Comments by "Jack Spring" (@jackspring7709) on "Russell Brand accused of rape, sexual assault and abusive behaviour" video.

Woah. Brand must have really upset you lot at channel 4 for you to put out a hit-piece like that on him. I guess he was 1: Talking about things you don't like him talking about 2: Doing the job that you lot, as journalists, should be doing but aren't.
200
Channel 4 will never tire of hitting new lows: its been their motto from the beginning.
12
Exactly.
9
I can believe it. They lie about everyone and everything else - and now they're doing a hit piece on him.
6
@jamesrobbins1243 I didn't say "no one likes" what he's saying. You may want to read my comment again. As for "Q": I also think "Q" is nonsense and I've never taken it seriously. I'm afraid my comment is way too nuanced for you but in the meantime you may want to see what these liars did to Cliff Richard. Its something along the same lines. There's also another reply I wrote to someone else further up the thread about genuine victims that none of these outlets reported on. You might want to read that, too.
6
@johnstory2996 You clearly didn't read, or didn't understand, my reply. Your ignorance isn't my issue. If you don't understand what I wrote don;t expect me to spoon-feed you like a little baby.
2
@johnstory2996 I already answered him and he didn't come back, so clearly he was satisfied with the answer or, at least, unlike you understood what I was saying. Now I have no idea who you are; you are a complete irrelevance to me - so go read my reply to him, and try to understand it. He at least did.
2
@johnstory2996 Let me put it this way: he's doing the job that paid journalists are neglecting to do. For that I give him credit: - I'm not even a fan of the guy: I don't particularly like him - but I'll give him credit for that.
2
@jojothepolyglot1866 Very true jojo. And, tbh, I once said exactly the same things as these schmoos are saying now - then one day I decided to start doing my own research. How anyone could trust and believe msm these days is a mystery to me. And these people expect to be spoon fed links and arguments (which I used to do until I realised I was wasting my time, btw - and what a waste of time that was). Thanks for the comment. You're right: some people do depend on these charlatans to tell them how the world around them works. Its a pity.
2
I'm sorry to read that you went through that. One of the worst things for anyone to go through. Ch 4 are reprehensible. This is a hit piece they are doing on him and they don't care if the allegations are true or not, the point is to destroy him for political reasons (he's talking about a lot of things on his show that Ch4 and other media outlets are too corrupt or cowardly to deal with) and that's why they want to take him down.
1
Its incredibly Channel 4 to have actors portray the supposed victims at this moment.
1
@Morning404 Given that the msm are proven liars with a long track record of false allegations (Cliff Richard, anyone? The same people made the same allegations about him). Now let me point out 2 things: 1: I was involved in a campaign many years ago to get justice for a young disabled victim of a well connected gang: Hollie Greig is her name, you may want to check her story out. Not ONE mainstream outlet ran her story: the bbc even accused her and her mother of lying. 2: Ch4 was actively involved in the cover-up of the Rotherham child grooming scandal for 10 years from 2004 to 2014 by refusing to run that story when one of their junior journalists approached them about it. (Ch4, after talking to police chiefs in Rotherham, decied not to report it because they said running the story could lead to riots). So when Ch4 or any of these other cronies accuse someone of something, while covering up ACTUAL crimes, then I'm sceptical.
1
@PGHEngineer Dispatches doing real journalism. Lol.
1
@django3422 Another one. I didn't say 'those weren't my words'. Try harder - and don't waste my time. I'm busy.
1