Comments by "LandGrabbingIndia" (@LandGrabbingIndia) on "Seeing China as NATO's imaginary enemy will only backfire on the 'Cold War vestige' itself" video.

  1. India invaded China in 1962 through Nehru's forward policy when China was having a massive famine from 1958 to 1962 and during the Sino-Soviet split from 1960 to 1962. It was a once in a lifetime opportunity that India would never miss to grab more land from a weakened China. When India gets beaten up and lost the war that they had started despite all these advantages, not to mentioned military supplies from Israel and USA (Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis"), she cried to the entire world and plays the victim. Till now, India never dares to disclose the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report on the 1962 war" even after 60+ years. And when the report was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement. You have to got to wonder why🤔🤥😏🥱A nation without integrity and honesty and a spawning ground for all the scam callers has no credibility on the Global Stage😏.
    17
  2. Has India ever beaten China into submission and surrender in a full scale war? No. It's the other way round actually, in year 1962 with 98k extremely "brave" Jawans waving the white flag of surrender. 🏳Who's your daddy?🏳🥱
    12
  3. Indians are defeated by the Chinese in the 1962 war. It was the most humiliating defeat in history if you were to examine all the facts that were involved in the war. This is the ultimate proof that war tactics/strategy/determination/will power/bravery triumphs over superior weapons/technology/cowardice. 1) The Chinese were having the "great Chinese famine" from 1658 to 1962. China was too weak to defend itself. 2) India had Israeli and American support in the form of supplies/weaponry. Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis". 3) The Sino-Soviet split from 1960 - 1962. China had nothing. No weapons, guns, artillery supplies from either Western and Soviet and no food (serious famine). 4) Despite all these advantages, India lost. 5) There are no excuses for such a humiliating defeat. That is why India is so desperate to have the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report of the 1962 war" concealed forever and also to hide which country is the true aggressor of the war. When it was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement.
    11
  4. Why do all historians except for Indian historians, said that there was no war between China and India in 1967 but only a 3-day skirmish (Nathu La) from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967? India lied? 😅🤣😂🤥🥱😭
    9
  5. Speaking of imaginery, China claimed that they won in the 1962 war and provided 1) Video proof for example, "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 1" and "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 2" 2) Territory Trophy Aksai Chin 1962 3) Indian prisoners of war captured India claimed that they won in the 1967 "war", a 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), and provided 1) No video proof 2) No territorial victory 3) No Chinese prisoners of war captured. 😁😆😅🤣😂All historians said that the 1967 "war" was not a war but only a "skirmish". ➡How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)🔚 🤭😅😂Noticed that they had use "skirmish" rather than "war".
    6
  6.  @mudshovel289  Are you hallucinating? 🤭
    5
  7.  @mudshovel289  India surrendered to China in 1962 and gave back Aksai Chin-a which they have stolen to their rightful owner, China. India begged for forgiveness and leniency. No joke. 🏳Surrender Modi 2020🏳: "China did not enter our territory, no posts taken’: PM at all-party meet on Ladakh clash" Source: Hindustan Times. Indians, including Indians with a passport change especially those who cowardly fled and abandoned India, should remember that China > India.😊 Lastly, |nd| ansR 51 averace
    5
  8.  @mudshovel289  1) You are Indian as long as you have Indian ancestry. It does not matter if you had a citizenship/passport change.🤭
    5
  9.  @mudshovel289  4) You have forefathers that are Indian but you are thinking that you're not an Indian just because you have a passport change?🤭
    5
  10.  @mudshovel289  Your 🟫 DNA says that you're an Indian😁
    5
  11.  @mudshovel289  That's your geographical location, not your ethnic identity.
    5
  12.  @mudshovel289  You are Indian, skin color and biological DNA from India.
    5
  13.  @mudshovel289  People identify you based on your skin color and origins of your DNA (ethnicity) before what is written on your passport. Anybody can be from any nationality by doing a passport change. Not so smart, aren't you? 🤭
    5
  14. Indian historians lied and Indian bots have no shame spreading lies. There was no war in 1967 but only a 3-day battle/skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), but Indian historians got to lie to salvage their Indian ego after losing the 1962 war in the most humiliating and embarrassing fashion when .... 1) China was having a massive famine (Great Chinese Famine from 1958 to 1962) 2) Sino-Soviet split from 1960 to 1962 meaning China had no weapon assistance from Soviets or the West. 3) India had Israeli and American support in the form of supplies/weaponry. Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis".
    5
  15. Why do all military rankings rank China above India? 🤣🤭😂1962 war? Wait, didn't the Indians claimed that they had won in the 1967 "war"? The score should be even like China: 1 and India:1 on paper? Oh wait again, all historians said there is no war between China and India in 1967 but only a small 3 day skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 😅🤣😂Read article "How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)". I guess that is the reason why China > India. 🤭😂
    5
  16. Another thing that is imaginery is the China-India 1967 "war" created by India. China claimed that they won in the 1962 war and provided 1) Video proof for example, "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 1" and "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 2" 2) Territory Trophy Aksai Chin 1962 3) Indian prisoners of war captured India claimed that they won in the 1967 "war", a 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), and provided 1) No video proof 2) No territorial victory 3) No Chinese prisoners of war captured. 😁😆😅🤣😂All historians said that the 1967 "war" was not a war but only a "skirmish". ➡How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)🔚 🤭😅😂Noticed that they had use "skirmish" rather than "war".
    4
  17.  @mudshovel289  2) You are an Indian who pretended that they are not Indians once they have a passport/nationality change?
    4
  18.  @mudshovel289  3) You are an Indian who fled and abandoned India permanently for a better life because of cowardice (war), unemployment issues or lack of opportunities or hygiene purposes (no open toilet in other countries) etc.?🤭
    4
  19.  @mudshovel289  You are Indian as long as you have Indian ancestry. It does not matter if you had a citizenship/passport change.🤭 You are an Indian who pretended that he/she is not an Indian once they have a passport/nationality change? You are an Indian who fled and abandoned India permanently for a better life because of cowardice (war), unemployment issues or lack of opportunities or hygiene purposes (no open toilet in other countries) etc.? You have forefathers that are Indian but you are thinking that you're not an Indian just because you have a passport change? Your 🟫 DNA says that you're an Indian🤭
    4
  20. China claimed that they won in the 1962 war and provided 1) Video proof for example, "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 1" and "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 2" 2) Territory Trophy Aksai Chin 1962 3) Indian prisoners of war captured India claimed that they won in the 1967 "war", a 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), and provided 1) No video proof 2) No territorial victory 3) No Chinese prisoners of war captured. 😁😆😅🤣😂All historians said that the 1967 "war" was not a war but only a "skirmish". ➡How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)🔚 🤭😅😂Noticed that they had use "skirmish" rather than "war".
    4
  21. Indians claimed that the 1967 conflict between China and India was a "war" but couldn't provide the dates which the "war" occurred. All historians said that there was no war between China and India in 1967 but only Indian historians. A 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La) is the actual fact. War lasts for months or years. Skirmish lasted merely days. An English dictionary may help them🥱 Here is just one example from Youtube: India - china war 1967 - A forgotten war (Defence Archive).
    4
  22. India can't beat China in any real-life war (1962) or in any economic war, thus, they could only do it online as keyboard warriors in a propaganda war knowing that China banned YouTube or Google. 🤭🤣😅😂I know what you are going to say, Indian bots, but 1967 is not a war but only a 3-day battle/skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La). Your historians lied that there was a 1967 "war" between China and India and later claimed victory, a coping mechanism as a result of losing the 1962 war in the most embarrassing fashion in history. If they dare to lie and distort historical facts right in front of the entire world, what else would they not lie?
    4
  23.  @Sayitlikeitis-jn6xe  Facts will prevail.
    3
  24.  @mudshovel289  In any case, that's your geographical location, not your ethnic identity. You are Indian, skin color and biological DNA from India. People identify you based on your skin color and origins of your DNA (ethnicity) before what is written on your passport. Anybody can be from any nationality by doing a passport change. Not so smart, aren't you?
    3
  25.  @mudshovel289  Listen, it is not that I do not know how to solve that math problem. It is I who refused to take orders from you. There is a difference.
    3
  26.  @mudshovel289  A cow can be born in any country and it is still a cow. I am referring to your ethnic identity, not your geographical location or what is written on your passport.
    3
  27.  @mudshovel289  Not so smart, aren't you?
    3
  28. Are you banned by SCMP? I did not saw you on their video titled "India stampede kills over 100, mostly women". 🤭
    1
  29.  @mudshovel289  Are you mourning for your relatives? "India stampede kills over 100, mostly women".
    1
  30.  @mudshovel289  Pa jeet, that is your geographical location, not your ethnic identity. You are Indian as long as you have 🟤Indian forefathers. 🟤
    1
  31.  @mudshovel289  That is your geographical location, not your ethnic identity. You are Indian as long as you have Indian forefathers. 😏🥱
    1
  32.  @mudshovel289  Indian doing another topic change and using lies? 🤣
    1
  33.  @mudshovel289  A cow can be born in any country and it is still a cow. I am referring to your ethnic identity, not your geographical location or what is written on your passport. Not so smart, aren't you? 🤣
    1
  34.  @mudshovel289  Poo2Loo, Indian.
    1