Comments by "Marcus W" (@Mawyou) on "The 4 Criminal Referrals Against Trump, Detailed by Rep. Jamie Raskin" video.

  1. Conspiracy to defraud probabaly will stick. Seems like an easy one to me. The fake electors. Of course Trump's lawyers will say he "didn't know that he really lost." Same reasoning for obstruction of an official proceeding. The fake electors The insurrection one should stick, depending on who's defining insurrection. False statements is obvious. Of course his lawyers will say he's a psychopath who doesn't know truth from fiction (basically true).
    1
  2.  @kevinschmelzer3083  Okay Mr. Fox News commentator. "The committee failed to provide real evidence." -- Lol. You're funny. "They would have gone straight to court" -- Congress doesn't prosecute people. They conduct investigations and pass laws.
    1