Comments by "Jack Spring" (@jackspring7709) on "UK Covid-19: Chris Whitty defends recommending vaccine for teenagers" video.

  1. Article 6 of UNESCO's Bioethics and Human Rights Acts states that it is against International Law to force or coerce anyone to take a v$££ine against their will. Whitty is advocating breaking the law: and his determination in doing what he is doing needs to be questioned, possibly investigated.
    8
  2.  @tattoodtear9607  Lol, you're right!
    6
  3.  @ConalRF  Yes, I think it's a great idea to believe politicians and their corporate friends - this time in Big Pharma. By the way: I thought you should know: Michael O'Bernicia opened a lawsuit against Whitty, Valance, Ferguson & Hancock with evidence they stand to gain personally from a mass vaccine rollout. You may remember Hancock and Ferguson both broke all their own covid rules so they could sleep with other men's wives. If you're happy to believe these people care about your welfare go ahead and roll your sleeves up, I won't stop you. BTW - Covid-19 has a recovery rate of 99.7% - far better than even the seasonal flu. You've been had.
    5
  4. True. Also: Article 6 of UNESCO's Bioethics and Human Rights Acts states that it is against International Law to force or coerce anyone to take a v$££ine against their will. Whitty is advocating breaking the law: and his determination in doing what he is doing needs to be questioned, possibly investigated.
    4
  5. Unfortunately, and to my great shock, too many people did tolerate this - even people whom I thought knew better: and now, of course, their children are next: this is what happens when we grow up in a free society that others sacrificed for: we take it for granted till its gone - and our children (maybe grandchildren) are left to fight the fight that our grandparents fought: what a burden for the cowards of this generation to put on their own childrens' shoulders.
    3
  6. Exactly.
    3
  7. Article 6 of UNESCO's Bioethics and Human Rights Acts states that it is against International Law to force or coerce anyone to take a v$££ine against their will. Whitty is advocating breaking the law: and his determination in doing what he is doing needs to be questioned, possibly investigated.
    3
  8. Exactly: also I want to point out that Article 6 of UNESCO's Bioethics and Human Rights Acts states that it is against International Law to force or coerce anyone to take a v$££ine against their will. Whitty is advocating breaking the law: and his determination in doing what he is doing needs to be questioned, possibly investigated.
    2
  9. What he's doing is illegal: Article 6 of UNESCO's Bioethics and Human Rights Acts states that it is against International Law to force or coerce anyone to take a v$££ine against their will: and whitty's determination in doing what he is doing needs to be questioned, possibly investigated.
    2
  10. What he's doing is illegal: Article 6 of UNESCO's Bioethics and Human Rights Acts states that it is against International Law to force or coerce anyone to take a v$££ine against their will: and whitty's determination in doing what he is doing needs to be questioned, possibly investigated.
    2
  11.  @klaeLIFE  No, I'm comparing the independent thinking, bravery and natural skepticism of that generation to the cowardice, compliance and inability to think of this one: I would have thought the comparison was obvious - and on the contrary I think they would have been shocked at how people these days, including you, have chosen to believe politicians and their corporate friends and happily handed over your freedoms to them over a virus that has a 99.7% recovery rate: It think that would really shock that generation.
    1
  12.  @jamescollins3647  Lol - but tbh They've done some things right. Article 6 is one of them thankfully.
    1
  13.  @rocketpig1914  I think you may need to look up the definition of 'coerce' again.
    1
  14.  @rocketpig1914  'offer' lol: I really think you should get that dictionary out.
    1
  15.  @klaeLIFE  Article 6 states to 'force OR coerce'. Force OR coerce: what I'm actually doing is letting people know what their rights are if it comes to it. Mr Whitty is, after all, a politician with ties to big pharma: hardly a litmus test of trustworthiness.
    1
  16. Also: Article 6 of UNESCO's Bioethics and Human Rights Acts states that it is against International Law to force or coerce anyone to take a v$££ine against their will. Whitty is advocating breaking the law: and his determination in doing what he is doing needs to be questioned, possibly investigated.
    1
  17. Ah - speak of the devil. Have a look at this clip of a Gates speech from a few years back: the full speech was removed recently for some reason (!!), but the most important part is in this short clip: https://youtu.be/C2Mdf_1LuZI
    1
  18.  @eastcoastuk1120  Thank you.
    1
  19.  @ConalRF  Covid 19 has a recovery rate of 99.7%: those odds are far better than even seasonal flu: hardly a reason for this over reaction: also the government did admit recently that they exaggerated the threat to frighten people so that it would be easier to pass legislation: they admitted that - they admitted it: also I really think you should be a little bit more skeptical of politicians and their corporate friends (this time in big pharma) - just healthy skepticism: final point: a man named Michael O'Bernicia brought a lawsuit recently against hancock, whitty, valance and ferguson with evidence that they all stood to gain personally from a mass vaccine rollout. Healthy skepticism really is needed here.
    1