Comments by "sandgrownun66" (@sandgrownun66) on "The Officer Tatum" channel.

  1. When rap becomes reality.
    400
  2. Hill. Part time sport player. Full time thug.
    29
  3. Hopefully, after this, Anthropologie will become the missing link.
    22
  4. She's Jamaican Indian and Irish.
    18
  5. Destiny would make even soy milk curdle.
    17
  6. Hill. Part time sport player. Full time thug.
    14
  7. She's Indian and Indian-Irish Jamaican.
    13
  8.  @danteh73  There are many flood myths from different civilisations. The one with Noah's boat is nothing special.
    12
  9. Due to evolution of course. The same way humans have a tail bone.
    11
  10. Exactly. Evolution keeps on being proved. It's the only show in town.
    9
  11. Destiny would make even soy milk curdle.
    9
  12. Wow! What impeccable logic you have.
    9
  13.  @mgtowabbott6924  No, just a stater of the bleedin' obvious.
    9
  14. Destiny would make even soy milk curdle.
    8
  15.  @ronniekregar3482  You might actually be being serious. LOL.
    8
  16.  @ronniekregar3482  You obviously don't know anything about Tatum. So why are you making assumptions about his competency?
    8
  17. jaguar is the new clown car.
    8
  18.  @mgtowabbott6924  Feelings are becoming more important than facts these days.
    7
  19. You don't need to be bright to run around with a ball.
    6
  20. Correct. It's not even a credible choice. Evolution has a mountain of evidence to support it. Whilst "god must have done it", has none.
    6
  21. What's being a patriot got to do with god-bothering? You can love your country without having imaginary friends.
    6
  22. Flaunting wealth in such communities can only have one result, and it's never going to be good.
    6
  23.  @bubberbucky7  Cand!ce 0wens explained it all in her videos.
    5
  24. It's California, man!
    5
  25. Some Indians have brown skin like Africans. It doesn't mean they're black.
    5
  26. Why do you even bother "aksing" the question?
    5
  27. Deliverance? What, like a Pizza?
    5
  28. He couldn't bring himself to believe, because he was a scientist. Such people use, reason, logic and facts to determine truth. None of these apply to so-called "Intelligent Design".
    4
  29. You need to make a choice. Either provable scientific facts. Or what some ignorant people said in some old book.
    4
  30. "God will never be disproven". Another one who obviously doesn't know how truth claims work. If you claim that your god exists. Then provide evidence to support your claim. It not on those who reject your claim to do do anything. So what cha got? Also remember, the bigger the claim, the more evidence required, and so a god would require the most proof of all.
    4
  31. Hill. Part time sport player. Full time thug.
    4
  32. Yes they are. That's what you get after four billion years of evolution. There was even primitive life, only 500 million years after the earth became habitable.
    4
  33.  @BarbiandGiaNews  their
    4
  34.  @gotchaback1365  By rapping about the very culture that got him killed.
    4
  35. Where's Uganda?
    4
  36. He hasn't been cut off yet. He's still got his twig and berries.
    4
  37. You reap what you sow. Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind.
    3
  38. Faith is believing in things which don't exit. If they did exist. Then there would be no need for faith.
    3
  39.  @doloresmartinez2434  You can only have one or the other. There's no hybrid version. You either believe in proven science, or the words of ignorant people in some old book.
    3
  40.  @nehen2225  "fasts"?
    3
  41. 🎶Playing a flute, should be something that comes naturally to her.🎵
    3
  42. Not to her favourite island she won't be going.
    3
  43. Actually, it's a pain in the @rse. Either provide evidence for your god, or shut up. It's as simple as that.
    3
  44.  @Loljjkb  Why don't you watch his whole speech?
    3
  45.  @kos-mos1127  So why do people call god "he" then?
    3
  46. “There are some things you can’t share without ending up liking each other.” J.K. Rowling.
    3
  47. Professor of what exactly. Astrophysics?
    3
  48. If Puerto Rico is such a great place, then why doesn't AOC move there?
    2
  49. Correct. It's Epistemology, 101. If you can't provide evidence for your claim that god exists. Then there's no reason to take any notice of what you say.
    2
  50.  @bankhead1  You already failed. So the embarrassment ain't with me. As I said, get back to me when you realise where you initially went wrong.
    2
  51. Demonically
    2
  52.  @ashowofhands9813  It happens all the time. It's possible to create a whole fake universe, that somehow seems real. Just take Harry Potter, for example.
    2
  53.  @herbb6813  Fantastic news. So this isn't an echo chamber after all. There's some other free-thinkers in the chat.
    2
  54.  @ronniekregar3482  Wanting to and actually doing something are two separate things.
    2
  55.  @piranhapout  You don't have to be religious to be crazy, but it helps.
    2
  56.  @bubberbucky7  OK. What's her family history then. Tell us. Where's the African in her heritage??
    2
  57. What's a non-Liberal Democrat?
    2
  58. Saying that the theory evolution is wrong and yet some old book written by ignorant people is right. Is the most ridiculous thing anybody could ever believe.
    2
  59. What do you mean. It's your god who's to blame for all this. Didn't he make all people?
    2
  60.  @manty5  Isn't it conservatives that are god botherers, not "leftists"?
    2
  61.  @therealalexmullins  Correct that's the way Epistemology, and truth claims work.
    2
  62.  @OG213LA  Yes. By the same measure, Harry Potter is real too.
    2
  63. Almost made me physically sick. When are these stupid companies gonna learn?
    2
  64. And what's your jezus gonna do?
    2
  65. Are you an English teacher or something?
    2
  66. Angel Tree. Another form of indoctrination. This time in god-bothering.
    2
  67.  @SymphonicEllen  OK. Of course males cannot naturally gestate a foetus. However, there are doctors working to make this possible. And they say that the barriers to this have been overcome. Science and medicine are dedicated to making the seemingly impossible, possible. So probably, the thing to do is keep your eye on the news. Something like this, would be the media's wet dream.
    2
  68. C. Don't allow your present location to be feely available on social media. D. Don't wear all your expensive bling, when just going out to the chicken shop.
    2
  69. Do you know what a "theory" represents in the discipline of science?
    2
  70. Wot like jebus to dat cross?
    2
  71. At least you got out alive. Which is worse the hood or combat? Your chances are probably better in the latter.
    2
  72. Yeah, and we all know prayer does absolutely phuq all.
    2
  73.  @dr.emilschaffhausen4683  No. It's people helping other people that's important. Not wasting time praying to some imaginary being. "Your witnessing". It's actually "you're". Faith is simply the belief in things which don't exist. If they did exist, then there would be no need for faith. You don't need religion to tell right from wrong. It's instinctive, and was around long before religion was invented. That's the reason humans have survived for the last hundred thousand years or so. You don't need to believe in adult fairy stories, and reject the right of women to chose what they do with their bodies, to have conservative values.
    2
  74. Have you since increased your knowledge beyond that of a seven year old? Why not read the book "A Universe From Nothing", if you haven't.
    2
  75. So the cuffs lock once again. Mr. Reek.
    2
  76. Stop praying and support initiatives which actually help.
    2
  77.  @KatieDidnt-ge2mk  @KatieDidnt-ge2mk The whole point of a joke should be to make people uncomfortable. That's what makes them laugh. "There is nothing you can't joke about, it depends on what the joke is." - Ricky Gervais.
    2
  78. How you know what any supposed god's sex is? What is the point of a god having a sex anyway?
    2
  79. Really. A garden with a sinning tree and a vicious snake. Doesn't seem like much of a paradise to me.
    2
  80. No. Only maybe gayby theyby.
    2
  81.  @quentinrawlins4876  Maybe because, one is real and the other isn't. Surely, that's the perfect reason?
    2
  82. How can thinking people still fall for the Teleological Argument? That nonsense was debunked a long time ago.
    1
  83.  @DxBlack  There are many vestigial organs in animals that now don't serve any purpose, but still exist. All signs of gradual evolution. Why would any so-called designer make something with such superfluous imperfections? This creationist BS is all nonsense.
    1
  84. And there's me thinking is was farting pixies.
    1
  85. Which Lord. Voldemort?
    1
  86. Both sides are crazy. Both the trannies and the god-botherers, but that's Murica for ya.
    1
  87.  @shypeoplearehawt8155  Ah, yes, Freewill. The convenient excuse for the fact that your god never intervenes in human affairs. Probably because he/she/it, doesn't exist.
    1
  88.  @shypeoplearehawt8155  "Still doesn't change the fact that we all have free will." So what? Of course we have freewill, whether there is any god, or not. Humans are imperfect flesh and blood. It's obvious what constitutes good and bad behaviour. However, some people tend to follow the rules, and some don't. How you treat others is what's important. Once you're dead, that's it. No heaven or hell to go to.
    1
  89.  @shypeoplearehawt8155  Great.👍
    1
  90.  @bankhead1  Who made the mirror. Your supposed god? Also, just one word, Epistemology. Look it up. If you knew anything about it in respect to truth claims. Then you'd realise that I don't have anything to prove in this matter, especially to you. Get back to me, when you understand this.
    1
  91.  @bankhead1  "without opinion". What does that mean?
    1
  92.  @OldSchooled  Is that a serious question. We have their paintings for starters. There are also photos which were taken of the two artists. Both also have living relatives, sharing their DNA.
    1
  93.  @bankhead1  Look, dude. You got nuthin@ You've already proved you know nothing about how truth claims work. Once you prove you understand how they do. Then it might be worth continuing the conversation. Until then, I'm just wasting my time.
    1
  94.  @bankhead1  The proof is all on you, pal. Whatcha got?
    1
  95. ​ @OldSchooled  It looks like there really is no hope for you. You're too far gone. Nothing is going to satisfy you of anything. It reminds me of those conspiracy theorists, who will never be satisfied by the simplest answer. There'll always looking for some complicated answer, rather than the one with all the evidence to support it. There are mountains for evidence for the existence of the two artists. There is even film of Monet painting from 1915. Was that faked too. Van Gogh paintings are some of the most valuable in the world. Not bad for someone who you say never existed. Just what amount of evidence, if any would satisfy you? "We have evidence of God's design within us in how intricately our bodies function." If that's the case, then why does the body have vestigial structures, which through evolution no longer have any use. For example, why do whales have rudimentary legs, and humans a tail bone. Your arguments are so weak, and easily debunked. It's hard to know if you're being serious, or not.
    1
  96.  @bankhead1  You can hold your own if you like. Give me any question, and will answer it. Assuming it makes sense. Statements from you such as, You choose to deny and cant prove God don't exist." Prove you know nothing about truth claims, and the burden of proof. So what's the point of answering questions from somebody who can't even ask a valid question. Let alone understand any answer given.
    1
  97.  @Basbhat  You're right, science can't always be trusted. That's why its open to constant refinement as new evidence is discovered. Unlike some old book written by ignorant people, who didn't know any better.
    1
  98.  @555atU  Darwin succeeded, actually. His ideas still stand up to scrutiny today.
    1
  99.  @rickfromthecape3135  However, there's only one side which can provide evidence to prove it claims. The one based on, logic, reason and facts.
    1
  100.  @bankhead1  No. You're bankrupt, pal. You got nuthin'. "You can't disprove God", just shows how ignorant you are. However, you probably think that's some kind of virtue. At least, you can never be wrong, because you'd never know what's right. So you win every time in your head. Have a nice day.
    1
  101.  @bankhead1  "You'll never be able to deny a creator." Yep, you still don't get it. proof is what counts, not lack of it. You're right in wanting to terminate this conversation. It's just a waste of time. Have a nice day, as ignant Muricans like to say.
    1
  102.  @555atU  The fact that Darwin didn't know of the existence of DNA, make his theory more compelling. Although, it wasn't necessary to understand heredity. Mendel took care of that. You can breed animals based on their discernible qualities. You don't need to know about their DNA. Humans have been doing this for thousands of years, to produce animals with desired features. No theory is not subject to refinement. That's the whole point of science. To modify our understanding, as new knowledge emerges. Of course, Darwin had doubts. When you've made such a profound discovery, it would be wrong not to. What if he had been wrong? His career would have been finished. He even held off publishing his findings, but was forced to by others like Wallace, who were about publish their version of the theory also.
    1
  103.  @bankhead1  Look, pal. You're just embarrassing yourself, and it's painful to watch. Once again, have a nice day.
    1
  104.  @OldSchooled  "feelings to cloud their judgment or ability to reason." No. It's you who think some old book has the answers to everything. How about your old book containing useful information, such as to cure cancer in children. However, all we have is pointless nonsense. "You yourself are close-minded to any type of evidence". All that does, is show that you don't understand what being open to the scientific method is like. I am open to any idea, as long as there is evidence support it. The problem is that your old book, stops you from accepting new ways of thinking. Even when the nonsense in your old book contravenes them. "One day that will not be the case though. You will stand before the One Who created you and make your case to Him." I'm not interested in your baseless threats. Isn't your supposed god meant to be a loving one? Yet you want to promote his/her/its vengeful side. I see that you're running away. However, this is something to expect, when you know that the evidence is not on your side. Evidence which make your alleged god more irrelevant every day. If the god of the gaps gets any smaller, it will disappear for you too, at some point.
    1
  105.  @julietruesdell.371  What has god-bothering got to do with your countries constitution. Are you saying that man-made law is above that of your supposed god? Well, actually it is because your country had separation religion and state. "Knock and you shall find." Find what exactly? When your old book contains something of value, like a cure for cancer in children, then I might be interested. Until then, you can have your old book, and I'll take science, which will find the answer to save those children from a short life.
    1
  106.  @Sly9192  Read the lyrics of one his "songs"? "Addicted." "I got my check up and then I got me a bad b**h. Put all this ice up on my wrist, check out my karats. Ayy, I remember I had a little, now I got a lot. Ayy, keep that money comin' fast was the major plot. And I done turned blowin' money to a habit. And all these f** n***as hatin' cause I'm mad rich. Ayy, addicted to makin' money, I could never stop. Ayy, Fetty Wap from the Zoo with PnB Rock."
    1
  107.  @Sly9192  Maybe to let his lyrics speak for him, and then make your own conclusion.
    1
  108.  @Sly9192  OK. Whatever you say. You're the expert!
    1
  109.  @Sly9192  Good for you. Your knowledge is surely going to be of great value in life.
    1
  110. Prayers are a waste of time.
    1
  111. Why not just get a real male athlete in a sport, to identify as a woman for a day. Then put him an event with real women, just to show hot absurd this is.
    1
  112. If you're hanging out in public. That's indecent exposure.
    1
  113. 🎶Da rapper iz a slapper!🎵
    1
  114. I've never been so disgusted in all my life.
    1
  115. Great. Just what we need. A few verses from some immoral old book.
    1
  116. "Brown" (Asian) people are doing very well in the USA. Even better than whyte people. It's her people that are failing.
    1
  117. It's a shame that your supposed god did NOTHING for the previous couple of generations, who grew up without fathers.
    1
  118.  @vernonhampton5863  "duche". Don't you mean "douche"? Il Duche was an infamous Italian dictator.
    1
  119. Not in Africa and Asia there won't. There the population is exploding.
    1
  120. Wrong channel.
    1
  121. How can over 50% of the World's population be wrong, and just 0.1% be right?
    1
  122. Your god doesn't care.
    1
  123. Compare that to the millions of words science has to say on the subject.
    1
  124.  @rw8614  “Blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.” That's better known as "faith". Faith is simply belief in things which don't exist. If they existed, then there would be no need for faith.
    1
  125.  @rw8614  Are you familiar with this maxim? "Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat –".
    1
  126.  @rw8614  Whatever dude. Maybe, you'll agree with the following though? ALL religion is mental illness, and the sooner a cure is found, the better for humanity.
    1
  127.  @ashowofhands9813  Except that he's not a scientist of any description. Just a lawyer, who knows nothing about the subject in question.
    1
  128. So you approve of killing, do you?
    1
  129. Three into one doesn't go. Looks like they ballsed up on that one. Whoever came up with that bright idea, should have been ridiculed. However, for some reason, the rest thought it was a brilliant idea.
    1
  130.  @ellohyou1859  It has changed, but for the worse.
    1
  131. Really. How do you know. Have you net satan?
    1
  132.  @SSGADMURRAY  Again. Somebody who doesn't know what a theory represents. Theories supported by the scientific consensus have the highest level of certainty of any scientific knowledge; for example, that all objects are subject to gravity or that life on Earth evolved from a common ancestor. Still confused?
    1
  133.  @ericseitzler81  I probably know more about your old book, than most of those who pretend to believe in it. That's usually the way it is. It's because those who believe in reason, logic, and facts to determine truth. Tend to do their research. Of course, the unknown men (women were kept illiterate), who wrote the book were ignorant. All people a couple of thousand years ago knew almost nothing about the world and their surroundings. It wasn't their fault. They just didn't know any better. Darwin worked on his theory of evolution for several decades, before publishing his evidence. This was just a century and a half ago. This was already in the post-enlightenment era, where great advances had been made in the field of science. Since then his theory has been tested and improved upon constantly, and will always be, as new facts are uncovered. Still after all this. Darwin's theory still holds true. Along with Newton, his theory of evolution are probably the greatest contributions to the advancement of knowledge in human history.
    1
  134.  @herbb6813  Sometimes, I wonder why I bother commenting here. The level of ignorance is staggering.
    1
  135.  @icanreadthebible7561  Macro evolution is a slow process. However, we now have a long list of examples which have been found in the fossil record.
    1
  136.  @kal_eide  I've never considered that evolution is a natural process amongst living things, because there is no evidence that this isn't the case. Would you expect a rational person, to except an alternative fairy tale explanation, for which there is zero proof at all?
    1
  137.  @herbb6813  There have been thousands of gods invented by humans. Any atheist just believes in one less god, than the believer.
    1
  138. Brother. Are you related?
    1
  139. A Jamaican Indian-Irish woman. Her mother is Indian Jamaican and her father is Indian-Irish Jamaican.
    1
  140.  @ronniekregar3482  And how many words does a person have to say before you really know them?
    1
  141. You've only got your god to blame for not doing anything about this.
    1
  142. With all your ridiculous words, You're just a crazy as she is.
    1
  143. Yeah, but Brits laugh at you every day of the year.
    1
  144. No, you have to be religious to do that.
    1
  145. Hearing voices other than your own private, internal one, is never a good sign.
    1
  146.  @arielmarbury467  If you didn't believe in god. Then what went wrong. You'd have been better staying as you were. How can anybody have a relationship with an imaginary friend, for which there is no evidence? If you'd been born in India, you'd now be a Hindu instead, and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
    1
  147. Prayers never did anything. They certainly ain't working in that place.
    1
  148. Has anyone else seen the video circulating of Neeley taking a dump in public a while back, on one of the NY Subway platforms? A very classy individual.
    1
  149. She's probably gonna have a stroke at this rate.
    1
  150. So you can't know right from wrong without your jezus. What happened before he was invented? How did people survive then?
    1
  151.  @angelika013  Your supposed jezus DOES NOT exist. Unless you can prove otherwise? (And what's written in some old book doesn't count).
    1
  152. Why didn't you find Buddha instead? You weren't in an American jail by any chance?
    1
  153.  @Jamesw829  BS. Why aren't you a Hindu. Could it be because you weren't born in India?
    1
  154. What delusion? That a god of either sex, or none, exists?
    1
  155.  @mixedangel22  Why not Awomen?
    1
  156. Which lord. Voldemort?
    1
  157.  @CountryStrong2309  "your being a child" You cant even write a four word sentence which is grammatically correct. It should read, "You're being a child."
    1
  158.  @CountryStrong2309  Maybe, one of those things should involve improving your literacy?
    1
  159. So your jezus actually answered you. That's a World's first.
    1
  160.  @Rlight96able  Times have moved on. Don't you mean Adam and Steve?
    1
  161. "Everything". Is that a TV show?
    1
  162.  @laurens9532  It was a joke. How did I know you don't have a sense of humour.
    1
  163. There's archaeological evidence for human going back at least ten thousand years. There are even cave paintings made by humans from thirty thousand years ago.
    1
  164.  @alexandremenguy5071  I have no idea what you're talking about. Can you write that in English next time?
    1
  165. When's this nonsense going to stop?
    1
  166. Don't hold your breath. You're in for a long wait.
    1
  167. They didn't include Unicorns in their Welcome Statement. Isn't that discriminating against horses with a horn growing out of the middle of their head?
    1
  168. Isn't god meant to love all his creations. Didn't he create these people after all?
    1
  169. Protect women only spaces @KellieJayKeen
    1
  170. Exile, the band?
    1
  171. Why? Your god doesn't exist.
    1
  172. Your fake god never blessed anyone. Certainly not those killed by guns that day. Or any other day for that matter.
    1
  173. So you're against a woman's hard fought right to bodily autonomy, are you? What other human rights do you want to deny people? Imagine your world, where everything is banned. It'd be like living in North korea, only worse. If your alleged god cared about children. Then maybe, he/she/it wouldn't watch and do nothing, whilst over three million children died of starvation every year. Children who will never grow up and have kids of their own.
    1
  174. So the cuffs lock once again. Mr. Reek.
    1
  175. "He made us EXACTLY how we are" That must include gays then.
    1
  176.  @HarleysDucks  Who made you a man? Well, it wasn't some imaginary god that did it. Sex, males and females, have been around for a couple of billion years.
    1
  177. Thank your fake god for absolutely nothing.
    1
  178.  @QuadriviumNumbers  Not only black females, but probably more than others.
    1
  179. "Tha God". God of what exactly?
    1
  180.  @misstasha  "Jamaican does not equal black". Doh! Tell me something I don't know. Jamaica is one of the most ethnically diverse countries on the planet. There are white Jamaicans like Lady C. Black Jamaicans, Asian Jamaicans like those with Indian heritage, and a mixture of all those and more. Take Bob Marley as just one example. Are you clear on this now?
    1
  181.  @StackinGreene  Doh. If you used your brain, you'd have understood that I was talking about a native African. Not those from another ethnicity which settled there at some time in the previous few centuries. Also, why are you talking like a simpleton? There are very few Jamaicans who are of 100% native African heritage. Like Afro-Americans, they are a mixture of West African and white. Although, in Jamaica there is also the presense of other ethnicities too.
    1
  182.  @bradblackmore2627  "Jamaican isn't a race". Really, Einstein?
    1
  183.  @bradblackmore2627  Whatever, Brad. I think I've made myself clear in this thread.
    1
  184.  @bradblackmore2627  Firstly, why are you so rude, Bradley? Didn't your parents teach you any manners. Secondly, Why are you here, when you have nothing of value to add?
    1
  185.  @bradblackmore2627  I'm not dying on any hill, pal. If you've got the "real" facts about her heritage, then why don't you present them. There's an old syaing, "either put up or shut up". Well, Bradley. Just what have you got, if anything?
    1
  186.  @TheHailstorm77  "WRONG! Get your facts!" You can't even write a grammatically correct sentence. So what's the point of even replying to you?
    1
  187.  @TheHailstorm77  Yeah right, sunshine. I already have my facts. Get your own set if you can.
    1
  188.  @yearlytwomonthly6113  Why are you telling me what I've already wrote about repeatedly in this thread? Her parents also moved from Jamaica, not to it.
    1
  189. Praise god for what? All the killings every day, which your alleged god, does phuq all to stop.
    1
  190.  @LoveDogs___3  Time for a new keyboard?
    1
  191. No gun crime in your community then?
    1
  192.  @eugene3484  Which biochemist (it's one word). What's his name?
    1
  193.  @eugene3484  Is that 90% of the Nobel Laureates, who won in the field of science? The ones, who specialise in using logic, reason and facts to determine truth. You know you're on a hiding to nowhere with this one, don't you?
    1
  194.  @eugene3484  "Professor" Dave. LOL. Professor of Nothing, more like.
    1
  195.  @eugene3484  "Stan's"?
    1
  196.  @lynncantrell2782  "most scientists believe in God". BS. Most scientists are too smart to have imaginary friends. They're also too busy trying to increase human knowledge, to be dreaming about angels either.
    1
  197.  @OOTurok  Yes, human do design things using intelligence. It's just that god-botherers try and pretend that the universe was designed by some imaginary being, for which there is zero evidence.
    1
  198.  @johngraves9237  You're asking too many questions here. The beauty of science is that we don't have all the answers, but at least we are trying to find explanations which make sense. Not from some old book, which tells us nothing. A good place to start would be to read the book, "A Universe From Nothing". As for living organisms. We can surmise as to how they came into being. Life is a rare event, as our planet is so far the only one known to have life on it. If we knew of another example, then maybe, through comparative biology. We'd have a better understanding of how living things come into existence. There could even be non-carbon based life elsewhere. With Silicon offering an alternative.
    1
  199.  @gs6205  If Hawking was a "dummy". Then I'd hate to think what it makes you.
    1
  200.  @maow9240  There are many religious scientists, and less that actually practise their beliefs. Why would there be? "Evidence is subjective". Wrong, scientific evidence is objective. How could it not be? "Science is self correcting". Correct, but that doesn't mean that the original conclusion was wrong. New evidence may complement and add new depth to any theory. "doesn't mean they aren't using reason, logic, or facts." Of course they are. Why wouldn't they be? The techniques and technology used in science improves all the time.
    1
  201.  @christopherharlan6594  "Faith" is simply the belief in things which don't exist. If they did, then you wouldn't need faith. If something's real, then you should be able to provide evidence for that existence. If you can't then there's no reason for anybody else to believe in your claim. It's a simple as that.
    1
  202.  @christopherharlan6594  I don't have to prove anything to you. You're the one making a claim that your god exists. So it up to you to prove it. That's how Epistemological truth claims work. And so, yet another person who doesn't know how to think, is dealt with.
    1
  203.  @michaelbrowder5251  Who is?
    1
  204.  @michaelbrowder5251  Darwin developed the Theory of Evolution. Although, he didn't give every example possible to demonstrate it. If you want an answer to that beginner's question. Then why not ask Richard Dawkins, Mike. He's answered it on several occasions. However, you obviously don't know how to use the internet, do you?
    1
  205. Why not read "A Universe From Nothing". It might expand and revise your thinking.
    1
  206. She'd have to be skinny though.
    1
  207.  @Basbhat  Your old book was written by ignorant, unknown men (women were kept illiterate", who didn't know any better. It contains proof of nothing. Science, on the other hand, is concerned with nothing but proof.
    1
  208.  @helixmoore7636  Do you know how much de@th and suffering god-bothering, has caused since it was invented? It's more than any other human activity. Just watch the news and you will see it every day. This doesn't affect those doing the fighting, but innocent people too. Yet you have the cheek to say I shouldn't bother about what others believe?
    1
  209.  @The4cp  "Ouch", if she bit their flute!
    1
  210.  @CountryStrong2309  "Mr Grammer". Who's He/She/They/ Ze/Ei/Per?
    1
  211. So the cuffs lock once again. Mr. Reek.
    1
  212. Yeah, right. We all know your god is real. LOL.
    1
  213. Yeah, we all know your jezus saves, right?
    1
  214. If god created people perfectly, then why do we have an appendix, when we don't need it?
    1
  215.  @seanmetro3496  What's the other opposing force?
    1
  216.  @lorireed8046  No, it wasn't. Modern humans have been around and unchanged physiologically, for around 100,000 years. The appendix wasn't needed then, and isn't needed now.
    1
  217.  @seanmetro3496  Do you know that god in your old book, killed several million people, but the devil killed only a few? So who's the bigger criminal?
    1
  218.  @lorireed8046  "I swear you have world knowledge right there in your hands... Use it!" I do use that knowledge. Not what it says in some old book written by ignorant, middle eastern goat herders, who didn't know any better.
    1
  219.  @chivonfortney1656  If god doesn't make mistakes. Then why did he/she/it create imperfect humans, with the ability to sin. Was that god playing some sort of sick game, where he/she/it wanted to see humans suffer at the hands of other humans?
    1
  220.  @wm1958  "The image of God is created perfect and that was lost due to sin". Weren't humans created in the image of your god? If so, why were they created imperfect, with the ability to sin? Don't you realise how nonsensical your ridiculous fairy tale is?
    1
  221.  @RaiiKairiChan  Why would your god have any sex, let alone the same sex as the men (no women, of course) who wrote your old book? Surely, the best pronoun for your god would be "IT"?
    1
  222. Caps Lock key broken, Linda?
    1
  223. This is like warning them that they might be crushed by falling tree at some time in their life. The chances are a million to one, that they are going to be injured or killed by a police officer.
    1
  224. If you want to know what a women is. The people are the last ones to aks. Even if they are adult human females. Support Kellie Jay Keene at Let Women Speak.
    1
  225. Yeah right dude. Do you believe angels are real too?
    1
  226. Believe or know?
    1
  227.  @stu7161  You KNOW nothing. You're just guessing. He knows nothing about Evolution, either. Maybe, he should stick to the law?
    1
  228.  @stu7161  The thing is that I DON'T believe what I want. I believe what there is evidence for. You know, the way rational people do. No adult fairy tales, or imaginary friends for me. And until god-botherers can provide some proof for their beliefs. That's the way it's gonna stay.
    1
  229.  @stu7161  I have no idea what you're on about, dude. Dawkins would make his assessment based on the evidence. "There is no point in presenting to you evidence of something you've already convinced yourself cannot possibly exist". Wrong, provide the evidence, and I will have no option but to accept it. The problem is that this god-bothering thing is de@d in the water. In the 100,000 years since modern humans have existed. Not one person has been able to provide one single piece of evidence for the existence of gods, which eventually became one god. However, in the case of the Nazarene is now three, or is that one? It's also not a case of not trying, as many have spent their life in pursuit of it. There's also a big incentive in it. Imagine suddenly being the most famous person in the World, and all the praise you'd get. Maybe, there'd even be a Nobel Prize in it as well. Until then, I'll leave them to their quest. Let's just say that I'll believe it when I see it.
    1
  230. Oh yes. A fake god means that nobody ever gets shot in good ol' Murica.
    1
  231. Are you a biologist or something?
    1
  232. OT. Bocelli is pronounced Bochelli.
    1
  233. So the cuffs lock once again. Mr. Reek.
    1
  234.  @1chemban  It was a joke. I guess your study of English didn't get that far?
    1
  235. ​ @1chemban  Firstly, what intentions? There really weren't any. Just a humorous jibe. Also, what language barriers, considering your username? An insulting joke. Are you really offended by such a slight. I could have been much more cutting, if I chosen to be so. Have a nice day.
    1
  236.  @1chemban  Isn't it reasonable to assume that somebody with your name, could be expected to have English as their native tongue? If that's the case, then it's also fair to posit, that they should have knowledge of the nuances said language. What bridge are you referring to? There are several different usages of the word, and it's possible to look for any of them.
    1
  237.  @1chemban  "personnel attack"? That isn't very good, considering how much you like to educate others, on the finer points of English. Why would others not understand? That's why written language was invented. To allow ideas to be conveyed, without the need for speech.
    1
  238. Males would give birth the way many women do. Through a surgical procedure.
    1
  239. And what are those lies? Why shouldn't god be female?
    1
  240.  @disregard7275  Your old book also sanctioned genocide, slavery and the abuse of women and girls. Even jc supported the old book, by stating that not a jot and tittle should be changed and that he had come to fulfil the original prophecy. Isn't it sad that such a supposedly sinless man, could support the owning of other people as property? Remember, slaves obey your master. Rather than saying that slavery is immoral, and should be banned. It just shows that the new book was written from the thoughts of men (no women of course). Rather than from words of some sinless being.
    1
  241.  @CONEHEADDK  Who cares. Why would a god have a sex? He/she/it is not an animal or plant.
    1
  242.  @shadowfax9177  You do realise that these old books were written by men (no women, of course)? Not by a god. Why didn't god just self-publish? He/she/it can supposedly do anything. Why use an unreliable method, such as men?
    1
  243.  @bludeuce3855  Your homicide rate is already high enough. Do you want to increase that further?
    1
  244.  @shadowfax9177  "because God refers to himself in the masculine HE." Oh, so god wrote his own book, did he/she/it? That's news to me.
    1
  245.  @meredethenglish1577  "across all Christian denominations". Yeah, and there are about 30,000 versions of the same book, and they can't all be right. Why can' you people get your act together?
    1
  246.  @CONEHEADDK  "It's a BELIEF - NOT proven knowledge". So is the existence of the Loch Ness monster, or Bigfoot. When the evidence of such an entity as a god, is proven. Then is the time to start believing in a god. We will also then know their sex. Although, why would a god need to have a sex anyway? In the fairy story of creation in old book number one. Why was Adam created before Eve. Why didn't god just create them at the same time. Also, why did god allow them to be imperfect, and capable of sin? It seems like your god just wanted to perform some kind of sick experiment.
    1
  247. You're
    1
  248. So the cuffs lock once again. Mr. Reek.
    1
  249. Tragic? Not really.
    1
  250. Your supposed god likes genocide, slavery and the abuse women and girls. So you can't have everything.
    1
  251.  @trixmania  Who says they don't teach sense in Biology classes. Classes about gender are a completely different subject.
    1
  252.  @shadowbolt5117  You'd have an issue including gender studies and queer theory in a biological science class. BTW, what's "stuff"?
    1
  253. ​ @iamthemagnificentjar  Cite some published protocols?
    1
  254.  @SymphonicEllen  I was asking for articles in reputable medical or science journals on how to treat pregnant men. Are there any?
    1
  255.  @SymphonicEllen  Science and medicine waits for nobody. You can try and bury your head in the sand, and pretend that males gestating foetuses doesn't exist, but that won't change the reality. Where there's a demand, there will always be somebody who wants to supply that need. It's the way the World functions, and there's nothing you or anyone else can do about about it. It's really only a matter of time before a man has a baby. Whether you like it, or not.
    1
  256. Why? Doctors are working on womb transplants.
    1
  257. So the cuffs lock once again. Mr. Reek.
    1
  258. You made your bed Chiraqians, now die in it.
    1
  259. It's amazing how naïve some people can be. Why would anybody want or need an imaginary friend. Why not get some real ones instead?
    1
  260.  @patsy4959  Keep wasting your time. Your god watches whilst children die of cancer and starvation, and does nothing to help. Kids that will never grow up to have children of their own. Either your god is an uncaring monster. Or he/she/it doesn't exist. Which of those two options is the correct one?
    1
  261. Bungalow Joe perpetuating tired old r@cist tropes. Telling blacks that some invisible hand is holding them back, and not to even try bettering themselves, because they ain't gonna make it.
    1
  262. Do you know how many millions of people have died due to religious conflict? And you still believe that religion is good?
    1
  263. ​ @Kendro311  So you can't be moral without religion, can you? People who don't believe in fairy tales, do just fine. What about the 96% of human existence before modern religions were made up. How did the human race survive all that time? It would be beneficial, if religion had not been made by men (no women of course). As humans are imperfect and biased, and so are the old religious books they came up with. The old testament was written for a small tribe of people, and if you didn't fit in that group, then the rules didn't apply to you, and you were a second-class citizen. This old book sanctioned genocide, slavery and the abuse of women and girls. Even in the new testament, jc supports slavery, by stating that not a jot or tittle of the original covenant shall be changed, and that his coming were the fulfilment of it. All religions have been in conflict with other religions at some time, and the resultant death toll is too high to count. The sooner religion is consigned to the dustbin of history the better for the whole of humankind.
    1
  264.  @Kendro311  "there's just too much to life and existence to think it wasn't by design." All the common arguments that life was somehow designed, have all been comprehensively debunked. We are probably lucky, that the character of jc was essentially a hippy, who preached peace, and love and never killed anyone, or sinned. That at least, gave any cultures adopting it ,the chance to grow away from it, as there was no penalty for apostasy. Unlike some other religion, we could mention. God seems to be playing the biggest game of hide and seek in history, to the point that he/she/it might as well be invisible. This being rather odd, considering the he/she/it, is meant to be the creator of the universe, and the most powerful entity, within it. Therefore, what is the point in believing something, that there's no evidence for. It makes no logical sense.
    1
  265. Your hat needs to be edible. There are doctors working on making womb transplants possible.
    1
  266. Does your god's love extend to the over three million children, he/she/it watches die from hunger every year, and does f all about it?
    1
  267. Your,god might know the heart of every person, but he/she/it does phuq all about it.
    1
  268. Uncle Trump is the GOAT.
    1
  269. We don't.
    1
  270. It also rhymes with gayby.
    1
  271. Lefties don't have a sense of humour.
    1
  272. That looks like a bloke in a dress, with make up and a pearly necklace.
    1
  273. Proof of what exactly. That there are artefacts left by people a couple of thousand years ago?
    1
  274. Your fake god frightens nobody.
    1
  275.  @Luxlowe  Why are there still people who think that evolution isn't real? Do they know how much evidence there is to support the theory? A huge mountain, and there's more confirmation coming each day. All these deniers achieve is to show how wilfully ignorant they are of facts and evidence. The amazing fact is that Darwin made the correct conclusions over a century and a half ago. Although he did a lot of research to formulate his theory.
    1
  276. There's zero power in your made up jezus. Where was your so-called messiah in all the other murders that day?
    1
  277.  @AdrielOutspoken  LOL.
    1
  278.  @QuadriviumNumbers  Join the queue. The old god/man hybrid and his dad, are busy meeting others at the pearly gates.
    1
  279. Nonsense. Firstly, why not prove your god exists?
    1
  280.  @melvaldepenas4972  Not another one. This is getting boring. "Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat –".
    1
  281.  @melvaldepenas4972  I am what? Are you going to prove your alleged god exists, or not? We're waiting.
    1
  282.  @melvaldepenas4972  I guess you ain't gonna prove your alleged god exists then?
    1
  283. Yeah, we know how in that area crime does not exist, thanks to your jezus. LOL.
    1
  284. And what's praying gonna do?
    1
  285. Doctors are working on womb transplants. So it might happen.
    1
  286. Do you know when Darwin wrote "On The Origin Of Species". And more importantly, do you even care?
    1
  287. Didn't they destroy themselves?
    1
  288. And what good did praying ever do?
    1
  289.  @keithsmith339  Are you a parrot or something? Blindly spewing out the ramblings of ignorant Bronze Age middle eastern goat herders, who didn't know any better. You're deluded.
    1
  290.  @Gonzalez541  Why not. What's your imaginary sky daddy going to do about it? Absolutely nothing. The same way as he watches over three million children die of starvation every year, and does phuq all to help them. Children who will never grow up, and have kids of their own. Either your supposed god is an uncaring monster. Or he/she/it, does not exist. Which of those two options is the correct one?
    1
  291. You alleged god isn't doing a very good job.
    1
  292. Yeah, and we know how prayer saved the lives of all those who were gunned down, don't we?
    1
  293. It's amazing that you can have a relationship with an imaginary being.
    1
  294. Your god seems to like watching, but hates actually doing anything.
    1
  295.  @ifeawosika966  Demons and angels. LOL.
    1
  296.  @ifeawosika966  "Or you think you're the only intelligent life in this realm". No. why would I? There's plenty of intelligent life on this planet, and even elsewhere in the universe.
    1
  297. Your god's make believe too, so that evens the score for all the lunatics out there on either side.
    1
  298.  @undergrace1808  Isn't your god big enough to take a joke?
    1
  299. So the cuffs lock once again. Mr. Reek.
    1
  300.  @philrolland7251  That geezer had nuthin'. They never do. There's a Nobel Prize waiting for anybody who can prove jebus and his dad exist. "hypothesized upon and most of these things were believed to be untrue until they weren't.". That's the way it works. If you make a claim that something exists, such as a god. You need to provide evidence for that claim. There is no reason for me to believe it, until you have done so. "Arrogance and ego". How does that exist in the scientific method. Any theory is up to scrutiny constantly. If there is any consensus that the theory is in error, then it will be modified. Science is a collective effort. Not, what's written in some old book.
    1
  301.  @philrolland7251  The problem for you is that we've landed a man on the moon, since that old book was written a couple of thousand years ago, and a lot more besides. If we took notice of just old books, we'd all be still living in the dark, with just candles for illumination. If you think your old book has all the answers, then why don't you live the way people did then. Or are you too attached to modern medical care, and driving around in your own car. Your donkey awaits. Oh, and don't wear mixed fibres. Apparently, that p!sses off your god, more than anything.
    1
  302.  @aeternafortuna1644  God-botherers can't disprove evolution, even if they tried. For starters, they're ignorant of science, and the use of logic, reason and facts to determine truth. Modern humans have existed for about 100,000 years. Isn't it odd how this supposed god only became interested in giving these so-called prophets, or should that be profits, what was on his/her/its mind, only about 3,000 years ago. That's in the last 3% of human existence, and just like buses, three come along one after the other. Where was this supposed god, the previous 97% of the time. You can smell the BS a mile away.
    1
  303. This is flat out child abuse.Children should be left to grow up without the pressure to conform to their parent's fetishistic ideas. How can this father be so cruel, to his own child? It's also odd, as it's usually the mother's who do this. There's also a deeper motive to all this besides dressing your boy as a girl. This never works out well. Take the tragic case of David Reimer as a warning.
    1
  304. Destiny would make even soy milk curdle.
    1
  305. But you said anyone with a brain. Does that include Mr. Reek?
    1
  306. Britain was invaded, it's people enslaved and its resources taken by the Romans, Saxons, Danes, Vikings and Normans. Are the British asking for reparations from Italy, Germany, Denmark or Norway? Of course, they aren't. Don't be stoopid!
    1
  307. Prayer never stopped a bullet yet, and it never will. So your're p1ssing in the wind, with that one.
    1
  308. They don't just come for the money. They don't want to live where they were born. Isn't that why there's millions crossing the border whilst they've been able to.
    1
  309.  @Shalandasway  Is it. Isn't it in the Caribbean?
    1
  310.  @MeghanMarzio  So why did AOC's ancestors leave PR, along with thousands of others? New York has a large number of people with that heritage.
    1
  311. Give it a few generations more, and you will be on your own.
    1
  312.  @dr.emilschaffhausen4683  You're welcome. If you know the difference, your responsibility is to use them correctly. 90wpm? Most commenters on this site struggle to put a coherent, grammatically correct sentence together. Prayer has been proven in several controlled studies, not to have any positive effect, except in the heads of those who think it does. People who don't engage in such activity, have just as much success, and luck, as those who don't. It's not as though prayer is all going to the same place. Each religion is praying to their own version of a supreme being or beings. So who's doing it right. Or maybe, they're all wrong. Why not just believe in one less religion than they do? Why do you assume that my rejection of religion was because I was "hurt" at some time. How about that it never occured to me that their was any god to submit to. There was nothing that ever disproved this position either. Indeed, nobody in history has been able to prove that any supreme being exists. Therefore, why waste time worshipping something that at best is invisible, and thus has no effect on your surroundings. Secondly, I was never indoctrinated into religion at any point in my childhood, like many people are. I just made my decision on the lack of evidence around me. The only reason people are a certain religion, anyway, is due to where they were born. If you're born in the US, you will be a Christian, and in India, a Hindu. So what's the point, if you might be backing the wrong horse? Why do I need to submit to a higher power, to be happy. Especially when there's no evidence for it. Over three million children die of starvation every year. Children who will never grow and have kids of their own. Why would an all powerful god, just sit and watch, and do nothing to stop this? There are only two conclusions. Either that god is an uncaring monster, who doesn't care about his/her/its creations. Or he/she/it does not exist. Which of those two options, do you subscribe to?
    1
  313.  @dr.emilschaffhausen4683  No, I think it's very important.
    1
  314.  @dr.emilschaffhausen4683  Before you go, are you able to give an answer to the question I posed, at the end of my last reply? You'd be the first, if you could.
    1
  315.  @dr.emilschaffhausen4683  Well, that was the last question I posed previous comment. Can you succeed, where others couldn't?
    1
  316.  @dr.emilschaffhausen4683  The third option is a convenient cop-out, by god-botherers to attempt to provide an excuse, as to why evil exists in the World. I don't buy the explanation, as to why a god would be so apathetic about his/her/its creation. This is particularly true of the Abrahamic religions, which see humans as special creations, made in the image of that god. In one of them, god supposedly even sent his son, to show how much he/she/it cared for his creation. The argument that we need religion, otherwise kids will join gangs, doesn't hold weight. Religious indoctrination has its negatives too. For one, it stifles free-thinking, and makes people think in an irrational manner. Subscribing to believes which in no way comport with reality. You can teach children good values, without filling their heads with thousands years old nonsense. The bible condones genocide, slavery and the abuse of women and girls. Luckily, in spite of these immoral teachings, people only pay lip-service to them. And if you reject these parts, why not reject the whole lot? As you will guess, I also think homeopathy is a fraud. Since when is less, more? I watched nearly every James Randi (with an "i"), video on the internet. He busted the so-called psychics, prosperity preachers, and other assorted fraudsters. My favourite was when Johnny Carson and him, punked celebrity bender Uri Geller on the Tonight Show. When Geller made the excuse that he "wasn't feeling strong tonight". That should have been the end of his career, but people like him have a habit of keeping their grift going. Although, with the internet, it's easy to see through their lies, if you can be bothered to be sceptical. As to some higher power being out there. I choose to believe it, when I see it. And if that's when it's too late, then tough.
    1
  317. You're
    1
  318. How do you know what sex god is? Do god's even have a sex, like animals do?
    1
  319. Lefties don't have a sense of humour. Life must be so empty for them.
    1
  320. Why didn't your jezus stop it before it happened? Could it be that he isn't real?
    1
  321. Why would anyone want you read your old book anyway? Read a science book instead.
    1
  322. ​ @lynsylva-bb6ss  There are certain religions that believe some god told them to chop off perfectly good parts of all their newborn baby boys. And it's all done whether that child wanted it done, or not.
    1
  323. ​ @southernparadise9896 "but without God, science would be unnecessary." What have you been smoking? We need science whether there is a god, or no god. How else are we going to explain the World around us, and its origin. Your old book, has no information of any value, to assist us in answering these questions. Do you think the electronic equipment, you used to write your comment, came out of thin air, from some invisible being? No, it took centuries of human effort to develop the technology, you take for granted today. If you relied on the information contained in your old book, you'd still be in a cave somewhere, scratching a living to survive. Do you think a scientists spend part of their day, thinking about god, and whether that god approves of what they're doing? Of course not. There is zero need for religion in inventing a new technology. God is irrelevant to the study of science. Finally, why do you assume your supposed god is male. Could it be that women were treated as second-class citizens, by the men who invented what's in your old book? Also, why do you people always have only one book. Maybe, you should go to a library sometime. There you will find thousands of books. Trying reading some of their extensive range of books on science and technology. You might actually learn something of value.
    1
  324.  @jonellgorrell8758  Do your believe that the old and new testament are the literal word of god, and that you should follow all the commands within them? A yes, or no answer is fine.
    1
  325. @REALMENAPOLOGIZE Women were seen as inferior, when those men wrote the bible, (women were not taught to read and write). Doesn't that tell you why god is said to be male?
    1
  326. ​ @southernsass2937 Are men superior to you, or something?
    1
  327.  @shaungreene751  Why?
    1
  328.  @number1enemyoftheuseless985  "You can't have a discussion of the Bible without a discussion of science." Yes, you can. When does science ever need religion? Do you think scientists are thinking about god in their laboratories? Of course, not. Why would they? Science can be done without there being a need to resort to magical thinking. In fact, it's a requirement.
    1
  329.  @whm_w8833  Fauci? What's he got to do with some old book written by unknown men (no women, of course) a few thousand years ago?
    1
  330. ​ @phyllisvanhuss1190  "God gave free will so we are able to choose how we live our lives." Ah, yes. A convenient cop out and get out clause, to try and explain why your supposed god, apparently, doesn't give a phuq about his/her/its creation. All that effort, to just sit back and watch it all go to cr@p. Why not just get it right next time, instead of having to do a couple of reboots, because you cocked it up first time. So much for a perfect all knowing god! However, there is a more logical reason, why your god is invisible. I wonder if you can guess what it is? As for god's part human, part god hybrid, jc. Who thought that one up? It's a bit like the sequel, that tries to fill the plot holes, that were forgotten first time around. Whomever came up with the jc character, should have been told that it was a bad idea, by the rest of the group responsible for formulating the new part of the old book. However, for some reason, he had is way, and they ran with it. Finally, the story of the crucifiction and resurrection. When jc had a sh1tty weekend, by topping himself in the most pointless suicide in history. Makes no sense whatsoever.
    1
  331.  @lovelyjanecohen2637  Like most atheists, I probably have more knowledge of the bible, than most so-called believers do. OK, they might be great works of literature. But the literal word of god? Never. What are the scientific facts you're trying to read into the bible? There are as many errors in your old book, as there are so-called facts. But you'd conveniently ignore them, wouldn't you? It's easy to try and shoe horn in facts taken for granted now. Similar to the way that there are those who try and relate the "predictions" of Nostradamus, in relation to modern events. It's easy, once they've already happened. Hindsight is a great thing.
    1
  332.  @cynbartek9324  And why have are people turning away from god? Maybe, because it's obvious in an increasingly scientific and technological World, that he/she/it does not exist. And if that's the case what the point of submitting to some imaginary being. There are millions of people who live decent and moral lives, without believing that there's some sky daddy watching their every move. People had a moral compass before religion was invented. It's instinctive what's right and wrong. We don't need some old book to tell us so.
    1
  333.  @Tom-cz9op  Thanks, I will. You're confusing faith in science with faith in man. Science proves that the Earth is a sphere, but that doesn't stop some lunatics believing it's flat. Trust science, not people. Humans are fallible.
    1
  334.  @johnsmith-ik8il  proud of what?
    1
  335.  @johnsmith-ik8il  Which church? There are over 30,000 different denominations. And guess what? Each of them think they are the only true one.
    1
  336. Nope, your fake god wasn't blessing anybody.
    1
  337. Don't worry. The US will look after them. It'd also help if they'd make up their mind about their association with the US. Something which is still unresolved after a century.
    1
  338. Do you mean religion is a mental illness? Well, religious conflict has been responsible for the deaths of millions of people, and it's still killing people today.
    1
  339.  @SIKE01  What's the APA?
    1
  340. Modern humans have been around for about 100,000 years. God only bothered to get involved in the last few thousand of them. And then three times in a row. The same as buses. Nothing, and then suddenly a few all at once.
    1
  341. So a person knows their pregnant straight away, do they?
    1
  342. Why would a god have a sex anyway? They're not an animal.
    1
  343. Are you saying that people aren't born gay? It something they pick up at some point. Ricky Gervais disagrees with you on this subject.
    1
  344. Join the club.
    1
  345. Did jezus have expensive watches and chains?
    1
  346. Trump in McDonald's was the diss of the century. A masterstroke.
    1
  347. What's banning gender affirming surgery, got to do with terminating an unwanted pregnancy?
    1
  348.  @Loyaltoafault210  Abortion isn't. It's defending women's hard fought rights to body autonomy. The freedom to choose what she does with her own body, without outside interference by external marplots. Are there any other human rights you'd like to see taken away?
    1
  349. Life is cheap, especially in the hood.
    1
  350. And what good did praying ever do?
    1
  351. A f@sc!st can be from the Left of the Right. Just look at the behaviour of groups like Ant!fa. They're exactly what they pretend to be against.
    1
  352. Unfortunately, Lefties don't have a sense of humour. They don't realise that normal people know what a joke is.
    1
  353.  @karaboo22  The "soul" doesn't exist, but nice try.
    1
  354. Really? Is that why your god kills millions in your old book, whilst the devil only kills a handful?
    1
  355. Your god killed millions in your old book. The devil only killed a handful. Who's the greater killer then?
    1
  356. @MilesDoyleSalt I am what I am, an’ I’m not ashamed. ‘Never be ashamed,’ my ol’ dad used ter say, ‘there’s some who’ll hold it against you, but they’re not worth botherin’ with.’” —Rubeus Hagrid, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.
    1
  357.  @SmokeBurp  What's a CKD?
    1
  358.  @lindabradford9591  What's wrong with god being a Trans woman? Are you bigot or something?
    1
  359.  @theVampkingkindredk  John who?
    1
  360.  @theVampkingkindredk  I asked which John? There are millions of people called John. Even some Trans people.
    1
  361.  @theVampkingkindredk  Have you ever read it? And if so, why did you waste your time doing so?
    1
  362. Yeah, faith stops people being killed by guns every day, doesn't it?
    1
  363.  @mmarsh2937  Three into one doesn't go. Did you not study arithmetic in school?
    1
  364.  @kos-mos1127  "Calling god he from a philosophical perspective emphasizes transcendence and separateness from humanity." No, it doesn't. "He" means male. Therefore you're making the statement that god has a sex. Why would a god need or want a sex? They are not an animal or plant.
    1
  365.  @kos-mos1127  Yes, but aren't the abrahamic religions meant to be monotheistic. Although, followers of jc, can't seem to make up their mind. Therefore, why should it be assumed that this single god, should be male? Let alone any sex at all. The men (no women, of course), who came up with this nonsense, are unsurprisingly responsible for making their supposed god male.
    1
  366.  @lupinsredjacket3191  "God calls Himself "He" multiple times throughout Scripture." How convenient. I wonder if they tossed a coin on that one? No, of course they didn't. At the time, men ran the show, and only a few of them had been taught to be literate. So it's hardly surprising, that they made god male. Why wouldn't they? Men were thought as superior to women then. So why wouldn't the supposedly most powerful being in the universe, be male too? The bible was fabricated and written by ignorant, middle eastern goat herders, who didn't know any better. Although, you pretend that was god, who wrote it, and in the first person. When we tell stories of what we did, we use first person (as in “I drove…”). When we tell stories about others, we use third person (as in “she drove…”). And there are two variations of third person perspective limited (restricted to what only one character can see or know) and omniscient (knowing everything, like God). In days of old, writers used third-person omniscient. The bible does this all the time. For example, how was Jonah aware that the seas calmed down after the sailors tossed him into the water (Jonah 1:15)? Or when Philip left the Ethiopian eunuch, how did he know the eunuch went on his way (Acts 8:39)?
    1
  367. The people who watch these shows, are the type of people who would be in the front row at public hangings.
    1
  368. The two are incompatible. You either believe in reason, logic, and facts as used in science, or you don't.
    1
  369. As though he knew anything.
    1
  370. Yeah. Your alleged god is doing a great job, isn't he/she/it.
    1
  371.  @RANDO4743  And does that not influence the behaviour of others in a similar situation?
    1
  372.  @RANDO4743  And does Gangsta Rap help the situation?
    1
  373.  @RANDO4743  Not a gangsta rapper? Have you read any of his lyrics?
    1
  374.  @RANDO4743  Why? Does everyone who grows up in the hood, belong to a gang?
    1
  375. Gold Diggers?
    1
  376.  @cliffgardner5717  Nobody created god. As he/she/t doesn't exist. However, if a supposed god did exist. Then that would be a valid question.
    1
  377.  @Lacey_Face  The story is just a ridiculous fairy tale. Why would any sane person even give it kennel space?
    1
  378. So the cuffs lock once again. Mr. Reek.
    1
  379.  @rickbrown6488  De-escalation from which side? Why not just do what the police tell you. Don't act like a m0r0n, and you'll soon be on your way. If you look for trouble, you're bound to find it.
    1
  380.  @rickbrown6488  What rights. Why not just act like a sensible person? Follow the law, and there shouldn't be a problem. Do you think the police were responsible for his actions of Mr. Reek? He's a grown man, and responsible for obeying the speed limit, and wearing a seat belt. Or do you think he's exempt from the laws everyone else is meant to follow? With rights come responsibilities. Officer Tatum was clear in how all this could have been avoided. A little compliance was all that was necessary.
    1
  381. Why? Your so-called doesn't exist. Unless you can prove otherwise?
    1
  382.  @Carlo173  What about your old book? Which was written by ignorant men (women were kept illiterate", who didn't know any better. How about your god telling us something useful. Like how to cure cancer in children? Or is your old book more precious to you than that?
    1
  383.  @LoneRangerDan  I'm mocking your so-called lord now. What's he gonna do about it?
    1
  384.  @LoneRangerDan  When? Wasn't your lord meant to return during the lifetime of his original disciples. If so, then what's the freakin' hold up?
    1
  385.  @dougcrowe1226  Got anymore one liners? You could almost make a boring, irrelevant old book out of them.
    1
  386.  @dougcrowe1226  Your imaginary threats don't phase me. You got Nuthin'.
    1
  387.  @LoneRangerDan  So your old book is wrong then? If so, then what's the point of taking the rest of it seriously?
    1
  388.  @Carlo173  I had no intention of running.
    1
  389.  @Carlo173  "Still", what?
    1
  390.  @dougcrowe1226  How about writing something useful?
    1
  391. Fatherless homes.
    1
  392. Your "new phrase" is wrong. There's already a term for it.
    1
  393.  @atleastimgenuine3566  Because there's already an existing term which is better.
    1
  394. You tend to get back what you give. If you're speeding expect to get pulled over. Accept your guilt, if it wasn't a life or de@th situation. Take the ticket and carry on. Why be late to the game anyway? If you're a professional on an obscenely large contract, who just runs around with a ball for a living. Then make sure you're gonna get there with time to spare.
    1
  395. Did your god bless those that actually died by guns in Murica that day?
    1
  396.  @barryon8706  Isn't it odd, how religious people praise god when something good happens, but never when it's something bad? Also, didn't god supposedly give humans free will? So he/she/it does not intervene in what people do. That means prayer is pointless. All this would be true if god existed, but there is zero evidence he/she/it does.
    1
  397.  @barryon8706  There's a difference between "acts of god", and acts of humans. If someone feels the urge to pray, nobody can stop them, but it seems like a waste of effort. Whom or what are you praying to anyway? Since, the supposedly the most powerful entity, loves to play a perpetual game of hide and seek.
    1
  398.  @barryon8706  Yes, but why get some imaginary being involved?
    1
  399.  @barryon8706  What odd question?
    1
  400.  @barryon8706  Some people think that imaginary beings are real. Isn't it true that eight out of ten Americans think Angels exist? That's certainly a scary thought if you have to interact with such people.
    1
  401.  @barryon8706  In truth claims. The burden is on those making a claim, not on those who reject it. If you can't prove something exists, then why should anybody believe it does. This is especially true, if it's supposedly the most powerful force in the Universe. And if a god does exist, any non-believers can't be held responsible for their doubting, if that god never does anything to prove he/she/it does..
    1
  402.  @barryon8706  Yes, because he/she/it is, until you or anyone else can provide evidence to the contrary.
    1
  403.  @barryon8706  You don't get it, do you? I am saying there is no god, prove there is one? The Latin proverb quod grātīs asseritur, grātīs negātur ("what is freely asserted can be freely deserted"),] also rendered as "what is asserted without reason (or proof), may be denied without reason (or proof)".
    1
  404.  @barryon8706  I've already stated the reason why, I am not required to prove anything. The person who says that god exists, is the one who has to provide the evidence for that claim. End of explanation. Plus, you're getting boring, with your inability to understand one of the basic tenets of Epistemology. It's pretty simple.
    1
  405.  @barryon8706  Just what is wrong with you? I don't know whether you believe in god, and it doesn't really matter. It was just an example of how truth claims should be evaluated. I don't need anyone to explain Epistemology. A word which I doubt you'd ever heard before, until I introduced it to you.
    1
  406.  @barryon8706 Good. I'd had enough anyway.
    1
  407. Demons and devils. Good old terms used in religion, which has been responsible for the death and suffering of countless millions of people. Got anymore gems of wisdom?
    1
  408. Jezus said that slavery was OK. How many slaves have you got?
    1
  409. Prayers ain't gonna do it.
    1
  410. Never apologize, when you've done nothing wrong. Just stay silent. If the perpetually offended, want to take a non-event to court. Then best of luck with that!
    1
  411. There are people here who would like to see terminations banned under any circumstances, and force the mother to keep the pregnancy.
    1
  412.  @jdthemighty  "You should be ashamed of yourself by just spouting some crap you don't know about". I wasn't even talking about you. I was simply stating the facts, that many American conservatives, want to see a complete ban on abortion in any circumstance. I have my view of this, and obviously so do you. "we could have been friends but we just found out who and what your about." (It's you're). Could we have been friends? The chances are slim, considering this is just a video-sharing site, and we know nothing about each other. It was you who chose to share things about your life here. Therefore it's hardly surprising when you get a response. And just what am I about? I was just making an observation, on the way many Americans in particular view issues like abortion. In the UK for example, The Abortion Act 1967 sought to clarify the law in Britain. And subject to heated debate, it allowed for legal abortion on a number of grounds up to twenty-four weeks, with the added protection of free provision through the National Health Service. And that was the end of the matter, and the law still stands today. Instead, in the US, you still have a conflict over the women's right to bodily autonomy, five decades after Roe vs Wade. It just doesn't make any sense.
    1
  413. Are you a veterinarian, or something?
    1
  414. Remember, "Celebrities Always Know Best", as M@rk D!ce says.
    1
  415. Are they going to show car accidents too? It'd make them think twice before driving.
    1
  416. Hill. Part time sport player. Full time thug.
    1
  417.  @Thisisntmyrealname331  What are you talking about. Why are such thoughts in your head? Anybody can be a thug. He just happens to be one too.
    1
  418.  @pkt86737  Just what is your problem? I didn't create his rap sheet, Mr. Reek did. Why don't you check it out? He ain't no angel. You gain respect, by giving respect. Something that Reek needs to learn.
    1
  419.  @pkt86737  You obviously have some kind of beef. Otherwise you wouldn't keep pushing your obsession with people's level of melanin. Oh, so his past behaviour has nothing to do with his current way of acting. Maybe, he had some invisible twin, who did all the previous sh!t, he's well-known for. Ever heard the saying, "A leopard can't change it's spots". Proverbs are always backed up by repeated knowledge. Unless you know some that aren't?
    1
  420.  @pkt86737  You're actually quite boring, pal. Whatever your issues are, take them out on somebody else. I ain't interested anymore. Take your love affair with Mr. Reek somewhere else. Have a nice day. As you Muricans say.
    1
  421.  @IllTalkAboutIt2.0  doesn't make him
    1
  422. Your pretend god blesses no one.
    1
  423.  @jennifercockfield3218  You're invoking Pascal's Wager. This was debunked a long time ago. There's no point in believing something just for the sake of it. Especially, when there is no reason to. Do you expect me not to challenge bad ideas?
    1
  424. Roman who?
    1
  425. Democrats. The biggest bait and switch con in history.
    1
  426. Nice to see somebody using their brain to think logically.
    1
  427. Funny how you mention mustard seeds, which are NOT the smallest seed. Odd that, your alleged god, not knowing what he/she/it supposedly created.
    1
  428. You old book is full of genocide, slavery and the abuse of women and girls. Do you agree with those too? Or do you conveniently ignore those parts?
    1
  429. How do you know what sex god would be anyway? He/she/it, is invisible, so how could anybody profess to know?
    1
  430.  @chrisoakley5830  But is the OP a real atheist though? Are they following the correct version of non-belief?
    1
  431.  @kirkhuneycutt4227  So he knows nothing about the subject of evolution then? They always trot out these so-called academics, who have no expertise in the area they're professing on. That's maybe, because nobody who studies evolution for a living, would ever content that it wasn't true.
    1
  432.  @kirkhuneycutt4227  Yeah, the last person to be pontificating, about the highly complex, and intensely researched science of evolutionary biology.
    1
  433. "Ass whipping". Who has a donkey these days?
    1
  434.  kyleamaral6809  How anybody can pronounce a simple word such as "asking"🪓 incorrectly, continues to amaze me.
    1
  435.  @frederickweeksjr.1189  What's an "Anglo"?
    1
  436. Well it worked. Now he's rich and famous.
    1
  437. Odd how somebody made up, can actually "be" with someone. That's a clever trick, if you can pull it off. Do you believe in the Loch Ness Monster too?
    1
  438.  @stevegiles9080  Is that anywhere near America?
    1
  439.  @knighterrant22  Which pond? It must be a big one, if it takes a week to cross it.
    1
  440. Do you need to wear all your bling just going out to lunch?
    1
  441. You've obviously never studied biology have you?
    1
  442. A curfew. Where do you live. North korea?
    1