Comments by "Jack Spring" (@jackspring7709) on "KING 5 Seattle" channel.

Unbelievable. It's only a matter of time before they attack someone else - and they have the taste of human blood now. Criminal negligence charges for whoever decided to give the dogs back to the owner.
39
I couldn't believe that decision. The problem now - and it's a big problem - is that they have the taste of human blood, now. They're dangerous dogs because they have a dangerous owner.
36
@charmingjinx9379 tbh - I think that could be quite likely: clearly she's a bad dog owner: you could see toward the end of the clip she was petting and 'comforting' one of the dogs afterwards - the dog will have taken that as a reward for what it did. The state was insane to give those dangerous pets back to her.
25
From what I can see they are bull terriers: a man who worked for my brother was killed by two of them a few years back. She is incredibly lucky she survived and was not severely injured. They have the taste of human blood now: whoever released them back to their dangerous owner should have been charged with criminal negligence.
22
The judge may want to educate himself on the Constitution, so.
20
@knickknight168 Good grief: actually read my blasted comment and understand it before you make stupid remarks . I DIDN'T SAY THEY HAVE A TASTE FOR HUMAN BLOOD. I said they have the taste OF human blood now now that they have attacked a human. I've been around animals all my life, I know what I'm talking about. You might want to do a little research on how it changes a dog who's bite has caused injury to a human. I get the very strong impression you're one of those dangerous owners yourself. And I just shook my head when I read your comment "They weren't returned, they were reclaimed." As if changing the word used to describe it makes a difference Some people. Smh.
9
If you're implying that she must have done something to provoke them - a friend of my brother's was torn to shreds and killed by two bull terriers a few years back: all he was doing was walking in the countryside with his girlfriend. The owner is a dangerous owner who hasn't trained her dogs properly - and for someone who is saying "Don't judge" you are being very judgemental. If you ever happen to meet Cesar Milan ask him if anyone has ever been attacked unprovoked by a dog. Smh.
6
@jermanmonster000 I agree on every point - and the fact that those two dogs have now attacked a human makes them dangerous to everyone, including their owner: where I grew up dogs are euthanized if they attack a human because they've "tasted human blood" - that was always my understanding growing up. I don't know why they weren't taken away. I hope they don't attack again but the ruling is baffling to me: seeing the owner comforting (??!!) on of the dogs afterwards had me shaking my head.
5
@PR-xm5zc You again. IWell, t's always funny to me that some people will wilfully misinterpret everything so they can argue against something that was never even said. I grew with animals, I have a fairly good grasp of their nature. And I also think you're lying when you say that people who say 'do some research' need to do it themselves.
2
@melaniec3819 True. A young man who worked for my brother was killed by two bull terriers when he was on holidays out in the countryside with his girlfriend. The most heart wrenching thing about it is that during the attack she was screaming at him to get up off the ground: his answer was "I'm already dead". He clearly knew the nature of these dogs. There was a court case but the dangerous owners won. I've been around animals all my life and there are boundaries that should never be crossed, especially with dangerous animals. Good on you getting rid of your ex. A friend of mine's boyfriend once brought a pit bull around to her apartment, but as soon as he left the dog started getting aggressive with her and her 6 year old daughter. She stayed out of the apartment all day and when he returned she demanded he take it away and never bring it back.
2
@ Nice try. I think you're in need of reading the 14th Amendment again - and understanding it, while you're at it. Smh. Some people.
2
@willfire0310 Another one. Read the Constitution again: and try understanding it this time.
2
@LittleSparklingStars Yes :/
1
UW picks its people very well, two criminals walking the streets after those types of felonies. And that assault would be reported as a hate crime had the roles been reversed.
1
Exactly.
1
"Without context this audio is horrifying". Gang of psychos covering for one of their own.
1