Comments by "" (@kimsland999) on "Chaos: The Science of the Butterfly Effect" video.

  1. Or Tinkerbell :) But no, he was speaking of science and questions. Everything that's not any claimed God.
    2
  2. Things are true or false irrespective of people's beliefs. So we already know what you said iis false. Guessing, wishing, believing even hoping, don't make things true, before during or after!
    1
  3. your not ready for lecturering your ready for nursery level instruction Wonderfully put. I have had some confusion when speaking with theists on such things does a monster (their claimed God) exist. I have constructed a reasonable line of conversation, where a parent will instruct a child: No monsters exist, go back to bed. And then added that once the child is able to reason effectively (possibly 10 years later with a more developed frontal cortex of the brain, we can add: ...not that we know of ;) Whilst you spelt you're incorrectly, your line will help me to add onto this reply. I generally find adult theists to not be ready of strong reasoning or science (on this particular subject of claimed Gods, evil wicked witches, supernaturally evil people who were supposedly born as evil babies etc etc). Thus I begin on their level of understanding, with words such as I wrote above. Ready for nursery and instruction may be the words I require, when other, so called positive only atheists, question my somewhat patronizing and being told method. Thanks.
    1
  4. Chaos effect is not a religion. A religion is about beliefs, this is about science. They are polar opposites. Things are true or false irrespective of ones beliefs. And believers believe, irrespective of reasoning that goes against their beliefs (well at least the believers don't change their mind immediately upon being reasoned with. Anyway, this wasn't religous speak at all.
    1