Comments by "sandgrownun66" (@sandgrownun66) on "When Britain was a culturally and ethnically homogenous society" video.

Dave is half British and half Nigerian, so he can chose to be on either side. But of course, the grift is stronger on the African part.
10
🤔Can you imagine being alive during those halcyon times? The sense of belonging and togetherness. If only those Britons knew how lucky they were. It's enough to make you cry.😭
9
@Second ChanceImagine if any Scottish school had a whytes only policy. The SNP would have a conniption fit.
8
thomas robert Does he need minders though?
5
Average whiteguy The commenter might have meant a large town. Some large towns are not cities, and vice versa.
5
@harry.flashman The British did much more in India, than just build the railways. They introduced, good government, the rule of law, respect for the individual, industry, and a massive increase in trade, medicine and the English language, as well as sports. Also, they stopped Indians killing each other, over petty differences. As well as widow burning, and infanticide. The most important contribution however, was the abolition of slavery. Before the arrival of the British, there were more slaves in India, than in the rest of the World combined. And this was done for no other reason, except that it was barbaric as well as immoral. This was just what I could remember off the top of my head, and is just the tip of the iceberg.
5
@LOCATIONREDACTED Dave wouldn't get the dough and attention he does in today's climate, bigging up his whyte side. The fact that he's talking bollox, doesn't seem to matter to those who put feelings above the truth.
3
@SirSnufflelots Yeah. When it's too late.
3
@chrisjordon864 India is far from an homogenous society. Do some research on the subject. Even The Guardian newspaper did an article about it.
3
@chrisjordon864 "India could easily unite under a national government." If it "easily" could, why doesn't it. Do you think that the warring you talk about, magically disappeared under the British Raj. All that happened was a two hundred year truce. It struck up again, as soon as independence was gained. You've also missed one of the elephants in the room, namely religion. Where you have poor, uneducated people of different religions living amongst each other, you are assured of violence and suffering.
3
@FARTQUAKE74 Yeah. OK. What percentage of White Americans, make up the population of India? 0.001%?
3
@johnforeman6620 If you call fractions of a percent, "minorities", then yes.
2
@davidreed9671 Forget the gingers, they're a red herring.
2
India is a prime example of multiculturalism not working.
2
@davidreed9671 Aren't they all supposed to be the same in the dark?😉
1
@stephfoxwell4620 Correct.
1
@basilmagnanimous7011 Turkey sort of got the RoP under control, through secularism under Atatürk. Unfortunately, the West with it's tolerance, hasn't learned how to yet. Or more probably, doesn't want to.
1
@basilmagnanimous7011 Britain was it its peak during the Victorian era. It sort of went gradually downhill after that. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like there's any desire to turn back the flood.
1
@basilmagnanimous7011 OK. Whatever! Your incoherent, spelling-mistake riddled ramblings, are full of contradictions. Are you for the survival of indigenous Britons, or not?
1
@basilmagnanimous7011 OK. Now we're getting somewhere. There's no need to throw the "n" word around. We don't want a repeat of what A H did in WWII. Only that every people should have a place of their own.
1
@FARTQUAKE74 "white Australians". And what percentage of the population of India, do those White Australians make up? 0.00001%?
1
@FARTQUAKE74 Why are you so ignorant? The British killed no one during the partition of India. It was Indians killing other Indians. Partition was insisted upon by the leaders of the two main religious groups, Nehru and Jinna. The British just helped with drawing up the borders of the newly independent countries. Of course, the Indians couldn't couldn't complete the process peacefully, and started attacking each other, after a two hundred year hiatus. This resulted in the unnecessary deaths of up to one million people.
1
@harry.flashman "futire"?
1
@FARTQUAKE74 Oh. So you've changed your tune. Would whyte people be tolerated in India, if they were a large minority, didn't integrate, low achievers, and expected special treatment?
1