Comments by "LandGrabbingIndia" (@LandGrabbingIndia) on "China's annual NEV output tops 10 million units, what's next?" video.

@mudshovel289 You do not seem to be very smart, and so is your script writer. Get some basic knowledge on "demand and supply" and cashflow of businesses.🥴
3
@mudshovel289 Learn some basic economics, especially with regards to the basic principle of the demand and supply curve. When demand is zero, supply is zero. No one would produce more than what is required, unless there is confidence that the excess goods would be in demand. There are holding costs and opportunity costs involved and when these costs are neglected or ignored, would be game over to a business. Businesses which do not have sufficient cash flow to meet it's current obligations such as payments to suppliers or utilities or operating expenses such as wages, would mean only one thing. It's time to close down your businesses. You do not seem to be very smart, and so is your script writer. Get some basic knowledge on "demand and supply" and cashflow of businesses.🥴
3
@mudshovel289 There is a reason why the national average 1 Q of India/Indians is 76🥴
3
@mudshovel289 Looks like I have beaten you again and again, in an intellectual debate. low 1 Q is holding you back and preventing you from giving me a relevant rebuttal. That is why your only rebuttal to my comments is a "topic change" and "accusations which you can't prove". Not so smart, aren't you?
3
@mudshovel289 Indian talks big in opening comment. Indian gets exposed for being ignorant and dishonest. Indian refused to give a rebuttal or counter rebuttal but does a topic change and hurling accusations which he can't prove....
3
@mudshovel289 It's a topic change. Here's a summary of what happened. Indian claimed in his opening comment: There is an overcapacity of EV from China Me: Principle of demand and supply and cash flow issues/importance refutes your claim. Indian: Wait, those rebuttals were not written by you (an accusation that Indian can't prove) and I refused to answer that. Me: Topic changing and accusation again? Do you dare to provide a rebuttal? Indian: (weeping and thinking of ways to save his face)... decides to evade and do a topic change.. 🤏🧠
3
@mudshovel289 Learn some basic economics, especially with regards to the basic principle of the demand and supply curve. When demand is zero, supply is zero.
2
@mudshovel289 No one would produce more than what is required, unless there is confidence that the excess goods would be in demand. There are holding costs and opportunity costs involved and when these costs are neglected or ignored, would be game over to a business.
2
@mudshovel289 An Indian talking big makes me laugh
2
@conti-vl6tx The comments from the guy whom you are speaking to were mostly low quality, dishonest, | Q degrading, foul/toxic and makes people dumber by just reading from it. Do not expect any intelligent/relevant/logical/reasonable reply from him.
2
@conti-vl6tx The comments from the guy whom you are speaking to is a naturalized Indian from another country but he has a tendency of getting extremely offended whenever anyone says that he is an Indian, despite the fact that he has Indian ancestries.
2
@mudshovel289 You don't seem to be very smart by doing another topic change.
2
@conti-vl6tx Obviously, he has very low self-esteem. He has a tendency of getting extremely offended whenever anyone says that he is an Indian, despite the fact that he has Indian ancestries.
2
1) News headline from September 2024: US President Donald Trump's recent claim that India is an "abuser" of import tariffs 🥳
1
@mudshovel289 Indian with a IQ of 76 trying to talk big makes me laugh.
1
@mudshovel289 Indian with a 1 Q of 76 trying to talk big makes me laugh.
1
@mudshovel289 Businesses which do not have sufficient cash flow to meet it's current obligations such as payments to suppliers or utilities or operating expenses such as wages, would mean only one thing. It's time to close down your businesses.
1
@mudshovel289 Prove it? Indian thinks that his opinions are facts? How shameless is that? Nonetheless, Indian has no counter rebuttal to my comments and the reason why he replied to me and slapped with an accusation is because he isn't smart enough to come up with a counter rebuttal. That is why he needs a topic change. I guess that is the limitations of his breed, which is 76.
1
@mudshovel289 Prove it? Indian thinks that his opinions are facts? How shame less is that? 🤭🤣😂
1
@mudshovel289 Indian has no counter-rebuttal or rebuttal to my comments and the reason why he replied to me and slapped with an accusation is because he isn't smart enough to come up with a counter rebuttal/rebuttal. The only way out for him to salvage and repair his Indian ego is to do a topic change. I guess that is the limitations of his breed, which is 76.
1
@mudshovel289 Indian has no counter-rebuttal or rebuttal to my comments and the reason why he replied to me and slapped with an accusation is because he isn't smart enough to come up with a counter rebuttal/rebuttal.
1
@mudshovel289 The only way out for you to salvage and repair your Indian ego is to do a topic change because you have no rebuttal or counter rebuttal for my comments.
1
@mudshovel289 Likewise, I can use back your comment against you too. this isn’t even your opening comment so I refuse to acknowledge some impaired spammer who is only capable of copying and pasting scripted comments that someone else sent to him.
1
@mudshovel289 You ain't smart to come up with a counter rebuttal/rebuttal, that's because you're an impaired spammer who is only capable of copying and pasting scripted comments that someone else sent to him.
1
@mudshovel289 Says the impaired spammer who is only capable of copying and pasting scripted comments that someone else sent to him. Hence, he has no rebuttal to my comments.
1
@mudshovel289 Do you know that shame less/ honesty is never a word found in the Indian dictionary?
1
@mudshovel289 Indian ain't that smart to come with up with a rebuttal. That is what happens when he debate with a script written by his hired script writer rather than using his b rains.
1
@mudshovel289 An Indian, equipped with a 76🧠 🤏, and talking big makes me laugh
1
@mudshovel289 Look at how I had humiliated you again by exposing your ignorance? What are you going to do next? Spamming "don't care" to reply to each and every of my comment? That is the best your 🧠can handle?🥴😅
1
@mudshovel289 Another topic change? Your b rain couldn't handle my rebuttal? Delete your open comment to save face please😆
1
@mudshovel289 You ain't that smart to understand what are national average !Q means. The national average !Q of India is 76, which means that the average Indianbots highly possessed the intelligence equivalent to that national average. That explains why you have got no relevant rebuttal to my comments which countered your idiotic opening comment.
1
@mudshovel289 the mental disability of yours is well known. Whenever I have countered your idiotic comments, you accused me of relying from a script writer and without any proof. That is how you save face after I had humiliated you thoroughly for your your idiotic comments.
1
@mudshovel289 low 1 Q is holding you back and preventing you from giving me a relevant rebuttal. Face saving comments and accusations does not give you extra points in a debate.
1
@mudshovel289 low 1 Q🥴 is holding you back and preventing you from giving me a relevant rebuttal. Face saving comments and accusations does not give you extra points in a debate.😅
1
@mudshovel289 First of all, you ain't that smart and that is why you had copied someone's comments without understanding what it means. The moment I had countered your argument in your opening comment, you went into evading/surrender mode just like your 1ndian ancestors did for 1000+ years. YT Video: ▶"Abhijit Chavda: China's Century of Humiliation; India's MILLENNIUM Of Humiliation".◀ If China has 1 century of humiliation, |ndia has 10 century of humiliation. 🤭
1
@mudshovel289 low 1 Q is holding you back and preventing you from giving me and the commentators a relevant rebuttal. That is why your only rebuttal to my comments is a "topic change" and "accusations which you can't prove". Not so smart, aren't you?
1
@conti-vl6tx That Paajeeet guy that you are speaking to is a low 1 Q bot. Do not expect any intelligent/relevant/logical/reasonable reply from him. His comments were mostly low quality, dishonest, | Q degrading, foul/toxic and makes people dumber by just reading from it.
1
@mudshovel289 Indian talks big in opening comment. Indian gets exposed for being ignorant and dishonest. Indian refused to give a rebuttal or counter rebuttal but does a topic change and hurling accusations which he can't prove....That is what your b🥴 rain can do in the absence of a script writer. You can't do a rebuttal in real time/hour/days and would probably need weeks.
1
@mudshovel289 Indian talks big in opening comment. Indian gets exposed for being ignorant and dishonest. Indian refused to give a rebuttal or counter rebuttal but does a topic change and hurling accusations which he can't prove....That is what your 🥴 🧠can do in the absence of a script writer. You can't do a rebuttal in real time/hour/days and would probably need weeks.
1
@mudshovel289 Topic change is what yourb 🥴 rain can do in the absence of a script writer. You can't do a rebuttal in real time/hour/days and would probably need weeks.
1
@mudshovel289 It was a topic change. Original topic that was created by you was about China's overcapacity in EV manufacturing and I have argued that in the principle of demand and supply, no one would produce more than what was required as there many costs associated with it (refer to my original comments, not going to repeat myself again). I have also mentioned the importance of cash flow in businesses. You do not have a relevant rebuttal for it and your only rebuttal was a topic change and accusation which you can't prove. You claimed that those comments were not written by me but lacks the proof to show for it. And so what if it was not written by me? Do you have a rebuttal for it? No. You are evading like a c 0ward, c owworshipper. 🤭😅🤣😂
1
@mudshovel289 It was a topic change. Original topic that was created by you was about China's overcapacity in EV manufacturing and I have argued that in the principle of demand and supply, no one would produce more than what was required as there many costs associated with it (refer to my original comments, not going to repeat myself again). I have also mentioned the importance of cash flow in businesses. You do not have a relevant rebuttal for it and your only rebuttal was a topic change and accusation which you can't prove. You claimed that those comments were not written by me but lacks the proof to show for it. 🤭😅🤣😂🤥🤥🤥🤥🥴🤏🧠
1
@mudshovel289 you're an impaired spammer who is only capable of copying and pasting scripted comments. Topic change is what yourb 🥴 rain can do in the absence of a script writer. You can't do a rebuttal in real time/hour/days and would probably need weeks. low 1 Q is holding you back and preventing you from giving me and the commentators a relevant rebuttal. That is why your only rebuttal to my comments is a "topic change" and "accusations which you can't prove". Not so smart, aren't you?
1
@mudshovel289 Another topic change? It seems like you're extremely desperate. 🤏🧠
1
@mudshovel289 My comments on the topic of "Principle of demand and supply and cash flow issues/importance" easily refutes your overcapacity nonsense stated in your opening comment. That is why you are evading and surrendering just like your forefathers....remember this "Abhijit Chavda: China's Century of Humiliation; India's MILLENNIUM Of Humiliation".:text-green-game-over::face-green-smiling::face-purple-crying:
1
2) News headline from 2nd November 2024: The US has imposed sanctions against nearly 400 individuals and entities — including 21 from India 🥳
1