Youtube comments of sandgrownun66 (@sandgrownun66).
-
854
-
400
-
365
-
357
-
254
-
221
-
211
-
206
-
188
-
181
-
147
-
132
-
129
-
109
-
93
-
79
-
76
-
74
-
72
-
66
-
61
-
61
-
53
-
51
-
51
-
48
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
@BunFight They might have been achievers, but it wouldn't have much of a step-up to improve on the countries they got out of. However, this doesn't mean that the second-generation are going to be as intelligent as their parents. In fact, the data shows that they aren't.
Also marrying your first cousin, is a sure fire way to ensure it.
The reason people left the UK, was for many reasons, such as weather, experiencing different cultures, or going to another part of the Anglosphere. Not because of dictatorship, political instability, corruption, or destitution.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
@docall18 Firstly, it's Apartheid. Of course, the GDP has increased. In the past, there were global sanctions on the country. Actually, the GDP has been decreasing in recent years. What's also risen sharply is crime, especially murders. Or don't the lives of people matter to you? Also, youth unemployment, which is now the highest in the World. There's also looting, and power cuts, which never happened a couple of decades ago. SA is now a hellhole, and a failed state. Just like Zimbabwe became. Let's see you try and put your spin on that.
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@b1ueocean There was a slight note of irony in my comment. Of course, if you have the right skills, there are opportunities, all over the World. However, only certain individuals possess them, and there are many reasons for not doing so. Also, some of those, might be happy to remain in their homeland. Maybe, they're doing well in Nigeria, because they bring skills the local don't have, but need. Such as in the oil industry, amongst other sectors.
Kazakhstan, Dubai, China, Brazil are not in Africa, as far as I know, but the same applies.
You also don't build the biggest Empire in history, if you're a nation that, as you put it, is "fearful and ignorant".
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Lt.GonvilleBromhead Those patriotic Britons who fought in WWII, had the best intentions, and the welfare of the British people at heart. After they had completed their mission. They just wanted to return home, get on with a normal routine, and raise families. It's just sad that they were betrayed by the politicians, who they elected. In the end it was a pyrrhic victory. It's odd that a country like Japan, which actually suffered a huge defeat, came out stronger, and still want to preserve their unique character and culture. Something which nobody ever seems to question. Unlike the UK, where pride in its achievements, is seen as something to be ashamed of, rather than celebrated.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@BarkusMuhl "People rejecting religion and tradition then living depressed lives devoid of structure and meaning." As though still believing in fairy tales as a fully grown adult, is necessary to lead a fulfilling life. Religion doesn’t have a monopoly on providing a sense of purpose in life. Instead, we can give purpose to our own lives. Taking care of our loved ones, helping needy humans or non-human animals, fighting for good causes (e.g., freedom and justice), striving for moral excellence, contributing to science, music, literature, art, or other areas of enduring human culture — such things can provide the non-religious with a sense of purpose in life.
Imagine an alcoholic asks you “ How can you be happy without alcohol?” Horrendous, isn't it?
Religion is never just a belief, an ideological stance, a world-view. It's like an addiction. People can't imagine how to be happy without god, they think only their religion makes their life meaningful, and they think it's how it should be. But remember, it's they who are the deluded ones!
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@harry.flashman The British did much more in India, than just build the railways. They introduced, good government, the rule of law, respect for the individual, industry, and a massive increase in trade, medicine and the English language, as well as sports. Also, they stopped Indians killing each other, over petty differences. As well as widow burning, and infanticide. The most important contribution however, was the abolition of slavery. Before the arrival of the British, there were more slaves in India, than in the rest of the World combined. And this was done for no other reason, except that it was barbaric as well as immoral. This was just what I could remember off the top of my head, and is just the tip of the iceberg.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@condensedsleep3936 Sometimes you get somebody so ignorant. It's hard to continue wasting your time.
"Control over key public services, such as health and education systems, are mostly devolved. Other areas where powers are mostly devolved include the environment, agriculture, culture, local government and public transport. This means that the Scottish Parliament, the Senedd (the Welsh Parliament) and the Northern Ireland Assembly can make laws on these matters. Because the UK parliament is considered sovereign, it can still make laws in these areas for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland if it wishes to. However, by convention, it usually avoids doing so except by agreement of the devolved institutions. The UK parliament and government make these policy decisions for England, which does not have a devolved parliament."
5
-
5
-
@tmetm13 Unfortunately, humans are innately wired to accept others like themselves, and reject those who aren't. Tattoos and body mods, are great if you want to be immediately judged by anybody who even sees you. It's also good if you like having no job, prospects, and only having similar freaks for friends. Putting your thoughts and feelings on show, and in people's faces, is never the best way to present yourself to others. That's why those with tats, often have them in places they can be hidden. Plus, it's cheap and tacky. Especially, if the tattoos have just been picked out of some ready-made designs in your local tat shop. Or letting everyone know when people in your life were born or died. As though that's of importance to every person you meet.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@dolly77196 "This royal throne of kings, this scepter’d isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England."
What a shame that this will just become a memory.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Irving Maher Nice try, buster. However, do I need to repeat myself. There are NO, ZERO, ZILCH, NIX, NADA, mentions of your supposed jezus. By anybody alive at the same time, as he was allegedly doing the rounds. Not one single solitary word. Do you think that is rather odd, considering he was the most important human to have ever walked this Earth? In reality, it smells like what is termed a "myth". One that started small and got bigger and bigger with each telling. Something hardly to take as fact and waste your life submitting to.
The people you cite, were only mentioned by the anonymous authors, who collectively brought together the scraps of information they had gathered. However, all this was done many decades, after these events were alleged to have.
"don't give us this Dawkins-esque, new atheist shite." What is a "new athiest"? Is it same as the old atheist. ( A "The Who" reference there!) Obviously, you think that it is better that truth be determined by made up fairy stories. Rather than by actual evidence. Best of luck with that one, mate!
4
-
@BarkusMuhl None of the things you highlight, has anything to do with a lack of believe in fairytales. You don't have to prostrate yourself before some imaginary sky daddy, to know right from wrong.
"The sermons which provide wisdom from story telling". You might appreciate listening to stories from an old book, which commands genocide, slavery and the abuse of women and girls, but are these appropriate for a so-called civilized world? If your old book was quietly put out to grass tomorrow. Do you think that the world would be a worse place for it?
"The endorphin release of singing in a group." Yeah, do some karaoke with your mates at the local pub. Or go to a football match every Saturday and sing your team's song.
"The comfort of being in a community environment." You well know that there are many ways to be in a community environment without going anywhere near a place of religion. There are many groups people can join which correspond to their interests and hobbies.
"Religious people tend to live happier and healthier lives. There is NO truth in that. I'd rather pursue truth, than the ramblings of ignorant men (no women of course), who didn't know any better.
The word "simp" is meant to troll young men for doing anything for a girl to get some action he supposedly deserves. Since when has that been a new thing?
"But without structure people tend to get lost." And are you saying that religion is the only thing that can give structure to a civilization? Why not just apply some common sense instead. It's easier and the resulting death toll is a lot smaller!
"I wish you the best." Yeah, I've come to expect that from anybody trying to justify the less savoury parts of their 2,000 plus, year old, crackpot beliefs!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
M No Crybabies "Wow. Who are u to tell anyone their faith, beliefs, or prayers are pointless & unheard/unrecognized?" Er. Maybe because it has been proven so in multiple controlled studies. In fact, it has been proven that prayer leads to more negative outcomes, if people think that their prayers have not been answered. I am aware that god-botherers hate facts, but don't take my word for it. The details of the best known experiment is the" Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP)". This is an experiment that was carried out by the Templeton Foundation on the effectiveness of intercessory prayer on patients recovering from coronary artery bypass graft surgery (e.g., to treat heart disease).
Like all things Templeton, this project was created to provide scientific evidence for religious action (specifically of the Christian variety). The team, under the leadership of Harvard Medical School doctors Herbert Benson and Jeffery A. Dusek, et al., was granted a large research grant (USD $2.4M) to test the efficacy of this type of prayer.
The paper can be found at:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/52aa/c71269472b8ab7af76152be36bd0d6dd0e6f.pdf
A simple summary of the findings is at:
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/31/health/longawaited-medical-study-questions-the-power-of-prayer.html
Unfortunately, the conclusion that prayer doesn't work, was against Templeton's hope that it would confirm that prayer did work. Tough Titty Templeton!
Here is another interesting article, further highlighting the uselessness of prayer:
Proof #2 - Statistically analyze prayer,
http://godisimaginary.com/i2.htm
But there is hope for the religious to find the truth and free themselves from their delusions. This comes from understanding WHY, their beliefs make NO sense.
Here is a good article which helps with that process:
The Arrogance of Prayer,
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/ambigamy/201305/the-arrogance-prayer
""Sky daddy" is not only belittling & insulting to believers." Sky Daddy is not my term, but it nicely sums up the simplistic nature of religious belief. As though there is some kind of omniscient, omnipotent father in the sky, watching our every move. It might make sense, if there was any proof of this, but there ain't.
"it's blasphemy." Blasphemy? If you've ever read your ten commandments you can see that your alleged god is a very insure god, who constantly worries that you might want to worship somebody or something other than him/her/it. Also, your supposed god, seems to have an unhealthy interest about what adults do in the privacy of their own bedrooms. It seems that you have one sick and depraved entity, watching over their celestial version of North Korea!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@100chinarapedbygenghiskhan7 "So no point in comparing the two . India has so many people with different ideology living together." Funny how you mentioned that. India is probably the primest example of a multi-faith society, not working. Four hundred people died in the The Jallianwala Bagh massacre, also known as the Amritsar massacre. However, that pales into insignificance, the huge body count racked up in the Partition of India, in 1947. When Indians finally resumed their tradition of genocidal hatred towards of each other , after two hundred years of relative peace in the British Raj. Instead of peacefully separating into the two new states demanded by the Hindus and Muslims. They decided to see how many they could kill of each other. In the butchery, up to two million Indians lost their lives.
Heaven knows, if a similar conflict happens in Britain, due to growing numbers of those with alien cultures.
You probably thought you had me in a corner. However, you underestimated my knowledge of history. Before Britain should even consider giving India or Pakistan a handout, which didn't even exist as countries under British rule. Those two countries should be compensating the families killed in all that intercommunal violence after Partition.
Finally, what about money for those whose ancestors were slaves in India. Before the British came, there were more slaves in India, than in the rest of the World combined. Also, widow burning and infanticide. Of course, the first thing the British did, was to outlaw these barbaric practices. The same as they did with such abominations, in the rest of the World. Not for economic reasons, as stopping those traditions actually cost money. Instead, because what the Indians were doing to each other, was immoral.
Have a nice day.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dragonmaster1360 Whatever you contend, dude, the British taught you everything you know. From your legal system to the language you speak, you should be thankful, it was the English who landed at Cape Cod, and not people from another country. Otherwise, you might be the same as South and Central America is today.
As for that black eye, are you referring to the War of 1812, where you got your arses well and truly kicked.
One thing the British can be forever proud of, is stopping the trade in humans as property. Something which you took another half century to do. It was probably, one of the reasons you revolted, as you didn't like the thought of having to start treating them as human beings. Sl@very was banned in the eleventh century in the UK. It's a pity that you thought fit to engage in that disgusting practice. It's a stain, that's never gonna wash out.
The British also gave you all the major inventions you take for granted.
As for the military, it wasn't until the 1960's that the US matched British technology. Your first jet aircraft used British engines, because you couldn't make any that were as good as those made by Rolls Royce. Not bad for a country, which spent a fraction of what you p1ssed away on defence. And yes, there is no "s" in defence, as it's an English word.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@narcisioelmurza882 Although most Romanians are law-abiding residents of the UK. There are several cases, where Romanian migrants have been responsible for serious crimes. Simon has talked about these in several videos. Just search for "Romanian" in this channel. One is titled, "How ruthless foreigners are deliberately destroying England’s cultural heritage", and another is, You couldn’t make it up; a typical incident in modern Britain". Also, "Britain’s imported crime wave." and, "How the Big Issue, founded to help homeless people, became a business opportunity for foreigners."
The problem was that because of freedom of movement, the UK could not stop the entry, or deport any criminal, whilst it was a member of the EU. This is still the case, due to existing Human Rights legislation.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@lesigh1749 In the US, they call anyone who teaches at a college, as they often call universities, a "professor". It doesn't matter if they have higher degrees, or not. In the UK, the term is only used for someone, who's been doing post-doctoral research, and lecturing for at least a couple of decades. You have to have published extensively in your field, as well, and probably written a few books on your subject.
There is no way this bloke is a real professor, let alone at one of the UK's and World's, supposedly best university. This is a joke, if ever there was one.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@den4199 Which police stations were set on fire. Also, which businesses were burnt? Give some examples. It was the police who attacked the protestors, not the other way round.
The UK is one of the peaceful and civilised places in the world. That's why so many people want to live there. You know that's the truth. There are hundreds of thousands of people trying to get into the country.
These disturbances are something which have never happened before. British people are the most tolerant people on earth.
The whole reason for the trouble is people who were allowed to live in the UK, were committing crimes against children. These people were biting the hands that fed them, and abusing their welcome. Finally, some British people have had enough of this betrayal. Its not just in the UK, that their are problems with this. It is happening in other countries, which took these people in. However, as usual, the UK was the last to react. You see, they don't like their people being attacked by people they were kind enough to give a home to.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@292Nigel What was more important to the British, was who was in control of the continent of Europe. She fought multiple wars, to stop either French or German hegemony over the whole continent. Germany was trying it again for the second time in the space of two decades. Something still fresh in all those still alive in Britain who had suffered through it. AH broke every agreement made, and could never be considered an ally. Do you think the British Empire could have survived, with Germany controlling the whole of Europe? Russia on the other hand, was no direct threat to the UK. Anyway, AH would have attacked Russia, whether Britain made peace with AH, or not. Japan, would have still attacked the USA, and there would have been another World War, in either situation. Are you also saying that Churchill was not a patriot, who didn't have the best intentions for his country at heart?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"In January 1994, respected racing car designer Jo Marquart died in his adopted Norfolk recently, following heart trouble. He was 57 years old.
In the late 1960s Marquart was noted for his work at McLaren, before he went on to Huron, GRD and Modus. Thereafter, he founded Argo Racing Cars in 1977. The Argo JM6 was one of F3’s pace-setters in 1979/80, in the hands of Roberto Guerrero, David Sears, Thierry Tassin and others, Later, the JM16 and JM19 sports car designs found their niche in IMSA’s Camel Lights class during the 1980s.
Martin Schanche and Will Hoy were often the fastest pair in the C2 class of the World Sportscar Championship, setting a string of pole positions and fastest laps with their Zakspeed 1.8 turbo-powered JM19 in 1987.
Marquart made several applications to find work with racing teams in the early 1960s, when he was working for the Scottish Bus Group in Edinburgh, and when he drew a blank he returned to Winterthur, in his native Switzerland. Team Lotus took him on in the mid 1960s, however, and he worked alongside the late Maurice Philippe before teaming up with Robin Herd and Gordon Coppuck at McLaren. There, he was credited with the successful Can-Am-winning M8A and the less successful M9A 4wd F1 car.
Within a couple of years, however, he had resigned from Colnbrook, in order to do what he preferred, working as a designer for small teams."
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@mikael0317 Newton, Darwin and Kelvin, were very much men of their time. For example, Newton had an interest in alchemy. They had traditional views, as well as the discoveries they made. "Why are you atheists always so angry & hateful towards us believers?" Maybe because atheists cannot understand your belief in things for which there is NO evidence. It's like still believing in Santa Claus, when you're a fully grown adult. Also, if religion was benign, there would be less of an issue. However, the fact that religion has been responsible for the suffering and death of countless innocent people, is the most important concern. Without religion, the world would be a much improved place. The sooner all religion is consigned to the dustbin of history, where it belongs. The better for all humanity.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ianhamilton3113 The Somersett case was a test case in relation to one person, not thousands. If there were many blaq people in England at the time, then that judgement would have been used many times, when other blaq people in England, brought similar cases. However, there were no other cases brought. Surely, there should have been many? English law is based on precedent, so landmark cases, are used to make decision in court all the time. All of which are recorded. There are none, or very few which cite this case.
What has raycist tendencies got to do with it? It's either true that there were thousands of blaq people in England, or there weren't.
What evidence do you have that there were thousands?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my comment?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@oneeyedgirl617 mmmm.... “ country “ is its land, sea and air. Err. It's whatever you want it to mean. It's probably better to consult the OED like Simon would, and see what that defines a country as.
"What generations do you speak of that “built it”." That's an interesting question. A good moment would be the end of the Medieval period. Which was followed by a flowering of thought in the Enlightenment. Finally culminating in the Industrial Revolution. Where Britain through rapid invention and innovation, almost single-handedly created the Modern World, that we all know and enjoy today. No other country has had the positive impact on the globe as Britain. If it's global trade, the rule of law, the spreading of democracy, respect for the individual, education, or the ending of global slavery, simply because it was immoral. Britain was responsible for all these achievements.
Of course, any erosion of freedom anywhere, is a threat to human dignity and needs to be resisted by peaceful means. Just being aware and not asleep or distracted of any forces pushing in the wrong direction is important too.
2
-
@oneeyedgirl617 "all those indigenous populations must have been grateful that the British came, killed a lot of them." More would have died from disease anyway, if the British hadn't shared its inventions and innovations such as modern healthcare, medicine, sanitation, education, better housing, and brought order, so tribes were stopped from killing and enslaving each other.
"As for praising the British for ending slavery." The owning of other human beings as property, was outlawed in the British Isles, as far back as the eleventh century. The British spent the modern equivalent of one trillion pounds, and the death of many British sailors, in ending the global trade in humans, once and for all. A practice, which all cultures had engaged in since the dawn of time. Some Britain's abroad, did engage in this trade, in the last couple of centuries of this vile activity. However, the most important fact is that Britain didn't start slavery, but through its global reach and resources, was able to end it for good. This act is probably the most selfless achievement in the history of humankind. Done at great cost in blood and treasure, and for no other reason, except to right a great wrong.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@b1ueocean OK. That's enough numbers. Feel free to analyse them all you want. You're obviously going to be more interested in Nigeria, than any of us. It's not exactly top of the list of countries, we'd consider moving to.
Leaving a country might be good for those doing so, but it doesn't help build the country they leave. Especially when that country is poor, and needs all the help it can get.
One thing that's true is that Nigeria, is a deeply divided country, on both religious and tribal lines. Simon has talked about this in his videos, although not always in a positive way.
I have read articles about Nigeria, so I am familiar with the problem there. You have already had one civil war, where The Beatles gave back their MBE's in protest at UK involvement in it. Biafra might want independence, but the problem is that they have most of the oil, and that's something the rest of Nigeria will do anything, not to lose.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kewan2045 "you’re clueless lol." Oh really Einstein? Ultimately, the verse refers to death by stoning. A common practice in your old book. Death by stoning was prescribed in the Old Testament Law as a punishment for various sins. Both animals and people could be the subjects of stoning (Exodus 21;2). Or do you deny that stoning is allowed in your old book, as a legitimate way to punish various crimes, not confined to murder? Maybe its time, YOU learned, just how ridiculous is the nonsense that's in your old book? Phuq YOUR stoning and any reference to it. We're supposedly living in the 21st century, NOT in your Stone Age!
What the Bible says about stoning:
"Everybody must get stoned
For touching Mount Sinai
Whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death. Exodus 19;13
For taking "accursed things"
Achan ... took of the accursed thing. ... And all Israel stoned him with stones, and burned them with fire, after they had stoned them with stones. ... So the LORD turned from the fierceness of his anger. Joshua 7;1-26
For cursing or blaspheming
And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him. Leviticus 24:16
For adultery (including urban rape victims who fail to scream loud enough)
If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city. Deuteronomy 22;23-24
For animals (like an ox that gores a human)
If an ox gore a man or a woman, that they die: then the ox shall be surely stoned. Exodus 21;28
For a woman who is not a virgin on her wedding night
If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her ... and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid: Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate: And the damsel's father shall say ... these are the tokens of my daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city. ... But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die. Deuteronomy 22;13-21
For worshipping other gods
If there be found among you ... that ... hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them ... Then shalt thou ... tone them with stones, till they die. Deuteronomy 17;2-5
If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers ... thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die. Deuteronomy 13;5-10
For disobeying parents
If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother ... Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city ... And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die. Deuteronomy 21;18-21
For witches and wizards
A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them. Leviticus 20;27
For giving your children to Molech
Whosoever ... giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. Leviticus 20;2
For breaking the Sabbath
They found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day. ... And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones.... And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the LORD commanded Moses. Numbers 15;32-56
For cursing the king
Thou didst blaspheme God and the king. And then carry him out, and stone him, that he may die. 1 Kings 21;10 "
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jimjones-bk2is OK, so it wasn't you, Jim. Even with a public transport system, people still waited a decade for a family car Firstly, why would you do that, and secondly, what sort of economy, makes people wait that long? Especially in the West, when you could just get one the same day. It's not as though the public transport system in the East was any good. Except for the metro, the buses and trains were dilapidated and overcrowded.
There is a nostalgia because firstly, things, although rationed, was available, and what wasn't you found a way to get. Secondly, the way things are in Russia today, anything was better.
The USSR might have been stable, but it was a terrible place to live. There's stability in the West, but there's also the opportunity to aspire and achieve more with your life.
2
-
@jimjones-bk2is If you're not that other person. maybe you're his clone, Jim?
So life is just about food is it? What if through science and technology you have enough of it. How about reaching a little further, to actually make life worth living? Not just surviving, as under Collectivism.
There can be no argument, over which system is superior. People voted with their hearts, minds and feet, and if given a free choice. They always choose a Free Market economy.
Venezuela has the largest petroleum reserves on the planet, and yet is a bankrupt, failed state. And we all know why that is don't we Jim?
The last but most important fact though is body count. Only religion has been responsible for the demise of more people, than the system you think is so great. One that is contrary to human nature.
Now the UK has a PM, who also grew up subscribing to this nonsense. Imagine how bad Britain is going to be four years time.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Nichola J. Rocha Without Christianity, the world might have been a damn sight better. Who knows? There are many variables which determine events and the jezus myth is just one of many. Why signal that one out? How about the Cambrian Explosion or the extinction of the dinosaurs, though a chance impact of a comet or asteroid. Both are easily more important events than your supposed messiah. A story made up by a group of unknown people, who weren't even alive when your alleged god, was padding around the Middle East a couple of millennia back.
"Christianity is the reason the West doesn't look like Africa, the Middle east, or China." You're running down the very religion, you're meant to be bigging up. Many people in Africa, the Middle East and China ARE christinsane, or at least profess to be. Culture isn't solely based on which religion myth you may choose to subscribe to.
Anyway, if you had been born in India, you would be a Hindu, and you'd know nothing about the religion you have just happened to be indoctrinated into. However, you can still switch brands. It's not too late. Surely, 1.1 Billion Hindus can't be wrong and yet you are right?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This news came as a shock. Simply giving away British territory, and even paying Mauritius to do it. The Chagos islands aren't even connected to Mauritius. They're actually part of the Maldives island chain. The Chagos has been British territory since 1814, a time when Mauritius had no interest in them. On independence, the Mauritian's agreed in a treaty that the the Chagos would remain sovereign British territory, with no conditions. This new government couldn't wait to put international issues, above domestic ones. All whilst, the boats still arrive. They couldn't care less about British people. Of course, Argentina has made a fresh claim on the Falklands. The Gibraltarians will be paying attention, in case they're next. Anything is possible for the next five years. Finally, China will be happy too. They don't respect any territory off the coast of their neighbours. They're also good friends with Mauritius also, and signed a free trade agreement with them recently. Now that Britain has lost control over the Chagos, it puts the whole area at risk. If we see Chinese ships in Mauritius and around the Chagos. Then nobody should be sruprised.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@rmmillerra Obviously, the legal history of SA is your speciality, but that's not the case for everyone else. So black people were discouraged from using the technology introduced by Europeans. OK, but the technology was nonetheless still present, and there was some trickle down to the native population. Wealth that would never have been there otherwise. Since the end of Apartheid, the corruption has been so great, that they can't even keep the lights on, and the country is now suffering from social collapse. Did that happen before 1990? Also, how and why is the current President of SA worth over $500,000,000? You might think that cultural relativism, is real, when in fact, it isn't.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"at the end of the day will cost £800 billion plus". What is your source? If that is true, then how did a country like Spain. With an economy only half the size of the UK, afford theirs? Or how about Belgium, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Morocco, The Netherlands, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, and Uzbekistan. Since when could Morocco, Turkey and Uzbekistan, would be more advanced than the UK?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my original comment?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my original comment?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@SamMejah "Its scientific fact that oxygen levels were 35% at that time." Yeah, you already said that.What difference would an O2 level of 35%, make to the longevity of humans. Certainly, not an increase of 650%, from 120 to 900. In fact, more is not always better. Greater 02 levels can have negative effects. High levels of O2 can be toxic.
At 21% (normal air), for a healthy person, the body is already absorbing the maximum amount of oxygen it possibly can from the lungs. The hemoglobin in the blood is completely saturated with oxygen — each hemoglobin is bound to 4 oxygen atoms (that’s how oxygen is transported via blood throughout the body).
Providing body with more oxygen isn’t going to yield better results. Breathing 35% oxygen isn’t then going to magically make hemoglobin capable of carrying 5 or 6 or 10 oxygen atoms per molecule. It’s physically impossible.
Humans have evolved to function optimally in the present Earth's atmosphere.
However, is there any real point trying to explain this to you. As you are obviously not a Biologist.
"About earth being flat that i dont know. Its yet to be proven". Yeah, and the reason it hasn't been proven to be flat, is that there is ZERO evidence to support that crazy supposition.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Let's assume that these problem tags are made of mild steel? This is probably the worst metal you could use, as it always heavily corrodes in the conditions found here. The only thing to prevent this is adding a significant amount of chromium to make it non-corrosive. All metals were at a premium in Germany during WWII, with coal being the only abundant material being used in metal production. However, Germany had supplies imported from the Axis or occupied territories. There probably was enough Cr available to make stainless tags. However, the other alternative was Aluminium. Why they chose mild steel is a mystery.
Mild steel is very reactive and will readily revert back to iron oxide (rust) in the presence of water, oxygen and ions. General corrosion will often be present along the surface of buried steel components unless the surface is coated with a dielectric, or an electrically insulating, material. The severity of general corrosion depends on the soil conditions (e.g., moisture, degree of aeration, pH). The corrosion can be so minimal as to be insignificant, or it can be severe. Typical general corrosion rates in soil result in a loss of about 0.045 millimeters (mm), with the deepest pits of about 0.23 mm over a period of 9 years. Of course, in this situation corrosion is occurring on both sides of the object.
As for being able to extract the information written on the tag, this is probably impossible. The surface metal is now just an irregular structure of oxide scale, which now occupies approximately six times the volume of the original steel.
However, if anybody has any ideas how to turn back time, and make the impossible possible. It would be interesting to know their ideas.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my comment?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gd3593 The British owes India nothing. There were more slaves in India, when the British arrived, than in the rest of the World combined. They ended this practice because it was wrong. A priceless gift, to those that were enslaved. Britain also gave India the inventions and innovations of the Industrial Revolution, such as railways, and roads. Not to forget, advances in medicine, which has saved many millions of lives, not just in India. Also, democracy, the rule of law, respect for the individual, and education. The increase in trade and economic activity under the British, is easily more than any so-called reparations.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lylecrawford2794 Resist the need to change the way words are spelt, (spelt is another word, which is good as it is). There's nothing wrong with spelling it, colour. That reflects its origin. You're never going to make English perfect, so why tittivate around the edges. People outside Murica, never have any problem spelling, colour, harbour, etc., The same with programme, except when its a computer program.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mikael0317 Oh no! Not the tired, old Fine-Tuning Argument again! Namely, how could everything have happened by chance. Conclusion: A god must have done it. Talk about putting the cart before the horse!
“This is rather as if you imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in — an interesting hole I find myself in — fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!' This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the air heats up and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and smaller, frantically hanging on to the notion that everything's going to be alright, because this world was meant to have him in it, was built to have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches him rather by surprise. I think this may be something we need to be on the watch out for.” ― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt.
Well, at least I hoped you learnt something new today.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kirineloch9292 You obviously don't understand or appreciate, the deep affinity and relationship, an indigenous people, have to their land. After many thousands of years, they are almost bound together as one entity. Since the end of the last Ice Age, about 10,000 years ago. Britain, was first populated by ancient Britons. Then there was settlement by Angles, Saxons, Danes, (Romans, who invaded and then left),Vikings and Normans. All those that stayed, were from Northern Europe, and had very similar cultures and religious beliefs. So any incomer, quickly assimilated into the local culture. Can the same be said, for migrants from Africa or Asia? Do they share the same history and values, as the native Britons?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CrocodileTear Yes, I understand. But with no internal fixation, compound fractures like those caused by ordnance, will never heal.
Previously, I've looked at the collections of photos of those who survived being hit by musket balls, during the American Civil war. The damage caused and the lack of modern techniques to aid in healing is quite apparent.
Surely, if internal fixation was not available. Bone healing would not occur, and the affected limb would eventually have to be amputated?
I don't know much about Orthopedic surgery and its history, especially in relation to WWII . But there will probably be literature relating to it somewhere.
Finally, it's interesting to see the materials used at a time only eight decades ago. In what was essentially still a pre-synthetic age. Very little plastic, just rubber, metal and glass!
2
-
@CrocodileTear I can't see the wire in the link you included.
From the research I've been doing. I can't find anything about what happened to the the men in WWII, who survived their injuries, but sustained, severe compound fractures, especially of the femur.
In these cases, there might be poor union, or even non-union of the bone. Without internal fixation, as used in recent decades. Successful healing of the bone would not occur. Without this, the treatment would be amputation of the affected limb, at aa later date?
Maybe, I can find out more with further enquiry, of those who know more.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
By the mid-1980's, when this was made. It was probably all shot on videotape. The strobing effect on the monitors featured confirm this. However before that, film was sometimes used for location shots, with videotape used in the TV studio. Film was less bulky than early portable video camera recorders. In the 1970's, the BBC often shot dramas, using 16mm film for outdoor shots and video cameras for the studio shots. 16mm was convenient to use (as used on the Apollo space missions) and had a similar definition, to that of PAL video recordings. Such an example of this is, Pennies From Heaven (1977). If you watch the series, you can see the difference between the way the indoor and outdoor scenes look. By the start of the 1980's, it was practical to use videotape on location, as well as in the studio. As by that time professional, all in one shoulder-mounted camcorders were available and video, unlike film, did not require time-consuming processing before it could be edited.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@rayturner7855 "they are a private business." Maybe you are a little confused. The BBC is a public corporation of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport. A government body. Maybe you are referring to a separate entity, called "BBC Studios"? This is a British content company and commercial subsidiary of the BBC. It was formed in April 2018 through the merger of the BBC's commercial production arm and the BBC's commercial international distribution arm, BBC Worldwide. BBC Studios creates, develops, produces, distributes, broadcasts, finances and sells content around the world, returning around £200m to the BBC annually in dividends and content investment. Maybe you learnt something?
As for the alleged damage to the Gill statue. That is a matter for the English judicial system. We will have to wait and see what transpires.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mikhailmik "fighting for freedom from NATO". In case you didn't know, Russia isn't part of NATO. NATO would never have considered attacking "World's number two army". However, now the pathetic state of the Russian military has been exposed by her aggressive war. Her enemies might think again about not invading Russia. The USSR twice took large areas of China in the early 20th century. China has not forgotten losing that land, due to its weakness at the time. Now China is the second largest economy, and can afford a large, modern military. It has the power, to attempt to retake those stolen lands, if it sees fit. Especially now it knows that the Russian military is so pathetic. All Russia has now, is to threaten the use of nuclear weapons. Does Russia really want to risk WWIII, and nuclear annihilation, over a failed attempt to invade a sovereign neighbour, like Ukraine?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dracofury1173 OK. You asked for it.
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@monsterglo There is no mention in the Bible of a pet heaven or dog heaven—and for good reason. Animals cannot take the steps needed to qualify for “the heavenly calling.” (Hebrews 3:1) These steps include taking in knowledge, exercising faith, and obeying God’s commands. (Matthew 19:17; John 3:16; 17:3) Only humans were created with the prospect of living forever.—Genesis 2:16, 17; 3:22, 23.
To go to heaven, earthly creatures must be resurrected. (1 Corinthians 15:42) The Bible mentions a number of resurrections. (1 Kings 17:17-24; 2 Kings 4:32-37; 13:20, 21; Luke 7:11-15; 8:41, 42, 49-56; John 11:38-44; Acts 9:36-42; 20:7-12) However, every one of them involved humans, not animals.
So the Bible is clear on this. No pets in heaven. Also, don't shoot the messenger. God made the rules, not me. Whatever shall be, shall be.
1
-
1
-
@zerotolerance9004 No, what I saying, and all the evidence supports this, is that god doesn't care about humans, either. That's because god is made up concept, only believed in by gullible people, who can't think for themselves. Obviously, from your comments, you're one of those who falls into that category. I can't imagine living life everyday, holding such fairy tale beliefs in your head. There are people who just see the World, without supernatural thinking, and they do just fine. Even animals and plants thrive and live full lives, without any thoughts about some supreme sky-daddy watching their every move.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my original comment?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pmoran7971 In which publication did you read about the bones being found. Where they also sub-Saharan African, which is the definition of black Africa.
Of course, early hominids, first evolved in the Rift valley In East Central Africa, But that was hundreds of thousands of years ago. There were also the Neanderthals and Denisovans later on, which interbred with those, whom had left Africa.
Whiter skin is a much more recent feature.
As to England's indigenous population being mixed. The majority is made up of ancient Britons, Angles, Saxons, Danes and Vikings. All closely related Northern European peoples, with closely related and intertwined cultures. Not mixed in any Global sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nigelsynnott7344 "The migrant crisis has worsened since Brexit, and we can't send them back to the EU under the Dublin accord." The EU has and still is doing an appalling job in protecting it's borders. None of the many thousands of economic migrants, could even have reached the UK, if it wasn't for freedom of movement within the EU. By the way, its not the Dublin Accord, which is for Engineers, but rather the Dublin Regulation, previously known as the Dublin Convention. This deals with claims for asylum, within the EU. However, the majority arriving are not asylum seekers, but rather economic migrants, which have abandoned their families. The EU should be handling these migrants, not dumping them on the UK.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@beaujac311 OK. So all the hundreds of thousands of deaths on the Union side were, just to keep together a political entity. Nothing to do with slavery. Glad we got that one sorted. Each Southern state, had every to right to secede from United States, should they have wished, and that's the course of action they took. Instead, a war started, with the aim of the North being to force them back into the United States, and force them to relinquish slavery and their right to self-determination.
Anyway, American history, is not my history. So why should I even care about it?
How can you separate any slavery. What's so special about what happened in America? In fact, the rest of the World is tired of your BS, such as BLM, and looting in inner cities, which is spreading to other countries.
Candace Owens should be free to say anything she wants, especially when it's based on facts, and compensated for her time. Or maybe, you want to live in a echo chamber, where you never hear a contrary argument?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@olliemck60 There's a saying., dude. If you're stuck in a hole, then maybe stop digging. You got it wrong, so why don't you just admit it, and move on. The American Civil War had been a possibility, since the country had be founded. It was about each state's right to have control over its affairs. That's why they were called "states", and not "counties", or some other such term. In fact the original thirteen states were sovereign countries, which united together. Much the same as the UK is.
You seem woefully ignorant of the history of your own country. However, it's taken for granted that most Muricans are. Big with the mouth, although nobody's home.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@roxximusik8958 They weren't married. This is something I've pointed out in the comments. Marriage is becoming the exception, not the rule. If people do get married, it's often as a second-thought. They might already have children. In my opinion, why not commit yourself to each other through marriage, and then start a family? People seem to show little concern for creating a strong, stable environment for them and their children, if they choose to have any.
A logical explanation was that the woman suddenly decided to take her life. It's not unknown for people not to give any indication, that this was on their mind. Sometimes, it's a split-second decision. Drowning yourself intentionally isn't an easy thing to do. The body naturally resists water entering the lungs. You have to overcome that and intentionally breathe in water, which is something you would never consider doing.
She did have problems, but so does everybody. Alcohol abuse is something which there is support for, and it is possible for people to stop drinking. As for the menopause, it affects each woman differently. However, the symptoms can be managed with medication. Other than that, she seemed like a healthy person.
She was not that old, and had everything to live for. What his most sad, is that she left two girls without a mother.
Hopefully, a full explanation will be found. If only to stop the speculation, and set everyone's mind at rest.
1
-
1
-
@Watchmaker_Gereon-Schloesser George I, in full George Louis, German Georg Ludwig, (born May 28, 1660, Osnabrück, Hanover [Germany]—died June 11, 1727, Osnabrück), elector of Hanover (1698–1727) and first Hanoverian king of Great Britain (1714–27). The British Royal family is well-known for its connections to Germany.
As you know, Linux system is derived from Unix and it is a continuation of the basis of Unix design. Linux distributions are the most famous and healthiest example of direct Unix derivatives. It is also more efficient than Windows, and can run on older hardware. This means less e-waste being sent to Africa or China.
People always look at the past, and see it as a better time. In the future, people will probably look back at 2023 with good feelings.
I don't know why this is so. Maybe, it does show that even with advances in technology. Things are getting worse, and not better?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Craig121000 I already told you that about that message. It is there in an edited state directly below your comment, "Nonsense, Project Fear died months ago its now Project Fact." Comments are ordered according to when they were posted, edited or not. The start of my comment, "@John Smith "Nonsense, Project Fear died months ago its now Project Fact." Oh, and what "facts" are those?", is the same as it was before editing. In editing, as well as posing the question. I added a response, as to why there is as many lies in the remoaner camp, as there are alleged "facts".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tonymccaul7159 "This is true, but it was such thinking then kept women out of sport and other such activities until relatively recently." What are you talking about? Females have been engaged in sport for decades. However, would you expect biological women to be able to compete against biological males, in strength sports, such as weightlifting or swimming? It's just reality. Maybe, that's also the reason there are jobs which are male dominated, such as mining, or deep sea diving, where physical strength is of primary importance. Male police officers are going to match the physical strength of the mostly male suspects arrested. Of course, there is a role for female officers, but more in a support role.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Public health experts have found that metzitzah b’peh can put babies at risk of getting a harmful virus called herpes simplex virus type 1 or HSV-1. Some of these babies became seriously ill. Some developed brain damage, and others have died. There is no proven way to eliminate the risk of HSV-1 infection from direct oral suctioning, though there are options to reduce the risk.
Many adults carry HSV-1 in their bodies. They may have no symptoms or only mild symptoms, such as cold sores. Unlike adults, babies are too young to fight the virus. When a baby gets the virus, they could have brain damage, develop a lifelong disability or, in some cases, die.
A baby can get the virus when the mohel's saliva gets on the baby's skin and circumcision wound. If a mohel does metzitzah b’peh, even for just a moment, there is no way to avoid this risk. Even if the mohel has no symptoms or obvious signs of HSV-1, such as cold sores near their mouth, they could still have the virus and not know it.
As a baby’s immune system is not mature enough to fight infection, HSV-1 is a serious risk for babies. If infected, babies will need to be hospitalized for at least two weeks of intravenous medicine to fight the infection. Even with treatment, the infection could result in lifelong disability, and babies could even die from the infection.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamesfrazier1731 Uncle Trump is the only human alive with no shadow. That's how awesome he is. Almost like a divine being, but not quite.
Uncle T signed up for two debates with Old Joe. However, since Harris stopped lying that Old Joe was fine, and he pulled out. That's never going to happen. She hasn't been officially been nominated as the candidate, and that will only happen at the DNC.
So why are you lying that Trump cancelled anything? Firstly, she's not the official nominee yet, and secondly, he committed to debate old Joe, and not somebody else.
Maybe, you should do your research, before you fabricate stories.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow! You managed to come up with all that bollox, that nobody will ever read.
Funny how you never once mention the Biden Crime family. Comatose Joe is a career politician, who achieved nothing in a five decade career. How could someone amass a $17 million fortune. When only on a Senator's salary. Or what about his drug-addicted, idiot son, using his dad's name to be paid millions in "consultation" fees, for things he knows phuq all about.
The US Justice Department filed three felony and six misdemeanour tax offences against Biden, 53. Biden “engaged in a four-year scheme to not pay at least $1.4 million in self-assessed federal taxes he owed for tax years 2016 through 2019,” the indictment filed in a US district court in central California read.
It further added that Biden instead spent this money on personal expenditures including luxury hotels, cars, clothing and more than $70,000 on drug rehabilitation.
Prosecutors said that between 2016 and October 2020, he received more than $7m in total gross income.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You're ignorant.
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@christinalogan311 "A body can lie in a river for days/weeks & even months if it’s caught up in underwater roots,debris, reeds plants etc," But this probably shouldn't have been the case here. The river was a prime search location. It is is not a big river, and the vegetation is at it's lowest, at this time of year. How a large and experienced search team couldn't locate her body, is a mystery. Personally, I'd have had a large number of people in canoes and kayaks searching sections of the river, starting at it's mouth and working upstream to the point of disappearance. Without knowing all the details, it was probably just one of those freak occurrences, that her body wasn't located earlier.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamesmmusic5806 So you couldn't name one WW2 plane from the Netherlands? In 1940, the Dutch had eight different homebuilt types. Seven from Fokker, and one from Koolhoven. Neither the Netherlands nor Sweden were, as you call it "famous" for producing aircraft during WWII. Firstly, the Dutch aircraft industry was effectively shutdown by the German invasion in 1940. However, they produced several types of advance military aircraft in the run up to the war. As for Sweden, they were nominally neutral. So they continued to build several models of indigenous aircraft during the conflict. Romania was allied to Germany through most of WWII. So they were not occupied, and therefore free to build aircraft, using parts aquired from other Axis states. Although not a large number. Overall, Romania was much larger country than either of the two countries mentioned, and yet both were still were able to produce their own aircraft. You should also look at Poland. A country with a similar population to Romania, which also produced a range of aircraft in the run up to WWII. Also, Finland and Australia, with only a fraction of the Romanian population. Yet were still able to produce homemade fighter aircraft during the war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@paulmerchant4416 "Europeans began to drain African natural resources including palm oil, ivory, rubber, gold, diamonds, metals, and cotton." Much of these resources were not being used by the locals. New plantations were created, which provided jobs and better living conditions. Also infrastructure, such as road, railways and ports for trade were built. The Africans benefitted from the modern innovations and inventions that were brought. There were negatives, but these were outweighed by the positives. If you asked any African whether the quality of life is better now, than before the Europeans arrived. What do you think the answer would be? The populations of Africa and Asia are exploding, due to Western medicine and technology.
1
-
@paulmerchant4416 "The report reveals the degree to which British companies now control Africa’s key mineral resources, notably gold, platinum, diamonds, copper, oil, gas and coal." Again. All these resources would never have been used, unless the West, extracted them. If a company spends millions, or even billions in capital investment, then it has the right to any profits received. Or maybe, you prefer the Communist models, where everybody is poor. Countries outside the developed world, are known for their corruption, which is endemic. The poor only get poorer, and the rich only get richer. And as these countries are now, all independent, sovereign states. What business do ex-colonizers, have in telling them, how to run their countries? You can't have it both ways.
1
-
@paulmerchant4416 "Africa should be extracting their own minerals selling it". They didn't in the past. And it was only the arrival of Europeans, with the technology they brought, that started the process. They are still reliant on outside technology and expertise to this today. Also, do you expect the foreign companies to simply walk away from their investment. The Africans could of course, nationalise these companies, but due to the resulting bad management, they'd probably end up as other countries who did so. Take the old USSR, which collapsed economically, and Venezuela, which squandered it's oil wealth and suffered the same fate, including hyperinflation. You really need to educate yourself on these subjects. I can't do it for you, by keep answering your questions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@donwoodward7944 Legal wrangles are part and parcel of the music industry. Or are you aware of this? I can provide a long list of prominent examples, if you like. Including John Lennon, George Harrison, Radiohead, The Verve, The Rolling Stones, CCR, Madonna, The Beach Boys, Huey Lewis, and Taylor Swift. The matter was settled out of court, and everyone was satisfied. Without the sample, the song might not have been a hit. Then Bowie and Queen wouldn't have got the money they did.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nunyabiznazz2210 I'm familiar with the Beat poets and Gil Scott Heron. It's good that someone else has bothered to do some reading about VI.
Between the ages of 13 and 14, he practiced breakdancing, which led to his friends nicknaming him "Vanilla", as he was the only one in the group who was not black.
In January 1987, Ice was stabbed five times during a scuffle outside of City Lights. After spending ten days in the hospital, Ice signed a contract with the owner of City Lights, Tommy Quon, and his management company, Ultrax. Two years later, Ice would open for EPMD, Ice-T, Stetsasonic, and Sir Mix-A-Lot on the Stop the Violence Tour.
On the basis of Ice's good looks and dance moves, Public Enemy tried to convince their producer, Hank Shocklee, to sign Ice to Def Jam, but Ice later signed a contract with SBK Records in 1990. SBK remixed and re-recorded Hooked under the title To the Extreme. The reissue contained new artwork and music.
To the Extreme became the fastest selling hip hop album of all time, spending sixteen weeks at #1 on the Billboard 200 and selling eleven million copies. SBK Record executive Monte Lipman stated that he received calls from radio stations reporting over 200 phone calls requesting "Ice Ice Baby". SBK wanted Ice on the road as soon as possible. MC Hammer, an old acquaintance from his club days, had Ice on as an opening act on his tour.
Vanilla Ice, wrote "Ice Ice Baby" in 1983 at the age of 16, basing its lyrics upon his experiences in South Florida. The lyrics describe a shooting and his rhyming skills. The chorus of "Ice Ice Baby" originates from the signature chant of the national African American fraternity Alpha Phi Alpha. Of the song's lyrics, Van Winkle stated in a 2001 interview that "If you released 'Ice Ice Baby' today, it would fit in today's lyrical respect among peers, you know what I'm sayin'? [...] My lyrics aren't, 'Pump it up, go! Go!' At least I'm sayin' somethin'."
So he paid is dues. Not to mention later drug addiction problems, and an attempt at suicide, which he was lucky to survive. The man's done more in his life, than most people ever could dream of.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ericseitzler81 I probably know more about your old book, than most of those who pretend to believe in it. That's usually the way it is. It's because those who believe in reason, logic, and facts to determine truth. Tend to do their research.
Of course, the unknown men (women were kept illiterate), who wrote the book were ignorant. All people a couple of thousand years ago knew almost nothing about the world and their surroundings. It wasn't their fault. They just didn't know any better.
Darwin worked on his theory of evolution for several decades, before publishing his evidence. This was just a century and a half ago. This was already in the post-enlightenment era, where great advances had been made in the field of science. Since then his theory has been tested and improved upon constantly, and will always be, as new facts are uncovered. Still after all this. Darwin's theory still holds true. Along with Newton, his theory of evolution are probably the greatest contributions to the advancement of knowledge in human history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kozmickhandi9951 No deflection. Just showing what nonsense this reparation scam is. Why don't you just develop your country, without demanding handouts from others. Britain is just a small island, yet its people built the most powerful country in the World by themselves from nothing, and with no help from outside. They did this through invention and innovation, which resulted in the Industrial Revolution, and was responsible for the Modern World.
As well as that, they spread the concept of good governance, no corruption, the rule of law, education, the rights of humans, and an end to slavery.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelslator64 "You know the police KNEW about those crimes?" Of course. Your ignorance is staggering! Maybe you should research, "Operation Augusta" and the the subsequent Operation "Green Jacket". Also the BBC documentary, "Three Girls", and it's follow-up "The Betrayed Girls". Operation Augusta was closed down in 2005, as part of a cover-up. In case it was seen as raycist, and caused tension in the community. Operation Green Jacket, was opened in 2018, to investigate the earlier cover-up. This would never have happened, without the tireless efforts of whistle-blower, and ex-cop Maggie Oliver. More sickeningly, you besmirch the name of Victoria Agoglia, a vulnerable fifteen year old girl, murdered by these gangs. Before accusing others of having an unsound mind. Maybe you should look in the mirror first?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kewan2045 "your an idealist". It's actually "you're" and not "your". An idealist? Yes, if those ideas can be backed up by evidence. "thinking science has explained all there is to life." Only an idiot, thinks that we know everything about the universe and why we exist, but saying "god must have done it", has NO explanatory power whatsoever. "yet you know got doesn’t exist." I never said that a "god", does not exist. There is just ZERO evidence that such an entity does. How can you believe it to be a fact, in the absence of any evidence? It is not my responsibility to prove that your does not exist. You make the claim that he/she/it does. Therefore, it is contingent on you, to provide evidence to support your claim. Wot u got? "I KNOW BETTER". Oh, really. What make you superior to the rest of us? Pray teach us, oh exhorted one! "I do not follow a religion but you cannot tell me there is no god." Not my task, but can you prove your claim there is?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@trevormcdonald385 E P, was a patriot and a nationalist. Other countries are a home for their native people. Why shouldn't the nations of the British Isles be a home for each of their people's too. Japan is, Korea is, China is, India is, Nigeria is, Thailand is, Vietnam is etc., In fact, most countries are, and nobody criticizes them for keeping their identity. Everyone should have the right to preserve their culture, without pressure to change it, by outsiders or even by the acquiescence of those in authority.
1
-
1
-
@trevormcdonald385 To be honest. I don't know if it's apathy by governments, or there is some underlying agenda. If you asked indigenous Britons, whether they approved of mass immigration, most would say no. Probably, many of those migrants would also say, no. The problem is, that people have so many other issues in their lives, that this specific issue never gets addressed. Again, is this intentional or is there some reason behind it. Maybe, if enough people are effected by its effects, and it does become a vote-winning issue. Then something might be done.
1
-
1
-
@trevormcdonald385 Not sure how much laws restricting Commonwealth economic migrants had on reducing numbers. There are criminals from the West Indies, who committed serious crimes, but they can't be deported because of old EU Human Rights legislation. Once they set foot in the UK, it is pretty much impossible to send them back home. Most migrants, are economic migrants, who have travelled half-way around the World. They are allowed to stay, even though they have no right to. Many destroy their documentation, so it's difficult to find out where they came from, or more importantly, who they are. The vast majority are also fighting-age males, and most a certain religion.
As for Brexit, a major factor was mass immigration, mostly from Eastern Europe. Due to freedom of movement, there could be no regulation, as to whether those coming had any skills to offer, or were of good character. As soon as they came, they had immediate access to benefits, school and health services, which British people had built. Suddenly, having to pay for a couple of million extra people, would put any country under pressure.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lesley1174 There's a saying, that if you want to get out of a hole, then maybe, it's better to stop digging. Of course the use of a Knighthood ends when the holder dies. However, the honorific title remains, when referring to that person.
"If it was still alive Cameron was going to set the procedure in process to strip it of the title." So you've just answered the question by contradicting yourself. If he was still alive when the revelations came out. Then Cameron could have removed his title. However, he wasn't, so the current prime Minister couldn't. There are several dozen people in the twentieth century alone, , who were honoured by a British Monarch. Who subsequently had titles they conferred removed. If you want their names. I can give them. Some examples are, Harvey Weinstein, Benito Mussolini, Anthony Blunt, Kim Philby, Ernest Brooks, Robert Mugabe, Naseem Hamed, Roger Casement, James Crosby, Jean Else, Rolf Harris, Vicky Price, Lester Piggott, Stuart Hall and others.
In 2012, the Cabinet Office confirmed that there was no knighthood to revoke in Savile's case. Former Prime Minister David Cameron raised the prospect of Savile being posthumously stripped of the honour in the wake of the allegations of sexual abuse against young girls. However, a Cabinet Office spokesman said: "It's a living order and then you cease to be a member when you die. "There isn't an honour to revoke." Savile would have been stripped of his knighthood if his crimes were exposed during his lifetime. The Forfeiture Committee said: "The Forfeiture Committee can confirm that had James Wilson Vincent Savile been convicted of the crimes of which he is accused, forfeiture proceedings would have commenced." Knighthoods can only be held by a living person and fall away after their death, so they cannot be removed once the person has died.
So there you have it. You can even check the Wikipedia article, about Sir Jimmy Savile. He will forever be referred to as Sir Jimmy Savile, whether you like it or not.
1
-
@lesley1174 You don't learn, or give up do you? The title can only be rescinded, whilst the person is living. If they die first, the title still stays associated with there name. If those responsible, had removed his title before he died, then it would have been plain old Jimmy Savile. However, they didn't. So he's officially recorded as Sir Jimmy Savile. The same as with any other deceased Knight of the Realm. Such as Sir Isaac Newton, Sir Winston Churchill, Sir Charles Chaplin, Sir John Gielgud, Sir Alec Guinness, Sir Bruce Forsyth. The list of dead Knights, goes on. Also, don't expect the Wikipedia article about Sir Jimmy Savile to change anytime soon, because whoever wrote it, is aware of the rules in respect to this, and is following them. The bottom line is that you can protest all you like, but there's nothing you or anyone else, can do about it. So just learn to accept, and live with it. You have no choice in the matter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SillyLittleAshTree Maybe, you think twice about extolling the virtues on Manchuria under the Japanese occupation. The trains probably ran on time, but would you actually want to have lived there if you weren't Japanese?
"Manchuria was on par with any European city in regards to development". Manchuria was an area of China, under Japanese colonial possession. It was not a city.
"the hospitals and engineering schools were just as advanced". It's odd how you mention the hospitals in Manchuria. Harbin the biggest city in the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo, certainly had the interested of local residents at heart. In fact, it was home to the Japanese armies, Unit 731, which experimented on kidnapped Chinese. Experiments included disease injections, controlled dehydration, biological weapons testing, hypobaric pressure chamber testing, vivisection, organ procurement, amputation, and standard weapons testing. What a wonderful place to be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ludicrousbkill You can't even get your alleged figures right, so now it's 6, rather than 3? It also depends as a "war"? Many millions have died in religiously motivated violence, in pogroms, forced displacements, and so-called "blasphemy" within their own religions, amongst many other events. Without religion these would never have occurred.
However religion isn't just responsible for deaths. it's also the restrictions it imposes on people's freedom. Such as who you can marry, what you can eat, what you can wear, who you can associate with, and numerous other ridiculous rules
Religion is the biggest disease of mankind.
“Religion is an insult to human dignity. Without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.” ― Steven Weinberg.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shelaghintallura5273 That would be a good idea. However, there's plenty of bleeding heart, open border nut jobs, who will fund her, if the taxpayer doesn't. After all, we wouldn't want her "human rights" to infringed, would we? It seems like the appeals process never ends. All it needs is a decision by a woke judiciary to turn it around. Remember, her and her team only has to win once, but the government has to keep on winning. It time to put a stop to this insanity. She made her bed, she should lie in it. The UK intelligence agencies has thousands of people of a certain demographic on watchlists, costing the taxpayer, billions every year. How far do you have to go out of your way, for the sake of "diversity"?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andread5560 Slavery ended in England in the eleventh century. Slaves could not be kept there. What English people did outside England was different. It was outside the control of the English government.
The Portuguese were the biggest slave traders. They transported millions of slaves to South America. You can see this by all the black people in Brazil.
Europeans, especially Britain, brought civilisation to Africa. They also brought medicine, good government, a legal system, and schools Also, trade and technology, such as roads, railways, ports and telegraph.
When the Europeans left Africa, it was a much better place to live, than before they came.
It's just sad, that the Africans were not able carry on improving their countries. There are no successful black African countries, where there are no white people. Even countries like Zimbabwe and South Africa are failed states, due to corruption and bad government, by the black people in power now.
There's only so much Western countries to help the Third World. If countries in Africa and Asian, can't help themselves. Then what more can the developed countries do?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Gia_Mc_Fia You're hilarious. You made me chuckle. The original comment you made was so sickly sweet, it's enough to make a normal person sick. In today's World, being severely mentally ill. Like the human/ wannabe reptile in this video. Seems to be something that should be applauded and celebrated. Maybe, it's time for MAGA, (Make Asylums Great Again), to be put in action. Or how about bringing in a compulsory military service for the youth?That'd certainly knock them into shape, and toughen up, all the weak, beta male, cucks, that never being told no, seems to created.
1
-
What. Your stupidity?
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@StaalBurgher0 They did. There are lots of Indian business owner. Some have been there for several generations, and followed the British to SA, when it was a developing British colony. However, the Indians are sick and tired of the violence and looting, which has become endemic, as public order breaks down. They work hard for their money, and don't want to just give things away, and risk being killed every day. I think there was a video by Serpentza, where he describes this. Some Indians are so p!ssed off, that they don't care if those responsible for the violence, live or die.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PAMELAPORTER-ci7mr OK, Pam. Lets start with the billionaires who lost their fortune and made it back again, Uncle Trump, Yasumitsu Shigeta, Maggie Magerko, W. Herbert Hunt, Robert Stiller, and the Hunt Brothers.
Seven multimillionaires who lost it all but came back are, James Altucher, Martha Stewart, Larry King, Dorothy Hamill, Bill Bartmann, George Foreman, and Walt Disney.
I hope I didn't keep you waiting too long, Pam?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vanpallandt5799 Really, What happened to just giving your name and number? Do you want your son to be possibly given a higher grade, due to his ethnicity? In the US there are many people, who got into universities and jobs, due to affirmative action. Of course, they took the opportunity. However maybe, one day they'll that they're a fraud, and it might eat away at them.
What about seif-identification, though. You might look one ethnicity which has a low oppression score, but identify as one with a high one? Who's going to deny you, in this degenerating World?
1
-
@vanpallandt5799 The Spanish have a whole lexicon of terms for people of mixed ancestry, and who's what, and how much. An Octoroon, anyone? Also Spanish, like the other Romance languages and German, are gender-based. Substituting Latino or Latina with Latinx, is a nightmare. It might seem righteous, in the tiny minds of woke lunatics. However, in real life, best of luck with it, from those that actually speak it full-time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tym5483 I understand your Murican "colloquialism", all too well. The issue is why are Americans so prudish about using good, old Anglo-Saxon English words?There is the word "arse", which has the same origin, as the German word "arsch". Next, Americans will be calling "toilets", "bathrooms", or even more stupidly, "restrooms". Where neither bathing or resting is done. What is the Murican sensitivity about describing things in a way, which actually describes their function? The idiocy of Americans, seems to have no bounds.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Second Chance The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my comment?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wally Reyes "She reads GOD'S WORD". Dogs word, my arse. Don't you mean the insane ramblings of ignorant Bronze Age, Middle Eastern goat herders, who didn't know any better?
"What is the meaning of life in the flesh?" How would I know. Maybe it was an accident. Perversely, that has more explanatory power than your, "god must have dun it" drivel.
"If GOD IS SPIRIT,why did HE create the material/flesh creation?" Who says your alleged god is a "spirit", you? What's so special about you, over all the others who have tried to prove the existence of your god and failed miserably every time. As to why he/she/it created "flesh". How the phuq would I know. Maybe he/she/it was bored and needed a hobby.
"You are completely clueless,willfully ignorant." Yeah and you know all the answers, I suppose? It's better to admit you don't know the answer yet, than resort to a bad "explanation". No explanation can never be wrong, but a wrong explanation can never be right.
"The question is why,why so willfully ignorant?" Maybe because we don't know all the answers yet, as to why the universe and ourselves exist. However, resorting to ludicrous pre-packaged bible nonsense, certainly isn't going to give us the truth either!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bob Wilkins Bob. You're the architype of all that's wrong with Western civilisation today, and why it's collapsing. Whether you like it or not, it's survival of the fittest out there, and that's always been the case, before humans were ever on this planet. If you show weakness, someone will take advantage of it. They'll take your stuff, and not even thank you for it. All indigenous Westerners need to do, is show some backbone, and stand up for themselves and continued existence. Otherwise, you and your culture, is going to be extinct sooner or later.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my original comment?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@traviscarter1023 OK, so you want the 40 acres and a mule, that you might have been promised? What are you going to do with them. Farm in the inner city? What percentage of farmers in the USA are black, anyway? So you could sell the mule, but what demand is there for them today, when everybody with a farm has tractors. If you did sell it, you might get a few dollars. But again, there ain't much use for mules in the city. What about the 40 acres? You might get a few dollars for that too. Firstly, because you're not going to farm it. Secondly, as all land in the USA is already owned by someone, you're going to have to take it from someone, and what are you going to do, if they point a gun in your face, and tell you no? Thirdly, a viable farm, needs to be at least four hundred acres, which is ten times what you're going to take from someone. Fourthly, what happens if the 40 acres you get your hands on it, just a patch of desert. What are you going to grow there? You can make the desert fertile, but it would take millions of dollars to do that. Personally, the reparations you were promised, are probably more of a burden than a benefit. How does that sound?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Alexandrias.Washington I already addressed this in a previous comment I made in this thread. However, you obviously failed to read it.
However, as I'm the generous type, I will repeat it, just for you.
"OK, so you want the 40 acres and a mule, that you might have been promised? What are you going to do with them. Farm in the inner city? What percentage of farmers in the USA are black, anyway? So you could sell the mule, but what demand is there for them today, when everybody with a farm has tractors. If you did sell it, you might get a few dollars. But again, there ain't much use for mules in the city. What about the 40 acres? You might get a few dollars for that too. Firstly, because you're not going to farm it. Secondly, as all land in the USA is already owned by someone, you're going to have to take it from someone, and what are you going to do, if they point a gun in your face, and tell you no? Thirdly, a viable farm, needs to be at least four hundred acres, which is ten times what you're going to take from someone. Fourthly, what happens if the 40 acres you get your hands on it, just a patch of desert. What are you going to grow there? You can make the desert fertile, but it would take millions of dollars to do that. Personally, the reparations you were promised, are probably more of a burden than a benefit. How does that sound?" That's my two penn'orth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lordofthestings “Now I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds”. These words, from the Sanskrit scriptural text the Bhagavad Gita, are famously attributed to J Robert Oppenheimer, the architect of the atom bomb.
Oppenheimer later referenced another verse from the Bhagavad Gita when recalling his state of mind as he witnessed the Trinity explosion in the New Mexico desert on 16 July, 1945:
If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendour of the mighty one.
These verses refer to the sublime form, “Vishwarupa”, Lord Krishna takes in the Bhagavad Gita when he reveals his divine nature to the warrior prince, Arjuna.
“Who are you?” asks Arjuna.
“I am Time,” replies Krishna, “powerful destroyer of worlds, grown immense here to annihilate these men”.
Arjuna is blinded by Krishna’s radiance even as he quakes with fear at God’s capacity to destroy evil with the fire emanating from his ferocious visage.
The Gita is more than just a sacred text of the Hindus. It distils insights from several schools of philosophy in classical India.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michellemoody9398 "Blue voters have a long list of viable, substantiated reasons, based on facts, to vote Harris." Like what? She's an unelected stand-in for somebody who was too far gone both mentally and physically to continue. As she said, she and Old Joe are responsible for the high prices. Also, being directly in charge of the border, and yet allowing up to twenty million unknown people to cross. Which should be a concern to any American female. She has no policies and won't take live questions, except for scripted, edited interviews. She also hides the white, Irish side of her family, who owned hundreds of people as property in Jamaica. Also, what about her fake job at McDonalds, when she grew up in a wealthy part of Montreal, Canada? Playing on identity politics, where colour is more important than character, and is a complete inversion of the quote by MLK, just doesn't cut it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Loch1210 What trauma? You never suffered like all past generations did. You weren't even born. You're lucky enough to have been born in a country and at a time, when you have greatest opportunity to achieve any goal you set your mind to. How's a hand out going to change the way you think? How much money have you and your family been given in the form of any type of welfare already?
Also, why are you pestering only the current US government? Africans were first taken by other Africans, and then sold to foreigners. Why aren't you also asking for a handout from the ancestors, who started the process in Africa. Your fellow Africans cared less for your ancestors, than the traders they sold you to. The reason is that you won't get anything from there because these people, firstly, don't care, and secondly, they haven't got any money.
So why don't you stop looking back, and start looking forward. You can do this by contributing to your country, rather than being a drain on it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@den4199 Why do you have to lie? Kenya is rich in natural resources. She has Gemstones, Gold, Lead, zircon, Iron, Titanium, Soda Ash, Flour Spar, Salt, Mica, Chaum, Oil, Coal, Diatomite, Gypsum, Meers, Kaolin, and Rare Earths. With all those precious commodities, it should be one of the rich countries on earth. Not one of the poorest. Plus, people have lived there longer than any other place on the planet. So why aren't they the most advanced technologically? They've had much more time to exploit their surroundings, and innovate and invent things.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@solitudechronikles3521 Firstly, the free stuff I'm taking about, is what you get when you come to the West. Healthcare, housing, free education for your children, and welfare to pay some of your bills. All without you having paid anything for them.
Do you think the West was always rich? It wasn't. The people living in those countries had to build their lives from nothing. The winters are cold, and nothing grows. It's not like central Africa, where their is plenty of rain, and crops grow quickly all year round. The people in Europe had to find ways to make the food they made in summer, last all year. Otherwise they would have no food in winter.
The countries in Africa have been independent for over half a century, and still have all the technology the West gave them. Why don't they use it? Stop being corrupt, and start building a good country. Where people want to live, and where people don't have to leave it for the West. It's simple, but will Africa, Asia and South America do this? Or do they expect the West to take care of them forever?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@solitudechronikles3521 OK, dude. You might of not been a country, but people have lived in that area, for much longer than anywhere else on the planet. Of course, your different tribes fought each other, because that's what people do. The British brought stability, and the violence stopped. The whole world is made up of countries. So borders had to be placed somewhere. In the case of Kenya, they seemed to be drawn up well, because you've not had any tribal conflict.
You talk about prosperity, but when will that be? If there is corruption in your country., it will never happen. Corruption is deeply entrenched in Kenya and has been synonymous with politics and public service since independence, in the 1960s.
The phrase “the fish rots from the head” aptly describes Kenya’s anti-corruption dilemma. Kenya’s political elites engage in corrupt practices to increase their wealth and influence through elaborate, murky bureaucratic processes. This has led to “state capture,” where corruption has become ingrained in the public sector and is used to maintain political power and build wealth. To effectively address corruption in Kenya, it is essential to adopt more comprehensive and radical approaches which target the governance and political conditions that allow it to flourish. The current political leadership, like its predecessors, has shown a lack of commitment to implementing the policies that are in place.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tr1707 "Since, you're into correct autocorrect typos, as if you're back in your high school English class," Autocorrect typos? You're mistake is one of the most common, and laziest mistakes in written English. The difference between "your" and "you're", is blatantly obvious, and their is no excuse for such an error. As for punctuation, the rules are less rigid.
"e-read my last comment a few times, until it makes sense to you." e-read? Nothing about your supposed "beliefs", makes the slightest sense, to anybody with the ability to make logical conclusions, based on the actual evidence. Or in this case, lack of it. Do you also believe that angels are real and that the Lock Ness Monster and Bigfoot exist? What about Santa Claws to. The proof for you're supposed god, is just as absent, as it is for the afourmentioned mythical beings. Just wear do you draw the line between fact and fiction?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@J.Y.718 My nation? We don't have a President. However, there should be a medical test for such a responsible job. It's not so much age, as ability which counts. The main one being cognitive ability. Biden had obvious mental decline when elected, and, of course, it's getting worse. However, he has a large team working for him, which do all the work. The problem is, the decisions he makes, aren't his, which they should be. He just hasn't got a grasp of the issues, and how to handle them. In fact, he's more interested in eating chocolate chip ice cream, than actually running a country, like he's supposed to be doing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stu7161 I have no idea what you're on about, dude. Dawkins would make his assessment based on the evidence.
"There is no point in presenting to you evidence of something you've already convinced yourself cannot possibly exist".
Wrong, provide the evidence, and I will have no option but to accept it. The problem is that this god-bothering thing is de@d in the water. In the 100,000 years since modern humans have existed. Not one person has been able to provide one single piece of evidence for the existence of gods, which eventually became one god. However, in the case of the Nazarene is now three, or is that one? It's also not a case of not trying, as many have spent their life in pursuit of it. There's also a big incentive in it. Imagine suddenly being the most famous person in the World, and all the praise you'd get. Maybe, there'd even be a Nobel Prize in it as well. Until then, I'll leave them to their quest. Let's just say that I'll believe it when I see it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@theresadoll5374 TV. What's that? I stopped watching the lamestream legacy media several years ago. Unfortunately, I think a "Return from the country", would be rather short-lived show, as those do-gooder, bedwetting, pompous, middle-class arseholes would soon run for their lives! I want to associate with like-minded people, who share my common sense values. Not have some left-wing, progressive propaganda shoved down my throat. Are you familiar with Alex Belfield? I assume some people who frequent this channel will be? There are many other speakers of truth out there. Just because the loony left, are intent on silencing them, doesn't mean what they say isn't right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aidam6379 No, Turkey is far from the best country in the world, although there are some more backward ones.
"I would rather live in a country that is 'underdeveloped' by your standards but where kids are safe, people have free medical insurance and there are no homeless people." So why not live in Western Europe, Canada or Japan then? They have all, and more. At least they don't live in a dictatorship. Turkey can also kiss goodbye to EU membership, as it doesn't meet the basic standards required.
"totally safe for kids and adults, and compared to dogs very clean." Really? Cats lick their private parts and then their fur, which you stroke, and then your face. How hygienic is that?
"My neighbors and I have been feeding a mama dog with her four puppies for the last two months". Rather than just feeding it, why don't they give it a proper home? Why can't you treat them as pets, just same as you would any other domestic animal?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GARDENER42 I never said a car engine was fully enclosed, like as in an air or water tight container. So stop putting words in my mouth. Of course, there are opening to allow air in an out for cooling. There has to be. However, the car's engine is hidden from view, if you look from the front, or the sides. Also, who drags themselves under a car, to try and see the engine from underneath. If you did, all you'd see was the under tray hiding the engine.
As for motorcycles, even liquid-cooled engines are clearly visible from either side, and air-cooled units, even more so. As the engine relies on a good flow of air for cooling. More so, in an air-cooled engine. Just look at the cooling fins. They are present on all sides of the block, indicating a need for all-round cooling.
Fairings are usually an add-on, as most bikes come from the factory in the naked form.
So just what will it take to make you admit you were wrong?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@carstenknapmann4683 Yes, badge engineering. The same cars, Opel, Peugeot, Citroen and Vauxhall. Each with just different badges stuck on. VW, Skoda and Seat, are the same. There were too many car companies, for them to be able to make their own vehicles. Making one car, and putting different badges on them, was the solution. It makes people still think that they're buying something different, when they're not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gerieveen4561 Don't you think that christianity wouldn't have found it to Scandinavia, without what you call a "pre-emptive strike". Was there anywhere in Western world that the jezus cult didn't penetrate? Britain was just a small part of the Vikings expansionist policies. They were by definition a sea-faring nation, like the British did later. They discovered North America, long before Columbus did. As well , they also voyaged as far as the Mediterranean, North Africa, the Middle East. On land, they even went as far as founding what is now modern day Russia. The close connection between the Rus' and the Norse is confirmed both by extensive Scandinavian settlement in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine and by Slavic influences in the Swedish language. Though the debate over the origin of the Rus' remains politically charged, there is broad agreement that if the proto-Rus' were indeed originally Norse origin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Of course the colonists and their leaders were disgruntled. In 1772, the Somerset case affirmed the decision, that slavery was illegal on British soil. Wouldn't you have wanted independence, if you thought that the practice of owning humans, as property, might be taken away from you, and you might be left out of pocket. Remember, 17 of the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention owned a total of about 1,400 slaves. Of the first 12 U.S. presidents, eight were slave owners. These men have traditionally been considered national heroes. Buildings, streets, cities, schools, and monuments are named in their honour.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Desert-Father "The Somerset case didn't end slavery in Britain". Correct, it had already been made illegal in England in the eleventh century. The first country, to outlaw the owning of people as property. The Somerset Case sought clarification as to right to own slaves in the British isles. The decision of the courts was, that it was indeed illegal, and that the air of England was too pure for a slave to breathe.
"The British are responsible for bringing slaves to the American colonies." These activities were offshore, and thus not subject to British domestic law. However, cases like Somerset, got the ball rolling for Britain to stop other European countries engaging in the slave trade. Something which they were content to continue. It also provided a stick with which it could beat its maritime rivals, and became the British project, at a great expense in lost revenue and loss of men.
"And the British backed the Confederacy in the American Civil War." Untrue. In May 1861, the British government issued a Declaration of Neutrality to signify its official stance on the American Civil War. This Declaration recognized the Confederacy's status as a belligerent faction, but not as a sovereign nation. She may have supplied arms and equipment to the South, but at the same time, did not wish to jeopardise her relationship with he Northern States.
1
-
1
-
@Desert-Father "You can't pretend that Virginia wasn't as much a British colony as Jamaica was." Yes, both were British Overseas colonies. As to the thirteen colonies, it's a fact that the British administration were guilty of wilful neglect, as they had to pursue conflict in Europe. Therefore, any laws relating to them often not enforced.
"You had nearly two centuries of slave trade in British North American colonies." Yeah. And what does that say about the mentality of the natives and colonists who lived there, and practised such immoral acts? Britain is a small island, not a vast continent, and so much easier to police.
"British absolutely did back the Confederacy." Still wrong. Not in any official capacity. It couldn't risk antagonizing the North. Also, Britain couldn't tell a large and powerful sovereign country, as the CSA, what to do, and interfere in it's internal affairs. Britain was able to end the global slave trade. Due their total control of the World's oceans at this point. The supply of slaves had been ended to the CSA, but it already had enough for its needs by that point. In the unlikely event that the CSA had been victorious, in their fight for independence. Then Britain have been obliged to recognise them. Slavery might have continued there for sometime longer, but due to the pressure from Britain and other countries, who now saw the same way as Britain did. It would have been made illegal too. Some of the British ruling class may have had some sympathy for the CSA, in its struggle for independence, which was not only about slavery, but the vast majority of the British populace did not, and with increasing suffrage, those in leadership had to follow the people's wishes, or pay the consequences.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bazingaburg8264 "I never understood the kicking of desperate people." The first thing you need to ask is why these people are desperate? There is twice the length of border between the US and Canada, than between the US and Mexico. Yet without any physical barriers whatsoever, the illegal crossing isn't twenty million. It's zero. Why is this. Could it be that the Protestant Anglo-Saxon North America is somehow superior to the Catholic Hispanic Central and South America?
North America was founded on the Common Law, humans being born with inalienable rights, a Protestant work ethic, and property rights, amongst other things. In total, the Anglosphere is the most successful group of countries to ever to exist. Other factors are a low level of corruption, which is the fastest way to ruin a country, and stable democratic governance. Also, English-speaking countries are on average twice as rich as Spanish-speaking ones. The very reason people are voting with their feet, tells you all you need to know.
Isn't it maybe time these dysfunctional countries got their act together? Abandoning your family and your country is never going to improve what's left behind. People instead, should try an build up the place they were born and grew up in. The North of American and especially Northern Europe cannot take an endless stream of economic migrants. It's just physically and economically impossible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jessemarcel25 "every indigenous tribes fought and for land". Wrong! They may have fought as a group, for control over certain areas. However, they never had the modern concept of individual property rights. Of course, indigenous groups "owned" things. Just because a group migrated to an area first, does that mean that they "own" that part of the World, or the lands that they travelled through. The Americas were empty of humans, until the end of the last Ice Age. When environmental changes, made it possible for those who just happened to be living near the Bering Strait. To be able to follow the newly exposed coastline from North East Asia into North America. Of course it wasn't until one thousand years ago, that Europeans developed ocean going ships, which allowed the Vikings to discover the continent of America from the East.
As for signing treaties, this is a modern concept. As most indigenous and aboriginal peoples, had not developed written language. Imagine trying to make a claim on anything, if you have no ability to record that in written form.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Kendro311 So you can't be moral without religion, can you? People who don't believe in fairy tales, do just fine.
What about the 96% of human existence before modern religions were made up. How did the human race survive all that time?
It would be beneficial, if religion had not been made by men (no women of course). As humans are imperfect and biased, and so are the old religious books they came up with.
The old testament was written for a small tribe of people, and if you didn't fit in that group, then the rules didn't apply to you, and you were a second-class citizen.
This old book sanctioned genocide, slavery and the abuse of women and girls.
Even in the new testament, jc supports slavery, by stating that not a jot or tittle of the original covenant shall be changed, and that his coming were the fulfilment of it.
All religions have been in conflict with other religions at some time, and the resultant death toll is too high to count.
The sooner religion is consigned to the dustbin of history the better for the whole of humankind.
1
-
@Kendro311 "there's just too much to life and existence to think it wasn't by design." All the common arguments that life was somehow designed, have all been comprehensively debunked.
We are probably lucky, that the character of jc was essentially a hippy, who preached peace, and love and never killed anyone, or sinned.
That at least, gave any cultures adopting it ,the chance to grow away from it, as there was no penalty for apostasy. Unlike some other religion, we could mention.
God seems to be playing the biggest game of hide and seek in history, to the point that he/she/it might as well be invisible. This being rather odd, considering the he/she/it, is meant to be the creator of the universe, and the most powerful entity, within it.
Therefore, what is the point in believing something, that there's no evidence for. It makes no logical sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kimyeap1124 Yeah, What you just came up with is a common argument. However, if god-bothering was banned, the body count caused by it, could be removed from the equation. Religion is a mental illness, and its extinction, would save innumerable lives, both now, and in the future. Take for example, the current unpleasantness going on in the so-called "Holy Land". A more unholy situation, you could never find. I'm not laying any specific blame here. But when some people way back, created a book which told them that they were a "chosen" people, (talk about a circular argument), it set a precedent, and it's been downhill ever since.
Not satisfied with that, we then had a reboot, where god apparently sent a part of him/her/it down to earth in the form of a half man, half god hybrid for some reason. Not forgetting a ghost-type being. Although, all this did was confuse the phuq out of everybody, because in monotheism, isn't there meant to be only one god, not three. As we all know, three into one doesn't go.
If that wasn't the end, fourteen hundred years later, we supposedly had the final instalment. When some illiterate, desert warlord, had the ridiculous idea that god was speaking to him, even though he couldn't write down any of the sh!t he was told. However, god did tell him that it was OK to have as many wives as he liked. How convenient of god.
Isn't it also odd, how later god also told a man called Joseph Smith, that he could have as many wives as he wanted too. As though god has some obsession with making sure that polygamy is a thing, amongst other immoral acts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ReinhartSchneider How about Ephesians 6:5, as written in the same old book? Firstly, I'm not interested in some immoral old book written by ignorant men (women were kept illiterate), who didn't know any better. Secondly, you might not agree with it, but tens of millions of people are reliant on social security in the US alone. Over a $trillion every year is spent on supporting them. LBJ's 1964 reforms, encouraged a certain group in particular. To stop having fathers around the home, and instead the mothers could get free stuff, by having as many children as possible. The more kids, the more handouts. Would you work, if the government would do the fathers job instead. So now we have multiple generations of women who have never had a job, and have been raised in single parent households. The problem is that the US is a rich country, and so you can't have starving kids because the parent doesn't want to, or know how to work. Also, imagine the chaos, if that free stuff supply was suddenly turned off? So, whether you like it, or not. The US is stuck with it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@donaldyoung2983 He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my original comment?
1
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my original comment?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KemetledAfrica Do you have be sub-Saharan African to have a tan and curly hair?
You're not even giving an accurate description of what those three writers wrote.
To fully quote Aristotle: "Too black a hue marks the coward, as witness Egyptians and Ethiopians, and so does also too white a complexion, as you may see from women. So the hue that makes for courage must be intermediate between these extremes. A tawny colour indicates a bold spirit, as in lions; but too ruddy a hue marks a rogue, as in the case of the fox. A pale mottled hue signifies cowardice, for that is the colour one turns in terror. The honey-pale are cold, and coldness means immobility, and an immobile body means slowness. A red hue indicates hastiness, for all parts of the body on being heated by movement turn red. A flaming skin, however, indicates madness, for it results from an overheated body, and extreme bodily heat is likely to mean madness."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@monsterglo Actually, it's a myth that black cats are adopted less frequently than cats of other colours. However, shelter workers may notice a bias against black felines thanks to lingering perceptions.
Black cats are associated with bad luck, and sadly, death. This fear of black cats appears to stem from medieval times, when an animal with dark feathers or fur, including crows and ravens, signalled death. In 16th-century Italy, it was believed that death was imminent if a black cat would lay on someone's sickbed. In modern-day North America, negative connotations continue to haunt black cats: It’s considered bad luck if a black cat crosses your path, and good luck if a white cat crosses your path. Another family member is bound to die if you spot a black cat during a funeral procession. And it's a bad omen if you see a black cat walking away from you.
1
-
@GalacticGoddess46 I was thinking about the superstition concerning now walking under a ladder. If you think about it, that makes a lot of sense. There might be someone up that ladder, and you might get something heavy dropped on your head, which is the worst place to be hit by an object.
Nobody is going to hurt someone for avoiding black cats. They're just reacting on these old superstitions. As long as they don't come into contact with a black cat, they think that they will OK. Its just that if they do by chance, something evil might happen.
Many superstitions are based on actions, which might help a person avoid a dangerous situation.
The colour black has for centuries, been associated with evil, misfortune and death.
I agree that this is wrong, and has no basis in fact. In no way, should black cats be assumed to be bad, and should be treated just the same, as say a white cat. The cat has no control of its colour, and shouldn't be discriminated against for this reason.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bunkyman8097 Why would Mexico pay for a wall. Nobody would want to go South, except for criminals?
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was a major overhaul of the tax code, signed into law by President Donald Trump on Jan. 1, 2018. The legislation included some of the biggest changes to the tax code in three decades. The reform impacted both taxpayers and business owners alike, particularly through tax cuts. Many of the tax reform benefits for individuals will expire in 2025.
He left Obamacare, because it wasn't practical to bring in a replacement. You have to prioritize.
Wiping out the national debt in a year(failed). Not even Superman could do that. It's just something the US is stuck with.
If you'd seen the videos of Haiti, that I have. Which you won't have. Then animals are just a side dish. So I'm not surprised by any of the stories.
Yes, my replies disappear, the same as others lose theirs. This is a private platform after all. There are certain channels, where nothing I write gets posted, or only sporadically.
Rather than learn the facts. You choose to run away. That tells me all I need to know about what you think you know, but actually don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yamiart6149 Firstly, that referendum was boycotted by nearly half of the Republics.
Secondly, there was no compulsion on the Republics to maintain the Soviets as the main political system. In fact, it was the Communist party, which opposed the implementation of the proposals in the Referendum.
Thirdly, the result was moot, as soon after many of the republics voted for complete independence. They didn't want to be part of a Russian-controlled Empire anymore. The time for Empire is gone.
The final consequence, was that the Soviet system was dead.
Funny how Communism also perished in the newly independent states.
Also, in the other ex-Warsaw Pact countries. Their people were sick and tired of being dominated by the jackboot of the USSR, and couldn't get away fast enough.
"most people still miss it and a large deal would like it back. That's the Russians, not the rest of the USSR. They don' want to be back as a colony of Russia anymore. In case you missed it. There's an struggle against Russian hegemony taking place in Ukraine, as we speak. Thanks, to Pootin, the Russians are heading back to a command economy anyway. The shortages are returning, just like they were in good old Soviet days. Maybe, there are some things you shouldn't wish for, as you might actually get stuck with them.
1
-
1
-
@yamiart6149 100 million is a reasonable figure. Mao contributed most of that figure, even beating Stalin, which takes some doing. China had a huge population of poor people, so that simplified the task.
The only other comparable body count is religion, which has probably caused more, and still does today.
Modern Communists still use the convoluted, out-dated stock phrases, that you use. In fact, reading Communist propaganda is required bedtime reading, as it's guaranteed to get you off to sleep in short order.
I read the programme of the the Communist Party of Great Britain, not to be confused the British Communist Party. Yes, the Communist can't even be united as one party. They also ditched the word manifesto. As I read, I counted off the obsolete terms referenced. Such as Class Struggle, the Proletariat, the Petit Bourgeoisie. I agree with some of their polices, but not most of them. Marx was writing in the middle of the Victorian Era, when conditions were poor for the working class, and they were being exploited by Capitalist owners, for their labour. Marx was an intellectual idealist, but not a realist. A workers paradise, where everyone is supposedly equal, seemed like the best expression of society possible. The problem is it provides no motivation to be entrepreneurial, and increase your standard of living. Why work hard, when you can get the same wage, doing nothing?
The problem with Communism, is that it doesn't work in the real world. It was tried behind the walls of the USSR and the Iron Curtain and was never successful in providing the same standard of living as in the West. Imagine having to wait ten years for an apartment or a car. It's ridiculous. Communism cannot deliver in a modern, technologically advanced world, where people rely on more and more devices.
If Britain was ever going to have a Communist revolution, it would have been around 1920. However, the UK has always chosen revolution, rather than revolution. So it never stood a chance, as much as the Communists hoped. Increased workers right were achieved through Trade Unions and industrial action, and these were successful in delivering, shorter working weeks, higher pay, paid holidays and other benefits, without bloodshed.
We don't live in the Victorian Age anymore. There are no longer huge factories, containing millions of workers involved in repetitive manual labour.
Marxist ideas as a whole, simply aren't relevant in the modern, high tech world we live in today.
1
-
@yamiart6149 You can laugh away on top of the mountain of corpses, Communism is responsible for. I'll refrain, if that's OK with you.
"where do you think europe got its ''wealth'' from?" From the newly-built factories, full of newly invented machines, turning raw materials like wool, cotton, hemp, and iron into finished goods, into finished products. The added values from selling these goods, provided a wage for the people who had come from the countryside. People who had previously been peasants on the land. The factories offered them a regular income, unlike working on the land. Some of the profits were invested back into the business, and also improving the living conditions of workers. Take Port Sunlight or Saltaire, for example.
To cut this short, Communism failed, when it was tried, and even then, it was impossible to implement fully. It also left a long trail of human suffering, misery and death. It had to keep a vice-like grip on those living under it, restricting even the most basic of freedoms, and human rights. This was necessary, because if people wanted change. They would be denied it, and every step would be taken, no matter how inhuman to prevent it.
You might want to see Communism make a come back. However you'll be forgotten long before it ever did. And it'll be even more misguided and redundant then.
1
-
@yamiart6149 You know what, dude. You're about as boring, as anything written by Marx. Maybe, even more boring. But I suppose reading his sh1t, doesn't help.
Theory and practise are two separate things. Communism was tried in the USSR, but collapsed after only seven decades. Even without being fully implemented, because it was not possible to do so.
Maybe it would have helped, if Marx, had actually been a member of the working class. Rather than being just an observer of them. If he had been one, then he might have understood their motivations.
Eight criticisms of Marx’s view of society are:
The class structure today is more complex.
Capitalism today is less exploitative
Control of the economic base does not mean control of the superstructure
False consciousness is a problem concept in postmodern society
There is less alienation today
Capitalism has lifted billions of people out of poverty
Communism didn’t work
Marxism was a metanarrative.
If you choose to continue, I'm just going to keep posting more reason why Marxism doesn't work. There is plenty of articles out there, by those who have studied this in great detail.
Stop living in a fantasy world, and make the best of the opportunities, freedoms and rights. That you're lucky enough to have available to you and other's around you, who don't think they way you do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@English Patriot Yes. If you had to choose one country to be a colony of, it was by far the British. PragerU, did a video on it called, "If You Live in Freedom, Thank the British Empire". It's available on YT. Ex-British colonies have twice the wealth of those colonized by other European countries. The USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and to some extent South Africa, are prime examples. Although, it's apparent that there were areas of the World, you couldn't bring up to First World standards, even if you tried.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chateauferret "As a Brit, this is true. :(" So you don't think the Industrial Revolution, where Britain invented the Modern World, with all its advantages, is nothing to be proud of? Or what about stopping the owning of people as property. When Britain spent the equivalent of $1 trillion and thousands of lives, stopping the global slave trade. This was of no benefit to themselves. It was simply done for moral reasons. There were more slaves in India, before the British came, than in any other place on Earth. Even more than in the Arabic World. Slavery had been practised by all cultures, since modern humans evolved. The British were the first nation to outlaw it. William the Conqueror made slavery illegal on British soil. This was upheld by several prominent cases in later century. Also, what about the spreading of good governance, and the rule of law, based on Common Law principles and a rejection of corruption. What about the British giving all their innovations in innovation and technology, to the rest of the globe? Also international trade, which helped to develop economies and infrastructure. Let me know, if I missed something out?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ukaszbiaas4093 "Germans love to brag how they did this and that during WW2 and how amazing it was and never talking about millions of non german slaves that was producing even top-of-the-line tech like V2 rockets..." Are you saying that modern Germany has no guilt over the crimes and atrocities it committed in WWII? They even have a term for it, Vergangenheitsbewältigung, "struggle to overcome the [negatives of the] past" or “working through the past”. This is a German term describing processes that since the late 20th century have become key in the study of post-1945 German literature, society, and culture. "Vergangenheitsbewältigung describes the attempt to analyze, digest and learn to live with the past, in particular the Holocaust. The focus on learning is much in the spirit of philosopher George Santayana's oft-quoted observation that "those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it". It is a technical term also used in English that was coined after 1945 in West Germany, relating specifically to the atrocities committed during the Third Reich, when Adolf Hitler was in power in Germany, and to both historical and contemporary concerns about the extensive compromise and co-optation of many German cultural, religious, and political institutions by Nazism."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Really, Einstein?
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence. He mentioned Uncle Trump's permanent funding of HBCU's. Also, Trump was responsible for the First Step Act. 30,000 people, many black, have been released from federal prison before their original release date, as a result of the First Step Act's reforms. Check out black woman, Alice Marie Johnson, the Prison Reform Advocate Who Was Freed From a Life Sentence.
WATCH, "FULL PARDON: President Trump pardons Alice Johnson in Oval Office".
WATCH: "Alice Johnson’s full speech at the Republican National Convention".
And people have the cheek to say that Uncle Trump Never did anything for the black community. When he's done more than any President since Lincoln.
You're never going to hear this, if you only watch the biased, lamestream, legacy media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jane---489 Of course, you don't give a damn. You've proved that by your disrespect of people that might need to use capitals or bold due to visual disabilities. If you think what you do, somehow makes what you write more important, be assured, it doesn't. It just shows narcissistic tendencies.
What else do you abuse. How about using the disabled parking bays at the supermarket, when you're not actually disabled. Does that appeal to you?
The fact that you keep replying, shows that I'm getting to you somehow. Otherwise, why don't you just ignore me, and carry on writing everything in bold, like nobody but people with visual disabilities do. Maybe, one day, you'll have to for real.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my original comment?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@snarkyjoe3556 At least you were studying something useful to you and other people. What about all those studying non-subjects? Imagine all that debt, with no change of getting a real job to pay it off.
All they can hope for is that another president, like Old Joe, cancels all their bad debt. However, there's always the state, to look after all these "highly educated" lunatics.
More people are choosing not to go to college, and have to put up with all the woke sh!t there, and rack up all that debt. They're training to become licensed professionals in jobs, where they will always be demand. Like electricians, plumbers, heating engineers, bricklayers, plasterers, carpenters, car mechanics, garden care, tree surgery and many other trades.
You can earn more than most people with a degree ever will, and no debt to be saddled with. Maybe, you can build a business in these areas.
What's the point of doing women's studies, if you're not a woman, anyway?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shivam_nagar69 "whoever speaks english has stolen from UK?" No mate. It was YOU who first said that words can be "stolen". If that's the case, then India "stole" thousands of words. A whole language in fact, English. Except for the fact, that you can't "steal" words! They don't have an owner. Do you want a law making it illegal for non-Indians to use an Indian word. If you do, then you're stupid.
"Why you thieves have still kept those stolen artifacts". You can have them back, if you like. It isn't going to make any difference to the present owners. They can just make copies and give the real items back. Anyway, 1,000 pieces of ancient artworks are stolen from Indian temples every year and shipped to the international market, with only 5 percent of the thefts being reported. Maybe you should do something about the Indians of today, who do the stealing? However, whilst your at it. Why not give back everything you got for free from Britain. Or do you want everything to be just a one way street?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aeternafortuna1644 God-botherers can't disprove evolution, even if they tried. For starters, they're ignorant of science, and the use of logic, reason and facts to determine truth.
Modern humans have existed for about 100,000 years. Isn't it odd how this supposed god only became interested in giving these so-called prophets, or should that be profits, what was on his/her/its mind, only about 3,000 years ago. That's in the last 3% of human existence, and just like buses, three come along one after the other. Where was this supposed god, the previous 97% of the time. You can smell the BS a mile away.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wewuzkangz2505 The English for some reason, went down this path of respect for and equal treatment of all. This was seen in Common law, William I, banning slavery on English soil and then the Magna Carta, giving rights to every English person, no matter their status. It just seemed the obvious thing to do.
It's obvious that some other cultures, put strength above respect for others. In some ways, this is seen as attractive by many in the West.
In nature, survival of the fittest is the method by which an organism lives or dies.
Slavery was also practised by every culture, since the dawn of humans. Abolition is only a recent phenomena.
What will be the outcome of this? Is the end of the West coming? Or is it time for the West to get tough again? Is this even possible in the modern technological world, Britain and the West created?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PaIaeoCIive1684 Oddly, in the university toilets, somebody had written above the toilet paper dispenser, "management studies degrees. Please take one. Of course, this should extend to all soft, humanity pseudo-qualifications. Studying a subject, about studying a subject, ain't like actually doing it. As you have to do in a STEM subject. Maybe, that's why Ricky Gervais, ditched Biology for Philosophy, with its grand total of three hours lectures a week. At least, it allowed him to pursue his short-lived pop career.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikael0317 "I say this, God either exists or He doesn’t. No one really knows." There is NO evidence for an all-powerful god. When there should be mountains of it. Of what value to us, is a god, that is essentially invisible? Occam's Razor states that explanations should always be kept as simple as possible. So why add in unnecessary complexity, such as a god, which you CANNOT justify from the evidence.
"ll decide to believe in His existence, because i’ll lose nothing by doing that." This is known as Pascal's Wager. This argument is flawed. Read this to find out why: http://whistlinginthewind.org/2012/05/06/the-flaws-of-pascals-wager/
"Believing in God gives me a meaning in life." Are you saying that you can't have meaningful life, without believing in some imaginary god? If anything, the stupid rules made by religion, stop you doing many things you can. There are hundreds of millions of people, who are not religious. I am sure most of them get on fine, not feeling that they are being constantly watched by some celestial Big Brother!
"As a believer, i can enjoy many things. For example, music, art, movies, gaming, good food, traveling, family & friends, sports, etc." And which of these can the non-believer, not also do? In fact, as I said, they can do MORE, because they are not held back by religious rules. Take for example, religious views against homosexuality, abortion, divorce, sex before marriage, pornography, masturbation, blasphemy, profanity etc., All these are seen as sinful and prohibited in your religion. (Notice how obsessed your god, seems to be with sex.)
1
-
@mikael0317 "Jesus is not a man made concept". Of course, he is. You don't think he just happened to come down from the sky one day do you? How often have you seen that? I never have and neither of you.
"Many atheist scholars agree on the fact that a man named Jesus lived on this earth and was crucified." Yeah, a few non-believers might think that there was indeed some holy man. Who went around allegedly performing feats of magic. However, the very fact that they are non-believers, means that they DO NOT think that your jezus, was actually god. There is a very wide gap between a man who lived 2,000 years ago and him being one third of the supposed god of the universe.
"If Jesus never existed, then that would be the biggest hoax in the history of mankind." It probably is. One hoax has to top the list, and saying that YOU ARE god, is probably a good candidate. The story is obviously a myth, as it evolved over time and got bigger with each successive telling. A bit like Chinese Whispers on steroids.
"If you’re interested in well-documented cases of real demon possessions, then watch these videos". Unsurprisingly, I am not interest in tales of supposed demon possessions. Anybody can fabricate such a story in their heads. They may even be convinced that it is real, if they are biased by a belief in such things. Personal testimony counts for nothing. It is only when something can be independently verified, that it should be taken seriously.
"If you’re interested in other people’s experiences of Hell, after they died, watch these videos:" Why? Unverifiable personal testimony can be dismissed.
"But i hope you realize that there are good believers out there." Yeah, OK. As long as they keep their ridiculous ideas to themselves. However, religion also, has many believers who DO harm others. Simply for not believing in what they do. If only one innocent person dies, due to some god-bothering maniac, is it really worth it?
"I suppose you know Fred Rogers and Bob Ross?" Of course, but there countless non-believers who have the same qualities of kindness and good heartedness. People instinctively know right from wrong, without some all-seeing and all-knowing busybody, constantly monitoring their thoughts and actions. Like some celestial North Korea. Just think of the freedom, in not believing in that eternal Big Brother.
"Take care, bye." Typical! This happens every time. You have just started to demolish their faith, and they run away. So much for the conviction of their beliefs!
1
-
1
-
@mikael0317 "the Bible doesn’t say ”Thou shall not listen to heavy metal”. Well it wouldn't, would it. Recorded music hadn't been invented then and certainly not Heavy Metal. Although, if your god is all knowing, why didn't he/she/it, mention that the electric guitars and HM, WOULD be invented some time down the line? Rather an oversight, wouldn't you agree. Maybe it should have been a case of "Let There Be Rock", instead of "Let There Be light"!
However, H Metal has always had a reputation for going against the grain of traditional, conservative culture For example, Christian groups are also much more likely to shun popular forms of music than the non-religious. Evangelical groups, for example, were five times less likely to listen to or state a preference for rock, heavy metal, and alternative rock than the non-religious.
The greater differences in musical preference between the religious and non-religious are at the extremes. Avoiding rock, heavy metal, and alternative rock perhaps suggests moral aversion based on a perceived incitement to sex and violence associated with the lyrical content. Classical music is less explicit on such themes, and has also been central to some Christian liturgy.
So, in conclusion, you are in conflict with the attitudes of the majority of your religious group.
1
-
@mikael0317 "In Islam, Jesus is a important figure." The reason for that, was that Mo was lazy and just ripped off large portions of the bible, with the jc bloke already in it. Much easier, than coming up with some new sh!t.
"Then why wouldn’t you convert to Islam?" Maybe, because I don't fall for any of this religious nonsense. In fact, shouldn't you be the one to do that? Anyway, I can't convert to a religion, as I am not already the follower of another one.
"If Mohammad revealed the Quran and we ”know” that, then why wouldn’t you?" But I don't believe that the koran, is the "word of god", either.
"My whole point was to prove that Jesus Christ existed. The Quran and the Muslims admit this too, Jesus is a important man to them too." Yes, but Muslims believe that your jc, was just a flesh and blood, human prophet of god, and certainly NOT a divine, part man, part god.
Does epileptic psychosis make you eat spiders & coal and drink your own urine? Yes. If the psychosis is complex, this behaviour could manifest itself. Each patient is different. The association between epilepsy and insanity has been recognized since antiquity. However it was not until the 19th century when the close relationship between these two conditions was studied in a systematic manner.
"Mental illnesses are a completely different thing than demon possessions." No they aren't. They are one and the same. As history and medicine has shown us.
This is a useful article: http://www.drjack.co.uk/epileptic-seizures-mistaken-for-demonic-possession-by-our-ancestors-by-dr-jack-lewis/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikael0317 "Anneliese Michel’s case is just one in various others." And so you provide more anecdotal tales, that cannot be independently verified. Also, these stories all have a religious component. A never-ending battle between good and evil. It just illustrates, how religion messes with susceptible individuals, especially those suffering from mental illness. More importantly, you do not understand what constitutes hard evidence. It must be able to be repeated by others on multiple occasions. If ghosts or spirits are real why is there no experimental evidence, for their existence. Why no photographs, video or other hard evidence. The only logical conclusion is that there is some other reasonable explanation, or these occurrences are just a figment of receptive people's imagination.
By the way, I think you mean Crete, in the English language, not Creta in Latin.
"I think i’m done, thanks for the debate. Take care." OK. It's a pity you had so many questions, but so few answers.
1
-
1
-
@mikael0317 "Strong, personal experience". Good for you, but how does that help determine what is universally true? If others CANNOT experience what you supposedly did. Then of what value is it?
"But many testimonies of Heaven/Hell share the same elements." Well they would, wouldn't they. Just as alleged sightings of UFO's, aliens, BigFoot and the Loch Ness Monster, all share characteristics, based on well-known preconceptions.
"The mystery of everything. Why is there something rather than nothing? For me, the answer is God." We don't understand everything. Therefore, god did it. What a convenient cop out. However, it DOES NOT help us to understand HOW the universe works. Only science can do that. Anyway, if your supposed god made and controls the universe. Then why is he/she/it, so damn hard to detect? Talk about the world's greatest master of hide and seek!
"Muslims say that Mohammad was an illitrate. So he couldn’t read or write, therefore it would have been impossible for him to copy from the Bible." That does not mean, somebody else read the bible to him.
"The reason i’m not converting to Islam? Jesus said that He is the way, the truth and the life and that NO ONE comes unto the Father except through." And Mohammad said that he was the way to god. Which should the potential believer choose? They offer the same thing. Just a different way of achieving it.
"Americans in general, are thought to be less intellect than us Europeans." No. Obviously, they have the same intellect as Europeans. Its just that they are more isolated, self-sufficient and less aware of the rest of the world.
"Playing musical instrument is not forbidden by God". No atheist would say that it was. Its just some religions that are against it for some reason.
"You also claimed that people in my country aren’t religious?" I never said that. As your English was so good, I thought you were in the UK. For some reason, Finland is quite a religious country. "The great majority of the people belong to the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland, whose status gradually changed from an official state church to a national church beginning in the 19th century. The archbishop has his see at Turku (Åbo). Yet, despite the high proportion of church membership, only a small number of Finns attend church regularly. Nonetheless, the majority of the people are still baptized, married, and buried with the blessing of the Lutheran church."
"Most of my friends & relatives are believers." Well that just shows the English saying, "birds of a feather, flock together". Is true!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikael0317 "trying my best not to sin." Trying your best IS NOT good enough for your god. He/she/it, commands that you follow all his/her/its stupid rules. If you fail to follow just ONE of those hundreds of demands, then you are sinning. If you are in sin on the day of judgment, the only place you can go is hell. "And when i sin, i repent." The rules in your old book are so complex and so many, that you DON'T even know, if you are sinning. But that is no excuse, as the commands are still there in writing. So it's your job, to spend half your life learning what behaviour is sinful and the other half not doing them. So much for religion, NOT affecting your ability to live the one life you have. It is more of a nightmare than a positive experience. Why not just live by the "do no harm" principle. It's a damn sight simpler and superior to a mess of ridiculous rules. "And some sins are not as bad as others." ALL sins are bad, in the thoughts of your alleged god. How can you know which may be worse than others. The list DOES NOT make sense anyway. "You don’t need to get angry at me for believing." Maybe not, but I know stupid rules when I see them.
1
-
@mikael0317 "He absolutely will forgive me my sins when i repent." So why did your alleged god spend so much time, supposedly giving all those stupid rules to follow? For example, the numerous ridiculous ones in leviticus? Didn't he/she/it mean what he/she/it said. If you can ignore the supposed "word of god", why have any rules in the bible at all?
"I have to ask you, are you strong atheist?" It is impossible to discount the existence of god completely, but all the evidence is in favour of his/hers/its non-existence. To look at the numbers. The percentage for the existence for god is 0%, or close to it and the percentage for non-existence is 100%, or close to it. So, you can assume that I am a "de-facto atheist", whatever that means However, there is a distinction between atheism and agnosticism, but this thread is already long enough.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jesussknight4918 "Who do you think a Real Christian is?" Why would or should I know or even care what a "real christian is"? Religious belief is by defintion subjective. Every christian thinks they are that "real christian", but each has their own interpretation of what that might be. That's why there are 33,000 different denominations of christianity alone! Even god-botherers like you can aggree on even the basics.
"Atheism means that people can determine morality by themselves." Oh, so because you are an adult who DOES NOT believe in fairytales, automatically makes you an immoral genocidal maniac. 99.99999% of atheists instinctively know right from wrong, without some imaginary man-made, sky daddy repeating the obvious.
"The fetus itself isn't part of the woman's body." The only part of a foetus which isn't the mothers, is the sex cell which fertilized her egg. The baby is entirely reliant on the mother, until it is born. No baby can survive solely without its mother, until it reaches full-term and is born. If the mother dies during pregnancy, so does the baby. Anyway, most pregnancies end in spontaneous natural abortions the majority before a woman even knows she's pregnant. What about these foetuses. Or do you only care about the ones, the woman elects to have performed? Maybe you want to go back to the good-old days when abortion was illegal? Surveys from the 1950s approximate somewhere between 200,000 and 200 million abortions performed illegally each year in the U.S. At this time, it is safe to estimate that four women a day died in America as a consequence of illegal abortion. However, you obviously don't care about that, do you?
1
-
@mikael0317 "Lmao just because the baby is reliant on his/her mother during pregnancy doesn’t mean that the baby should be murdered." I have already explained, why it is the mother's decision. What she does with her own body. Abortion is not classed as homicide, and is restricted to the first part of the pregnancy, where no baby could survive, outside its mother's womb. Who cares what your alleged sky daddy or old book says?
Surveys from the 1950s approximate somewhere between 200,000 and 200 million abortions performed illegally each year in the U.S. At this time, it is safe to estimate that four women a day died in America as a consequence of illegal abortion. However, you obviously don't care about that, do you? The life of the foetus, is obviously of more importance, than that of the mother. Maybe you should realize that if the mother dies, the babies she might have wanted and let be born, will NEVER happen, period!
You should know that in Finland and in the rest of Europe the question of the legality of abortion is settled. It is legal, end of argument. The battle to allow a woman, the right to have control over her own body, was settled decades ago. Whether you like it or not, abortion is here to stay. Unless you were able to change the law, as a dictator, without the consent of the people?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I did some research as you do. Here's more information:
"A teenager who flew to join the Ukrainian war effort was reportedly killed by a Russian drone on his first mission. James Wilton was 17 when he flew from Manchester Airport to fight against Russia, despite his lack of military experience.
Four months later, aged 18, he was tragically killed by an exploding drone. It's believed the volunteer died after being pursued on the battlefield by three drones, Yorkshire Live reports.
James, from Huddersfield, joined a group of international fighters in Ukraine. He was delivering supplies to the frontline when he was spotted by Russian drones.
His dad Graham, of Huddersfield, had asked his son not to go to Ukraine but James had said he wanted to go to help. "He wanted to help Ukraine. I wish we could have swapped places because he had his whole life in front of him," he said.
Graham described his son as 'laid back, polite, easy-going and likeable' and said he would always be proud of him. James' best friend Jason, an American volunteer fighter, was with him at the time and recalled the terrifying moment they were being chased.
"Once the drone was on him, James never stood a chance", he said. The drones had hovered over the pair, according to Jason, as they had to decide whether to run for safety or hit back.
James decided to sprint but the drone quickly followed him and struck just 30 metres from the trench line. The death of the teenager remained unreported for months - to help the family grieve in private. Dad Graham, a trade counter assistant, travelled from Huddersfield to Ukraine where he attended his son's heartbreaking cremation.
He also met Jason and the other fighters who were alongside him. Graham told The Sun: "It's taken time to process, but I think it's important people know about James's sacrifice." According to James's mum, Kerrie-Anne, 44, the teen had already made up his mind and wanted to travel to Ukraine.
His dad drove him to Manchester Airport despite not wanting his son to go. Jason, who lost his foot after stepping on a landmine, has returned to Ukraine for rehabilitation and paid tribute to his friend James, who had no formal military training before joining Ukraine's 2nd International Legion.
He said: "I've killed two Russian soldiers myself, but nothing prepares you for losing someone who's close to you. I knew James was going to be a lifelong friend.
"Now he's gone, and all I have are memories. I've seen people die out here." James was reportedly cremated in Ukraine following his death on the eastern front on July 23 last year." Source, MEN.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dr.emilschaffhausen4683 You're welcome. If you know the difference, your responsibility is to use them correctly.
90wpm? Most commenters on this site struggle to put a coherent, grammatically correct sentence together.
Prayer has been proven in several controlled studies, not to have any positive effect, except in the heads of those who think it does. People who don't engage in such activity, have just as much success, and luck, as those who don't. It's not as though prayer is all going to the same place. Each religion is praying to their own version of a supreme being or beings. So who's doing it right. Or maybe, they're all wrong. Why not just believe in one less religion than they do?
Why do you assume that my rejection of religion was because I was "hurt" at some time. How about that it never occured to me that their was any god to submit to. There was nothing that ever disproved this position either. Indeed, nobody in history has been able to prove that any supreme being exists. Therefore, why waste time worshipping something that at best is invisible, and thus has no effect on your surroundings. Secondly, I was never indoctrinated into religion at any point in my childhood, like many people are. I just made my decision on the lack of evidence around me. The only reason people are a certain religion, anyway, is due to where they were born. If you're born in the US, you will be a Christian, and in India, a Hindu. So what's the point, if you might be backing the wrong horse?
Why do I need to submit to a higher power, to be happy. Especially when there's no evidence for it.
Over three million children die of starvation every year. Children who will never grow and have kids of their own. Why would an all powerful god, just sit and watch, and do nothing to stop this? There are only two conclusions. Either that god is an uncaring monster, who doesn't care about his/her/its creations. Or he/she/it does not exist. Which of those two options, do you subscribe to?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dr.emilschaffhausen4683 The third option is a convenient cop-out, by god-botherers to attempt to provide an excuse, as to why evil exists in the World.
I don't buy the explanation, as to why a god would be so apathetic about his/her/its creation.
This is particularly true of the Abrahamic religions, which see humans as special creations, made in the image of that god. In one of them, god supposedly even sent his son, to show how much he/she/it cared for his creation.
The argument that we need religion, otherwise kids will join gangs, doesn't hold weight. Religious indoctrination has its negatives too. For one, it stifles free-thinking, and makes people think in an irrational manner. Subscribing to believes which in no way comport with reality. You can teach children good values, without filling their heads with thousands years old nonsense. The bible condones genocide, slavery and the abuse of women and girls. Luckily, in spite of these immoral teachings, people only pay lip-service to them. And if you reject these parts, why not reject the whole lot?
As you will guess, I also think homeopathy is a fraud. Since when is less, more?
I watched nearly every James Randi (with an "i"), video on the internet. He busted the so-called psychics, prosperity preachers, and other assorted fraudsters. My favourite was when Johnny Carson and him, punked celebrity bender Uri Geller on the Tonight Show. When Geller made the excuse that he "wasn't feeling strong tonight". That should have been the end of his career, but people like him have a habit of keeping their grift going. Although, with the internet, it's easy to see through their lies, if you can be bothered to be sceptical.
As to some higher power being out there. I choose to believe it, when I see it. And if that's when it's too late, then tough.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anne-rc2tl Why not just make the age when a person can be judged to be fully accountable for their actions, at say forty, or just to be on the safe side, fifty? Many people don't even get to that age. Especially those with substance abuse issues.
People can't wait to be adults, so they can do what only adults are allowed to do. And with engaging in those things, comes immediate responsibility.
You're also referring to "them", as a "she". So you've obviously been captured by the social construct of gender, pushed by the Trans agenda. If the dude, was even trying to be feminine, then that would help "their" cause. However, they aint.
Are you also the type who's happy to have c0cks in frocks, or chicks with d!cks in women's spaces. Just because they might self-ID, as female? Males who are probably AGP's, who sole intention is to have their shenis swinging in full view of women and girls, at the local pool, or gym changing room. Who knows, it could be YOUR daughter, if you have one. To have the pleasure of seeing their swinging junk standing to attention in future.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mercedesprecht-matuschek6026 Do you mean the same emptiness as the following people, you might have heard of? Woody Allen, Aristotle, Andrew Carnegie, Benjamin Disraeli, Thomas Edison, Benjamin Franklin, Sigmund Freud, Stephen Fry, Yuri Gagarin, Yuri Gagarin, Victor Hugo, Thomas Jefferson, Immanuel Kant, Johannes Kepler, Stephen King, Stanley Kubrick, Vladimir Nabokov, Gene Roddenberry, Jean-Paul Sartre, George Bernard Shaw, Percy Bysshe Shelley, Leo Tolstoy, Mark Twain, Oscar Wilde and Frank Lloyd Wright.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@southernparadise9896 "but without God, science would be unnecessary." What have you been smoking? We need science whether there is a god, or no god. How else are we going to explain the World around us, and its origin.
Your old book, has no information of any value, to assist us in answering these questions.
Do you think the electronic equipment, you used to write your comment, came out of thin air, from some invisible being? No, it took centuries of human effort to develop the technology, you take for granted today.
If you relied on the information contained in your old book, you'd still be in a cave somewhere, scratching a living to survive.
Do you think a scientists spend part of their day, thinking about god, and whether that god approves of what they're doing? Of course not. There is zero need for religion in inventing a new technology. God is irrelevant to the study of science.
Finally, why do you assume your supposed god is male. Could it be that women were treated as second-class citizens, by the men who invented what's in your old book?
Also, why do you people always have only one book. Maybe, you should go to a library sometime. There you will find thousands of books. Trying reading some of their extensive range of books on science and technology. You might actually learn something of value.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@phyllisvanhuss1190 "God gave free will so we are able to choose how we live our lives." Ah, yes. A convenient cop out and get out clause, to try and explain why your supposed god, apparently, doesn't give a phuq about his/her/its creation. All that effort, to just sit back and watch it all go to cr@p. Why not just get it right next time, instead of having to do a couple of reboots, because you cocked it up first time. So much for a perfect all knowing god!
However, there is a more logical reason, why your god is invisible. I wonder if you can guess what it is?
As for god's part human, part god hybrid, jc. Who thought that one up? It's a bit like the sequel, that tries to fill the plot holes, that were forgotten first time around.
Whomever came up with the jc character, should have been told that it was a bad idea, by the rest of the group responsible for formulating the new part of the old book. However, for some reason, he had is way, and they ran with it.
Finally, the story of the crucifiction and resurrection. When jc had a sh1tty weekend, by topping himself in the most pointless suicide in history. Makes no sense whatsoever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tracysharp1361 "white people have always received this and received even more !" Maybe, that's because they founded the country and laid down it's laws, principles, values and society. They put in all the initial work. They planned and built the cities, towns, and also created the industries which caused the economy to develop and grow.. So why shouldn't they have got back all that they put in, and more?
"communities they burnt down". Which communities. Name some?
"schools they burned down". Which schools?
"black businesses". Which businesses?
"the welfare system has benefited more whites". And why shouldn't it? Whites were the ones working and paying their taxes. So they deserved something back, if times got tough. Since the 1960's, many black women have married the government, becoming reliant on it for support and many black men are now redundant. And we know what happens to children, who grow up without two parent families.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nagameel7324 So you're back from under your rock for another try. Some people never learn.
"The Caucasian people of the earth have DNA from all the ancient indigenous so called black people of Europe, Middle East & North Africa". So what? It's the achievements of a people which counts, not how much melanin they happen to have.
"Low skin pigmentation is something that is embedded into the DNA of so called negroid people, it’s called albinism." Wrong, Albinism is a very rare recessive genetic condition. It occurs in all r@ces of humans, blaq, whyte and azian, and many animal species. It's obviously more noticeable in blaq people. All you've achieved is to make yourself appear more ignorant.
"Also black people have been living in Europe for 2,000 years & they’re still so called black skinned." Really? Take a look at any photo taken of people, taken in Europe up until even the last few decades. That's well over a century, and countless pictures. Then try finding any people who are blaq in them. Although, best of luck with that. By the way, we're taking natives, not people only visiting. Maybe, that's some homework you can do?
"Lack of sunlight does not make you go from dark chocolate to light skin in 1,000 years, the DNA component of high melanin will always hold strong." Wrong again. Who said 1,000 years. A study on the genomes of Anatolian Neolithic farmers in West Eurasia (6500–300 BC), who are probably the source population of the first European farmers, suggests that the light skin colour has been evolved since at least 6500–4000 years ago. However, even 6,500 years, is still relatively recent event in the 100,000 year history of modern Humans.
Your rock awaits.
1
-
1
-
@nagameel7324 "Caucasian feelings"? Don't you mean Caucasian facts? It was Caucasians, principally people of Northern European heritage, who created the Modern World, which you are lucky enough to live in and benefit from. Those brilliant people invented the telephone, radio, TV, internet, radar, steel ships, aeroplanes, helicopters, submarines, spacecraft, man on the moon, medicines, surgery, computers. As you know, the list is endless.
"Caucasian feelings & ideals have corrupted the earth of the spirit of reality & truth." Those innovations and inventions are reality and truth. They exist, and every person today, can benefit from them.
OK, I can understand the anguish. Maybe, even the resentment you feel. That it was Caucasians who created all these amazing things. However, you can't change history. It's something you'll have to reconcile, or it's going to eat away and destroy you. You already seem to be expressing anger about it. Maybe, you just need to accept it, and make the best of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Arnold Ridley went with The Somerset Light Infantry to France where he became involved in the bloody war of attrition. He found the mental suffering was far worse than the physical misery of the trenches. Promoted to Lance Corporal he saw other battalions wiped out time after time and knew that he wouldn’t survive continually going over the top. Wounded twice, a bayonet wound in the groin and a vicious blow to the side of the head from the rifle but of a German soldier meant spells in hospital but always with a return to the front, even though the blow to the head gave him blackouts throughout his later life.
In September 1916, during the Battle of the Somme, where 58,000 British troops lost their lives, Lance Corporal Ridley was badly wounded. Caught by the blast of an exploding shell he was riddled with shrapnel, especially in his left arm and hand. He lay for some days in front of the uncaptured German line and was carried unconscious part of the way back by another soldier. Shelling again started and the pair sought refuge in a shell crater. A shell burst in the crater, miraculously missing Arnold but blowing his unknown rescuer to shreds.
After leaving the shell hole Arnold found himself leading a group of stragglers back through no-man’s-land to the British front line. (On their return the members of the party were recommended for the Military Medal but an officer, seeing that Arnold was a lance corporal, recommended him for the Distinguished Conduct Medal. The other members of the party duly received the MM but Arnold was turned down for the DCM and received nothing.)
Arnold went to the first aid post at Le Treport and was admitted by mistake into a Canadian hospital where surgeons managed to save his hand Arnold was convinced his hand would be amputated and admitted being dismayed when he regained consciousness and found his hand was saved. He had convinced himself that a ‘Blighty’ wound was his only chance of survival. As it turned out Arnold was repatriated to Woodcote Park Military Hospital Epsom, judged unfit for further military service and returned to his depot for final discharge. Arnold Ridley’s war was over.
Arnold was secretly disappointed at missing his chance for the MM. He must have given himself an ironic chuckle when in 1982 he received an OBE for his services to the theatre. This award was sparked by his portrayal of Private Godfrey, a conscientious objector who had been awarded the MM for his actions as a stretcher-bearer in the Battle of the Somme. In real life, in 1917, after his discharge, Arnold had been given a white feather by a lady in Torquay. He had his silver discharge badge in his pocket but accepted the feather anyway. He didn’t wear his badge as he didn’t like to advertise the fact that he was a wounded soldier. He just felt grateful, and guilty, that he had survived."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AVIARYCOURT I had to research this. There isn't much on the internet, except from a pre-show press release, below. It shows the national sentiment even then, after six years of Blair rule. Imagine the situation now? The show was called "You Be The Judge", from 2003. Did the viewers reject all five asylum seekers?
"BRITAIN is currently the world's top destination for asylum seekers, receiving 92,000 applications last year -a third more than the USA.
For some people, this is proof that Britain is becoming a ``soft touch'', with many critics of the current system insisting that not all applicants can really be fleeing persecution.
But how do the authorities distinguish between genuine asylum seekers and economic migrants?
The BBC tonight devotes an entire evening to the issue, including a live debate from Liverpool.
Why Liverpool? The Beeb says it's because of the city's strong historical links with migration and immigration, added to the corporation's desire to make more programmes out of London.
You the Judge, asks viewers what they would do if they had to make the life-changing decisions Britain's immigration officers face every day.
Some commentators argue that immigrants are a burden on the taxpayer and a strain on the already over-stretched NHS. Others fear press hysteria is putting too great a pressure on the government to cut down the number of applications, meaning genuine refugees are being sent back to face persecution, torture and ,in some extreme cases, death.
Presented by Fiona Bruce, the live, interactive programme hears stories from people who have arrived in the UK from countries including Zimbabwe, Turkey, Afghanistan and Slovakia.
In each case, the Home Office has already decided whether or not the applicant should be allowed to stay in Britain -but You the Judge allows viewers to make up their own minds. But will their verdicts match those of the Home Office?
You the Judge is followed at 9pm by the documentary Asylum, in which a reporter goes undercover in a bid to explore the failings of the British system."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The BBC must have had a wet dream, when they found this story. Unsurprisingly, Arday, the subject of this video is a sociologist. Unlike the STEM subjects. Sociology is a pseudo-discipline. Where you can talk a load of bollox, and get away with it. Just look at the societal breakdown of today, for example, where men can be women, and there are a thousand genders. All backed up by sociological BS. As the black economist Thomas Sowell, said in a video I watched yesterday. Very few black lecturers are involved in STEM subjects. Most of them are teaching courses on education. Just like this guy at Cambridge is. He fits Sowell's observations precisely. BTW, I did this as a standalone comment, and have got zero likes. Can people even see my original comment?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cynthiaa2644 A "playbook", as you call it, isn't the same as a specific plan. A particular epidemic is going to need it's own tailored approach, as each presents it's own set of challenges.
Even the H1N1 crisis didn’t prevent the Obama administration from backing away from the no-holds-barred approach to national security that had characterized the Bush administration, paring back funding for preparedness amid the Great Recession. The health department and Homeland Security department cut preparedness funding by nearly $900 million between fiscal years 2010 and 2011.
“The preparedness budget cuts may make it particularly difficult for the nation – and the country’s public health agencies and workforce, in particular – to achieve the goals” set by the White House and CDC for national health security, Columbia University’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness experts warned in 2011. “The New York metropolitan area, in particular, is at greater risk for large-scale catastrophic events, and cannot afford to be less than maximally prepared.”
The H1N1 crisis was bookended by the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak, which hung over the 2014 midterm elections and shaped how Obama approached his waning years in office. Officials working in the Obama administration described being surprised as the outbreak unpredictably surged in West Africa, sickening thousands of people and killing about 40 percent of those who were infected. Historically, the deadly virus had burned itself out before jumping borders and becoming an epidemic.
The 2019 outbreak was no different, although much more serious in it's size and domestic impact. However, it was still handled appropriately by the Trump administration.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bvs1q I missed those. We all know about Mastermind" Lammy, don't we? He wouldn't have had any idea where Diego Garcia was. He probably thought they were talking about an Argentinian footballer. It was the last lot who started the negotiations to give way the BIOT. To a country that didn't even exist, when Britain claimed it. It was only administered from Mauritius for convenience. On independence, Mauritius signed away any claim on the Chagos, and accepted £3,000,000 to seal the deal. Several decades later, they suddenly get seller's remorse. That isn't the way treaties work. There's a poll in The Telegraph, were 97% are against the giveaway by the UK, and 5,600 comments against the UK, giving in so easily.
The problem is that this sets a precedent, and Argentina has of course, renewed its spurious claim to The Falklands again. I also, watched the daily news from Gibraltar, and they of course were concerned about.
The ruling Uniparty in the UK don't care about putting the interests of Britain first. They're Internationalists, who put country second.
Meanwhile, China is busy building artificial islands off the coast of Vietnam and The Phillipines, and don't care what anybody else thinks. They put their strategic interests first. Not that of others.
It looks like anything is up for grabs in the Great British disposal sale.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@russellbrown7024 Look, fool. His close family WAS there, except those that had reasons to be there. If you had a young, adult daughter, who wanted to take a skiing trip over the holiday season. Would you stop her? That trip was a one-off. Christmas comes every year. She's probably spent most of her Christmas' with her dad. If you have several children, who are young adults. There's a good chance, that at least one will not make it to their parents. Also, a point comes when you have your own kids kids, and you have Christmas with them. Rather than going with them to their Grandparents. Do you know how crowded that would be? What you're trying to insinuate is that Uncle T, is estranged from his children. If so, then provide the evidence. Or just shut up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lupinsredjacket3191 "God calls Himself "He" multiple times throughout Scripture."
How convenient. I wonder if they tossed a coin on that one? No, of course they didn't.
At the time, men ran the show, and only a few of them had been taught to be literate. So it's hardly surprising, that they made god male. Why wouldn't they? Men were thought as superior to women then. So why wouldn't the supposedly most powerful being in the universe, be male too?
The bible was fabricated and written by ignorant, middle eastern goat herders, who didn't know any better. Although, you pretend that was god, who wrote it, and in the first person.
When we tell stories of what we did, we use first person (as in “I drove…”). When we tell stories about others, we use third person (as in “she drove…”). And there are two variations of third person perspective
limited (restricted to what only one character can see or know) and
omniscient (knowing everything, like God).
In days of old, writers used third-person omniscient. The bible does this all the time.
For example, how was Jonah aware that the seas calmed down after the sailors tossed him into the water (Jonah 1:15)? Or when Philip left the Ethiopian eunuch, how did he know the eunuch went on his way (Acts 8:39)?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@myrahartmann2164 Oh dear. It looks like you just blew it, Myra. How wrong you are. You don't have a clue what you're talking about. Jamaica is one of the most ethnically diverse and mixed countries on the planet. There are white Jamaicans, black Jamaicans, and Asian Jamaicans, and a mixture of all three. Bob Marley would be a good example of this. The mother of Harris, is a Hindu and Indian. Her father is Irish and Indian. She has no black in her. Her father has a white side to his heritage, which she hides. They owned a sugar cane plantation, and originally came from Ireland. She wrote a book, and it contains photos of fictious members of her family. Candice Owens and Lady C, have videos which expose all this. Owens has a Jamaican grandmother and Lady C is a Jamaican, My suggestion is you watch there videos for the truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@whosaidthat9265 No. You move along. In your original reply, you criticized the legal system where you live. It's worked for a thousand years, and it'll be working for a thousand more, assuming Sharia doesn't replace. So railing against it, is tantamount to banging your head against a brick wall. Or you could move to Japan, where they have a 99.9% conviction rate. So you wouldn't have to worry about being found innocent at their bench trial system. Maybe, you should watch the film, I Just Didn't Do It (それでもボクはやってない, Soredemo boku wa yattenai), based on a true story, for more details.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Kanciapaa "You cant compare a street rat to a domesticated, clean, healthy socialized pet rat just like you cant compare a feral dog to a socialized domesticated one." You don't much about Biology, do you? A "feral" dog, is the same species, as a "pet"dog. It is just an escapee from a domestic setting. It is also, a different species from its original, ancestor. Dogs started on the process of domestication 15,000 years ago. From a population of now-extinct Late Pleistocene wolves. The "pet" rat is not a separate domesticated species, but rather just a breed of the Common Brown Sewer Rat, Rattus norvegicus. As such, the "pet" rat is capable of being a reservoir for the carriage and transmission of life-threatening diseases. The same as its "feral" brothers and sisters. Similar to other rodents, brown rats may carry a number of pathogens, including Weil's disease, rat bite fever, cryptosporidiosis, viral hemorrhagic fever, Q fever and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome.
"Why do you think emotional support animals exist?" So why not choose an animal that is actually a domesticated species, specifically breed by humans over thousands of years. Such as a dog or cat? Rather than a wild species, which just happens to be forced to live in a cage in captivity?
"Also if someone is comforting somebody else and it helps them, why do you attack that?" Yeah, I suppose facts are not as important as feelings!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@coventrypunx1014 Look dude. It's just the internet at the end of the day, and not real life. Why apologise for anything. It's all just words. Nobody got hurt. Although, today, even words are seen by some as violence.
My message on religion is based on the Christopher Hitchens model. Simply that ALL religion is mental illness, and the sooner a cure is found the better. It's also been responsible for more death and suffering than any other human activity. Personally, I put my faith in science, as it's the only way to determine truth, using logic, reason and facts. After all, it put a human on the moon, and hopefully will do the same on Mars soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The secret to a long life , eternal life is to receive Jesus as Lord and Saviour and have all your sin past present and furure forgiven and removed". What a steaming pile of BS! The people in this documentary, don't even know about your jezus. Let alone follow YOUR religion. Go and spread your irrelevant cr@p somewhere else.
The chinese characters you mention, were formed a few thousand years before your brand of religion was even invented! Even if they did have the meaning you allege. Why was this transmitted to the Chinese people, when your homie jc, never went near the place?
The Chinese character 義 has broad inner content and includes values such as justice, honesty, loyalty, and reliability. Pronounced as yì, it is composed of 羊 (sheep) on top and 我 (I, myself) on the bottom.
The sheep, 羊, is obedient and kind, and mutton tastes good and is nutritious. Given those characteristics, the sheep is considered to be a symbol for good luck and prosperity.
The character 我 was originally developed from the oracle bone script, where it denoted a fighting implement with a sharp tooth, although it later meant “I” or “myself.”
羊 and 我, combined to make 義, can be literally interpreted to signify “I am a sheep.”
In ancient China, a sheep or lamb was sacrificed to honor the gods. The character’s intrinsic meaning is that, in regard to this ritual, one can make sacrifices in the name of justice or righteousness.
The Chinese character 義 reminds people how they should conduct their lives — that is, selflessly.
Yi (義) belongs to a special category of ideograms called huiyi (multiple meanings brought together). They are composed of ideograms with different meanings, and their inner contents are a fusion of the several meanings.
Thousands of Chinese characters exist. Thus, coincidences are likely, and even with valid breakdowns, it is easy to find meaning that isn't there. The same logic could be used to support any number of religious beliefs.
To make any assertion that this character has any connection with your jezus, is ridiculous in the extreme.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mywhorled OK, Einstein. Where is all that evidence that ghosts are real? You have none. Oh. And following is just a simple explanation on how truth claims work. Where the onus is on those making the claim. Not on those who oppose it.
The burden of proof regarding the truthfulness of a claim lies with the one who makes the claim; if this burden is not met, then the claim is unfounded, and its opponents need not argue further in order to dismiss it.
The concept, named after journalist, author, and avowed atheist Christopher Hitchens, echoes Occam's razor. The dictum appears in Hitchens's 2007 book titled God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. It takes a stronger stance than the Sagan standard ("Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"), instead applying to even non-extraordinary claims.
It has been compared to the Latin proverb quod grātīs asseritur, grātīs negātur ("What is asserted gratuitously may be denied gratuitously"), which was commonly used in the 19th century.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mywhorled I already know the definition of both terms. Of course I'm bigoted against ridiculous ideas. Why wouldn't I be? Thankfully, there are people who think rationally. Otherwise, we'd still be burning witches, like they still do in Africa. The internet, for example, was invented by those who believed in science. You can't achieve anything with rational thought. Maybe, you should thank those, who DO NOT believe in superstitious nonsense. For all the amazing technology you enjoy today. The scientific method is the only proven way to determine truth. In fact, claims about ghosts and spirits have already been investigated, and COULD NOT be backed up by evidence. James Randi even offered a million dollar prize, to anyone who could demonstrate so-called paranormal activity under controlled conditions. Guess what? NO ONE was able to claim the money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidlawes4954 Tugging has been around for a long time. It does after a lot of effort, at least allow the glans to be covered, and protected, as evolution designed it to be. Although, as you know, you are missing the delicate, sensitive epithelial skin, with all those nerve endings. The same as what is found inside our mouths. Also, if the equally sensitive frenulum has been ablated, that can never be restored. The sooner the barbaric process of MGM is outlawed, the better. It is against our basic human rights to bodily integrity. It has no place in an advanced, civilized society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jdthemighty "You should be ashamed of yourself by just spouting some crap you don't know about". I wasn't even talking about you. I was simply stating the facts, that many American conservatives, want to see a complete ban on abortion in any circumstance. I have my view of this, and obviously so do you.
"we could have been friends but we just found out who and what your about." (It's you're). Could we have been friends? The chances are slim, considering this is just a video-sharing site, and we know nothing about each other. It was you who chose to share things about your life here. Therefore it's hardly surprising when you get a response. And just what am I about? I was just making an observation, on the way many Americans in particular view issues like abortion.
In the UK for example, The Abortion Act 1967 sought to clarify the law in Britain. And subject to heated debate, it allowed for legal abortion on a number of grounds up to twenty-four weeks, with the added protection of free provision through the National Health Service. And that was the end of the matter, and the law still stands today. Instead, in the US, you still have a conflict over the women's right to bodily autonomy, five decades after Roe vs Wade. It just doesn't make any sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikhailmik OK, so you think Russia starting an aggressive war, causing the deaths of a million people and the total destruction of Eastern Ukraine is worth it? Ukraine posed no threat to the World's so-called second most powerful army. Who would dare attack a country with such a strong military? Who attacked who? It's like 1941 again, but in reverse. This time it's Russia that's the bad guy. Well, all this has achieved is to expose the Russian military as a paper tiger. Using hopelessly obsolete weapons from the 1960's. Wasn't the "Special Military Operation" meant to last a couple of weeks. Now a year on, the Russians advance has ground to a halt, with none of their objectives achieved. Throwing more conscripts into the meat-grinder, will achieve nothing. The Ukrainians are well-dug in now, and can easily absorb any attacks. Especially now, they have all the modern weapons they need. Just the same way the USSR armed the Communists in China, North Korea and Vietnam in their wars of aggression, during the 1950's and 60's. So two can play at that game, as is happening now, with Ukraine getting weapons from around the World. Or maybe, you think using nuclear weapons would be a good idea? Why not have WWIII, whilst were at it. Let's turn the Earth into a radioactive desert. Just so Russia, the biggest country on Earth can gain even more territory, to add to its Empire. How does that sound. Mikhaila. Are you up for it?
1
-
@mikhailmik So Ukraine has almost no ammunition left, does it? Of course Ukraine will say that. It's the best way to get more. But this isn't a problem. NATO and other countries have huge stockpiles of ammunition. Much is nearing the end of its storage life. So what better way to use it up, than to kill and injure more of the Russian invaders? Unlike the corrupt companies in Russia, who keep the money, instead of producing new and better weapons. NATO and the other allies against Russia, have factories which are able to actually produce the most advanced weapons in the World. Something which Russia doesn't have. Factories in the USA, and Europe are now ramping up production of new ammunition. NATO has never needed to use it's weapons, as it's been a purely defensive organisation. It's never attacked another country in its long history. Now, is the chance for it to use all that cutting-edge technology, against an enemy using useless, obsolete weapons.
If Ukraine is in dire need of weaponry, it will get them. It's managed to stop an army with thousands of tanks, with not one single tank of its own. Using a $40,000 missile to kill a $2,000,000 tank, seems like a great deal. And all it shows, is that all those Russian tanks designed sixty years ago, have no place on a 21st century battlefield. The fact that no fighter jet have been given to Ukraine, and only now a small number of tanks, shows how much NATO has tried to avoid an escalation of the conflict. In fact, most Western observers thought that Russia would have been victorious in a couple of weeks, in February 2022. However, as that was not the case, and the willingness of Ukraine to fight became apparent. NATO and its allies felt compelled to help Ukraine in resisting Russian aggression.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rorykeegan1895 It's a temporary reduction. Electric cars are the future, and that's where the UK is showing significant growth. Brexit was seven years ago, if you can't remember. The EU percentage of global trade shrinks every year, whilst the BRIC economies grow, except for Russia, of course. It's now down to just 13%, compared to the Anglosphere, which is 30%. By the time the Anglosphere falls to EU levels, the EU will be at around 5%., and almost insignificant. If you want to keep looking to the past, that's up to you. I'll look to the future, which is the only place worth looking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AnonymousReader-er4eg Do you apologize for the Ottoman Empire or maybe the Mughal Empire. No. Of course you don't. The reason is because you're a hypocrite. There have been empires since humans humans first evolved. Maybe it time you got over it and moved on? At least the British had a lot to give, unlike other empires which just took. They were also better at organizing and running their empire than anyone else. The British first built railways in their own country, to move materials and products around their small island. So it's only natural that they would export this technology to the rest of the world. This also included Canada, the United States, Argentina, Australia, South Africa, and new Zealand. These railways were not just built to extract wealth to be sent to Britain. They also transformed the economies of those countries, through movement of goods and people and made the people living there more prosperous.
"Britain was built "by African labour and by those indentured from India". Well. Mr. Lewis obviously never visited a cotton mill or went down a coal mine in Victorian Britain. Those places were like hell on earth. He might have sat in a nice clean room writing about such matters, but he would not have lasted five minutes in those places. And whom do you think built those first railways or canals in Britain. Was it Indians? Of course, it wasn't. There was not one Indian involved. Without those first railways. No others would have been built anywhere else.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@UshankaShow Lucky you. Just imagine if you'd had "real" Communism, and not just a pretend version. In "genuine" Communism, money is abolished because you don't need it, as everything the states thinks you need, is provided. Of course, you don't even own the shirt on your back. And there are crazy people, who still think that Communism is something to be aspired to. If they actually has to live under it, they might change their ideas. Marx thought he knew the nature of humans, where we are meant to love sharing everything, and have no desire to own anything, or become wealthy. How wrong he was!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Challis1989 "that's harsh and older peoper certainly aren't any of that". Of course, they're not. However, that was the excuse given by some remoaners, in wanting another Brexit vote. Or as they termed it, a "peoples vote". As though it wasn't people who voted in the first one. In 2014, the SNP tried the same trick, by getting it so that 16 year old children could vote. When the age for all other votes is 18. They thought that by getting kids to vote, that they would be more likely to be brainwashed by the woke socialist agenda, and thus more likely to vote for Scottish Independence. However, as we know, that trick still failed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RealKevGotEm Terminations are not murder. If it was, the medical practitioners doing them, would all be on death row, or doing life without parole for homicide. What does the fact that they aren't tell you? Women had to fight hard to get the basic human right of autonomy of their own bodies. Until it's born, a foetus is not an independent human being. It's just a part of the mother, and totally dependent on her for it's life.
Maybe you want those rights taken away, and go back to the bad old days, when women had to seek unsafe, backstreet abortions? Times when many women died slow, agonizing deaths, due to unqualified people, doing botched terminations.
You're obviously anti the rights of women, and that's nothing to be proud of.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DawnFshing Yes lies. It's actually only 1.5 miles off the coast, and about two miles from Uncle Trump's course. You wrote, "hundreds of miles from his property." Which is of course complete BS. The turbines are easily visible from anywhere around Aberdeen Bay.
"windmills and bird cemeteries". According to BBC Science Focus Magazine, estimates suggest that between 10,000 and 100,000 birds are killed by turbine blade strikes annually in the UK. They are also useless when the wind's not blowing.
"I have also never heard of Aberdeen bay and I’ve lived in Aberdeen for 50 years". Well, it's you lucky day then. Today is the day you're going to learn something new. From the turbine builder's website: "The European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre consists of 11 x 8.8 megawatt turbines and is located in Aberdeen Bay off the coast of Aberdeen." If you weren't aware, the coastline just above the mouth of the Dee curves slightly inwards and forms what is known as a "bay". All the official Scottish Government documentation referring to this farm's location, gives it as "Aberdeen
Bay". If you don't believe me, just check for yourself. You can even use Google, for "goggling" it.
Why is it that chronic TDS sufferers think that they're so superior? When all the time being ignorant and untruthful themselves.
1
-
@DawnFshing Yeah, I wrote a long reply which disappeared. So instead of your BS going down the plughole. My facts do. However, I'll just have to repeat what I said, but this time. I'll have to save it as I sometimes do.
The wind farm is actually 1.5 miles of the coast of Aberdeen Bay, and 2 miles from Trump's course. They are easily visible from the coast.
"windmills and bird cemeteries". According to BBC Science Focus Magazine, estimates suggest that between 10,000 and 100,000 birds are killed by turbine blade strikes annually in the UK.
"the law in Scotland for windmills at sea has to be built far greater than a 3 miles from land". Wrong. According to Wattenfall, the manufacturers of the turbine, "The European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre (EOWDC), also known as the Aberdeen Bay Wind Farm is an offshore wind test and demonstration facility located around 3 kilometres off the east coast of Aberdeenshire, in the North Sea, Scotland." 3 km is 1.8 miles.
"I have also never heard of Aberdeen bay and I’ve lived in Aberdeen for 50 years". All Scottish Government documents on this project refer to "Aberdeen Bay". You can verify this if you like. The coast above the mouth of the Dee, follows a slight curve inland, and such a geographical feature is called a "bay".
Maybe, it's you who needs to use Google to do some "goggling" for yourself?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@annedouglas9769 Duped? The people of the US need things to be back like they were under UT. The quickest way is for UT to have a third term. There's no reason why prices can't be cut fast. UT has made this his top priority. Harris will only continue what she's been doing for the last four years, and that's wreck your country. Everything a C0mmunist touches turns to sh!t. The US was built on free-market Capitalism,and that's the only way it should be. She has no policies to change things, except some vague mention of introducing price-controls. These are something that the USSR and Venezuela tried, and look at what happened to them. Retail margins are already at a razor thin 1%, so there's nothing to left to gouge. With UT, things will soon be as they were four years ago. Either that, or the same high prices, and costant war, costing hundreds of Billions, and millions more innocent civilians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@direaltalktv2828 OK. You might not like it, but what have I written which isn't true?
"but no slavery by any nation in history was more brutal than the transatlantic slave trade." That's only because the Europeans were more efficient at it. The Arabs had been doing it for thousands of years in East Africa, and their treatment was the most brutal. They castrated male slaves, a practice which European never did. That's why there are black people in America, but none in Arabic countries.
It's interesting how you mention the colonisation and enslavement of Britain by the Romans, Saxons, Vikings and Normans. However you won't find British people asking for reparations. They don't need or want handouts from anyone.
"Moores were black people they conquered England". False! There were NO black people in Britain, until a few decades ago. That's the reason you won't find them in old photos, because there weren't any. You have no evidence to prove otherwise.
"Africans didn’t have the technology to match them in warfare". And why didn't they have the technology? The Chinese managed to invent gunpowder. Black people have been on Earth, a lot longer than white people. What were they doing all that time, before the white man?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tomnash7382 The current EU was originally a trading area, which became a political bloc. The intention that this would occur was always part of a plan. It doesn't matter that the people of Ireland voted against this twice. They were made to vote until those in power got the answer they wanted. The industrialized North of Europe keeps the South afloat. This was shown when Germany had to bail out Greek and Cypriot banks in the early 2010's. When the Germans finally get tired off paying for the debts of other countries, then they'll consider their position. Also, the election of more conservative, and nationalistic government, doesn't bode well for the future of the EU. If the same thing should happen in France, they will become more Eurosceptic too. The odd thing is that the right-wing parties who want real change, always seem to come second in elections for some reason. The UK was never a good fit in the EU. The only time she ever got involved in their affair, was when either France or Germany attempted to take control of the whole continent. Apart from then, Britain couldn't really care about Europe. She has the US and Canada across the Atlantic and the rest of the Anglosphere as close relations. As for Ireland. Maybe they joined to be closer to the rest of Europe. However, she's even more separated geographically than even the UK.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Lauren Lewis Juries at Crown Court and above in England and Wales can either convict or acquit defendants. The judge can direct a jury, but it is up to jury made of twelve peers, to return a verdict of guilty or not guilty. You might not agree with this, but this is the Common Law system, which has evolved over many centuries. However, the majority of common law jurisdictions in Asia (such as Singapore, Pakistan, India, and Malaysia) have abolished jury trials on the grounds that juries are susceptible to bias. Such discrimination was seen in the Southern States of the USA, in several infamous cases, during the Jim Crow era. Whatever happens in the future with the Colston case, is a matter of conjecture. However, hopefully, some form of sanity will prevail!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@The.Adept.Chamber "The U.S. conference of Mayors says that the U.S.A. owes Reparations". Well they would, wouldn't they. Especially, the black ones. However they're the ones usually in charge of crime-ridden, drug-addled, hell-scape cities. Maybe, they should spend more time fixing , what they are in charge of. Instead of lecturing other's about what they don't.
"those who were promised 40 acres and a mule". And that what they should get, if anything. 40 acres and a mule. They weren't promised any money, which is subject to inflation. Physical objects, aren't. Although, instead of land and a mule. maybe, they could have an equivalent cash sum in today's money? The cost of 40 acres of farm land and a mule today, can easily be calculated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by the telescreen; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was, of course, no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork.
— Part I, Chapter 1, Nineteen Eighty-Four.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robertaspindale2531 The Russians sent a force they believed was was sufficient for the task. They initially tried a direct assault, and when that failed encirclement of the capital. Both of which failed. Even if they had entered Kyiv, the result would have been a bloodbath, similar to that in Stalingrad during WWII. Only this time, ten times worse, due to defenders around every corner, being armed with modern hand-held missiles. On many occasions during war, an army has underestimated then strength of their adversary and paid the price. Just the same as as A H, thought the war would be won against the USSR before Christmas 1941! We all know how that one turned out! Hence the fact that a war Putin thought would be over in a matter of days, could now last years. What do you expect the Russians to have demanded from Ukraine in return for a cessation of hostilities? Yet more loss of territory. Since when has Ukraine demanded anything from Russia? Also which side has been the aggressor here? Naturally, Ukrainian's will fight for their homes. Wouldn't you or anyone else do the same in a similar situation?
1
-
@robertaspindale2531 It looks like you're beginning to double-down. A sure sign you don't have conviction in what you say. Also, having to invoke the "n" word in the conversation, as per Godwin's law, is a sure sign that you're on the run. The West was already buying all the resources Russia could supply. In fact, Europe was reliant on their supplies of natural gas. With their invasion of an independent, sovereign country. Putin has lost his main source of income and made the West have to look elsewhere for resources.
As for countries annexing territories, that was the cause for at least one World War, and maybe you're in favour of a third and final one?
The days of the USSR are gone for good, and those who had to suffer under it, are glad that it is dead and buried.
As for Ukraine, it invaded nobody. More than half the territory occupied by Russia, is not even the part of the two republics in question.
You state that Russia needed to start this war, for it's survival. Russia is by far the largest country in the World, and much of it's territory was taken through imperialist expansion up until this day.
Nobody would ever have dared to consider military action against the Russia, before this war. However, now their weakness is exposed, and the hopeless condition of their arms, who can tell what the future will bring?
In war all cards are on the table, and if you think the deaths of tens of thousands of human beings, is somehow "limited" and "justifiable", then you are indeed crazy.
1
-
@robertaspindale2531 Considering the title of this video is, "Will Britain’s new king seek to seek to implement the neo-feudalism of the Great Reset?" You're way off mark, by trying to shoe horn your opinion about this war into any discussion.
So you think Putin, is a benevolent leader who never does anything wrong? Who cares that he orders, the assassinations of his opponents, and the spread of propaganda?
He also thinks that Ukraine, is not a country, which should not even exist. Rather, that it should be nothing more than a vassal state of a new Russian empire. However, the Ukrainian people have long memories, and will never forget the genocide they were subjected to in the 1930's.
Russia was seen as a powerful country, with a strong defence. Therefore, who was going to walk in and take their resources, unless they allowed it? Natural products are the one thing that Russia has an abundance of, and selling them to other countries, was the primary way to earn foreign currency. Especially considering the weakness and corruption in the rest of their economy.
As for the rest of your comment, you keep repeating yourself, like a broken record.
This conflict, like most, has a long and convoluted history, and the only way to get a true picture, is to try and understand the events, which have lead up to the present situation. Luckily, in the age of the internet, there are many resources which allow this to be done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1