Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered" channel.

  1. Any actual evidence to back up your personal incredulity? Take care.
    2
  2. "firmament" is a word used in some English language translations of the Bible to mean the sky. It does not have a physical reality. If you really think that the world is flat as you seem to imply then where exactly does the Sun go at night? Take care.
    2
  3. In the 1960's NASA budget peaked at close to 5% of all US federal spending and the had one main mission. Today NASA receives less than 0.5% of federal spend to cover a large range of missions. Take care.
    2
  4. Any actual evidence to back up your personal incredulity? Take care.
    2
  5. Any actual evidence to back up your personal incredulity? Take care.
    2
  6. Personal incredulity is not evidence. Are you seriously suggesting that radio waves and the ability to transmit and receive them was not available in 1969? Also do you not see reasons why a manned lunar mission needs to progress quicker than an uncrewed one? Take care.
    2
  7. The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who is credited with their discovery. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
    2
  8. If you think that there were "3 men" in the Lunar Module then you really do not have the slightest clue about the topic. Take care.
    2
  9.  @rooxynala841  There are hundreds of hours of footage from the lunar surface and thousands of photographs. Take care.
    1
  10.  @jmbbk4737  (1) You wrote "a ball spinning at at a thousand mph". Nothing "spins" in mph as these are the units of Linear Velocity. Angular Velocity and Tangential linear velocity are Not the same thing! The correct angular velocity of the Earth's rotation is 0.000073 radians/second. (2) Take care." if it were 93 million the rays would be straight down".....How exactly can parallel rays of light strike all points of a sphere at the same angle? You really did not think that through. Take care.
    1
  11.  @jmbbk4737  (3) "Is it so hard to believe that they can pull off such a lie as the shape of the earth"...Who are this "they" that you refer to? The shape of the Earth has been known for tens of centuries and has been verified and accepted by every nation and peoples on this planed. "they" is everybody. Take care.
    1
  12.  @jmbbk4737  (4) You wrote "The sun simply goes away and comes around the next morning". Unfortunately what you suggest here is at variance with observable reality for a number of reasons. (1) A stationary observer would see the angular size of the Sun vary hugely over the course of the day. However the Sun presents the same angular size of about 0.5 degrees for all observers. (2) Different observers, depending on their distance to the Sun would see the Sun at different angular sizes. However in reality the Sun presents the same angular size of about 0.5 degrees for all observers. (3) Different observers at different locations would see different faces of the Sun. However in reality all observers (while using the correct equipment such as solar filters) will see the same face of the Sun. (4) A Sun above the horizon could never appear to disappear below the horizon bottom first. This is simple geometry. (5) A Sun above the horizon would have to be visible to all observers at all times. It could not simply disappear. Take care
    1
  13.  @jmbbk4737  Thank you for your reply. You wrote: "The sun rotates around the flat disc world". Unfortunately what you suggest here is at variance with observable reality for a number of reasons. (1) A stationary observer would see the angular size of the Sun vary hugely over the course of the day. However the Sun presents the same angular size of about 0.5 degrees for all observers. (2) Different observers, depending on their distance to the Sun would see the Sun at different angular sizes. However in reality the Sun presents the same angular size of about 0.5 degrees for all observers. (3) Different observers at different locations would see different faces of the Sun. However in reality all observers (while using the correct equipment such as solar filters) will see the same face of the Sun. (4) A Sun above the horizon could never appear to disappear below the horizon bottom first. This is simple geometry. (5) A Sun above the horizon would have to be visible to all observers at all times. It could not simply disappear. Take care
    1
  14. "They flew into low Earth orbit".......9 times???? There is no hiding place in Low earth Orbit, especially when every astronomer and radio telescope on the planet is looking at you. Take care.
    1
  15. NASA never said such a thing. Try sticking to the truth. Take care.
    1
  16. What radiation? What nature, type and intensity? How long would you have to spend there to receive a fatal does? Do you think that these questions are important, yes or no?
    1
  17. So any actual evidence that the moon landings were somehow fake or will it all just be implication and personal incredulity?
    1
  18.  @dutchymon  The Dutch petrified wood never had anything to do with NASA, the Apollo astronauts or the US government. The family of a former Dutch Prime Minister presented what they claimed to be a lunar sample to a Dutch Art museum and received a sizable tax write off in return. The first geologist to view the sample immediately realised that it was not of lunar origin. This clearly demonstrates that competent geologists will easily know the difference between material of terrestrial and lunar origin. Close to 500 samples are released every year for research by The Lunar Sample Laboratory at the Johnson Space Centre, Houston. To date thousands of scientists of various fields have examined lunar samples and verified their lunar origin. Thank you for raising this point. Take care.
    1
  19. Nope, try again, this time with the truth. Take care.
    1