Comments by "Jack Spring" (@jackspring7709) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. I enjoyed Pakman's work many, Many years ago. he at least seemed to have sense: Now I regard him as an angry and repulsive hack. His mocking of the shooting victims of a Christian school, tweeting "Maybe they didn't pray enough" was one of the most stomach churning things I've ever read. I've despised him since.
    9
  2. Exactly.
    9
  3. "Very surprising that there would be a mass shooting at a Christian school, given that lack of prayer is often blamed for these horrible events.Is it possible they weren't praying enough, or correctly, despite being a Christian school". David Pakman's deleted tweet on the killing of 3 Christian children and teachers in Nashville. What a vile remark - but you seem to have enjoyed it, for whatever reason.
    6
  4. It's a threat to pakman, too, by the looks of things.
    5
  5. I saw your tweet: "Very surprising that there would be a mass shooting at a Christian school, given that lack of prayer is often blamed for these horrible events.Is it possible they weren't praying enough, or correctly, despite being a Christian school". What a vile remark - but you seem to have enjoyed it, for whatever reason.
    4
  6. After mocking the child victims of a shooting at that Christian school for "not praying enough" you are in no position to make moral judgements about anyone.
    4
  7. Its at times like this that you see his mask slip and he reveals himself to the be the disingenuous, mean spirited hack that he is. I used to think he was good years ago, too. Glad to see he's being called out in the comments section.
    3
  8. Yep: that was the very first name I though of when he asked for examples.
    2
  9.  @rhysperegrine5100  Are you on Pakman's production team? Did you see the list? because you do know he has a reputation for lying. Plus: you went from saying he never sent a list to suddenly saying he did send a list with just 3 people.
    2
  10.  @Madway  You are of course free to go with the most charitable interpretation: but even Pakman himself deleted the tweet - and then went on to call anyone who criticised his comment 'anti-semitic'. Interesting that he thinks its anti-semitic to criticise someone for laughing at slaughtered Christian children, but I guess whne someone has enough hatred in their heart they will excuse anything.
    2
  11. Its so interesting to see the same people who had no problem with bill gates suddenly melting down over another billionaire being involved in politics.
    2
  12. For someone who is anti-gun, you sure did have a good laugh about those Christian children being slaughtered in your vile tweet.
    2
  13. Exactly.
    2
  14. Republican operative interviewed.....by democrat operative, I guess? BTW - in fact Graham regularly slammed Trump in public, not just private.
    2
  15. Lol - he ran rings around you, he even neutralised all the passive aggressive tactics you always use: you've been reduced to using thumbnails that make him look as if he's roaring.
    2
  16.  @LittleBitofHopeToo2518  I didn't call it a debate, honeybuns.
    2
  17. Peddling conspiracy theories now, are you? Well I guess you have to do the bidding of those who pay your actual wages. Hoping to hype up another paranoid jan 6 type situation for the dnc. Shame on you.
    2
  18. Its not a big cross.
    2
  19. He's popular on both sides because he talks to, and for, ordinary people about real concerns: if that make shim a right wing conspiracy theorist that says more about you than it does about people who see him as a coherent option.
    1
  20.  @joanhellyer9964  But you don't say why.
    1
  21. Yep - that's the impression he gives.
    1
  22. Both of you are completely different people with completely different outlooks: obviously there's going to be a clash in personalities, as there has been in interviews you've done with him: but this is getting a bit ridiculous, Dave. In your dealings with him and comments before you never went to this level. Pardon me but you don't bring up something like that and say you "don't care about his sexuality". The Daily Beast also has a shocking record of lying and slander. You do know they also doxxed journalist Gonzalo Lira over in Ukraine at a time that authorities there were threatening him. He was arrested soon after. I've never completely agreed with many of your stances but I have always respected that you never seemed to lower yourself to these types of tactics. Very surprised.
    1
  23. Learn to get your facts straight once in a while. The Oath is sworn to the Constitution, not the government.
    1
  24. Lol, this is what pakman is reduced to. Well, they can't criticise policy so I suppose they have to grasp at any crumbs they can find.
    1
  25. David Pakman - the man who mocked young Christian victims of that mass school shooting saying "Maybe they didn't pray hard enough". That's all I need to know about him.
    1
  26.  @adamcornell1186  He has a medical condition that causes his voice to be like that. Would you mock someone who has a stutter? How easy it is for some people who regard themselves as civilised mocking someone who have a condition because it affects their voice.
    1
  27.  @rhysperegrine5100  Nicely worded set of lies, there. You're in good company.
    1
  28.  @rhysperegrine5100  You're still waiting. I thought you said a list was already sent. make up your mind. How old is this interview anyway?
    1
  29.  @rhysperegrine5100  P.S. Lol - the list was a transcript from the video. Dear oh dear. Rhys.
    1
  30.  @rhysperegrine5100  You made it clear (after a while) that the list you spoke about was the transcript of the interview. You're really wasting both our time by now.
    1
  31.  @rhysperegrine5100  P.S. You did say Pakman was still waiting: read your own comments. Interesting that someone comments about comprehension when he doesn't even understand or remember what he wrote, and gets passive aggressive and feline about it when it's pointed out to him. yep - you're a pakman fan, alright.
    1
  32.  @rhysperegrine5100  Smh. Give up: you're talking to yourself at this point.
    1
  33.  @rockradstone  Ah - so a joke about slaughtered children is "the truth" is it? Another person who thinks the slaughter of children is funny because they're Christian: but I can understand why you'd wnat me to "give it up". I guess the truth hurts.
    1
  34.  @eunicemurray9644  Birds of a feather, eh? Another Pakman fan who sits there delighted about the thought of 9 year old school children being slaughtered just because they are Christian. Interesting insight into the caliber of people who follow his content. Anti-gun but drooling at the prospect of murdered children becasue they happen to be Christian.
    1
  35.  @rockradstone  He deleted his comment along with the entire comments thread where he called people anti-semitic. You're one of his followers - ask him about it yourself.
    1
  36. All these anti-gun people - Pakman and his ilk, then go on to drool, salivate and laugh at the slaughter of children by a gunman. Try working that logic out in a normal, healthy mind. Unbelievable - and I used to respect that guy before he became twisted: but I didn't realise just how twisted and sick he is until today.
    1
  37.  @rockradstone  You do follow him: so much so that you will trivialise the murder of innocent children just because they belong to a demographic that he has a pathological hatred for (for whatever personal reasons). And you're only going to get the source of his following vile remarks by asking him himself, even if you do believe you're so irrelevant that he won't reply to you. And yes - you are a "follower" - you can't think for yourself: and my apologies if the truth hurts with that one.
    1
  38.  @Kathom34  Check your facts before calling other people 'ignoramus'. And try not to lie while you're at it. He mocked 9 year old children for being murdered - and then called anyone who criticised him 'anti-semitic': then he deleted his own tweet because even he realised how that looked. Nice try, but with the same old generic lies and juvenile attempts at insults. There really is something seriously wrong with you.
    1
  39.  @deloresmatt8643  Laughing at Christian children for being slaughtered. He even deleted the tweet afterwards. That's like laughing at Native Americans for fighting with spears against guns. You're no different to him, but even he had the insight to delete his vile tweet. And I find it disgusting, but not surprising, that you would then suggest those children were slaughtered as some sort of original sin because you see some sort of deluded correlation to them being Christian and someone who is "right wing". You regard those innocent Christian children as being no different to "mass shooting right wingers". You can dress up this vile "man's" joke about children being slaughtered but, I'll repeat, even he deleted it after he got over his initial delight about the situation. Secondly - you may want to do some research into how many "left wingers" have carried out mass shootings in the last 3 years alone. By the way: I don't regard things in terms of "left" or "right" - I take every individual as they come because I believe that people who allow themselves to get tagged into "teams" tend to end up being divided along lines they don't need to be - and they end up laughing about innocent victims being slaughtered, whilst others make excuses for them.
    1
  40. He has a medical condition that causes his voice to be like that. What a nasty, mean spirited comment.
    1
  41. Not really: Pakman had similar "civil" conversations with Jesse Lee Peterson and then was all over the false accusations made against Peterson recently, grinning and drooling like a cheshire cat. Even I was surprised at his nastiness. He also referred to the interviewee as an "operative". He's just a lot more covert with his nastiness.
    1
  42.  @op3129  Dear oh dear - I was being metaphorical, which you already know seeing as you're familiar with the word: no he wasn't literally drooling and didn't look like the cheshire cat: but he was gloating in a way that even disgusted me, as someone who used to respect him. Lol "link and timestamp". Who do you think you are?
    1
  43.  @op3129  Provide links, timestamps and proof that miller wasn't the only operative - links please to kristol, wilson, sykes and etc - (especially etc, as he must be a secret operative). Links and timestamps?? LOL :D
    1
  44.  @op3129  Oh, come one - can't you recognise when you're being trolled? I referred to "etc" as being a secret operative lol - and no, I didn't mean there was uncontrolled saliva pouring from pakman's mouth :D
    1
  45.  @donbianconi8446  Where have those accusations been proven true? Hearsay and hit pieces by people who hate him is all I have seen. What's your attitude towards all those black men who were lynched on the strength of false accusation back in the 50s just because they weren't liked? Suddenly not looking so different from the lynch mobs, are you?
    1
  46.  @donbianconi8446  Nothing funny about it - there's no difference. I didn't claim they were proven false, I said they were not proven true - you need to be intelligent enough to understand the difference - good luck with your k*k membership: I'm sure they'd be VERY happy to have someone like you on board.
    1
  47.  @donbianconi8446  P.S. You may think it's funny going after a black man with false accusations just because you don't like him; I don't - but it tells me a great deal about you, racist. Black people have to think a certain way before they'll be accepted by the mob that you're part of, I get it. Anyone outside of that is fair game. I get that, too.
    1
  48. Mr Pakman: I wouldn't have expected you to be part of a modern day lynch mob going after a black man based on hearsay just because you don't like him. It must be disappointing to have that revelation about your own morality.
    1
  49. After mocking the child victims of a shooting at that Christian school for "not praying enough" this presenter is in no position to make moral judgements about anyone.
    1
  50. What does that have to do with what he is doing now?
    1