Comments by "hizzle mobizzle" (@hizzlemobizzle) on "Jimmy Dore 'Chewed Over' Seth Rich Story" video.

  1. Yes we should only fuel left wing conspiracy theories like Russia being responsible for hacking the DNC emails with no proof but the word of the CIA. For gods sake Rachel Maddow is making a career from spreading unsubstantiated stories. What I like about Jimmy is he states his sources and that makes it easy to check them out and I can come to my own conclusion.
    2
  2. Dirt flyer first no reason to be so insulting. I am referring to how all this talk about Russia hacking e-mails and election meddling began. It is meant primarily to stop people from talking about what was leaked in the e-mails. It was meant to distract us from talking about the corruption pointed out in the emails and it has been very successful at that. It shifted the conversation from corruption and rigging of the primaries to Russian interference. I do not have a problem with looking into collusion and into election interference. I do have a problem with 24 hour a day talk about What may or may not be true. Learn something and then tell us. Look at all this talk about Paul Manafort. In the end they are nailing him for plain old fraud not collusion. I have never doubted Trump is corrupt and would eventually go down for using office to enrich himself. I think it is dangerous to overblow what Russia may or may not have done. For god's sake how can we act so high and mighty when we bug the phones of our own allies? And do any of us think we don't meddle in foreign elections? If we are so concerned about voter tampering then go back to paper ballots.
    2
  3. No the point is Jimmy covers a lot of issues and he has to be 100% correct all the time or else he's a hack. Unlike Sam who can spread CIA propaganda and not get called on it. Where is the evidence Russia hacked clinton's servers?
    2
  4. B D sorry not confusing anything. I mentioned both the emails were leaked not hacked and the Russia crap was meant to distract us from the content of the emails. In your case it was very effective. Still waiting for that link.
    2
  5. yes. yes he is
    1
  6. Dirt flyer all well and good. does not change anything. Lets see who is convicted of what. charges are not convictions. If they are guilty then charge them. I am not standing up for scumbags. Does not change the fact this all began to distract from the emails. We have a world of problems here at home that are not being addressed because of the Russia obsession.
    1
  7. Dirt flyer damn. What's got your panties in a bunch? I have tried to be respectful to you. Believe what you want to believe. The truth will come out eventually same as it did with the gulf of Tonkin and weapons of mass destruction. I will not let my hatred of Donald Trump force me to abandon critical thinking. If you think the intelligence agencies don't lie then good for you..
    1
  8. Hey Dylan How about any proof? Considering the fact that Clinton refused to turn her server over to the FBI is a fact. So how can there be proof if the servers were not examined? I know blast Jimmy Dore for e being the one who asks questions. I guess liberal trolls are quick to throw insults same as conservative ones eh?
    1
  9. Gdylan don't worry I'll survive. Again. show me a link or tell me where you come by evidence. I would love to see it. If you can't link one reasonable source then you are wrong. A small mind resorts to insults when he can't prove his point.
    1
  10. B Dylan I don't think my request was that hard to follow. Let me try again. Provide me with one link that will explain to me how any evidence was provided that the Clinton servers were hacked by Russians. You can't do this because there is none. Only the word of the CIA who's job it is to spin lies. We know for a fact the servers were never inspected because Clinton refused to turn them over to the FBI or any intelligence agency. So stop whining about how I could not possibly comprehend evidence that does not exist. If any such evidence existed it would have been presented by now.
    1
  11. Oh I see "they attempted to hack". Admit it. There is zero evidence that is why you can't link a source. I thought all this Russia crap started because Russia hacked Clinton and the DNC servers. Now they may have attempted to do so? What's next Putin thought about hacking the servers? You can insult me all you wish. You still can't quote one reliable source. You can't do this because one does not exist.
    1
  12. Still waiting
    1
  13. check back in a couple of months maybe some evidence will pop up.
    1
  14. still waiting for evidence the Russians hacked the servers
    1
  15. He's jealous. Just waits for Jimmy to say anything he can smear im with. Jimmy never claimed this was conclusive proof of anything. We do have the ability to make our own conclusions don't we? When I catch a story that peaks my interest I look for other sources to back it up. I don't just accept Jimmy Dore or Sam Seders word for anything.
    1