Comments by "Remnant Disciple Lazzaro - Revelation 12:17" (@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217) on "Double Down News" channel.

  1. 134
  2. 93
  3. 72
  4. 52
  5. 52
  6. 46
  7. 36
  8. 23
  9. 23
  10. 22
  11. 16
  12. 15
  13. 14
  14. 13
  15. 12
  16. 12
  17. 8
  18. 8
  19. 7
  20. 7
  21. I do not concur with all that was said, due to my own many years deep digging into factual history of the Scriptures and unto today. If you completely agree with that Jewish man ["gentleman' comes from "Gentile" thus really "Gentileman"] then ever so sadly you are yet another as so so many on this page in this world, not learned well enough about your own history to know where he is actually dead wrong, and thus yet another one of his kind who is not part of the minority of his kind to know what Judaism truly is, see below; The Israelites stopped existing circa a few hundred years after the 70 A.D. destruction of the temple as Jesus foretold, due to how the Israelites, both the ones born again under Jesus the Christ [God] and those who rejected authentic austere Scriptural Jesus the Christ, reveal in the first centuries after Jesus ascended, that they mixed with gentile stock [it was now allowed by Jesus for His born again/John 3:1-21 qualified Israelite followers since the Law (Mosaic) which He is the manifestation of was fulfilled and now they were allowed to marry into Gentile stock which inherently dilutes the bloodlines, and the other camp of of Israelites who rejected Jesus, also mixed with gentile stock] and thus Jesus' prophecy came to pass that the second temple and the bloodlines of Jacob via the House of Judah would be left desolate meaning no more would they exist as a people, which happened within a few hundred years even less seemingly since a very small minority made it out alive of Rome's massacre of most of the Israelites [collectively] in 70 A.D. / destruction of the second temple. The word "J . e . w ." according to even the J e w ' í s h Encyclopaedia, is a religious term, not an ethnic one, they have by means of deception fooled much of the world to believe it's ethnic when it suits them, but my own Bible Hebrew teacher in Israel admitted it's a religious term based on them who are adherents to "Ju-daism" [which is not by any stretch of the truth the true faith of the Old Covenant/Testament which is Abrahamic/Mosaic but actually the the religion of the Pharisees and Scribes = the "tradition of the elders" the Christ Jesus rebuked them for]. The children of Jacob/Israel where the House of Israel and Judah, collectively "Israelites", under Judah they were still Israelites but specifically Judahites, not "Jews" for the latter is, again, a truncated word for Ju-daism. Here's proof; "We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism [or later Rabbinic Judaism] as the true and direct descendants of the Old Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumption of one Mishnah-Tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the Priestly Code....and generally contradict it!" ~ Jacob Neusner, A History of the Mishnaic Law of Purities [Brill Academic, 1974], P. 7. - ISBN-10: 9004038973 The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that Judaism is based on the teachings of the Pharisees and not upon the Law of Moses: "The Jewish Religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature." ~ Vol. VIII P. 474 [1942]. "Edom is modern **JEWRY**." ~ 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Ed., 5, Pg. 41 "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary 'Jew' an Israelite or a Hebrew." ~ 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3. So according to their own literature buried into their dense Encyclopaedia they are not Israelites, and for the record = according to a brave remnant of Genomicists/Geneticists in Israel who have faced quite the blowback for being the small minority voice to boldly tell the factual operational science of what they discovered, **that it is a genetic impossibility to claim to be a genetic descendant of the Israelites, not only because the gene pool of mankind is so mixed that no one is truly 'pure' breed, but supremely because there is no way to obtain a DNA sample from a true Israelite in circa 30 A.D. who came out of Jacob to compare with the professing to be modern day genetic descendants of the Israelites to verify truly if they really are the descendants of the Israelites.**
    6
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. If you really think that Jewish man ["gentleman' comes from "Gentile" thus really "Gentileman"] is absolutely right on everything, then ever so sadly you are yet another as so so many on this page in this world, not learned well enough to know where he is actually dead wrong, and thus yet another one of his kind who is not part of the minority of his kind to know what Judaism truly is, so see below; The Israelites stopped existing circa a few hundred years after the 70 A.D. destruction of the temple as Jesus foretold, due to how the Israelites, both the ones born again under Jesus the Christ [God] and those who rejected authentic austere Scriptural Jesus the Christ, reveal in the first centuries after Jesus ascended, that they mixed with gentile stock [it was now allowed by Jesus for His born again/John 3:1-21 qualified Israelite followers since the Law which He is the manifestation of was fulfilled and now they were allowed to marry into Gentile stock which inherently dilutes the bloodlines, and the other camp of of Israelites who rejected Jesus, also mixed with gentile stock] and thus Jesus' prophecy came to pass that the second temple and the bloodlines of Jacob via the House of Judah would be left desolate meaning no more would they exist as a people, which happened withing a few hundred years even less seemingly since a very small minority were made it out alive of Rome's massacre of most of the Israelites [collectively] in 70 A.D. The word "J . e . w ." according to even the J e w ' í s h Encyclopaedia, is a religious term, not an ethnic one, they have by means of deception fooled much of the world to believe it's ethnic when it suits them, but my own Bible Hebrew teacher in Israel admitted it's a religious term based on them who are adherents to "Ju-daism" which is not by any stretch of the truth the true faith of the Old Covenant/Testament [which is Abrahamic/Mosaic] but actually the the religion of the Pharisees and Scribes = the "tradition of the elders" the Christ Jesus rebuked them for. The children of Jacob where Judahites, not "Jews" for the latter is, again, a truncated word for Ju-daism. Here's proof; "We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism [or later Rabbinic Judaism] as the true and direct descendants of the Old Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumption of one Mishnah-Tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the Priestly Code....and generally contradict it!" ~ Jacob Neusner, A History of the Mishnaic Law of Purities [Brill Academic, 1974], P. 7. - ISBN-10: 9004038973 The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that Judaism is based on the teachings of the Pharisees and not upon the Law of Moses: "The Jewish Religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature." ~ Vol. VIII P. 474 [1942]. "Edom is modern **JEWRY**." ~ 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Ed., 5, Pg. 41 "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary 'Jew' an Israelite or a Hebrew." ~ 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3. So according to their own literature buried into their dense Encyclopaedia they are not Israelites, and for the record = according to a brave remnant of Genomicists/Geneticists in Israel who have faced quite the blowback for being the small minority voice to boldly tell the factual operational science of what they discovered, **that it is a genetic impossibility to claim to be a genetic descendant of the Israelites, not only because the gene pool of mankind is so mixed that no one is truly 'pure' breed, but supremely because there is no way to obtain a DNA sample from a true Israelite in circa 30 A.D. who came out of Jacob to compare with the professing to be modern day genetic descendants of the Israelites to verify truly if they really are the descendants of the Israelites.**
    1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. No he is not spot on about Judaism. why? Israelites stopped existing circa couple hundred years after the 70 A.D. destruction of the temple due to how the Israelites, both the ones born again under Jesus and those who rejected authentic austere Scriptural Jesus the Christ [God], admit in the first centuries after Jesus ascended, they mixed with gentile stock [it was now allowed by Jesus for His born again Israelite followers since the Law which He is the manifestation of, was fulfilled, and the other camp of of Israelite who rejected Jesus also mixed with gentile stock] and thus Jesus' prophecy came to pass that the second temple and the bloodlines of Jacob via the House of Judah would be left desolate meaning no more would they exist as a people. The word "J . e . w ." according to even the J e w ' í s h Encyclopaedia, is a religious term, not an ethnic one, they have by means of deception fooled much of the world to believe it's ethnic when it suits them, but my own Bible Hebrew teacher in Israel admitted it's a religious term based on them who are adherents to "Ju-daism" which is not by any stretch of the truth the true faith of the Old Covenant/Testament [which is Abrahamic/Mosaic] but actually the the religion of the Pharisees and Scribes = the "tradition of the elders" the Christ Jesus rebuked them for. The children of Jacob where Judahites, not "Jews" for the latter is, again, a truncated word for Ju-daism. Here's proof; "We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism [or later Rabbinic Judaism] as the true and direct descendants of the Old Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumption of one Mishnah-Tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the Priestly Code....and generally contradict it!" ~ Jacob Neusner, A History of the Mishnaic Law of Purities [Brill Academic, 1974], P. 7. - ISBN-10: 9004038973 The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that Judaism is based on the teachings of the Pharisees and not upon the Law of Moses: "The Jewish Religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature." ~ Vol. VIII P. 474 [1942]. "Edom is modern **JEWRY**." ~ 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Ed., 5, Pg. 41 "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary 'Jew' an Israelite or a Hebrew." ~ 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3. So according to their own literature buried into their dense Encyclopaedia they are not Israelites, and for the record = according to a brave remnant of Genomicists/Geneticists in Israel who have faced quite the blowback for being the small minority voice to boldly tell the factual operational science of what they discovered, **that it is a genetic impossibility to claim to be a genetic descendant of the Israelites, not only because the gene pool of mankind is so mixed that no one is truly 'pure' breed, but supremely because there is no way to obtain a DNA sample from a true Israelite in circa 30 A.D. who came out of Jacob to compare with the professing to be modern day genetic descendants of the Israelites to verify truly if they really are the descendants of the Israelites.**
    1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. WRONG. A correct historical reading of the Scriptures especially the New Covenant/Testament, you will learn they are not the chosen, and it is possible to argue the ones who claim to be the chosen, actually are unable to truly prove they are the physical descendants of Jacob/Israel since you would need Jacob's blood sample/DNA sample to compare with all of mankind today to actually see who is carrying the specific derivative haplogroup genes to truly confirm if the so called "chosen ones" are actually of Jacob. Even if you were able to prove it, Jesus makes clear they lost their inheritance and are no more the chosen ones, and the true chosen ones are those who choose Him back via John 3:1-21, a spiritual position, as it always was, since Abraham was not chosen due to some physical reason, but because he trusted God's [Jesus'] promise/he had faith in God's promises, and the Lord counted that as righteousness unto Abraham, and blessed him, that just like in the Book of Galatians in the New Covenant/Testament, all who are truly John 3:1-21 qualified, they are the spiritual children of Abraham, not today's number one wannabe children of Jacob. I hope you find this edifying that you now know these wannabe bloodline Judahites [not "Jew" which that truncated word actually is a religious term for Ju-daism which is the religion of the Pharisee's, not the only faith of the Old Covenant/Testament] have *zero ways to prove they truly are bloodline descendants when any Jew is a adherent to Ju-daism.* Here is further evidence from their own sources; The word "Jew" according to even the J.e.w.i.s.h Encyclopaedia, makes clear it's a religious term, not an ethnic one. Thus they have by means of very sly deception, fooled much of the world to believe it's ethnic when it suits them, but my own Bible Hebrew teacher in Israel admitted it's a religious term based on those who are adherents to "Ju-daism", thus converts, which is *NOT* the true faith of Old Covenant/Testament [which is Abrahamic/Mosaic] but actually the religion of the Pharisee's and Scribes = The "tradition of the elders" "We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism [or later Rabbinic Judaism] as the true and direct descendants of the Old Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumption of one Mishnah-Tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the Priestly Code....and generally contradict it!" ~ Jacob Neusner, A History of the Mishnaic Law of Purities [Brill Academic, 1974], P. 7. - ISBN-10: 9004038973 "Edom is modern **Jewry**." ~ 1925 Jewish Encyclopaedia, Ed., 5, Pg. 41 "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a *'Jew' or to call a contemporary *'Jew* an Israelite or a Hebrew." ~ 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3. So according to their own literature buried into their dense Encyclopaedia they are not Israelites, and for the record [do your supra due diligence to learn the hard truth of this] = according to a brave remnant of Genomicists/Geneticists in Israel who have faced quite the blowback for being the small minority voice to boldly tell the factual operational science of what they discovered, *that it is a genetic impossibility to claim to be a genetic descendant of the Israelites, not only because the gene pool of mankind is so mixed that no one is truly 'pure' breed, but supremely because there is no way to obtain a DNA sample from a true Israelite in circa 30 A.D. who came out of Shem to compare with the professing to be modern day genetic descendants of the Israelites to verify truly if they really are the descendants of the Israelites.*
    1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. **Albert Pike Letter to Mazzini** -- The Illuminati Plan for 3 World Wars, August 15, 1871 -- The following is a letter, that speculation claimed that Albert Pike wrote to Giuseppe Mazzini in 1871 regarding a conspiracy involving three world wars, that were planned in an attempt to take over the world. The Pike letter to Giuseppe Mazzini was on display in the British Museum Library in London until 1977. This letter has been claimed by many internet sites to reside in the British Library in London, which denies the letter exists. • Giuseppe Mazzini was an Italian revolutionary leader of the mid 1800s as well as the Director of the Illuminati • Albert Pike [historical Masonic figure] was a 33rd degree Freemason, Occultist, Grand Master and creator of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Masonic Scottish Rite Order Following are apparently extracts from the letter, showing how Three World Wars have been planned for many generations. "The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war. Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions." "The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm." "The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion... We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
    1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. ​ @bigbasil1908  [Will i be censored?] You are spreading false truth. Please allow me to share something with you from their international clan sources - their "Holy Books" and their unpopular scholars with the Western world? I'm just a messenger; Regarding Zio nism which inherently is part of Judaism, here is what true Judaism is by their own scholars; The word "Jew" is not an ethnic term, it's a religious one = adherents to Ju-daism, the religion of the Pharisees which the Jew'ish Encyclopedia admits. Here's some more; "Edom is modern *JEWRY*." ~ 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Ed., 5, Pg. 41 "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary 'Jew' an Israelite or a Hebrew." ~ 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3. So Jews are not Israelites and have more to do with Edom than any true Judahite [do your supra due diligence to learn the hard truth of this]. "We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism [or later Rabbinic Judaism] as the true and direct descendants of the Old Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumption of one Mishnah-Tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the Priestly Code....and generally contradict it!" ~ Jacob Neusner, A History of the Mishnaic Law of Purities [Brill Academic, 1974], P. 7. - ISBN-10: 9004038973 The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that Judaism is based on the teachings of the Pharisees and not upon the Law of Moses: "The Jewish Religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature." ~ Vol. VIII P. 474 [1942]. So according to their own literature buried into their dense Encyclopaedia they are not Israelites [thus not of Shem], and for the record = according to a brave remnant of Genomicists/Geneticists in Israel who have faced quite the blowback for being the small minority voice to boldly tell the factual operational science of what they discovered, **that it is a genetic impossibility to claim to be a genetic descendant of the Israelites, not only because the gene pool of mankind is so mixed that no one is truly 'pure' breed, but supremely because there is no way to obtain a DNA sample from a true Israelite in circa 30 A.D. who came out of Jacob to compare with the professing to be modern day genetic descendants of the Israelites in 2023 to verify truly if they really are the descendants of the Israelites.**
    1
  115.  @simondancaster8334  ​This is what i stated: You are spreading false truth. Please allow me to share something with you from their international clan sources - their "Holy Books" and their unpopular scholars with the Western world? I'm just a messenger; Regarding Zio nism which inherently is part of Ju-daism, here is what true Ju-daism is by their own scholars; The word "J-e-w" is not an ethnic term, it's a religious one = adherents to Ju-daism, the religion of the Pharisees which the J-e-wish Encyclopedia admits. Here's some more; "Edom is modern *JEWRY*." ~ 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Ed., 5, Pg. 41 "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary 'Jew' an Israelite or a Hebrew." ~ 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3. So J-e-w-s are not Israelites and have more to do with Edom than any true Judahite [do your supra due diligence to learn the hard truth of this]. "We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism [or later Rabbinic Judaism] as the true and direct descendants of the Old Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumption of one Mishnah-Tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the Priestly Code....and generally contradict it!" ~ Jacob Neusner, A History of the Mishnaic Law of Purities [Brill Academic, 1974], P. 7. - ISBN-10: 9004038973 The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that Judaism is based on the teachings of the Pharisees and not upon the Law of Moses: "The Jewish Religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature." ~ Vol. VIII P. 474 [1942]. So according to their own literature buried into their dense Encyclopaedia they are not Israelites [thus not of Shem], and for the record = according to a brave remnant of Genomicists/Geneticists in Israel who have faced quite the blowback for being the small minority voice to boldly tell the factual operational science of what they discovered, **that it is a genetic impossibility to claim to be a genetic descendant of the Israelites, not only because the gene pool of mankind is so mixed that no one is truly 'pure' breed, but supremely because there is no way to obtain a DNA sample from a true Israelite in circa 30 A.D. who came out of Jacob to compare with the professing to be modern day genetic descendants of the Israelites in 2023 to verify truly if they really are the descendants of the Israelites.**
    1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. ​ @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Mafiacat2023 What was the Native American cause, about 100 years into being colonized and ethnically cleansed?" ahhh yes the "NATIVE" Americans. **NO ONE is "native" / "indigenous" / "aboriginals" / "first nations" etc in the Americas,** when the latest Genomics studies in May 2023 i researched prove indisputably that the so called "natives/first nations/aboriginals/indigenous" from the tip of Alaska to tip of Patagonia, ALL HAVE VARIOUS RATIOS OF MIXES OF CHINESE, MONGOLOGIAN, INDIAN ETC DNA [North to South Asian] and that the truth of such peoples coming over the Bering Strait is indisputable circa the little age in the medieval period. Vikings came circa 800s A.D. and they are finding Roman coins near the shores of America suggesting even early knowledge of North America before Vikings. The land does NOT BELONG TO ANY OF US, IT BELONGS TO GOD/JESUS WHO CREATED IT and we need to learn to live peacefully on it. You want to spread the accursed damn lies of history that so called "natives" in the Americas are peaceful, an iota of tribes were. You are them who make such claims like "step back for a second and think the way of life of Native Americans who have been butchered on this land." .... SIGH, YET ANOTHER showing they don't know they were taught WICKEDLY DISHONEST HISTORY that supposedly the "Native" Americans [more like Bering Strait Migrants] were peaceful, tame, friendly, innocent little lambs that were supposedly "butchered" by Europeans in the land when actually Europeans used guns and canons far more than knives, daggers, swords, arrows that were used by the "Native" Americans who also used guns WHO WERE THE REAL BUTCHERS AND WERE CANNIBALS, MANY OF THEM - THAT IS FACTUAL HIISTORY. Here's some factual history and expose yourself to honest history not indoctrination into a Leftist wickedly dishonest retelling of history in the Americas; So called "Native" Americans claim they're not from India son, well, ACTUALLY THEY ARE from India etc and other places. I know it's hard for them to accept since that since-birth mythical history of greatness. Again, May 2023 Genomic factual operational scientific studies show from tip of Alaska to tip of Patagonia that they have a mix of Siberian/Mongolian + Chinese + Southeast Asian + Indian [aka from India] DNA, they came over via the Bering Strait around 1600s or so seems to be the latest honest accurate none-woke-manipulated history. Also, the woke poison version of history is absolutely satan deception for it seeks to use the minority groups as a super cudgel to destroy Western Bible based [more so than not] civilisation which is inherent with new-Marxism/Maoism. And yea... they were s a v a g e s as hard evidences show which is so suppressed more than ever due to Woke Ideology history revisionism, almost all tribes in the Americas were s a v a g e tribes and only very small minority were neutral, the non-neutral would bash the skulls open like a cantaloupe of the other tribe with their tomahawks they fought in battles for land, skin and/or scalp them alive or dead, cannibalism, murder women and children also, take the women as slaves usually impregnating them, they did more so than not eliminate other tribes, all mercilessly butchered dead - they were cunning [skilfully deceitful/characterized by wiliness and trickery + dexterous skill and subtlety (as in inventing, devising, or executing)], lascivious individuals who cohabited like beasts without any reasonableness, fearless [in a reckless way more so than not, one of the most dangerous, and yes, stupidest, things you can do.], brutal, intemperate, over hostility, seriously blood-thirsty s a v a g e combatants/war-men where their devils of possession were quite exercised during war-time with other tribes or even when there was no war. **Traditional life involved almost perpetual warfare, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.** -- Col. William Collins commanded men who faced the Comanche, Kiowa, Arapaho, Cheyenne and Sioux. Of these tribes, he wrote: “War with somebody . . . is the natural state of an Indian people. Every tribe has some hereditary enemies with whom it is always at war . . . It is by war that they obtain wealth, position and influence with the tribe.” Col. Henry Carrington wrote: “The great real fact is, that these Indians take alive when possible, and slowly torture.” Enemy dead who could not be tortured were horribly mutilated. This is how Col. Carrington describes the battlefield where, on December 21, 1866, 80 American troops were annihilated by a combined force of Sioux and Cheyenne under Chief Red Cloud: Eyes torn out and laid on the rocks; noses cut off; ears cut off; chins hewn off; teeth chopped out; . . . brains taken out and placed on rocks with other members of the body; entrails taken out and exposed; hands cut off; feet cut off; arms taken out from sockets; private parts severed and indecently placed on the person; . . . skulls severed in every form, from chin to crown; muscles of calves, thighs, stomach, breast, back, arms and cheek taken out. Punctures upon every sensitive part of the body, even to the soles of the feet and palms of the hand. All this only approximates the whole truth. A few of the soldiers had managed to kill themselves before being captured. Many — probably most — were taken alive and tortured to death. This was the potential fate of every soldier on the Plains, and it is hardly surprising that it was standard practice to “save the last bullet for yourself.” Source: amren [insert the period] CEE OH EMM _[forward slash] news [forward slash] 2017 [forward slash] 10 [forward slash] indian-savages-american-indian-wars-scalp-dance-thomas-goodrich -- Of course today we are not told by increasing Leftist control of history about such factual proven hard history.
    1
  122. 1
  123. He's either lying about what Judaism really is or he's quite still deluded, why? ​ Israelites stopped existing circa couple hundred years after the 70 A.D. destruction of the temple due to how the Israelites, both the ones born again under Jesus and those who rejected authentic austere Scriptural Jesus the Christ [God], admit in the first centuries after Jesus ascended, they mixed with gentile stock [it was now allowed by Jesus for His born again Israelite followers since the Law which He is the manifestation of, was fulfilled, and the other camp of of Israelite who rejected Jesus also mixed with gentile stock] and thus Jesus' prophecy came to pass that the second temple and the bloodlines of Jacob via the House of Judah would be left desolate meaning no more would they exist as a people. The word "J . e . w ." according to even the J e w ' í s h Encyclopaedia, is a religious term, not an ethnic one, they have by means of deception fooled much of the world to believe it's ethnic when it suits them, but my own Bible Hebrew teacher in Israel admitted it's a religious term based on them who are adherents to "Ju-daism" which is not by any stretch of the truth the true faith of the Old Covenant/Testament [which is Abrahamic/Mosaic] but actually the the religion of the Pharisees and Scribes = the "tradition of the elders" the Christ Jesus rebuked them for. The children of Jacob where Judahites, not "Jews" for the latter is, again, a truncated word for Ju-daism. Here's proof; "We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism [or later Rabbinic Judaism] as the true and direct descendants of the Old Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumption of one Mishnah-Tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the Priestly Code....and generally contradict it!" ~ Jacob Neusner, A History of the Mishnaic Law of Purities [Brill Academic, 1974], P. 7. - ISBN-10: 9004038973 The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that Judaism is based on the teachings of the Pharisees and not upon the Law of Moses: "The Jewish Religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature." ~ Vol. VIII P. 474 [1942]. "Edom is modern **JEWRY**." ~ 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Ed., 5, Pg. 41 "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary 'Jew' an Israelite or a Hebrew." ~ 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3. So according to their own literature buried into their dense Encyclopaedia they are not Israelites, and for the record = according to a brave remnant of Genomicists/Geneticists in Israel who have faced quite the blowback for being the small minority voice to boldly tell the factual operational science of what they discovered, **that it is a genetic impossibility to claim to be a genetic descendant of the Israelites, not only because the gene pool of mankind is so mixed that no one is truly 'pure' breed, but supremely because there is no way to obtain a DNA sample from a true Israelite in circa 30 A.D. who came out of Jacob to compare with the professing to be modern day genetic descendants of the Israelites to verify truly if they really are the descendants of the Israelites.**
    1
  124. Of course i'm against Z10N1ST 15RAEL ... but.... but... "Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful." ~ Philip K. Dick This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view; cybernews [insert the period] kom [forward slash] editorial [forward slash] machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine [what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems] does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a part, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot. "AI" only "exists" in the realm of science fantasy/fiction and the NewWorldOrder kings/rulers refer to the great myriads of society they have been spending decades stultifying as the actual 'artificial intelligence'. The more dim-witted and dulled-down they make the society, the easier it is to deceive them that something is true, when it's not true. What is called ''AI'' [a great made up lie by satan] by premier swindlers and their victims, is not no matter how much they claim it is and it will never exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. Leave it where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist".
    1
  125. 1