Comments by "Jack Spring" (@jackspring7709) on "Queues at vaccine centres in Ireland as Covid jabs offered to children" video.

Well, the biggest public advocate of the vaccine in Ireland, Dr Luke O'Neill, has refused to take it himself: so I think you may need to stop banging your own head and wonder why that would be.
6
And the biggest public advocate for the vaccine (Dr Luke O'Neill) has actually refused to take it himself and not one Irish main stream media journalist has called him out on it.
6
@M Nobody said anything about gates trying to mind control people with jabs - don't know where you got that from.
5
Dr Luke O'Neill is the biggest public advocate of the jab, but did you know that he has refused to take it himself? That makes me ask questions - and should make anyone ask questions. Covid-19 also has a recovery rate of 99.7%.
3
I don't use facebook and I'm not interested in conspiracies just facts. Dr Luke O'Neill is the biggest public advocate of the jab, but he has actually refused to take it himself. That makes me ask questions - and should even make you ask questions. Covid-19 also has a recovery rate of 99.7%. Not conspiracy: facts - look into them for yourself - and stay off facebook, it's not good for you.
3
@TheLiamMurphy Many other scientists and virologists and doctors don't recommend it, some of them have even pointed towards existing and inexpensive drugs that are very effective against covid-19 - but you don't want to listen to those, so your assertion about interest in facts and logic does not apply to you. All you have to do is listen to what those scientists are saying, but you won't.
2
@TheLiamMurphy Not 99.9% of virologists - just the virologists that you agree with: unfortunately the others who are voicing serious disquiet about all this are being marginalised: even that fact alone should ring an alarm bell. But hey, if you have a habit of believing career politicians, big pharma and their various promoters go right ahead: I personally am very skeptical of politicians and corporations - especially when they are working hand in hand: and I always thought most people were, but there you go - I would never deny you your right to roll your sleeve up and take whatever they want to give you. I wouldn't even dream of trying to stop you. I can try warning you, but I won't stop you.
2
@cottagearts8467 Dr. Luke O'Neill is an educated person who publicly promotes the jab - the only problem is he has refused to take it himself. That would make other educated people pause for thought and with good reason. I hope you had a good education.
2
@TheLiamMurphy He did refuse it and your fallacious claims to the the contrary won't change that, regardless of your ability to recite the word 'google'.
2
@dazza4345 He said at the very beginning he doesn't need it. Pretty obvious to someone who can think for themselves that he has no intention of taking it.
2
Don't be an idiot. Nobody here is anti-vax, but there are questions to be asked about this particular one. Dr Luke O'Neill is the biggest public advocate of the jab yet he has actually refused to take it himself. If that doesn't cause you to wonder you are too stupid to even talk about this. Covid-19 also has a recovery rate of 99.7%. These are facts and not claims: learn to look at them and think for yourself.
2
@TheLiamMurphy Sure, little Liam - there are plenty of other scientists who do not follow this narrative but they don't agree with you so you don't want to listen to them.
1
True :/
1
@TheLiamMurphy @TheLiamMurphy No it isn't, I think you're mixing it up with the 100% of virologists who are following the government line (politicians are all very honest) and big pharma corporate interests (another very trustworthy bunch): of course 100% of them are going to say what you're saying: you've paid no attention to those who are extremely concerned about this experimental 'vaccine' (gene therapy) - but, as I said, and we're both beginning to repeat each other at this stage - by all means feel free to believe the political class in Ireland and the corporate interests who have, interestingly and successfully, lobbied to exempt themselves from liability of any injury or death caused by the vaccine: you trust those guys to inject you with their experimental drug - go right ahead: I guess in 5 years we could chat again on this thread and see how well it's going for you. I live in Europe by the way: I'm in Ireland at the moment.
1
That's a smart doctor.
1
Lol what??? Are you serious?
1
@ULYSSES-31 Yeah I see a picture of someone holding a needle close to O'Kelly's arm - I guess you don't have the attention span or the brains to remember when London Mayor Sadiq Khan posed for a flu jab picture and was roundly laughed at when everyone could see the sheath was still on the syringe when it was being pressed against his arm: but hey - go ahead and roll your sleeves up - I am definitely not going to try to argue you out of taking it.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth I saw the picture of him with a needle being held close to his arm - and as I had remarked to that other idiot on the thread London Mayor Sadiq Khan once infamously posed for a flu shot during which the syringe was still in its protective casing when it was pressed against his arm: if I saw a pic of the needle actually going into his arm I'd sut up straight away and wouldn't say another thing about it. You're way too trusting.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth No need to to upset yourself, Flat earth truth: if you want to believe a bunch of politicians and their friends go right ahead, and, as I also said to the other idiot - go ahead and roll your sleeves up and take that jab - I certainly won't stop you. And your 'facts are meaningless' comment makes me symoathise with you very deeply. SMH - a jab over a flu variant that has a 99.7% recovery rate. Some people.
1
@nigelraporam6917 I never said the taoiseach or tanaiste didn't get the vaccine, so you should really read and understand my original comment before arguing against something I never even wrote. Smh.
1
@JohnThomas-c7e You're right. Sometimes I forget that people sometimes just troll (or shill) - we can normally tell by the very generic and snarky comments they make and the no content channels.
1
@Schtiel Yep - a qualified scientist is "just a hack" when he speaks facts that you don't feel like believing. Its a mystery to me why you feel so threatened by just looking at his claims and the statistics behind them - then you could make an informed judgement - but you won't.
1
@TheLiamMurphy Calm down, Little Liam - I replied to your comment already if you take a few deep breaths and read it.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Here we go again. You live in a world where politicians and big pharma never lie and are to be trusted over everyone else - that fact alone gives me my very deepest sympathies for you - and thank you for admitting (without having the brains to understand it) that the 99.7% statistic is true - of course you added all sorts of fluff that someone who believes career politicians and big pharma would, but I guess that comes with the territory. Poor guy.
1
@Schtiel You're talking about what he claimed. Newsflash: untrustworthy people do lie, incase your cognitive development has not reached that point yet. Also - he knew people would question him, so he did what you do - threw out the word 'anti vaxxer (ingenious argument lol) : I'm not an anti-vaxxer, I'm just deeply skeptical of this one and the obsessive push behind it: this would make any rational person question it. Now clearly you believe everything politicians and big pharma say, that's your prerogative - as I said before: go ahead, roll your sleeves up and take it: I'm not going to stop you or even try to convince you not to.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth I could, and will, ask you the same question. I think you suffer from a condition called the Dunning Kruger effect: look it up - it begins with you being completely and utterly incapable of processing the fact that people may have good reason to be skeptical - and getting very upset, defensive and even angry when your own beliefs are challenged. Calling evidence that you don' want to believe 'no evidence at all' is another trait. As I'd mentioned before - you have my sympathies. Try thinking for yourself.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth "Calling evidence that you don't believe is not evidence at all". Your Dunning Kruger effect prevents you from seeing how that statement applies to you. Believing a bunch of politicians, big pharma and their promoters is really not a good idea - I'm naturally skeptical of those people anyway and with good reason: as even you would know that all of them have very sketchy track records: we're never going to agree on any of this: I've looked at it (including evidence from doctors and and scientists who are not agreeing with any of the promoted narrative) you've looked at it from your end and decided who you're going to believe. I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I'm deeply suspicious of this one and the people who are rabidly promoting it.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth I've just replied to your message and seen you've written another reply, too. TBH you've been going on about evidence but haven't produced any yourself. In fact I posted 3 links yesterday by credible sources but none of those were even looked at, which is why I rarely post them these days because it'll always be answered with 'I don't believe that'. You're welcome to post whatever evidence and links you want and I will (unlike most people who demand links and evidence) read them.
1
@Schtiel The words 'Confirmation bias and cherry picking' is not an argument and could just as easily be applied to you. All the tabloid papers completely agree with your points on Covid and the vaccine so you're admitting something about the quality of your argument without even realising: I doubt if you've ever written a peer reviewed paper yourself, so I chuckled at that, too, but I have read and listened to scientists and doctors who are extremely concerned about the response to Covid-19 and the vaccine - and for good reason. Your tabloid paper remark, given that the tabloids completely agree with your narrative has given me a real laugh. Thank you.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth They are backed up by sources and evidence, 3 links of which I provided, but (predictably) you weren't interested in looking at that as I knew you wouldn't be: you yourself have provided nothing. There are two schools of scientific thought: one of them powered by politicians and big pharma (both well known for being untrustworthy and corrupt) the other by scientists, virologists and doctors who are extremely concerned about the response to the virus and the use of these experimental gene therapies - some of them even have pointed to existing, inexpensive drugs that have been very effective in treating the virus: interestingly many of them are being marginalised on this issue despite their credentials - which makes me, and should make you, understandably very skeptical.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Just look at the links I provided: you can't keep saying I provided nothing, especially as you yourself haven't.
1
@Schtiel Repeating yourself over and over again only suggests one thing - that you're trying to convince yourself - now think of something original to say - you sound exactly like all the other accounts who've been saying the same thing - anyone would think you're the same person with multiple accounts repeating the same babble with no personal sign of meaningful life or intelligence.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth They're there alright: I posted them yesterday - they were still there when I posted them and I also posted them to the other account name on this thread Schitlel or whatever he calls himself.
1
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth They are being called vaccines by their creators and promoters but they are gene therapies - and that's straight from a scientist's mouth - and is also one of the many reasons I am so deeply suspicious of the career politicians, representatives of big pharma and those who are helping promote this jab: and it's why you should be, too.
1
@obk1404 Working in the medical profession he is a frontline worker: also - "not jumping the line" is him saying he's not taking it at all in a way that will fool people like you. Your third point about having been fully vaccinated because of his age is comedy gold, especially from someone who started their own comment with the word "nonense". But hey, go and roll up your sleeves and take it on behalf of someone who has no intention of taking it. I definitely will not stop you.
1
@obk1404 A professor of biochemistry who has elected himself to be one of the biggest and most regular media spokesmen on Covid 19, and he's not on the frontline as far as you're concerned. Yeah, sure - but I'm glad you at least haven't denied that he has refused to take the vaccine that he is urging everyone else to take, despite having missed completely the point I was actually making in the first place.
1
@obk1404 Google. Lol! Yeah I know what he said and I did see a picture of him with someone holding a needle close to his arm: I also saw a picture of London Mayor Sadiq Khan pretending to take his flu shot whilst promoting it for others - lol the needle was still in its protecting plastic sheath when it was being pressed against his arm. If you want to believe career politicians, big pharma and their minions go right ahead - I'm not going to stop you: if you want to be injected with an experimental drug that hasn't even been tested properly go right ahead on that, too. I can assure you I won't try to stop you, believe me.
1
Yep.
1
Well, the biggest advocate of the vaccine, Dr Luke O'Neill, has refused to take it himself. Critical thinkers would ask questions about that, and may even be a little distrustful of it - but go right ahead and roll you sleeve up, I definitely won't stop you.
1
It's worse than insane: the biggest public promoter of the jab (Dr. Luke O'Neill) has actually refused to take it himself - but no msm journalist has called him out on it and the Irish seem to still be listening to him.
1