General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
sandgrownun66
History Debunked
comments
Comments by "sandgrownun66" (@sandgrownun66) on "Is it possible to turn the clock back in Britain and reverse the effects of immigration?" video.
They should be fixing their own countries, rather than destroying others.
33
@jumblestiltskin1365 Hungary had to fight for survival against the Ottomans, a few centuries ago, and they have long memories.
9
@chrishart8548 The indigenous ones of course.
7
First, the UK needs to implement some of the measures being used in Denmark.
6
@englishpatriot9464 No Empire, should have meant no economic migration. If Britain wasn't welcome in their countries anymore. Then why should they have been welcome in Britain?
6
He or she would also get called a waysist.
5
OldEnglish Ale A blaq farmer. What's that?
4
@englishpatriot9464 The British Empire minus the Dominions and the USA, became a noose around Britain' neck. The colonies got the independence they wanted. Then the UK should have battened down the hatches, and gone its own way. Why should she have let in massive numbers of people from countries, that had rejected her?
4
@englishpatriot9464 It might be controllable, if indigenous people could be bothered to have bigger families.
4
@JH-lf4ql Have you any free rooms? If so, you take some in. Like Gary Big-ears Lineker did, LOL.
3
@chrishart8548 True. Even though there's plenty of free stuff in Scotland, paid for by the English taxpayer. They still don't like the weather there.
3
@echochamberdisrupter2852 Did they slip across the Straits of Gibraltar? It's only twelve mile across. Half that of the Channel.
3
@jasonbourne7499 Yes. And the only two options to the Hungarians, against the Ottoman Empire was to submit or die. If they had not resisted, the whole of Europe could have fallen, like it is doing now. Except now, it's the womb, not the sword, that's going to victorious.
2
Why did the UK bother to vote to leave the EU, if it cant tell the ECHR, were to stick it?
2
The UK has a reputation for fairness and being the "good guy". How can you change that and make its native people wake up to their own destruction?
2
@malicant123 Diversity is by definition, division. Nothing good can come from being divided. Unless, you are completely divided into different countries.
2
🛳The ship sailed with the Empyre Wyndru$h.🚢
1
@WaveyDeem95 What's the "DU"?
1
@california816 Women like strong men, not physical and mental. Something the RoP uses to undermine the West.
1
@JH-lf4ql All your supposed god has done so far, is make you take sh1t from what others built.
1
@ericjohnson7234 If a bit too late.
1
Marc Berger They could take any assets they legally acquired with them. That would go a long way in the Third World countries, they return to.
1
The problem is that turning the tide is a one time only opportunity. There isn't going to be a second chance.
1
@trevormcdonald385 The first and last time, Trev. There isn't going to be a second chance to give indigenous Britons their own country. However, you don't care, as the free sh1t keeps coming your way, do you?
1
The whole of Britain is infected, but England is suffering the most. That's why Simon is getting out to Wales.
1
@Mogzilla86 You're.
1
@jasonbourne7499 But the Hungarians did it first. Without that victory, there may have been no British army.
1
@grotekleum "HD channel"?
1
@grotekleum I missed the wood for the trees on that one.
1
Imagine the carnage, if the free sh1t the migrants get, was cut off.
1
There is no prosperity gained from mass uncontrolled immigration, especially those with no education, or skills. All it is, is a big drain on resources provided by indigenous people.
1
@joelc9439 Wrong. Atheists believe in no gods of any kind. Pre-Christian Britons weren't atheists. They already had their own gods.
1
@WaveyDeem95 Why she he. They always distract the people, with other matters, such a economic crisis. Economic migration is always kept well down the list.
1
@barryhill1044 If you look at the strain on infrastructure, it's obvious that mass economic migration IS NOT beneficial, to either the country they leave or go to.
1
@Fahrenheit451. Which word, "Civilizations"?
1
@karrots2421 There has never been full employment, even excluding those on benefits. So why import more? Especially those, with no education, no English skills, or knowledge of the culture, except what they saw on TV, if they had one.
1
@Fahrenheit451. "Taking out a social media"?
1
@heathercooper6043 The UK has the capacity to train all the NHS workers it needs, and pay them a wage, which means they will stay in their job. Eliminating economic migrants taking these jobs would free up billions. It would be also more efficient, because they would be people who knew the language and culture, and not need the support imported labour needs.
1
@davidsexton6604 And where would all that tax money go? If you gave it to the countries they came from, it would just be swallowed up in corruption.
1
@aiswaryabersan7983 Those countries had the chance to grow even before NATO was invented. Stop making excuses for the failure of these Third World countries.
1
@reardelt Of course the Labour party will. They're more infected with wokeness, than the "Conservatives", although not by much. However, there's only a few places in the Rwanda centre, even if any economic migrants ever actually made it there. And if they did, there claims would probably be granted. So, it would be straight back to the UK, and all the free stuff, paid for by the indigenous British taxpayer.
1
@reardelt If I recall, the UN Convention on Asylum, isn't clear on this. Somebody might know the full details. But the UK would be well within her rights to withdraw from such a convention. The same with the ECHR. Other countries withdraw or don't sign up to international conventions, all the time. However, the UK always plays the good guy, so there's not much chance of ditching either.
1