Comments by "D M" (@DM-dk7js) on "News Host Stunned That Biden Advisor Doesn't See How This Will Backfire | DM CLIPS | Rubin Report" video.

  1.  @drjerry5389  how about mocking a disabled person’s disability. How about calling neo Nazis very fine people. How about telling 30,000 lies in four years. How about attempting to ban an entire religion from entering America. For starters.
    3
  2. Who’s willing to agree that you can’t use violence when you lose an election.
    2
  3.  @Time4Project2025  no it isn’t. You’re making a false equivalency. Like I already said. Theyre not analogous. Nor does one mistake make another mistake acceptable. As I also already said.
    2
  4.  @Time4Project2025  nope. I hereby condemn the resistance or summer of riots or whatever else you want me to condemn. I hereby condemn those actions. Plain and simple. That was EASY!
    2
  5.  @Time4Project2025  so now condemn January sixth…..
    2
  6. It wasn’t hate speech. Not by any definition of the term.
    2
  7.  @uaeio  lol no. That’s called mocking someone’s disability. Not doing an impression of them 😂
    2
  8. He didn’t project tho. He is not blaming the opposition for what he did. Biden nor democrats tried to overthrow a free and fair election.
    1
  9. It’s just not relevant
    1
  10. Attempting to kill your own VP to prevent him from certifying your political oppositions election victory is pretty extreme
    1
  11.  @Dinky-IMO  no….nobody on the left did that in 2016. Nor would it make it acceptable. That’s a really , like really ignorant comment.
    1
  12.  @Time4Project2025  they aren’t analogous. It’s irrelevant. Plus, what’s the point of bringing them up? It doesn’t somehow make J6 acceptable. Obviously….
    1
  13.  @Time4Project2025  condemn January sixth or you’re the hypocrite. It shouldn’t be difficult. I condemned the resistance nonsense. I’m waiting.
    1
  14.  @Time4Project2025  that’s what I thought fascist clown. You can’t. And that’s exactly why Biden’s speech was necessary. Because of unamerican fascists like you.
    1
  15. Then you shouldn’t disagree with Biden and you should condemn the maga terrorists who do.
    1
  16. Not even close. It was treason by a bunch of ignorant unamerican cultists.
    1
  17. Did democrats try to overthrow a free and fair election? No? Then it’s not relevant and you’re making a false equivalency fallacy. Furthermore, one destructive act does not allow for another. Obviously.
    1
  18. What has antifa done that’s equivalent to overthrowing a free and fair election with violence?
    1
  19. Because they’re the violent ones. Not every one, a minority. Aka people who can’t condemn January sixth.
    1
  20. That’s not hate speech
    1
  21. Kinda difficult reasoning with fascists, so that has been difficult
    1
  22. What would help bring america together would be to condemn January sixth, for one.
    1
  23.  @148crusader  that wasn’t a protest. Protests don’t involve attempting to kill your own VP, or overthrowing an election. You are the problem, you are exactly who Biden was speaking to.
    1
  24.  @Just_Pele  nope. She was attempting to kill mike pence and overthrow our country. But go ahead and defend a traitor. Just don’t be surprised when you come off as a traitor yourself. Traitor.
    1
  25. He didn’t project
    1
  26.  @kjnoah  nope. Democrats aren’t fascists who used violence to overthrow a free and fair election. So no. You’re confused.
    1
  27. That’s not happening here.
    1
  28. Falsely.
    1
  29.  @virginiahobby3726  what’s been debunked lol?!
    1
  30.  @SemperSalam  not fake news lol. And not funny either. Shame on you.
    1
  31.  @ms.pugsley  it was….what? What was? What are you even saying?
    1
  32.  @uaeio  and yes, he did say neo Nazis were very fine people. The March itself, Unite The Right, was CREATED by self described Nazis. So categorically there were no fine people on that side. So that’s strike 1. Furthermore, that side murdered someone that day….so that’s strike 2. Between being Nazis AND murderers that day, how could they POSSIBLY be fine people?!
    1
  33.  @twins2646  it’s 30,000. And every single one is documented online with sources and fact checks. Just search trump 30,000 lies.
    1
  34.  @darkfang25  right. He mocked a disabled person’s disability. I’m right. What I said is true. You’re not smart.
    1
  35.  @darkfang25  and regarding very fine people, I already refuted your comment lol. Try to keep up.
    1
  36. It’s also not relevant
    1
  37.  @Freedomfighter20251  k. But “the resistance of 2016,” whatever that even means, does not negate the treason of January sixth. So it’s not relevant.
    1
  38.  @ellenthompson7525  not relevant.
    1
  39.  @ellenthompson7525  please explain how that makes January sixth acceptable ….
    1
  40.  @ellenthompson7525  ​ anyways. The topic is January sixth, and Biden’s speech. So if you’re not mentioning “the resistance” of 2016 as a way to deflect from the atrocity and treason that is J6….why did you bring it up at all then?! In other words, what does “the resistance” have to do with anything, and WHY did you mention it?
    1
  41.  @ellenthompson7525  so again, what’s the relevance of bringing up “the resistance of 2016”? How is that relevant to the topic of the video?
    1
  42.  @ellenthompson7525  how is that relevant? Why bring it up? How is it relevant to Biden’s speech?
    1
  43.  @ellenthompson7525  how is it RELEVANT tho? Do you not know what that word means? How is the resistance relevant to January sixth?
    1
  44.  @ellenthompson7525  did democrats attempt to overthrow a free and fair election and kill their own VP to prevent him from certifying an election?
    1
  45.  @ellenthompson7525  no. They didn’t. So as I already suspected, you are in fact pretending that “the resistance” somehow justified J6. It doesn’t. Obviously.
    1
  46.  @ellenthompson7525  nope. Irrelevant.
    1
  47.  @ellenthompson7525  like I said, you’re 1. Making a false equivalency and 2. Pretending violence elsewhere somehow makes j6 acceptable too. That’s absolutely asinine.
    1