Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "The Why Files" channel.

  1. (1) "frames where wire is reflective"...You mean the radio antenna on the backpack exactly where it is meant to be? (2) ""NASA representative stating we went to the moon, but the images shown are from Stanley filming the Apollo moon landing"....Total fiction. Do better. Take care.
    4
  2. "Neil Armstrong only did 2 interviews after .... the moon landing". This is a factually incorrect statement. After the 3 week quarantine period the 3 Apollo 11 astronauts gave a 45 minute presentation to the international press then continued with a lengthy question and answer session. After that Neil Armstrong embarked on a 6 week World tour visiting 29 cities in 24 different countries giving dozens of interviews. In the years that followed Armstrong gave several public speeches and interviews including interviews with the BBC, speech to the National Academy of Engineering, talks at various universities and several oral history interviews for NASA. Please get your basic facts straight. Take care.
    3
  3. Correct. Satellites in lunar orbit from 4 different countries (CSNA, JAXA, IRSO, LRO/NASA) have detected the various Apollo landing sites and equipment exactly where it is supposed to be and also matched the terrain to Apollo photographs. Take care.
    3
  4. You mean the press conference after they spent some 3 weeks in quarantine? The one in which they smile, laugh and crack jokes with the reporters? Take care.
    2
  5. (1) "Who was filming the outside of the ship and lunar module takeoff"...Westinghouse TV camera mounted on LRV. Rate of tilt calculated in advance an controlled by Ed Fendell in Mission Control, Houston. It is unfortunate that you were not curious enough to research this yourself. Take care.
    2
  6. (2) "The surface heat would have killed them".....What surface heat? All 6 lunar landings took place early in the lunar day when the temperatures were mid-range. The measured surface temperatures during Apollo 11 for example ranged from -23C to 7C. Take care.
    2
  7. " flag salute photo was clearly photoshopped"...Which flag salute photograph on which mission?? Here you make a claim but produce no actual evidence to back it up, If you are refereeing to Buzz Aldrin saluting the flag on Apollo 11 mission then the exact same salute was captured by both the Westinghouse TV camera and the 16mm camera from different angles. Another fail for you I am afraid. Take care.
    2
  8. (4) "Unnatural shadows"...Another claim with no details or no evidence. No photograph catalogue number no mission or footage identifier. Trying to be as vague as possible so your claim can not be checked? Take care.
    2
  9. (5) "Reflections of studio lights Repeating background Props with labels still on".....More claims with no details or no evidence. No photograph catalogue number no mission or footage identifier. Trying to be as vague as possible so your claim can not be checked? Take care.
    2
  10. (6) "Footprints don’t match standard issue boots of the time".....The footprints match the boots perfectly. Here we seem to have found another who does not know the difference between the Apollo space suit (examples of which can be found in the National Air and Space Museum) and the boots worn over the spacesuit. On most missions the boots were discarded on the lunar surface to minimise dust entry into the LM but the boots from Apollo 17 are on display in the NASM. Take care.
    2
  11. (7) "Everything is too bright"...It was Daytime!
    2
  12. (8) "Wind in space" The Apollo flags oscillated when the astronauts moved them during assembly. Do flags not wave when moved in your country? Take care.
    2
  13. (9) "No stars"......Star light is very dim (just like moon-landing deniers) and will not register on cameras which are set for bright, daytime conditions. Research camera exposure levels. Take care.
    2
  14. (10) "No live feed of the flag supposedly planted all those years ago"....."the" flag? Seriously? ..There were 6 flags. Satellites in lunar orbit from 4 different countries have verified the various Apollo landing sites on the moon and identified some of the flags.....all exactly where they are supposed to be. Take care.
    2
  15. "because is nothing to push against"......?!?!?!.......Serious question, what exactly do you think that a rocket leaving the Earth's surface "pushes against"......???? Take care.
    2
  16. Westinghouse TV camera attached to LM. Take care.
    2
  17. Everything that you wrote is non-factual nonsense. Do better. Take care.
    2
  18. So any evidence to back up your claim? Take care.
    2
  19. "Who took the video of them leaving the earth". Basically every TV network in the US had cameras present at the Apollo launches. Take care.
    2
  20.  @themossgarden9698  OK. I assume that you are referencing the lift-off of the Ascent Stage of Apollo 17. Tha was filmed using the Westinghouse TV camera mounted on the LRV remotely controlled by Ed Fendell in Mission Control, Houston. Take care.
    2
  21.  @themossgarden9698  Obviously there is no Earth based telescope (in a satellite or otherwise) that has the resolving power to detect Apollo equipment. However satellites in lunar orbit from 4 different countries (CSNA, JAXA, IRSO, LRO/NASA) have detected the various Apollo landing sites and equipment exactly where it is supposed to be and also matched the terrain to Apollo photographs. Take care.
    2
  22. We can only get out of LEO when somebody is funding and manufacturing a heavy-lift rocket comparable to the Saturn V. Between Apollo and Artemis no one was doing this. Take care.
    2
  23. If you are referring to the filming of Armstrong 's first steps on the lunar surface then the TV camera was mounted on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. This Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon’s surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA. The signal was transmitted to Earth where the recording took place. Shortly afterwards Armstrong moved this camera a short distance from the LM and mounted it on a tripod facing the LM. This camera then filmed Aldrin's first steps on the lunar surface some 20 minutes after Armstrong. Take care.
    2
  24. "how can a small Hasselblad camera send video signal through the radiation belts"....?!?!?!?! The Hasselblad cameras used on Apollo missions were still film cameras. Take care.
    2
  25.  @TheHandsomeman  " how can a still camera take video footage"......They can't! So why are you suggesting that they were? Please explain. Take care.
    2
  26.  @TheHandsomeman  You are repeatedly claiming that "" how can a still camera take video footage". You and you alone are making this absurd and ridiculous claim. The thousands of Apollo photographs taken with the Apollo Hasselblad cameras were on film which was brought back and developed on Earth. So once again, why are you making this claim? Is your knowledge and understanding really that poor? Take care.
    2
  27.  @TheHandsomeman  In general all the Apollo landing missions carried a range of cameras. As well as the Hasselblad still cameras there were Westinghouse TV camera, Maurer 16mm camera and some missions carried mission specific cameras such as the Carruthers camera on Apollo 16. You have access to the internet. Use it. Take care.
    2
  28. During Apollo Program NASA had up to 5% of US federal spending and just one main goal. Today NASA has less than 0.5% of US federal spending and has multiple projects. Work it from there. Take care.
    2
  29.  @sandrokolar4387  You asked a question. I gave you the factual answer. During Apollo Program NASA had up to 5% of US federal spending and just one main goal. Today NASA has less than 0.5% of US federal spending and has multiple projects. Take care.
    2
  30. Yes, in many of the Apollo photographs and much of the footage you can see the lunar horizon, which of course will be much closer than on Earth. Determining the distance to that horizon from photographs or footage on the largely featureless lunar landscape is pretty impossible. So what exactly is your point? Take care.
    2
  31. Utter nonsense. How can a "light source" have shadows on its surface. Try again.
    2
  32.  @therealzilch  Same as his knowledge. Take care.
    2
  33. "NASA still says today that we humans cannot go through the radiation belt"....Nope they do not say that at all. Try again.
    2
  34. Had it but did not fund it so it became obsolete.
    2
  35. "the van halen belt"........Serious question: Do you really think that it is a good idea to reveal in public that you haven't got the slightest clue about what you are talking about? Take care. PS: "Shooting Stanley Kubrick" was not a "fake". It was a mockumentary film with a credit listing for actor Tom Mayk as "Kubrick". At no stage was it ever present as fact.
    2
  36. Basically every radio telescope on the planet was tracking the Apollo 11 (and subsequent & previous) mission to the lunar surface. Not only the Soviets but radio telescope teams in USA, UK, Germany, Italy, Australia and even several amateurs with the necessary equipment. Take care.
    1
  37. All 6 Apollo landings took place early in the lunar day when the temperatures were mod range. The measured lunar surface temperature range during the Apollo 11 mission was -23C to 7C. Take care.
    1
  38.  @lindsaybeadle2559  "the German camera manufacturer said so"........Hasselblad cameras are Swedish and the Westinghouse and Maurer cameras were from the USA. Perhaps you should try another line of BS. Take care.
    1
  39. The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who is credited with their discovery and also advised NASA on the Apollo Program. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
    1
  40. The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who is credited with their discovery and also advised NASA on the Apollo Program and was known about and studied well before the first moon landing. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
    1
  41.  @cristianrusu89  Air is a gas which is compressible. How exactly does exerting a force on a compressible gas manifest itself into a force on another object. Seriously do a bit of study on basic Physics (and rockets) before posting. Take care.
    1
  42. The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who is credited with their discovery and also advised NASA on the Apollo Program. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
    1
  43. " i saw the module land with a camera filming the descent from the ground".....There was no filming of any of the 6 Apollo moon landings from the ground nor has anyone except reality deniers ever claimed that there was. Try again.
    1
  44. I am sure that you must have lots of creditable and reliable evidence to back up your claim and that you will share this with us. Take care.
    1
  45.  @user-fb4sb1zi8g  Please stick to facts. Where exactly did NASA say that "how the ship lifted off the moon with no booster" or that "we can’t get through the earth’s atmosphere". Where are these "cords". As I previously stated, everything that you wrote is non-factual and total nonsense. Take care.
    1
  46.  @user-fb4sb1zi8g  What you clamed in your post is non-factual. Take care.
    1
  47.  @user-fb4sb1zi8g  Moon-landing deniers usually resort to emojis in the end as they have nothing logical or factual to say. Take care.
    1
  48. The Westinghouse TV camera was stored in a compartment in the LM and deployed and activated by Armstrong before he exited. Take care.
    1
  49. " is why an astronaut would report from the space station so many years later that we still cant leave earth orbit because of the dangerous radiation levels".....This did not happen, please get your facts correct. "why would we destroy that technology"......The technology was "destroyed" only in the sense that it became obsolete. "there is a definate stink of lies going on here"......Yep, SURE IS.
    1
  50. I am sure that you must have lots of creditable and reliable evidence to back up your claim and that you will share this with us. Take care.
    1