, Dune
One more thing: If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self" and autonomous] cars, they are SGCs or SCCs = Software Controlled/Guided Conveyances. The point of this technology being pushed is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death.
1
1
@roberthuntley1090 I have been studying this agenda for years, once you understand the greater agenda [You will own nothing, they will own everything, and them, not you, will be happy] you realise the you do not want hybrid nor EV cars [hydrogen i would consider next to Petrol and Diesel if Steven Meyer and his Water Car Dunebuggy was never arguably killed for his technology] because you learn through much deep documented verified study that we have had inventors for Petrol and Diesel that have built motors that burn the fuel so cleanly [like the late Paul Pantone, and his GEET device] that you do not even need to get off Petrol or Diesel etc due to how crafty nifty inventions have been made, but suppressed by certain powers that be, that burn Petrol and Diesel fuel so cleanly hardly any pollution out the tailpipe. But of course, the love of money is the root of all evil and those in power position love money more than really well made motors that burn hydrocarbons cleanly with no real detrimental effect on the environment they so claim to care about.
One more thing, not that it may matter to you, but i live in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and not far from me here in the west end of the city, we have an evangelical type church called "100 Huntley Street." .... anyway.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Thumbs up... i've been studying the NewWorldOrderAgenda since early 2001 when i was told about it.... tens of thousands of hours later, i agree quite a bit with your very well-read points you make, also because of having much experiential knowledge with cars, motorcycles etc and some erudite knowledge also with the things like 4G LTE+ [the inventor of 2G, 3G, 4G, 4G LTE, 4G LTE+ makes clear it's an advertising/marketing lie there is such a thing at "5G"... honestly, look up "5G does not exist"..with enough competent diligent searching you will see it's another scam that supposedly it exist but really as the inventor stated, it does not really exist but for advertising/marketing reasons... 4G LTE+ is what they call "5G", anyway[ and the other things you mention, and you gave me also some further insight so i mainly agree with you especially those 15 minute prison cities we ****MUST ALL NOT COMPLY WITH/RESIST**** ... so you make good points.. quite valid and reasoned. The below is where i disagree with you, hopefully you may find what i share edifying and consider refining your own position on such things and of course you don't have to, God gave us free choice.
If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self" and autonomous] cars, they are SGCs or SCCs = Software Controlled/Guided Conveyances. The point of this technology being pushed is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death, i hope you as well make that choice, i hope tens of millions due to really put an huge obstacle into the NewWorldOrder agenda.
1
1
I've warning people for some time about the remote control deception with EV cars especially That scene you refer to, is the inherent process of seeds of truth that our NewWorldOrder kings are showing us of where they seek to steer society so that there is not escape, no more God-gifted freedom/liberty, that they have gained full control over us, and this nefarious sinister megalomaniacal pinnacle lust for power and control over us is always presented as anything but such a dank, dark, de-man-ising, depressing, dismal, dreary, chilling cold, cacotopia diabolic agenda but sold to us as though it's such a desirable future. They show us this in movies, novels, comics, shows, games etc to get us to believe it's an inevitable future, so we just accept it as a done deal... but no... it's not if enough wake up, do not comply/resist the NewWorldOrder agenda.
If we called a spade a spade [calling something by what it actually is] then maybe such ill-reasoned false language would address the problem accurately, hence for me these are not "driverless" nor "self-driving/autonomous" [only living things are a "self"] cars, they are SGCs or SCCs = Software Controlled/Guided Conveyances. MGUY, the point of this technology being pushed is that there is a ****war on the car*** ...meaning...in order to have a modern day Collectivist Technocracy [no middle class] you first have to convince people that SCCs are aa "great" idea so eventually you indoctrinate them to be fully on board with taking govt owned transit and that private ownership of a conveyance is is not desirable [Communist Manifesto abolishes private ownership] and thus TPTB gain full control over our autonomy....we are a thrall unlike ever before to the TPTB. I will not comply/resist unto death, will you?
1
1
1
1
1
1
@LoremIpsum1970 Replicants will always be fiction, sci-fantasy/fiction always has been an invention of the diabolist.
"Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful." ~ Philip K. Dick
This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view, just like another great lie in our modern day that supposedly "AI" exists.
cybernews [insert the period] kom [forward slash] editorial [forward slash] machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers
It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine [what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems] does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a part, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot.
1
1