Comments by "nunereclipse" (@nunereclipsereborn) on "Beijing Bidens Congressional Address was As Expected: Dull, Sloganeering Nonsense" video.

  1.  @UncleMikeDrop  Exactly my point! By Supreme Court Standards the only speech not protected is the criminal misconduct from one's speech via call-to-action like inciting imminent violence resulting in imminent lawless action.
    2
  2.  @UncleMikeDrop  Cuz' the regressive left is objectively worse than the religious right.
    2
  3.  @dragonmartijn  Of course rights are not 'absolute'. Just we have the right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness but it's not 100% guarantee. I could die tomorrow. The federal government's duty is to make sure that no individuals or groups abuse a right.
    2
  4. @Tim Reid Only if somebody gets hurt.
    2
  5.  @zawarudo596  Isn't he the one that said you must submit to the will of the mob?!
    2
  6. @B Mo So long as it doesn't rile up, incite a crowd and somebody gets hurt then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  7. @DH M Yet we still have blue states in quasi lockdowns with a handful of small businesses out of commission.
    1
  8. @EternalRespawn Corporate state media.
    1
  9. @CaptainZ Precedents change over time. SCOTUS Ohio vs. Brandenburg ruling stated that the standard is inciting imminent violence resulting imminent lawless action.
    1
  10. @Denizen Wolf So long as it doesn't incite people to be riled up and someone gets hurt. Then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  11. @shocker1215 Precedents change all the time. SCOTUS decision comes from Ohio vs. Brandenburg ruling which the standard is the only speech not protected is inciting imminent violence resulting in imminent lawless action.
    1
  12. @SirRollAnO So long as it doesn't incite people to get riled up and someone gets hurt. Then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  13. @banced1 More like corporate slavery.
    1
  14. @John Loked n Loaded As long as it doesn't rile up a crowd and somebody gets hurt then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  15. @Mike Vasquez So long as it doesn't incite a crowd to get riled up and somebody gets hurt. Then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  16.  @UncleMikeDrop  That's criminal misconduct coming from one's speech that is illegal. It's not the speech itself.
    1
  17. @rusty rockwell So long as it doesn't incite a crowd to get riled up and somebody gets hurt. Then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  18. @Raverus Precedents change over time. SCOTUS decision Ohio vs. Brandenburg ruling stated the standard is inciting imminent violence resulting imminent lawless action.
    1
  19.  @raverus2126  Our rights come from our humanity! Period! End of Discussion!
    1
  20.  @raverus2126  Some people believe and think that our Constitution gives our rights. Wrong! Even if the Constitution was never drawn up nor crafted our pre-existing rights are inalienable and natural!!!!!!!!!! Period! End of story!
    1
  21. @Inquisitor Matthew Ashcraft Didn't Kamala and Pelosi also nodded off?
    1
  22. @dragonmartijn Our rights come from our humanity.
    1
  23. @Glassic Gamer Precedents change all the time. The new standard is Ohio vs. Brandenburg.
    1
  24.  @86BarbOmega  And I thought it was also Kamala And Pelosi nodded off.
    1
  25. @Ryan Hall So long as it doesn't incite a crowd to get riled up and somebody gets hurt. Then you can be held liable & sued civilly.
    1
  26.  @ryanhall5360  Correct. However it doesn't mean you aren't held responsible nor accountable if somebody gets hurt if you rile up the crowd into frenzy via call-to-action.
    1
  27.  @ryanhall5360  You're repeating my exact point LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1
  28. @Mike Jk Ohio vs. Brandenburg is the standard now. Precedents change all the time.
    1
  29. @Bob Parkhurst So long as it doesn't incite a crowd to get riled up and somebody gets hurt. Then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  30. @Marc P. So long as it doesn't incite people riled up and somebody gets hurt then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  31. @Rainbo Sprinkles So long as it doesn't cause people to riled up and get hurt then you can civilly liable.
    1
  32. @Tom Will So long as it doesn't incite people to get riled up and someone gets hurt. Then you can held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  33. @Albaniaball 89 So long as it doesn't rile people up and somebody gets hurt you can be held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  34. @Jimmy Day Still Bezos can't own slaves. That's why we have SCOTUS.
    1
  35. @Jack Frost Minor stumble here and there.
    1
  36. @Armed ASMR That's the federal government's duty is to make sure that no individual or groups abuse a right.
    1
  37. @Gerald Armstrong So long as it doesn't incite a crowd to get riled up and somebody gets hurt. Then you can be held liable and sued civilly.
    1
  38. @Smith Smithy I couldn't even watch the speech--BORING!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1