Comments by "Marcus W" (@Mawyou) on "Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell delivers statement after Trump acquittal" video.

@Mark-oi9rf Wow! That Antifa school for the performing arts is quite impressive. They even get a free Go to Jail for Terrorism card.
1
@Mark-oi9rf And what was Antifa's purpose there? Are you telling me Antifa decided they wanted to keep Trump in power?
1
@Mark-oi9rf I don't know how breaching the capitol keeps Trump in power. It was a dumb idea. But seriously, why would the left go on Parler to plan an attack and then risk prison time just to frame Trump? He had already lost the election in a landslide. Where are you getting this information?
1
@Mark-oi9rf The 6-3 conservative Supreme Court said he lost. Twice. So did 60+ other courts. In this country, courts settle the disputes. It's literally written in the Constitution. Did you miss that part the last time you read it? You don't just get to cut the courts out of the Constitution any time you want to keep a president.
1
@Mark-oi9rf Well that's just too bad for Trump isn't it? There is a process. The courts have the final say. If the courts say you lost, then you lost. Democrat Al Gore took it like a man in 2000 when the Supreme Court told him no. Trump doesn't get an exception just for being Trump.
1
@Mark-oi9rf The cases were thrown out for lack of evidence. I know you disagree. But legal disputes are settled by lawyers and judges, not angry citizens. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
1
@Mark-oi9rf They didn't see evidence because Trump's lawyers filed the cases without actually providing any. Smh. For some reason, the evidence you saw was not presented in court. You'll have to talk to Trump's lawyers about that. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempts_to_overturn_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election Let me know if you find a better source.
1
@Mark-oi9rf Let me know if you have a better source. You were asking why courts didn't see any evidence. I answered you and you attacked me. Here's an article on the court cases. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election
1
@Mark-oi9rf Since you don't have a better source, my assumption is that you just came here to argue. Why do you think the courts threw out the 60+ cases without seeing evidence?
1
@Mark-oi9rf Oh really. You can't paste your source? Anyway, they did do the investigations. Many investigations. There were multiple recounts and audits in various swing states. How do you not know this?? As far as the affidavits, those were included in the court cases. In Michigan for example, Wayne County Judge Timothy Kenny said plaintiffs’ interpretation of events at TCF Center in Detroit were “incorrect and not credible.” That came from the very first search result for "2020 election affidavits". So sure, many people swore under oath that they saw fraud, but according to the courts, they were mistaken.
1
@Mark-oi9rf I don't get it. You can't provide any sources, and all of your stolen election claims fall apart with just a simple investigation. But you are the one calling me dense. Lol.
1
I dont think you can make the summer riots look as bad as this. For one, the Trump riot was based on a lie.
1