Comments by "patriot enfield" (@patriotenfield3276) on "HistoryLegends"
channel.
-
That Thumbnail.
Finally , A Historian who truly recognises Mughals and Turkic muslim dynasties as foreign invaders and not some "Great local rulers" .In India , some specialised "experts and historians " are hell bent on giving these islamic central asian invaders an Indian color and glorifying them while at the same time hiding their atrocious activities and discrediting local rulers who actually resisted them like Maharana Pratap, Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Samrat Krishnadeva raya , Ahom Senapati Lachit Borphukan , 10th Guru Shree Guru Gobind Singh, Gurubhakt Banda Sign Bahadur , Maharaja Ranjit Singh Rana Sangha , Raja Hasan Khan Mewati ,Hakimkhan Suri, Shamshera Bahadur, Prithviraj Chauhan etc .
353
-
125
-
100
-
89
-
75
-
73
-
73
-
61
-
51
-
50
-
47
-
43
-
38
-
35
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
@husseinbonaud1883 while I do agree with you that Mughals gave India some Indo Islamic arts but have you ever heard of majestic Temples and Palaces in South of India. Southern India has some of most wonderful arts and geometrical designs of all time and that too carved on stones and melted into metal works. the Temples of Mahabalipuram, Madurai , Tiruvanthapuram , Puri , Tirupati , Hampi , Ellora , Khajurao , Bhubaneshwar etc Even North India used to had many Buddhist stupas, Hindu temples like Somnath Mandir Martand Temple, Sanchi Stupa, Sarnath,Gyanvyapshi, Kashi Viswanath, amazing forts like those in Chitoorgarh , Udaipur, universities like Taxilla and Nalanda , Harmandir Sahib etc. but before the mughals , the turkic dynasties of delhi sultanates, specially the ghoris and khijis attacked, ransacked and looted many of these sites and filled their treasuries with them. and the Mughals with the exception to Akbar (even Akbar did this sometimes) kept this practice same of attacking and looting .especially under tthe likes of Babur Aurangzeb , it was lot worse because Hindu Temples were destroyed everywhere and on their destroyed bases mosques were built.The Gyanvapsi mosque is the biggest example of all. and those who opposed mughals, most never wanted to be subjugated by other rulers and to subjugate others. especially with the policies of Mewar which was hostile to any another kingdom. Plus the Marathas were the first rulers to actually invent the concept of modern nationalism into Indians as the ideas of "Swarajya" which means self rule. Marathas actually fought Mughals on Land and Europeans at sea for their ideals . and that's why marathas are my favorite. because even a Muslim ruler can be a part of Swarajya as long as he keep his connection iwth his cultural roots intact.a Great example is that Peshwa Bajirao 1 married the muslim rajput princess of Bundelkhand Mastani Bai, and their Son Samshera Bahadur chose to follow Islam in his late parent's honor as a part of Swarajya , but still he never deviated from the path of Swarajya.
20
-
19
-
19
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
@UrMomEatsShitt Even Germany (ww2 timeline) were using messengers on foot, horses, Mules to bicycles for message transportations at some point ( unlike France or Poland , they were just additional options for Germany since Radio was the prime means of communication, until the war boomeranged inside Germany) . The Japanese also did the same despite having some good motorcycles and radio communication system . The Finns took it far with the use of Reindeers/ Elks for communication .
IMO ,the Commonwealth , American and Soviets were the only armed forces who almost or entirely quit using ww1 methods to establish communications.
for the Commonwealth (in case of Britain's Asian colonial forces like British Indian army ) , they still relied on Horses, Mules , messengers on foot and bicycles , sometimes even oxen and water-buffaloes in the Burma campaign as well as in other Pacific theaters, before being replaced by Jeeps, Universal Bren carrier and Motorcycles .
So that leaves us to Americans and Soviets ,who owing to their Geographical borders, have to quickly progress in faster means of communication, especially radio communication. although the Americans outpaced everyone else in wireless communication, the Soviets were the first to close the gap through massive railway infrastructure and mass manufacturing of motor-vehicles to airplanes , followed by the Brits .
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Russia still has a lot of tanks .lots of T-72, T-80 and even T-90s too. And not so surprisingly mobilized some T-64s they had too. The fact is however , they lack dedicated electronics and spare parts that actually makes these cold war relics competent enough to face Modern NATO tanks like 2nd or 3rd generation Thermal vision sights , Hunter killer capability, Independent thermals for Commander, Dzohd APS, Kontakt 5 ERAs, Laser warning recievers , carousel ammo protector , auto fire extinguisher , a good engine with frontal and rear speed and so on.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@teodem5620 i have no issue with a woman in a military . i have issues with watering down the efficiency of killing machines just because you want to promote equality and all and just because Soviets did it earlier. i mean you can promote how women can enter into armed forces service by making them look that they can do fair in Men's qualification level and not by lowering down the standards of men's qualification level just to have women enter the race. and even if you do, then there must be increase in difficulty with every level. and all of these points old class veterans mention regularly , from ww2 till the Modern wars in Iraq and Afghanistan including Women too. and the "woke army ad" just did what politicians often do. promote political utopia over dedication to Patriotic duties.
This is the thing where the Soviet recruitment propaganda for Women holds many ground levels above Western one. They show dedicated women, women who are competitive enough and above all patriotic enough to the victory of Motherland. whether they are frontline Snipers working along with their Male counterparts , be in Air force scouts or pilots, in recon units, in army engineers and mechanical works, in medical staff, even as a cook , as an agricultural worker role that fits them. kid, you must watch how Armed forces recruitment Ads and campaigns work.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@noriantiri9310 technically , on an industrial case, India evolved. But they say when a child grows up , innocence is first lost. As India industrialised on western toelines, The small cottage factories / small business sectors were hit the hardest. what actually made this matter even worse was not industrialisation of India itself, but how british colonial officers handled it. You see, as the British destroyed local small factories / cottage industries, most of whom were privately owned, they also denied the growth of western-technology based in India and denied many Indian industrialists facilities and loans to set up one. even the famous Tatas had to labor too hard for obtaining land ownership and permission to make their factories from colonial "gora babus" than they faced with labor or transportation of machinery to their factory. Youu see, The british wanted total monoply.for them ,India was no more thana cash cow, take milk from India (taxes, raw materials, minerals etc ) and feed them the sweets made from the cow's own milk ( British products). The Brits wanted a total monopoly in Indian market and didn't allow neither small sectors nor big sectors to Thrive. They also removed import duties from any British goods imported via Indian ports, conducted raids on Indian businessmen to make them "confess" for their "corrupt dealings" and made the license of permit process more difficult. Idk which colonial officers spoke it but it was true 100% "We will not allow these Indians to manufacture even a single needle ". proof, Republic of India , at the end of 1947-48, had a few big industries standing like those of Tatas and Birlas and half of the small cottage industries survived to the bare skeleton. And 1st PM Jawaharlal nehru had to request both West Germany and later USSR to make facories , specially Steel plants and Automobiles.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@arielquelme and also you have no Ideas about Pakistan either
1)Pakistan is a nuclear state with nuclear weapons , all acquired through shady deals with UK , US And China. They already have predicted this that if a Nation ha
s nukes and especially the will to sell them in illegal markets , no foreign power will try to destablise them no matter what .
2)Pakistani Military exists and so by far compared to any other military juntas out there, have seen success in running the nation under an Iron grip without any problems , using religion and anti India hatred as excuse to brainwash the population. Which have always worked successfully.
3) Both US and China supports Pakistan. Because both Fear India's increasing geopolitical influence and wish to Contain them. China doesn't want any Asian nation to match their geopolitical power and will do anything to stop them. Meanwhile US govt do want India in their camp , but because all of their policies are managed by bureaus who as per Brian said , are working with an inflexible spectrum and still living in Cold war mentality , often end up taking steps that rather ends up angering everyone in India. Take for Example , US annual aid of roughly 250-550 millions USD per Year to Pakistan which we all know a vast majority will go to buy weapons despite them intended for Aiding the people.
4) People are fed up with Pakistani Army. Especially Baloch and Pashtun. Baloch never wanted to be a part of Pakistan to begin with. Most wanted Independence in 1947 itself. However due to Jinnah's pressure , Khan of Kalat eventually decided to write a letter to Nehru regarding Kalat joining India , which was sooner thwarted by Pakistan army. Pakistan army was also the main reason why Jinnah's plan to integrate Kashmir into Pakistan also bite to dust because they acted too early and too rogue against Jinnah's wish . But were eventually driven from Srinagar and Baramulla by Indian forces who arrived there only after the instrument of Accession of Kashmir into India was signed by Maharaja Hari Singh via Sheikh Abdullah (who was the actual winner in this deal ).
5) if you want to knwo more Watch Historysheeter1947.
1
-
@arielquelme and also you have no Ideas about Pakistan either
1)Pakistan is a nuclear state with nuclear weapons , all acquired through shady deals with UK , US And China. They already have predicted this that if a Nation ha
s nukes and especially the will to sell them in illegal markets , no foreign power will try to destablise them no matter what .
2)Pakistani Military exists and so by far compared to any other military juntas out there, have seen success in running the nation under an Iron grip without any problems , using religion and anti India hatred as excuse to brainwash the population. Which have always worked successfully.
3) Both US and China supports Pakistan. Because both Fear India's increasing geopolitical influence and wish to Contain them. China doesn't want any Asian nation to match their geopolitical power and will do anything to stop them. Meanwhile US govt do want India in their camp , but because all of their policies are managed by bureaus who as per Brian said , are working with an inflexible spectrum and still living in Cold war mentality , often end up taking steps that rather ends up angering everyone in India. Take for Example , US annual aid of roughly 250-550 millions USD per Year to Pakistan which we all know a vast majority will go to buy weapons despite them intended for Aiding the people.
4) People are fed up with Pakistani Army. Especially Baloch and Pashtun. Baloch never wanted to be a part of Pakistan to begin with. Most wanted Independence in 1947 itself. However due to Jinnah's pressure , Khan of Kalat eventually decided to write a letter to Nehru regarding Kalat joining India , which was sooner thwarted by Pakistan army. Pakistan army was also the main reason why Jinnah's plan to integrate Kashmir into Pakistan also bite to dust because they acted too early and too rogue against Jinnah's wish . But were eventually driven from Srinagar and Baramulla by Indian forces who arrived there only after the instrument of Accession of Kashmir into India was signed by Maharaja Hari Singh via Sheikh Abdullah (who was the actual winner in this deal ).
5) if you want to knwo more Watch Historysheeter1947.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mughals invaded India to make India part of their empire.
after Sher shah suri's death, they realised theirmistake and stayed in India.
Indianisation is the process where the foreigners , immigrants, guests and invaders alike settle in India and embrace the local Culture and traditions . Examples are Greeks under Selucus Nicator and Kushans under Kanishka the 1st, who settled in North western India and converted to Buddhism .
Mughals came, looted towns and cities like their timurid ancestors , pillaged innumerable villages of crops and women , imposed jaziya (Except Jalaludin Akbar ) , destroyed temples like Babri , Kashi Vishwanath, Mathura , Gyanvapsi , Puri etc and made mosque on them ( they couldn't make mosque in Puri because the local rulers fought back ) . They converted hundreds of thousands every year during their reign forcefully . there was open genocide of Hindus and Sikhs under intolerable rulers like Babur, Jahangir and the infamous Aurangzeb .instead of Indianization , they tried to completely destroy Indian culture and replace it with a Turkic/Timurid /Persianized culture . which part of that is Indianization?
everybody knows the black deeds of Britishers and why the sun even doesn't have faith over the union jack. but the day when the sun's eyes will be casted upon the dark deeds of the mughal empire, even he will be forced to live the Union jack in the darkness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@umaryusuf537 tel me a single war in Indian subcontinent where rape and pillage culture and temple destruction culture was practiced. wars were fought full blood-on, and even temples were surrendered to be looted. But had a single temple being Destroyed ?and their Idols vandalised ? The Tamil Cholas and The Odia Gajapatis were famous for respecting and worshipping the idols they won from wars over other kingdoms while they destroyed zero temples. Plus no Buddhist and Jain monasteries were ever attacked in many wars which were fought on , except for Ashoka and under Pushyamitra sungha , the formal did a massacre of Jains because He didn't like their teachings for a bit while the later was against Buddha's teachings. I can't say the same for many muslim rules in India where in case of exceptions , the opposite happened ( under a Few muslim rulers like Balban, Raziya and Akbar ,lootings, rapes and pillaging was stopped ) . and what logic is that ? to avoid jaziya , people converted to islam? this is a prime example of forced conversion because no jaziya literally means you are going to be sentenced to worse forms of death . and they still do that to no muslim minorities in pakistan. forced conversions. and for Fellow dalits , who converted to Islam, very little changed for them. on the contrary , their upper caste oppressors, to avoid the fate of death , also changed to the same religion and treated the aljafs (lower caste muslims ) same. apologists like you will be telling that mughals in India brought riyasat e madina with them. The reality fact is, it wasn't even a fraction of what Riyasat e Madina was . A blood soaked Mughal Empire and Riyasat e madina has hell and heaven culture between them.the formerwas bent on destroying Indian culture instead of respecting to it,The latter to an extent ,respected and prospered under bit progressivism before that was destroyed by Mongols . This is why the times of riyasat a madina was called Golden age for Islam. not the age of mughals which was filled with cries and blood of those millions of poor souls who were devoured by the mughals and the central asian invaders.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1