Comments by "D M" (@DM-dk7js) on "'Defeat the speech, don't ban it': Ari Fleischer reacts to Facebook ban" video.

@rynnykitty6945 again. If I sign a sworn affidavit claiming you broke into my house and stole my tv, would that in and of itself be evidence for my claim? It’s a simple question. Please answer it.
4
Toni The Tigris what he’s referring to is how Trump donors were scammed into weekly recurring donations because Trump’s website required you to OPT OUT of weekly donations rather than OPT IN. A man was bankrupted because months went by before he realized he was making unintentional weekly recurring $500 donations against his will.
3
@dmeauxoxo did the Chinese president incite an insurrection LOL?
2
The insurrectionists didn’t propose a debate. They committed treason. How asinine. What you should be saying is, you can’t debate an insurrectionist mob or reason with people intent on overthrowing democracy, so it’s asinine to expect liberals to debate these traitors in the first place.
2
@rynnykitty6945 if I sign an affidavit right now claiming you broke into my house and stole my TV, would that be evidence you broke into my house and stole my TV?
2
@matthewmosier8439 but storming the Capitol is. That’s what he’s referring to.
1
He did. Lol. It’s super funny. A third grader could have made it.
1
Inciting an insurrection isn’t a debate. Let’s ask the same of trump and his insurrectionists. It’s weird you don’t require the same standard for them.
1
@rynnykitty6945 affidavits like mellissa Caron LOL? A sworn affidavit in and of itself isn’t evidence the election was stolen.
1
@rynnykitty6945 irrelevant. This guy is asking democrats to properly debate topics while also completely overlooking the fact that the insurrectionists didn’t do so.
1
And I would say speech that incites a treasonous mob to attempt to overthrow democracy is worse than “speech we don’t like”.
1