Comments by "Jack Spring" (@jackspring7709) on "Seditious Conspiracy | Analysis of Stewart Rhodes and Oath Keepers" video.

I don't think they should have entered the building, any of the protestors. But - Dr. Grande...a riot? You're saying there was a riot in the building on January 6th? There wasn't. Very odd take.
1
@robertnobles8189 Oh, behave. Honestly.
1
@robertnobles8189 Yeah, a small hand full of idiotic hot heads and troublemakers! Unfortunately the protestors allowed themselves to be talked into entering the building. Personally I thought they were crazy to enter because they ended up being smeared by a handful of troublemakers: hopefully they'll have learned from this: but come on - sedition? Overthrowing the government? That's a Bit of a stretch. You can't honestly believe that.
1
@robertnobles8189 They did not attempt to overthrow the government. And I don't know if you noticed but one of the inciters at a protest a day earlier was trying to incite the crowd then and they told him he was 'retarded' and to 'get lost'. The people who did follow that imbecile and his friends into the building were too naive to understand what was going on. Hopefully they'll learn from this but they were not trying to overthrow the government, unless you think chanting and flags can do that.
1
@robertnobles8189 A few absolute morons did, and that's why the rest of those protestors were crazy to enter that building. Well, you mustn't think too much of the strength of the constitutional process if you think it can be overturned by a few morons with too much time on their hands and a big group of very naive people who thought it would be a good idea to enter that building. As I said I hope they learned their lesson and realise that, like the vast majority of the protestors did (let's not forget) - they should have stayed outside the building and had their peaceful protest, made their views known and gone home - which is, incidentally, what the overwhelming majority of those protestors did.
1